Which nuclear weapons? Do you mean the ones that weren't in Iraq, or the ones that weren't in Iran?
Or do you mean chemical weapons from Iraq or from Syria or from Edinburgh Airport or...
4557 publicly visible posts • joined 30 Sep 2009
My reading of this story is that if the junior DBA was only a junior DBA then Alessandro might have given them up. Or given the name and then fought to keep them from being fired, if it came to that. But it's also their senior UNIX person, who they couldn't afford to lose or risk losing.
You can say that everybody makes one great big mistake on a computer system, so replacing them just means you get someone whose great mistake is still to come. On the other hand, no one has a guarantee of just one.
It is or was quite ordinary for a British business or personal bank current-account to provide overdraft authorisation up to a certain amount; easy borrowing by a more-or-less trusted customer - with interest charged, of course. I think my information is from journalist Alistair Cooke's radio broadcasts from America - he died in 2004 though - that this basically doesn't exist in the U.S. and is considered perverted. More formal loans with regular repayments also exist. And credit cards.
Since some time in the 1980s, I think, most British personal bank accounts don't charge for your individual transactions when the account is in credit, which means basically that your bank earns money from the relationship by selling other services or by charging the customers whose account is in overdraft. That's often an unwelcome surprise. The fairness of overdraft fees has recently been scrutinised.
I haven't looked up Alain but he says he has mental issues that account for not coping with the situation.
Not everyone has a credit card for online shopping and it's not like they'll be able to get one in the middle of this. And not everyone wants a bloody overdraft. (As I understand, Americans think overdraft is dishonest, and most Europeans don't have a credit card, but things may have changed.)
People are entitled to spend the money that is rightfully theirs, and waiting until they HAVE the money is prudent, but in this case it's gone missing "thanks" to TSB.
Last time was a bigger problem admittedly - possible biggest losers were a family reported by BBC who were house buying and their mortgage didn't come so they were suddenly homeless, at least till it was sorted out. Or, people whose money was taken by fraud in the middle of the fuss.
It's implied that TightVNC 1.x has continued in use although unsupported. This must be partly because you have to pay (pay again ?) forTightVNC 2.x, which declares as not containing GPL program code and seems to be not covered by this testing. The question then... were users told that TightVNC 1 would be unsupported from date x, and were they told that before date x? Well... it's entirely credible, of course, that many users went on running the old product after they knew in good time that the guarantee of maintenance, such as it was, was withdrawn. However, when it was supported, evidently bugs were in it dating from 1999, the whole time.
I'm not better informed, but I surmise that if I steal the results of your colonoscopy examination, for instance, the value of that on the open market isn't much. Where I could get money is by denying you and your doctor's access to your own life-and-death data. Maybe your life insurer would also be interested, but moderately well regulated companies won't go around buying illegal access to customers' medical records... well, maybe out of petty cash.
Another customer for stolen patient data would be people or groups who are morally outraged by some medical procedures, such as abortion, gender reassignment, circumcision reversal, assisted reproduction for racial minorities. Specifically they would like to know where you live so that they can come round and let you and your neighbours know that they're praying for you, or against you, and why. I'm sort of assuming praying, it goes with the subject. And they've got money.
In practice, it works often enough for criminals to specialize in making their living wiping out people's bank accounts. Getting shop staff to give you a new SIM is just a matter of social engineering. Another possible strand, featured recently on BBC radio's "Moneybox" personal finance news show, is to recruit an innocent teenage accomplice to do it on behalf of the criminal, maybe disguising the actual motive. Of course the accomplice probably gets caught, but you don't.
You can use the self check out till at the supermarket. It already has a screen, a speaker, and software to prompt for an age check if you're buying adult drinks or cutlery - it automatically summons a shop worker to help you complete your transaction. Some of them also have a, well, I hope not a web cam...
Well, the story of Ovid that I was reading recently concerns two loved ones separated by a Wall and given ridiculous names, and due to mutual misunderstanding it ended badly for each... it's in "Midsummer Night's Dream" you know.
