* Posts by David 164

590 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Aug 2009

Page:

Galileo, here we go again. My my, the Brits are gonna miss EU

David 164

Re: HS2 and the Galileo replacement

Most of them aren't own by Britain, they are own by foreign companies or even worst own by companies effectively control by foreign governments both only care about themselves. They have no loyalty to the UK and will move to where the work is, which Airbus has already announce it will do for Galileo. The UK only tool to fighting this is really deny export licenses for technology on security grounds but that so anti business that Tories funders are unlikely to be happy with the tories doing this and could well withdraw there funding for the Tories, even if that risk Corbyn getting in.

Tories really are the worst party you could imagine to implement a successful Brexit as everything you need to do a successful Brexit goes directly against core Tory ideology.

David 164

Re: HS2 and the Galileo replacement

Many people did and try to raise them during the campaig, I did, and why I'm patriotic, I couldn't vote leave for the simply reason the leave campaign had no answers to these questions and even if they did have the answers they weren't in a position to implement those answers because they weren't the government.

David 164

Re: HS2 and the Galileo replacement

That not how being a club member works. If you join a club and then help build a clubhouse, you can't throw a tantrum leave and expect to be able to take the bit of the club house you built with you, it just not how it work. An no person in there right mind would think it would work like that.

David 164

Re: Fgs

Trump is already launch trade wars with everyone in the world. An he hardly a person we can rely on for anything.

David 164

Re: Fgs

Germany and France will likely fight dirty an tell Airbus, which they control not to bid on the contract, which means alternative facilities will need to be built an companies establish to build the system. Also there no guarantee others won't play silly buggers when we try and find rockets to launch the system on.

David 164

Re: Fgs

Then the UK will need to invest tens of billions in all type of manufacturing projects because that the only way government can make sure the money is invested in the UK and in the areas it wants in the UK and not shuffle off to some offshore tax haven.

Investing on such a scale goes against every instinct the Tories have.

David 164

Re: Brexit means Brexit

Most leavers have low levels of interests in these subjects as a consequence of having a very low level IQ.

David 164

Where the 5 to 10 billion pounds coming from?. Hammond have already stated their no extra money for other departments and the MOD is already struggling to pay for all of it current equipment on order for it.

National ID cards might not mean much when up against incompetence of the UK Home Office

David 164

The Lib Dems could have stopped them, after they got the tories stuck in a fixed term parliament, the tories needed them to get anything done. A strong leader could have stood up to the tories a lot more, they got annihilated at the next election because they didn't. They didn't get a single one of their policies that the general public actually cared about through intact. aka the general public really really really don't care about constitutional reforms and how we vote politicans into power in this country. An even the referendum on changing our electoral system was watered down by the tories to the point where there was no point in changing it.

An it happens in similar coalitions all across the world, minorities getting at least one or two of policies fully implemented. Ultimately Nick Clegg will go down as one of the worst politicans this century, David Cameron and Theresa May won't be far behind them.

Gordon Brown will at least be remember for taking leadership during the financial collapse in 2008 an leading the world to solutions to stave it off. Through at the bottom it will probably have something along the lines of the bloody idiot called a election either three years to late or two years to early, both would have led to election 2012, where the economy the on the up, as the tories policies didn't completely kill off growth.

How Blair will be thought off will ultimately depends on how Middle East turns out in the long term. I suspect in the fullness of time he may actually be considered someone who change the middle east for the better. People in the future won't care about how he lied to get it done or how many people died because of his actions, after all we don't care about how churchill sacrifice Coventry to hide the fact we broke the german codes or the devastating bombings of Dresden, we just care that he lead us to victories over the Nazies. An ultimately I believe Iraq change the middle east in ways that we won't see the full extent off for decades in the future.

David 164

The passport office, 100% competent and I have never had any problems with it.

David 164

Which is one of the theories I had one why they cancelled Labour government project, so that argument over immirgration would carry on and the tories are always stronger on those grounds than Labour.

Capita admits it won't make money on botched NHS England contract

David 164

Let be honest now the upfront costs into staff training, equipment, office hire are done, they hope NHS is now dependent on them and they will have this contract in perpetuity and can cream large profits off future contract extensions.

Only problem is Simon Stevens seem to taking non of capita bullshit. An if the chancellor can't get him fired, I'm pretty sure capita ain't going to get rid of him anytime soon either.

Done and dusted? Vast storm gobbles NASA's long-lived Mars robot

David 164

Re: Well, let's be accurate here

I imagine instead they were punch multiple times for causing budgeting problems because they built their rovers to well and they last just to damn long!

Artificial intelligence... or advanced imitation? How DeepMind used YouTube vids to train game-beating Atari bot

David 164

This is the first time many of us are hearing that humans are inferior at certain complex, intelligence related tasks, it should come as no surprise that many are refusing to accept it, are writing it off as overhyped.

