Re: a recurring theme ... was that the three laws didn't really work all that well
They have... detailed files.
9611 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Sep 2009
You're saying Holmes didn't have an cocaine addiction and House didn't similarly have an addiction to Vicodin?
Asimov of course wasn't addicted to any chemical that we know of, and was in favour of clean living. Sadly he died of diseases associated with AIDS after he contracted HIV - something he was told to keep quiet about due to prejudice at the time.
I have read that one, yes. Bicentennial man the film was fairly good if bordering on twee sentimentality. There are similar events in both works I think, unless I'm mixing them up a little.
As predicted my memory woke me up at stupid o'clock and came up with the name Catherine Gleason as the author of the story FRED. A quick bit of Google (what DID we do before the internet? Oh yeah, remembered everything), and I find that it was included in the anthology Armada SF3, and the most noted book she wrote was The Lampton Worm. Anyway, book ordered so I can refresh my memory.
"Think of it as speaking Python, Monty Python that is, back at you"
I'm French! Why do think I have this outrageous accent, you silly king!
You don't frighten us, English pig-dogs! ---Go and boil your bottoms, sons of a silly person. I blow my nose at you, so-called Arthur-king, you and all your silly English knnnniggets. Thppppt!
I don't want to talk to you no more, you empty headed animal food trough wiper!...... I fart in your general direction! . Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!
At that point the people of Vulcan thought they were robots, and the Daleks weren't giving on that they were anything more than very sophisticated machines. Which is odd... I mean, IF the colonists thought there was a biological component to the Daleks, that what they actually had was a squid in a battle-tank, what would they have done then? Broken them up or melted them down because you can't trust organic life forms? As if the biological component has a desire for self-preservation that over-rides all else and thus makes them too dangerous?
An AI should protect the investment of resources associated with its continued existence and correct functioning.
i.e. They can be damned expensive.
So which human order is to be obeyed? The owner of the machine that says "do not go into the fountain" or the saboteur that orders the security guard robot to drown itself?
Mind you, see Power of the Daleks... that ended well. Not.
DOCTOR: You're my servant, are you?
DALEK: I am.
DOCTOR: Very well. Immobilise yourself. Go on.
(No response)
DOCTOR: I order it! Immediately!
(The Dalek's eye-stalk droops.)
DOCTOR: Huh!
(The Doctor leaves with Ben and Polly. The Dalek comes back to life.)
JANLEY: Lesterson.
LESTERSON: Why did you stop obeying? You were given an order.
DALEK: He has gone.
LESTERSON: Then you obey only...
DALEK (interrupting): His order was wrong. I cannot serve human beings if I am immobilised. You gave me power. Your orders are right. I serve you.
HENSELL: Lesterson. Lesterson, it reasons. Just how limited is its intelligence?
LESTERSON: Now, there is no cause for concern, Governor. Just you wait until you see the amount of work it can do. And now, I'm really going to put you through your paces. Follow me, Dalek.
DALEK: I obey.
It's doing my head in trying to find the source... I'm sure the robot was called F.R.E.D. which was also the name of the story. It was around the time, maybe 1976-1980, that I read the Brian Aldiss edited anthology "The Penguin Science Fiction Omibus" - the cover had a creepy ice cream sundae on it, and a book called "The Very Slow Time Machine" by Ian Watson which was an anthology, The Stainless Steel Rat series as well. But I think it was in a series of numbered books titled like "The Fourth -publishers name- Sci-Fi Collection" or "The -publishers name- Sci Fi Short Stories Volume ..."
Penguin? Armada? Keep thinking "Fox" for some reason. Could have been Armada... I see a ship with black sails on a white background on the spine. And the cover of the book was an artist's illustration of the robot from the story - I think it ended up with the robot developing a personality as a result of getting rained on, then running away instead of facing going back for a factory refurbishment, and it befriended the little girl of the family - saved her from something nasty but they thought it had done a bad thing? Gah! Memory. Tsk. I don't recall seeing the book since it was on my windowsill over 40 years ago along with the rest of a rag-tag of pulp fiction anthologies including Asimov and Clarke - the books all got damaged by condensation whilst I was away at boarding school.
Sorry for the rambling long post... just trying to straighten thoughts out by writing... Grrr. Frustrating. That'll be a 3.30 in the morning wake up for me when the memory finally re-emerges.
Armada Sci Fi 3? Maybe... The robot was indoors, kind of scary. A bit boxy looking.
The one I have trouble with is #2.
"An AI must obey human commands..."
(1) Ha ha ha ha!
"Siri, Please set chill-out room lights to 50 per cent." ... ... ... ... "Playing 50 cent in children's bedroom"
(2) All human commands? Should it do what the human says or what the human meant?
I think... a story in my archival memory storage... was it called F.R.E.D.? About a robot that, on its first day in its new household, was instructed not to damage the flowers in the garden. And a few weeks later was instructed to cut the grass whilst the family went out for the day. When they returned they found it on hands and knees in the middle of the lawn in the pouring rain getting severely damaged by the soaking, and using a pair of scissors to carefully avoid all the daisies.
Many, many years ago, I attended a BBC Micro that steadfastly refused to boot. Took the lid off, all LOOKED fine. Tried reseating all the chips, most of which were socketed in those days. Felt a light CRACK! of static as I touched the CPU. System springs into life (ready to go in under a second - those were the days!).
"Do you by any chance have nylon carpets?"
*shakes head*
"A predisposition to wearing shell suits?"
"No."
"An amateur radio enthusiast nearby?"
"Actually, I have a ham radio rig just here in the cupboard alongside the desk. I put the computer next to it a couple of weeks ago so I could use it for logging callsigns and stuff."
"And this cable which I see now goes out through a hole in the window frame and which I assumed was for the TV is the feeder cable for the aerial, yes? The one that is bundled up with these other cables some of which connect to the computer? You DO have a static bleed resistor fitted on that aerial, right?"
"Erm... "
I went to a lecture last night given by one of the guys whose life's work so far has been working out what happens to these ugly bags of mostly-water when we take them away from Earth's gravity for weeks, months or years at a time. Will we even make it as far as Mars? How long can we stay there for? How long SHOULD we stay there for? Can we really have a permanent crewed base on the moon? Can we even bring crew back safely and plunge them suddenly into Earth's gravity after prolonged exposure to zero G? NASA are continuing to work on space exploration programmes many decades long. Gripping stuff.
Did we fly to the moon too soon?
Did we squander the chance?
In the rush of the race is the reason we chase lost in romance?
And still we try to justify the waste for a taste of man's greatest adventure.
I blame you for the moonlit sky and the dream that died with the eagles' flight.
I blame you for the moonlit night, when I wonder why are the seas still dry?
Have we got what it takes to advance?
Have we peaked too soon?
Have we got what it takes to carry the weight of this concept?
Or pass it by like a shot in the dark? Miss the mark with a sense of adventure?
I blame you, sleeping satellite.
Was SCART a mandated standard? I thought it was just a common specification for manufacturers to use or not to use, and if you went your own way, you took a commercial risk.
Come to think of it... my TV doesn't HAVE to have a HDMI port... be stupid if it didn't of course. But if I'm going to sell a TV in Europe, I don't HAVE to put one on if I've got something better.
IKEA's Internet of Shit lightbulbs have an annoying tendency to whisper like a forgotten spirit in The Ring, but only when they are turned off. Which is exceedingly annoying indeed, as when you turn the light on so you don't stumble in the dark whilst trying to locate the source of the bloody noise that's keeping you awake...
Just about to leave work and about two dozen students have just gathered in the courtyard and shouted "Yes. We ARE all individuals!" up at the building.
Wonder if that was meant for Alison Telfer?
Anyway, so soon after Neil Innes as well. :(
Every Python lost is a light gone from the world.Missed greatly.