Re: To be fair
to site the ever reliable wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trap_street and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_street :)
186 publicly visible posts • joined 1 Sep 2009
Oh god no!
I've spent years training people not to maximize every application (Looks particularly stupid on 30" wide screens with small fonts ...) and now they're taking it away?
I'd remove all Windows boxes from our building if I could get away with it, just for this error, but I guess I'm gonna be stuck supporting this new POS for years to come ...
Anyone know how Mass Spectrometer software will work of in (click start and 3 apps come up ...)
They have stopped paying to have a developer working on KDE ...
But they are going to continue providing the servers, storage, and other services that will support Kubuntu, they're just hoping that the "community" will do the work of the 1 person who was paid.
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2012/02/canonical
It seems strange to me though because KDE has gained lots of support since they introduced the Unity interface (not from me, I hate KDE too, and was happy to move away from SuSE because of that)
we bought some dell laptops recently and one of them "came of the shelf" with everything on it (silly reseller)
so it had a touch pad, _and_ "nipple" + keys, plus we always use external USB mice, and then I gesticulated at the screen and it clicked where I touched *shudder*.
It was a great spec laptop, but there were just _too_ many input devices (and you couldn't turn them off)
I used Unity for just under 2 hours, I could use it, but it wasn't nice.
Gnome 3 lasted 30 seconds ... long enough for me not to find my applications, but to find the "log out" button.
Gnome Classic looked more like what I wanted, but just try to set up a printer and you will decide that it's not worth going there.
Of the new interfaces Unity does _work_ so therefore is the best of them, but I'm trying XFCE and I reckon that's where I'll end up ...
I'm going to get my 10 year old son to try all the interfaces (without help) this weekend and see how well he does with them, I think I'll have a better clue after that.
"The source's view is that Amazon and fellow US retailer Barnes & Noble will eventually give away their tablets, subsidising the price entirely from content sales."
no they wont ... it wouldn't work ...
"Low Energy Lightbulbs" were given away free and pretty much ignored, they sold much better at a very small price.
Loft insulation likewise ... government grants were taken up better when they were a "money off" scheme rather than a "free" scheme ...
they'd be better off selling the tablets with vouchers for the same amount in online content ...
Having had to set up IMAP with a Mailbox prefix on an Android phone is a real pain.
HTC's version of the default Android mail client has had the "Mail prefix" option removed, and the only tool we found to get it working was K9 Mail ...
Not only does it have all the options, and is easy to set up (if you know your settings) but it's easy to find in the android market :)
I Recommend it to most Android users :)
Just for the hell of it I accessed the site with Firefox on Open Solaris ...
Under "Key Security Features" under "Attacks on your browser" I have ticks next to:
"Does the browser benefit from Windows Operating System features that protect against arbitrary data execution?" and
"Does the browser benefit from Windows Operating System features that randomize the memory layout to make it harder for attackers to find their target?"
which I have to say is decidedly odd :)
Re-engineering of FAT isn't the issue, because the FAT Linux uses was never created by Microsoft, they built a working model from the specification ...
as it happens it isn't even FAT that they have problems with, it's not FAT16, or FAT32, but the ability to talk both at the same time.
WOW! so basically the difference between firefox and opera is that in firefox if it gets the revocation list it will warn you and get you to jump through hoops to access the site, and in opera it will just not change the icon next to the URL!
that's amazing and will obviously really help normal users!
My favourite use of psionics was to scout for other aliens (out of sight) and control them as well so that my Men/Women never had to go anywhere and I could get the aliens to bitch-slap themselves :)
I loved the guideable rocket hovertanks though ... useful with big ships and men with jet-packs.
send the jetpacks to the roof of the big ship, get one man to open the door at the bottom and walk away, a man into the lift shaft to open the door at the top, then leave the ship then rocket grenade from a safe distance into the lift shaft, up to the top, along the open corridor and into the roof/far wall near to my hovering men ... men fly in through the new doorway and waste/capture anyone in that room ...
so many wasted days of my life :)
They're using a new daemon called NWAM (NetWork Auto Magic) ... and it works with computers that move to new locations _and_ with equipment that stays in one place.
OpenSolaris used to have network/physical:default (the old style of networking) as well as network/physical:nwam (the new default) so that you could choose between them, I'm assuming that Oracle have decided to remove the old style from the list of possible services.
NWAM works better on laptops and other computers that change networks regularly in that it notices network connections appearing and dropping, but it takes getting used to.
I bit the bullet a while ago realising that NWAM was not going away and learnt how to control it in lots of esoteric ways ... just remember that if it isn't doing what you want you need to type "svcadm restart nwam" ;-P
Umm ... I've been reading the Forums on Illumos and they're seriously talking about dropping x86 support, and old Sparc ...
I disagree, but there are a fair number of Vocal people who comment that the Spec's you need for good ZFS basically require new/modern hardware with 64 bit support and Gig's of memory ...
I'm a Solaris nut, but I've taken to using Ubuntu Server on the P3 boxes at work because they boot in less than 128Mb of memory, in about 4 seconds ...
I'm a Solaris user and Fan, and have been for too many years to count ... (and I did upvote you, but I think that this isn't just a one sided issue)
Solaris does have a static API (which is a wonderful thing), 32bit and 64bit at the same time, in the same package, and yes we have apps that run from 2.0 all the way up to the latest kernel ... but all that comes at a price.
because almost all objects are built statically linked, even though dynamic is well supported ... the current Solaris kernel needs at least 256Mb base memory to boot, the newer Solaris is made to support much more advanced chipsets ... but at the same time anything below a P4 system will not boot unless you modify /etc/system or use the kernel debugger to set flags ...