One thing I will say is through is that so far Deepmind seem to need to train a new neural net for each game using this method and other methods. They haven't yet it seem to have manage to get one neural net to be able to play multiple games and switch back and forth between games. I also haven't seen them show a neural net get better at learning new games as it gains experience from playing games.

David 164

Re: This is fraud

Except that it exactly how humans operate, except our reward is often chemical signals in the brain that makes us feel happy and a sense of euphoria when we manage to repeat the actions of our favourite Youtube star.

David 164

Re: Pointless

An I bet Deepmind often tests how it AI does when it introduce to a new game straight off without any training of that game. They will get there in time, probably by combining many of these approaches and others into a single neural design.

WikiLeaks took 10 days to reject Cambridge Analytica's US emails bid, says Tricksy Nixy

David 164

Except we aren't in a world without them. They have just rebranded and no doubt will rebrand again when the media attention as died down or another scandal hit them.

Dems push Ryan to vote to help save America's net neutrality measures

David 164

Re: 86% of Americans agree with *THEM*? Since *WHEN*?

Yes but that not the point, they want republicans to vote against the bill, they would love Trump to veto it, either of those would serve their purpose. Why? Because they believe that they can win around voters by showing republicans don't care about them and they only care about big business, in this case broadband providers and doing their bidding. They believe this is a vote winner.

Google nukes military AI, Amazon happy touting Rekognition to police, and much more

David 164

But they can resign and leave the company knowing Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and others will snapped them the second they leave. I bet most of the real talent at google have inboxes overflowing with job offers.

David 164

Wasn't the whole project based on Tensorflow anyway. Which is a open source project, so the military can just carry on like nothing happen, Google engineers just won't be answering the phone when they ring asking questions.

Russia to Apple: Kill Telegram crypto-chat – or the App Store gets it

David 164

Trying, no they succeeded in fully annexing crimea from Ukraine. With relatively little effort.

Android devs prepare to hit pause on ads amid Google GDPR chaos

David 164

Re: GDPR

Or Google lawyers will turn out to have read the regulations right and we can look forward to GDPR 2.0 yayyyyyyyyyyyyy................

David 164

Re: Hmmm..

But what does absolute actually mean, that will be different to each service. An that where there will lots of courts cases over. An that why I bet the app market in the EU is going crash and burn and the app market will cease to become a place where a hobbiest can even dream of playing. In fact it seem safer just for me to make my app available only to Americans and asians, South Americans and Africa, the EU could become a desert for apps.

David 164

Given the EU courts past actions of just reinterpreting the laws to suit their agenda, I suspect you are indeed right.

David 164

Re: "personalised ad" stuff is absolute nonsense.

How are auditors suppose to audit if google don't keep IP addresses?

UK rocket-botherers rattle SABRE, snaffle big bucks

David 164

Re: That's good, but...

It be UK developed it and make it work, US sulks and ban it from it airspace, Chinese tries and copy it

Airbus plans beds in passenger plane cargo holds

David 164

We all know Mr O'Leary, not only is he thinking hot bunking already, he probably thinks two passengers per single bed!

David 164

May be the idea is that these are bookable, may be on board the flight, so you can book a 4- 5 hour slots on the way to Australia. A alarm system will gently wake you up, a quick change of bedding by the hostess and the next person move in.

That way they can all be cleared out and locked up and passengers in there seat ready for landing an hour before the flight is due to land.

Watchdog growls at Tesla for spilling death crash details: 'Autopilot on, hands off wheel'

David 164

I think the whole idea on relying on anything that needs to be maintain by local authorities simply won't work for automated cars.

Because they are pretty much universally shite when it comes to maintain any roads that isn't outside their offices or just happens to be a road a councillor lives on!

Autonomous vehicle claims are just a load of hot air… and here's why

David 164

Re: Deep Learning is the problem

or you just program them to avoid all objects in the road that are bipedal.

David 164

Re: My prediction - it won’t happen unless

They will learn as these cars takes nice picture of their number plates and even of the individual faces and send it straight to the police for them to be fined!

Already Essex police are fining people base on dash cam footage sent in by the public, I suspect they are rubbing their hands at the thought of all those automated cars sending footage of their human rivals breaking the law, their fine revenue will go up ten fold, at least until humans learn to leave autonomous cars alone.

David 164

Re: Finally somebody said the truth

ROFL,

Nope they are being tested on London roads, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfRqNAhAe6c

Not quite as bad as Indian or some other countries roads but not exactly the wide open roads of california either.

