Re: IT industry
76 posts • joined 28 Sep 2009
Do you also propose licensing LIPO Batteries, Brushless Motors, polystyrene and Radio Control transmitters (which can also be used for RC cars/Boats)?
Because if you're not, anyone with YouTube and a hot glue gun could make a 'drone' without a license.
In game theory that's called the Minimax Algorithm. Find the 'worst case' outcome of every action, and picking the action with the best 'worst case.'
Probably not, the actual complaint seems to be that it doesn't metaphorically 'give you wings' any more than anything else with caffeine in it. rather than the fact it doesn't literally give you wings.
The suit says:
“Even though there is a lack of genuine scientific support for a claim that Red Bull branded energy drinks provide any more benefit to a consumer than a cup of coffee, the Red Bull defendants persistently and pervasively market their product as a superior source of ‘energy’ worthy of a premium price over a cup of coffee or other sources of caffeine.”
Yep! People have been selling stolen client lists for decades. It would also be a goldmine for social engineering, e.g. If MegaSoft was using salesforce for post-sales support, you could find a user with an open trouble ticket, and send them some malware as a 'fix.' Only the very paranoid would spot that one.
What the author is trying to demonstrate, is that he's been asked by an editor to jump on the 'Exam results' bandwagon, so had to make something out of the IT results regardless of whether there's any real story.
"To be fair, public or private seems to be absolute no barrier to being utterly clueless "
Fixed that for you
They seem to be shy to say how many of those arrested were actually charged, and subsequently convicted of anything.
So this story so far is that 660 people are innocent of any wrongdoing (until proven otherwise)..... which is a bit of a non-story.
To be fair, a lot of the people who call the office claiming to be "Calling From Microsoft" don't actually work for Microsoft either
There's an argument that one of the IBM Chess playing supercomputers passed the Turing test. not because it beat Kasparov, but because he was convinced that one particular move had direct human intervention.
"Stephen Fry is an English comedian, actor, writer, presenter, and activist" ... Why exactly should we care that he made a mistake about network protocols?
The sound of the 'Degauss' button on a CRT monitor that hasn't been degaussed in years is one of the best sounds in the world :)
Unless I'm sorely mistaken, the NSA were operating in 2001, and quite evidently didn't succeed in protecting anyone from anything.
The most interesting question is whether we're building our economy on systems that we have no right to believe will be available to us for as long as we would like.
If Amazon decided that 'cloud' was no longer something they wanted to be involved in and turned all their AWS servers off with the minimum notice; unless one of the other providers made the commercial decision to pick up the slack (And had the capacity) there would be a lot of companies that wouldn't survive, and the people using the services of those companies would struggle for a bit too.
I know that under-using them allows resistant bacteria to survive; I just don't know if over-using them is an issue.
The mental illness one sounds too easy to not be a trick question.. I'd actually be hesitant with that one.
The age of the universe/world, I have no idea if those numbers are correct. I also know that the 'big bang' theory fits all of the observable evidence, but the way that question is worded makes it sound a bit too simplistic for me to say it's absolutely true.
Well I can tell you, lots of pen-testing companies don't do due diligence! I don't ever remember a pen testing firm asking me to confirm my identity...
I've always wondered that. e.g. If someone called me asking for a penetration test to be performed on their network, signed all the normal contracts etc. Then turned out to be either someone without the proper authorization, or someone completely unrelated to the company .. Who would be liable! IS there a precedent for this sort of thing?
Section 3 of the computer misuse act relates to impairing the operation of a computer. I'd have thought section 1 would be more relevant:
"he causes a computer to perform any function with intent to secure access to any program or _data_ held in any computer " Bang to rights imho
Yeah, if someone now used this information to breed a potato with these exact same genes the old fashion way, no-one would have a problem. You could actually have two identical products, one which would be legal to sell and one that would not be legal to sell... that would be an interesting test-case!
I was thinking exactly the same. These lists of passwords from sites that have been hacked show that people use rubbish passwords for sites which were subsequently hacked ... showing that they've chosen wisely in using a throwaway password for them.
Yeah yeah, you had to walk 10 miles uphill (both ways) to the printer after being beaten to death by the computer salesman, only to find the printer had stolen your car, girlfriend and mother..
Actually that's pretty much my relationship with printers to this day.
