823 posts • joined 18 Aug 2009
Re: Are any of the earth-sized planets NOT tidally locked?
I don't think you've fully appreciated the science being used here.
"Verified" does not mean "seen". They know the planets are there by the way they effect the star they are orbiting, but there is no data about basic things like planetary rotation or atmosperic composition at this point.
Given that we haven't even put people on Mars yet, it's probably a little early to worry about colonisation of favourable exoplanets.
You're talking about moving house from London to Sydney by walking before you're capable of walking to the end of your own garden.
Re: Much as I dislike Facebook, I wish...
>You mean like gmail's Report Phishing option..?
Yeah, those Google reporting tools work really well.
I've had a GMail address almost since the service became available and I always report false positives when asked, yet it still sends every single email I get from PayPal, Amazon and my bank into the spam folder.
In the end, I got so fed up that I specifically set up filters for the more common cases to stop it putting them in the spam folder - at which point it helpfully displays a message above every one of these messages insiting that it *is* spam and that I should change my filters.
Damn you, Google Mail Team! ::shakes fist impotently::
Re: A taste of things to come?
I have an uncle who used to be a funeral director, he uses churches as reference points for directions, it's *really* weird the first time you encounter it.
Re: "Banco di Mesa Verde"
No, $79bn would be a fair price for Samsung's brand value. $104bn for Apple.
Brand value is the intangible bit that makes people pay more for your products or services than they would for an unbranded or unknown equivalent, it's entirely based on perception.
For example, it's the reason why Ford were able to sell the Mk IV Fiesta at a higher price than the Mazda 121, even through they were the same car made in the same factory, just with different badges.
Nah, the norm is to somehow imply that Apple are involved in some evil way.
Still, it'll be interesting to see CERN turn the LHC into the first warp coil and blast itself and a good chunk of Switzerland into space.
If they time it right we might have the first people on Mars much sooner than currently anticipated.
"Normal" companies don't pay their tax bills judging by the stories of the last few years.
Show me a global company that's paying the taxes that people think they should be paying and I'll show you a global company that's not managing its finances properly.
None of these companies are acting illegally, they're playing the rules to maximise profit and the situation will continue as long as you continue to have a situation where companies can be global but taxes are only national.
Isn't the real story here the fact that Apple responded to a question from El Reg?
Well done those peeps
I'm sure I read a few years ago that scientists expected to discover an exoplanet with life by the end of the decade, but this makes me think that we might have that discovery by the end of the year.
I think the markets might be slightly different in both size and target demographic.
Sure, I replaced my iPad with an A380, but then I'm not a normal consumer.
Re: The rich get richer ...
"Never forget that there are three things you cannot buy with dollars*: happiness; the respect of your colleagues; and the love of a good woman."
Four, you forgot abject poverty.
>I can't imagine how bad a 48Kb/s music track will sound.
Ever used an old AM radio with the analogue tuner? You know when searching for a station you sometimes hear a little bit of music under all of the static?
It sounds like that, only worse.
>Everyone else except Apple has been standardized, for what, a decade now?
Not even slightly, the last two Nokia phones I had (around 2006 & 2008) had different chargers from each other and they are both different from the Nokia that someone I work with has from earlier this year.
In fact, Nokia still don't quite have a standard connector across the board right now. Most of their handsets use micro-USB, but some of the cheap ones they still sell (like the 105) are using the older Nokia 2mm power supply.
NB This is not a defence of Apple, I'm just pointing out that other manufacturers have not been standardised for a decade, they aren't even standardised now.
I'd also like to point out that those that are standardised on microUSB still haven't standardised on power requirements, I have cables that will charge one handset and not another. In short, it's still a blooming mess.
While I'm not a fan of BT, surely the reason why they're missing targets is due to underinvestment somewhere in the business (e.g. number of engineers).
How will taking money away from them help? Isn't likely to make the situation worse, not better?
It seems that an alternative to fines is needed, perhaps OFCOM should have the ability to cap profits and force re-investment of any excess rather than taking more money out of the system.
Feels like there should be better options.
BTW, I'm not saying fines should not also remain as an option, just that they shouldn't be the only option.
Re: Report offending spam texts to your network operator by sending them to 7726.
They did tell people, but only by sending a text message to their own customers at the time they implemented it, meaning that as not all networks implemented it a the same time it was easy to miss it if you happened to switch from a network that hadn't implemented it to a one that had.
So, for example, I was on Orange when they made the service available and had a text, but O2 had already rolled it out when I switched to them, so I knew about Orange's service but not O2's - at least not until I looked for it.
It'll be by browser and app.
Adblocker for browser and with any luck it will be possible to blacklist a URL on my router to prevent it on the app.
Alternatively, report every advert as ether sexually explicit or spam. Or leave Facebook.
"Governments will never take a financial risk that is obvious as such to the electorate, and, as taxpayers, should we really expect anything different?"