But that wouldn't happen again, would it?? :-)
But when they brought in longer and more complex requirements and frequent changes, my coping mechanism necessitated that my ******** was my password.
More innocent times (although puerile) - this year the penetration testers "got" me, I think because my password WAS random and non-rude (as far as I remember) but too short.
So now I'm using 15 random symbols and not enjoying it much at all.
It's complicated, there is a thing, it might be fixed now.... I forget what exactly it is but something like, I'm robertcarnegie@gmail.com (actually I'm not) and e-mail to robert.carnegie@gmail.com will reach me... until a real robert.carnegie@gmail.com signs up, then they get it.
Trying to remember the story, I think it was an old News Quiz newspaper clipping, from when a fifth British national TV channel was brought in, that mostly used the same frequency as a VCR communicating with the TV by RF modulator i.e, imitating a TV channel. This meant they had to send a technician to try to retune any affected householder's equipment and check reception.
One of the engineers found no antenna (aerial) connected, but a sausage stuck into socket on the back of the VCR or TV.
Householder explained that they'd found that they got reception when they stuck their finger in the socket, but they got tired.
"A Yorkshireman gave instructions for the headstone for his recently departed wife. He wanted the words "She was Thine" on the stone.
"A short time later he was told the headstone had been erected, so he went to the cemetery to check. He was horrified to read "She was Thin."
"Naturally, he went straight to the monumental masons to complain that they had left the "E" off his wife's headstone. He was assured the matter would be dealt with immediately. A day or so later he returned to the cemetery to view the corrected inscription, only to read:
"EE, She was Thin"
You don't want the Government redirecting citizens to express opinions to zanystuff.surveywibble.ru though - although it's happened before.
It crossed my mind that a survey on paper forms also has a limitation of not preventing more than one viewpoint being chosen on the page. For instance, at an election, or a referendum. Maybe that's how we got to the current situation?
Yes. This was somewhat covered already, but, writing your best documentation needs to be tested by having someone use the documentation to do the job, under supervision. Then you find out what was poorly explained, or not at all, just assumed. You can't tell, yourself, because you know what you meant.
It is not used in the bible. https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/lo-and-behold.html
As quoted, the closest that you get: "And Abram said, Behold, to me thou hast given no seed: and, lo, one born in my house is mine heir."
The bible has a lot of things said twice. It's religious.
It isn't quite the same thing, I suppose. Sherlock Holmes told John Watson, "You see, but you do not observe." And indeed, you can look and not see. You search your desk for something that sits in the middle of it the whole time. Maybe not everyone does this...
I think it's called "back formation", where people think that Word A needs to exist and to produce Word B, but it isn't so. For instance, Word A being, "to burgle", and Word B being the answer to the question, "Who burgles" - a burglar. But that isn't where Word B came from. It could be someone's name, Burgla presumably, and anyone else who behaves like Burgla did is called "Burglar". Yes, I am doing it too.
The last time I looked, "burglar" was an ancient noun, but without a verb. Around 1890, both British and U.S. English formed a verb, but America got "burglarize" and Britain got "burgle".
In the latest issue of "Marvel Action Spider-Man", Spider-Man uses the word "burgle", and his team mates (Ultimate Spider-Man and Ghost Spider) challenge this. All the characters and the credited writer, Delilah S. Dawson, are American, so I don't know what happened here. It may be addressed next month, since in this telling they all go to the same high school and are interns at the Daily Bugle newspaper - and their English may be scrutinised in either venue.
...My reading choices are my own affair.
I might be mixed up, but it seems that the review on the blog said that Enigma's product is s useless piece of crap. In which case, a respectable security tool is entitled to say so. Also there's an overlap between software that performs a function very poorly, and software that only exists as an excuse to throw adverts at you or to mine crypto currency on your PC for their brnefit using your electricity. So are we looking at s case of that?