The X system on my OpenSolaris box is currently using 811Mb of memory running Gnome ... compare that the the 64Mb of my colleagues Ubuntu ...
Our Linux print servers and routers still sit happily in 128Mb with room to spare.
I will never move to putting Linux on the file servers, I can't do without ZFS now that we're using it, but It is huge.
you are correct, that is what he meant, but that isn't what he said, and if there is any possibility for her to use his words and stop the extradition then good on her really.
You know what he was implying, I know what he was implying, but if she can twist the meaning behind the words, to the right people at the right time, she might be able to get a politically acceptable climb down.
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Permanent_magnet_synchronous_generator
"Disadvantages of permanent magnets in synchronous generator
...
The mining of high performance permanent magnet materials is environmentally demanding and as a result, the use of permanent magnets is by no means environmentally friendly."
hmm ... maybe they really are doing evil!?!
<whisper> https://supporthtml.oracle.com/ </whisper>
you didn't hear it from me ;-P
Moving a database to a windows box just seems plain wrong to me ... when we had to get a PervasiveDB working recently, for the Accounts dept, knowing it doesn't run on Solaris we installed it on an Ubuntu box, with tar/rsync backup systems onto our Solaris boxes. (Shame we couldn't run it in an lx zone, but it needed a 2.6 kernel) ... we even paid extra to do this even though we had a paid for 10 user license to run it on a windows server as part of the Accounts package.
Autistic children have problems interacting with others, partly because they don't understand others or the rules of interaction, partly because trying to play by the rules of social interaction is tiring and stressful ...
Even the most adjusted kids with an ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder) need timeouts or space to not be on guard all the time.
Another big thing about kids with an ASD is the obsessions that they have, you might imagine that you have a fixation on something or someone, but for them it's a case of every breath, every thought, every word is targeted ... It can be very hard to get your child to do anything but that obsession.
Having said all that my son has to be watched because he can turn aggressive if not given strict times that he is allowed on to the computer/console ... we used to have to physically restrain him when removing him after 1/2 hour of play time so that he didn't hurt himself or the computer that he was using.
Knowing that he has a fixed limit of play time (using a timer that he cannot change) and him being a bit older means that this problem is much improved. Asking _him_ to turn off the computer is much better than _me_ turning off the computer as it leaves him feeling in control.
Having set limits on time (50 minutes is a kinda maximum before he gets grumpy) and appropriateness (not before bedtime, not when he's tired) and, unlike the mother of this child, I will not let him play on anything above a PG ... he is only 10
Hoepfully that made sense and wasn't a general ramble.
"One question, did they guy that wrote that code have access to manufacturers data on the SCSI interface for it, or was it reverse engineered ?"
I know that in my case, with the Canon SCSI Scanner I was using; I had signed the NDA to access their documents in order to modify the Linux kernel to access that specific scanner.
I believe that previous guys/gals had had access to the specs of the devices they were using ... most of them were available online even at that stage, and the basic SCSI spec was very detailed since all manufacturers had to stick to the spec in order to call their device SCSI.
" ... Ever taken a look back at some of your earlier projects ? "
Actually I did ... I used to write in BBC Basic on an Acorn Electron (come on, someone must remember :) ) I wrote an adventure game just to test the concept ...
I did a computing course at college and learnt loads of new techniques and flow techniques.
I was stuck for a job for about 2 months after I finished so I thought, as you do, to go back and see if I could improve on this Adventure game, and fix broken loops (exiting out of uncomplete loops or using goto's, you know the type) and change the variable types to work better or more efficiently, proceduralise everything, etc.
I looked back at the code, I spent ages examining it (well about a week, but the code wasn't huge ... I'd already stored the Data separate from the code.) ... I made about 1 change on one line in the code.
Looking back at my old code that I write here, most of the changes are based on the fact that I update the comments to help my boss if he ever needs to look at it in future. Yes I've made other changes, but then I code mostly SQL now, they're usually due to database changes.
I like Linux, it is inherently more secure than windows, and the code is getting better and it does look nicer than it did in 1999. I have to support Windows as part of my job, but I won't go back, you can't make me!
I've taken a look at the code for Linux.
I've spent some time fidling with the SCSI code (anyone remember SCSI?)
It's god damned awful.
The main trouble was that it was basically passing data packets around in unsigned blobs of unknown size, even when it knew the size it was working with.
Most of the code was fine and fit the standard SCSI definitions, but the latter half of the instructions seemed to change from supplier to supplier.
The guy who wrote it originally had a scanner that used the SCSI code one way, so he hard-coded the _entire SCSI system_ to work with his scanner.
It created the blob, and knew it's size, it passed the blob to another routine which unpacked it and put it in another blob, this routine then sent it to a completely separate routine which unpacked it and sent it to the SCSI device ... but the sizes all got messed up when they could just have been passed about, or placed in the blob before the data.
the worst part is that my contribution looked for certain instructions that were passed in as part of the blob, and changed the assumed packet size for the 2 instructions that I needed changing, rather than fix the code properly.
I love Linux, I'm not a windows user, but some of the code is bad.
Not that anyone cares, but "Red sea" was a bad translation/spelling mistake of "reed sea", many years ago, which is a lot flatter and basically full of reeds ...
look on a map and you'll find it as well.
In fact modern Bibles use the "reed sea" translation after it's discovery in the original untranslated scripts.