David 164

If they weren't confident they wouldn't have pledge to buy 20,000 ipace cars would they?. Already there cars only have a engineer or backup driver in the back seat as part of their pilot program, so far zero major or even minor accidents, have been reported and the press is all over even minor accidents that involve autonomous cars.

An the reason I repeated it three times is because I reply to three comments, not everyone reads the whole comment section.

David 164

Re: I'm sceptical about driverless cars

Given the death recently in the USA, I don't think that driverless is going to be here before 2024.

If it was cause by Waymo or GM vehicles you would be right because they are the leaders. Unfortunately it was done by Uber which already has a shitty record and are known for their dodgy practices. So it likely to just be written off as something done by a company cutting corners trying to catch up to their rivals.

There going to be a autonomous taxi at the end of 2018, that Waymo goal. An in several cities across America by 2020. It likely the UK will also have various driverless schemes up an running by then as well, probably in terms of small buses shifting people from town centers to out of town car parks or train stations. An countries like Singapore, Dubai and Qatar will have will all have something similar being set up. Singapore wants self driving buses because they can't hire enough bus drivers.

I bet on Qatar having self driving cars and buses driving around world cup fans for 2022 world cup. Because they want to show off what a modern country they are. They might even have a few flying autonomous taxis flying around by then as well.

David 164

Re: For God's sake, why?

they are not around the corner through, they are here now, driving on our roads, from the end of the year Waymo will have a autonomous taxi service up and running in the US without any safety drivers.

David 164

All I know is that Waymo is launching a self driving taxi at the end of the year and just slump 1.4 billion down on twenty thousand cars.

But then Waymo built it own technology and understands how it work. Uber stole theirs.

Meet the open sorcerers who have vowed to make Facebook history

David 164

Re: providing a good UX - Facebook?!?

Ironically I believe Facebook has gotten worse precisely because of all of the layers of privacy features they have added on top.

David 164

Re: Please just don't care enough

They got content people want. However you face a classic chicken and egg problem, you won't get people to buy the box unless they know the content is there and the contents won't be there unless people buy the box.

£100 quid is way to high, it can't be more than around 10 to 15 quid, it got to be a impulse purchase. You need partners big enough to be able to hand out thousands, tens of thousand for free to people so you are generating the content.

David 164

More like billions and billions of users is what the likes of facebook and google and yahoo operate at.

The number of individual who actually pay for their own email service is in the low millions.

Tantalising Tabby's Star teases watchers with big dimming event

David 164

Re: Science = Awesome!

Well that the theory, surely there should be some sort of pattern that should eventually emerge with enough observation of the star, until that pattern emerge this is nothing more than a guess.

Chrome adblockalypse will 'accelerate Google-Facebook duopoly'

David 164

They probably want to up the price of the ads they serve. Serving more is costly afterall in server time and data transmission, if they can serve the same number of ads today but can charge advertise 20% more for them that would be Google dream, increase revenue without increase in the costs.

David 164

It content that 90% of people care about through. Google will again be proven right that it approach is the correct one, trying to get publishers to think more carefully about where they place their ads, what kinds of ads they want on their site.

David 164

so you want the site content but you want it for free? How do you expect reporters to feed and house themselves, how do you expect them to pay for flights to go out an interview people and companies and to visit conferences and trade shows like CES for example?

David 164

Re: Bypass the middle man

Google, Facebook, Apple are the only ones with the scale to ever consider implementing such a system.

David 164

Google is tackling the side that most normal users are actually concern about and that ads interfering with there ability to consume the site content.

Apple is tackling it from the side of a small niche of privacy worries that worry their privacy is affected by ads that follow you around.

Most people I know who use ad blockers use them because the ads they see are annoying, loud, intrusive.

It took us less than 30 seconds to find banned 'deepfake' AI smut on the internet

David 164

Not long one suspects. Considering this was built by just one developer, who knows what the likes of GCHQ and NSA or Google, Facebook could develop with far larger teams and better hardware.

Ex-Autonomy exec agrees to be a witness for HP fraud case

David 164

Re: But the alledged dodgy accounting only bring forward sals 1 quarter

Thing is that they will lose the British case at the high court and will have to pay out hundreds of millions to Lynch, if your theory is right.

Still that 8 billion it can use to reduce it taxes, so it no all bad for HP.

NASA reconfirms 2019 will see first launch of Space Launch System

David 164

The best thing for NASA is that this explodes in a great ball of fire and thus end this wasteful project once and for all.

Android snoopware Skygofree can pilfer WhatsApp messages

David 164

bet they can be made specific to the infected phone.

Google puts the last coat of polish on Chrome 61

David 164

Re: Web Share API

I was think with the WebUSB stuff wouldn't they implement similar validation that Microsoft or presumably Google chrome and Linux own online update mechanisms uses. Which are all themselves reasonably secure and safe to use.

Page: