BADA ?
And you've to call her in caps all the time!
471 publicly visible posts • joined 27 Aug 2009
Also: Why does it say "we are sorry you didn't like this post" when I downvote one.
I would imagine moderatrix (or El Reg) being glad that moronic commentards are quibbling amongst themselves ?
PS: I didn't downvote any post on this article - it's a general question.
Unless... there really is no portion of brain exclusively devoted to devotees ? That should preempt
the debate.
PS: I wish I was as smarter and counter argue in a constructive manner, but as you can see I am the sort who gets tingly feelings by looking at a 2x2 of Paris.
> its only ever when big business makes moves like these that prices ever drop for the mainstream
Reverse is equally, if not more, true.
Eg: x86 walks all over itanium because the consumers use x86, the R&D (& a few other) cost is subsidized. Similarly flash started with consumers and when smartphones, airbooks and other flash oriented storage made the technology reliable & cheap enough, enterprise entered the market.
If EVA is entry level, what is MSA (P2000) ?
Anyway, personally, I think while it's fine to keep all 4 and let the market decide, but having a 2.5 billion$ investment and call it 2nd tier is foolish (your margins are highest on the top tier, that's where you expensively R&D'd products belong).. It should be polished and replace the top tier, if
it can't already.
2.5billion dollar acquisition to fill an arguably non-existent gap ? How does th story translate so far:
Daddy Mark Hurd got the case of blue balls & got fired. Meanwhile son-in-law (the new guy at the head of enterprise products) became a CEO candidate - no one wanted to cross him. So he just went out a bought a porche to park in the driveway so that no one looks at the luser across the street (DELL). A year down the line, Porche is being used haul grocery coz mom uses the van for daily errands and the new daddy likes the SUV for weekends. Err... doesn't translate that well then. But you get the Porche point, right ?
A few disgusted browser/open/web folks will get angry. websites will publish stories and views. Webdevs will wakeup to see what's up with this native thing. webdevs will embrace IE10, maybe not as much as they used to but still a 60-70% of them still treat IE as no.1 platform. MS will create a new standard. They done it in past , they'll do it again.
TCO by itself is a pretty useful tool. It's the (over/incorrect)application to sell a bad product is bad. Instinctively one does TCO calculations all the time in your life as a buyer:
Why people buy sucky japanese cars over sturdy germans ? TCO.
Why buy CLF over incandescent ? TCO.
Why pay taxes over being a fugitive ? TCO.
Why buy a 300$ phone w/o contract than a 50$ with one ? TCO.
In enterprise worlds, companies like IBM are restructuring themselves to give you a low cost(= low barrier) of entry and a high TCO for lifetime. Windows is another example of high lifetime TCO if you add downtimes, anti-virus, office suite.
Marry or date Paris ?
It's easy to argue that overall Redhat are good for future of linux. But I am sorry to say they are suffering because of a potential folly in GPL: It's very easy for a big giant to eat into a niche created by a smart but small innovator whose entire product is open source, whether the smaller guy is a willing partner or not. Redhat's patches and products are well understood by competition and they can easily eat into red hat's accounts. Also, redhat can't easily do direct-to-customer patch delivery because of GPL's terms.
OTOH, even if redhat had money, could they do that to Oracle customers ? Most likely no, because redhat wouldn't have the same level of expertise with the Oracle's software or understand the patches in the same great detail. Most 3rd party service providers depend on a revenue share agreement with the original product vendor to deliver patches. (Eg: if IBM services arm is installing patches on customer's Sun/Oracle box, it's because their agreement with Sun/Oracle covers it).
Lot of Linux distros are simple re-branded redhats. They make money by investing on 3 unbilled engineers worth of money where as redhat has a 300-400 engineer staff which is part of R&D and not billed to any customers.
I think original purpose of GPL - **why I like it**- it that it allowed a customer to tweak the product they bought as per their whims and fancy. Things are a lot different 30 years down the line.
co-orelation/causation/yada-yada...
...probably the people who are full of life and active have more opportunities to drink, or tend to indulge in drinking. So they might have a healthier brain. Dullards, with no social life, probably don't drink and go obtuse faster ?
Regardless, I'll say cheers to that!