Re: Is Katie here?
Some cockwomble is, yes.
9611 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Sep 2009
They're not electrodes, they're tentacles. Love the tentacle!
We don't know for certain, and we never will because the best we can do is find a generalised model. There are too many individualities to say they all work this way exactly. And every single "brain" is broken in its own unique way, and though most conform to the middle of the bell curve, there are those that fall in the middle of the tails that we call extraordinary or even mentally ill, and there are those at the tails that are too broken to work at all.
However, there has been an enormous amount of work completed over the last 40 years, and we have a much clearer picture. We CAN say that there are micro-consciousnesses specialised and resulting in specific neural circuits and that these are interconnected as a result of, for example, brain lesion studies where people will deny being able to see, yet can catch a ball thrown at them or duck to avoid a branch, or will deny being able to see colour, yet can guess with far better than chance the colour of a stimulus, or deny the existence of visual motion (this is a really weird one to conceptualise), or who are conscious of taste when presented with a shape, or a shape when presented with a sound etc. We know that the loss of a 40Hz synchronised electrical signal that might be mistaken as noise in firing even, or as a bias on the neural potential, causes a loss of consciousness that is reported by subjects experimentally and accidentally or as a result of insult.
The role of general neurotransmitters and hormones is also being explored very, very vigorously, although they are thought to be too slow and diffuse to mediate consciousness. Synaptic neurotransmitters are fast enough to form part of a specific signal path, and indeed that is what they do. Electrical signalling to chemical signalling and back again.
And I believe you are correct about the neural lace. It certainly rings a bell.
These things are tiny compared to a human brain. It works on a mouse because their brains are smaller than a nickel (5¢). Conscious thought is considered to be an emergent property arising from the synchronous activity of a diffuse number of specialised "micro-consciousnesses" distributed or arising across the entire brain. He'd be far better off looking at, say spinal transections, where the actual area of tissue that's useful is on the same scale as his device.
Actually, they're not my children. They just live in my house, eat my food and make use of my household amenities. In return, I give them an allowance, but they have no holiday entitlement, and if they get sick, then that time gets deducted from their pocket money.
Ah, but it might be able to classify a face as likely to belong to a female aged 62, who most likely will have a high echelon job in UK politics, live in Sonning and be unable to dance properly to her choice in music which will likely include Abba.
is it still identifiable private info? And as the laws requiring such mechanisms for deletion apply to all filing systems, agnostic of the physical medium, electronic, paper or otherwise, does this also apply to people's brains? You'd have to develop some form of amnesia drug, and be sure it had no side effects. Anyway, the duty rostered lab have just finished brewing today's coffee, so I'll just pop down to get a cup... if I can remember where the kitchen is.
which for some reason El Reg isn't that into... you'll know about the debates raging on the London Underground about Seltrac versus Westinghouse and all those various flavours of TBTC and what capabilities they have, and how trials of one system over another can delay the renewal of rolling stock and various line upgrades etc. It's actually a fully fledged cock-fighting arena rather than some relatively trivial bit of pilfering. We are talking billions of $$ here. Just look at how much the UK is spending for HS2 stuff.
I think a lot of it will hinge on if at any time, even in a casual phone call, the cops asked for the information before it was volunteered. Mind you, I'm not sure I'd consent to the processing of my PID if the reason for the processing was compiling a list of dissidents. They'd probably present that as being "processing of data related to the security of individuals, the institution and its teaching, research and other activities". Which of course we would all have no objection to. Right, kids?