So you were cycling at 22.5 mph then?
Yeah right ! ! ! ;-)
511 publicly visible posts • joined 14 May 2007
These EULA's are written by self declared very smart people who earn of money using their voodoo witchcraft to protect the company from imaginary risks. This actually is the lesser of several evils, the worst being that you let them write procedures that actually matter in they daily business of a company.
Back in the early days of atomic bombs (they were called nuclear weapons much later), little was know fall-out, radiation and their long term side effects. Atomic bombs were just seen as a tool that could big holes. Plans were made to make (Panama class) canals using atomic boms. To build instant harbors. To move riverbeds.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peaceful_nuclear_explosions
and for a blast from the past: http://books.google.be/books?id=ZC0DAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA102&lpg=PA102&dq=#v=onepage&q&f=false
What we learned from this is that if you outsell your competitor, you can defeat a superior product that is "supported" by "strategists" and self declared smart people who concentrate on company politics instead of business.
Who would have thought? Well I would.
But not my boss. And neither his boss.
The problem is that there are a lot of people in the economy, finance and banking that simply don't have a clue. They talk the talk, but really they couldn't balance their own checkbook. I was looking into the Facebook IPO, just to check if it would be worth the time for a proper study. But hell, it wasn't easy to get some sound advice on it. Everybody was "excited". Well, that's hardly a rational position, so I decided to walk away from it. Of course, after the bottom fell out, everybody was shouting that they saw it coming.
It was like the weather girl forecasting yesterdays weather. She can do that with great accuracy, but it's rather useless.
Like I said, there's easy money in finance and banking and everybody is a specialist, but really they're not.
The professionals of KBC (Belgian Bank) for instance lost € 350k on the Facebook IPO. That's not a lot of money for them, but it shows they don't know what they're doing.
No no, the point is that they went from Zuse, Colossus, Eniac, Leo & Dec: hardware that could only be afforded by nations and the biggest companies to the desktop. But there was a decade where the average Joe couldn't afford a computer, but the medium company where he worked would have a Wang 2200.
In my first job as engineer I had a Wang 2200 with just 1 terminal. So it really was a personal computer.
When I started to work in IT, we were still replacing Wang 2200 with 4-8 terminals with a PC network and that was frequently used by small to midsized engineering firms with 4 to 20 employees. That was about 25 years ago.
Ah, the niakwa fingerprint. And the horror when the floppy got lost ! ! !
A decent Compaq with 386 processor and 640k would set you back around € 5.000. An extra € 1.000 for the full 1MB. An extra € 1.000 for a 287 coprocessor. Remember when you weren't supposed to want a coprocessor because you already had a 386 so what more could you want?
And if you want a 13" screen, that would cost an extra € 1.000.
And the margin on this hardware was 40-50%.
Looking back, developing software was just an excuse to sell the hardware. And most of these smaller software companies got stung when the PC became widely available and cheap.
I remember IT fairs where the visitors were packed shoulder to shoulder and they could only move forward when they guy in front of them would. And he wouldn't because he was staring in awe at your mouse and 16" color monitor.
And back at the office he would be working on a monochrome mini terminal. Probably shared by 4 colleagues.
with an iPAQ 3970. That was still Compaq then. And you're right, it was a PDA, not a smartphone. But I put a GSM/GPRS sleeve on it (developed by Option) and I had a TomTom GPS mouse in my car. So it had all the functionality that modern devices had, but it was quite a bit thicker. In every meaning one of the word, because it was running Pocket PC = Windows. So Microsoft was involved and it was unstable.
And it often failed to pick up incoming calls.
But it would pick up your stress levels so when you were in a hurry, you would have to wait extra long for a GPS-fix.
And it weighed a ton so you couldn't carry it around in the pocket of a summer jacket.
But I was young then ! ! !
And people were impressed when I put that brick on the table.
Yes, and what we have noticed is that this liability is somehow passed on to the general public. After all, we're all in the same boat now, no? And then they pull the rope on their golden parachute, get paid a lot of money. There's nothing to be done about that, it's in their contracts.
And when they land, they become capitalists and it's all me me me again. Untill it blow up in their faces.
And this will continue untill the politicians finally work up to courage and throw some of these people in jail.
Then throw away the golden key.
"The probability of this type of incident is inordinately low."
Yes you're right, but only if people are sane and work to avoid this risk. If they're the mad management type, and they know "The probability of this type of incident is inordinately low" meaning "we can f*ck around like we want, this is never going to happen", than of course the risk rises astronomically. And this is upgraded to "a disaster waiting to happen".
No, you don't understand. Because this companies managment is very smart and they know things. Because they've got lots of money and you don't. Because you are not a manager, so you wouldn't be able to understand.
It will turn out ok. Trust their managers on that. And if it doens't turn out ok, I'm sure the managers can not be blamed.
Whaahaaa, I hope they cut of their nuts and serve them on a platter. Best served cold I imagine.