Yeah, It's looking like my generation (born in the early 80s) are the last of a dying breed. When I started work, I knew more about computers than most of the people already working.. and I expected that the new graduates would be able to run rings around me.. but that doesn't seem to be the case.
I think there's an analogy with cars, my dad can change the head gasket on an engine, because in the 70's, if you couldn't, you might as well not bother getting a car, I, on the other hand, just had to google "head gasket" to check it's a real thing...
I can program, because my first computers were equally useless without being able to.
IANAL but I can think of : Obtaining money by deception. conspiracy to commit fraud. Fraud. Breaches of the health and safety at work act. just of the top of my head.
So the attacker sends the 'destroy all humans' command to the device once a minute, for the next year. Repeat the above for 365 devices that are 'only connected to once a year' and you've got plenty to be getting on with!
Network Security 102 , the meaning of the word 'All'
Nope, sounds like it's coming in over the internet. So you'll get the MAC of the router at the next hop. Not the originating host.
He's also president of the tautology club :)
Perfect analogy.. I knew about this point of law, but now I GET it :)
$1500 was the pre-pre-release figure for the especially eager user.
My biggest concern is that you have to have an android device to make any use of it; Which will bump the cost up for me, as I don't currently have one!
I have a labour saving device in my house that does that.
She doesn't really like being called a labour saving device.
A high spec laptop for people who 'live in the cloud' ... so that's a high spec laptop for people who, by definition, don't need a high spec laptop, because all they're processing is done somewhere else...
So in that case, if they're blocking wireless in a 3 metre x 3 metre box within a private building, it's probably not 'undue' interference.
some of the telcos will let you use boosters (If you ask really nicely and wave enough money under their noses) on the strict proviso that the signal is not detectable outside of your premises
Average class size :20 kids
15000 / 20 = 750
That's 750 schools that could have one classroom with enough RPis in it for every kid to have one each. that's a lot of schools!
My biggest concern is the fact that the foundation have claimed this donation allows them to hire some new executron, does this mean the donation is just a pile of money to the value of 15,000 pis that the foundation can waste as it pleases, or will this actually lead to 15,000 new devices in schools?
Yep, do anything a few times and you get a life sentence.
After you've committed a crime a certain number of times there's no incentive to stop, because when you get caught you are going to prison forever.
Suddenly, in this context, is defined as 1 millionth of a perfect pint (The time it takes for a pint of Guinness to settle acceptably)
I've seen a few projects where the users wanted to spend £millions, and the primary success criteria was 'it has to work exactly like what we already have'...
sorry. Merry new year :)
They're proof that if the creationists are right, then God's a bastard, nothing more.
I've never seen anyone claim they're proof that God does not exist. In fact most Atheists recognise that it's impossible to prove the non-existence of god (hence the cosmic teapot and flying spaghetti monster thought experiments)
There's a strong analogy here with genetics (Read Dawkins' "Climbing Mount Improbable")
By walking upright with a back designed to walk on all-fours; we risk spine degeneration, pain, and disability. But from a genetic perspective it was infeasible to go back to 'no spine' and build one from scratch; just to be able to stand a little bit taller.
The same applies to code, you get to a point where to add a new function, the 'right' solution is to start from scratch; But that might mean re-writing a £multi-million piece of software, JUST to add one new function. So the only feasible option is to hack it on in a sub-optimal way.
They bail them out by printing a few billion extra notes and handing them over to the capitalists.
Looks like el reg's automated defense correspondent needs tweaking before it's safe to be allowed to fly on its own :)
freedom, security, jefferson
over-privileged fops who have never done a day’s graft in their lives are exactly the sort of people HR bods are looking for!
Not quite a new idea, Nintendo were pipped at the post by the Sega Dreamcast by a mere 14 years or so.
Nice try though :)
I invented a private non-reduntant read-only cloud storage device.. I call it a piece of paper :)
It's never nice, but most of the wars we get into are, ethically speaking, the best of a bad bunch of options.
that was 15 metres (19 1/2 inches) across, according to NASA :D
Every school has PCs; install python on them. Money saved....
Just because WE learned to program on a rubbish PC, doesn't mean that having a rubbish PC is a pre-requisite to learning to code...
To be fair, british industry has failed to deliver a working government IT system for quite some time, this way it's probably got a chance of working!