Generally I'd agree with you, but this was money specifically put aside to try and kick start inventions an innovation.
I'd rather they put the money into projects that had a 5% chance of success than give it to moochers after an expensive holiday. But that's just me, it seems.
Has the bloke who was give thick end of £40k to go to Vegas made back even 1% of that money in any way? I would hazard a guess that we would have got better value from sending him to Blackpool to play the penny falls with it.
"There are a number of reasons for this. We have a long history of catalogue shopping in the UK.
What this has done is that we trust people to deliver parcels, and we're used to getting parcels delivered to our homes and we're used to using credit cards."
I'd add that we also have quite good consumer protection laws, particularly those dealing with distance selling.
<Looks at silver+black plastic laptop with cream keyboard on desk>
Nope, laptop keyboards have not always been black. This one I have here is around 8 years old now and I think I have a Sony one with silver keys from about 13-14 years ago in a cupboard somewhere.
I don't know which models the earlier poster is referring to, so I can't say if they have any significant resemblance to either each other or any of Apple's offerings - similarly I can't say that they definitely don't have any resemblance. You need to try to keep an open mind about these things.
Re: BALLMER: 'WE MADE MORE MONEY THAN ALMOST ANYBODY ON THE PLANET'
>Apple's Newton was a PDA, not a tablet.
While technically true, it could also be argued that the "tablets" spawned from early MS efforts were just laptops with touch screens and were also not tablets by today's definitions.
IIRC, the Newton was the first device to be referred to as a PDA and those early touchscreen laptops were the first to be referred to as tablets, but in reality there are a lot of semantics and fine lines between the definitions of these devices.
In fact, these days, I would tend to say that a tablet is a touchscreen device with no permanently attached keyboard (this is not intended to be a complete definition, sit down at the back) and that would exclude those early laptop derived machines.
>Of course some 7.0 users are new installs, but Apple has sold perhaps 35 million phones since 7.0 came >out, so around 90% of the 7.0 users must be upgrades.
600 million iOS devices in use worldwide by June of this year according to CNet, those 35 million phones account for about 6% of that base, probably more like 5% now as I expect the base has grown in the last 6 months.
So, no, 90% of those 7.0 users are most definitely not upgrades, at best upgrades are likely to account for 10%.
According to IDC, Android's install base is about 2.5x that of iOS, which would make around 1.5 billion (in American units) installed devices and it's growing faster.
Relax, Android already won. Make up your own reasons for this if you feel the need to belittle someone who bought something else, naturally.
Re: "qualified to judge"
You've missed the point of the case, which was not whether the patent should stand, but whether or not HTC infringed on a patent that Nokia owns.
The merits of the patent are irrelevant to the case and as HTC themselves have not attempted to have the patent invalidated, then I would suggest that your supposition that the patent is rubbish and that the legal parties are stupid is probably incorrect.
Re: Deja vu?
That's fine, 'cos it's not what the patent is about.
The patent is for a couple of things, first deciding if someone is sat in front of the device but not actively using it (reading a book, watching a movie for example) and having the device not do things like switching the display off and second, if someone is in front of the device then modifying the behaviour depending on them being an "authorised user" or not.
In other words, if you give your device to someone to watch a movie (or whatever), the device won't then go about showing them all your incoming messages or allow them access to your photographs or the device settings.
It's quite similar to what the XBOne does with Skype once set up, if it recognises one of the configured Skype users in the room when a call comes in it can bring up an incoming call to be answered, but if they're not present then it doesn't.
>>I honestly wonder what advantage Google sees in all this
>Nobody does - it's called speculation
You don't think Google could make use of a device that can actively follow you around all day making note of your movements and buying preferences?
GOK what they might do with that data.
I can't imagine, for example, wandering into a café and my "plastic pal who's fun to be with" telling me that it's talked to the servers of all of the other eating places within 100m and that I have a voucher I can use two doors down. Then again, maybe I can imagine this.
Share and enjoy!
Re: Negative marketing worked really well for Apple
And Samsung's. And Nokia's.
Of course, the difference here is that it's someone bashing Google instead of Apple or Microsoft, which might be the reason for the vitriol in the comments.
Personally, that mug is the first MS product I've actually wanted to buy in years. And yes, I use Google services, I just like the humour.
Re: copyright clowns
There's a nice mathematical breakdown here:
Re: They are successful...
Comet's biggest asset was it's staff, I'm not sure I want to see them stripping...
Re: "An obvious first move...
>Personally, I'd rather see the on-selling of any 'personal data' outlawed.
Or at the very least include data tracking information so that when I get contracted by company "X" who I've never done business with I can find out the name of company "Y" who sold them my data and make sure I stop doing business with them.
Re: Let me correct that for you...
And if you knew the different meanings of open then you might understand the point.
For example, OpenPGP is an open standard (RFC 4880), that doesn't make it insecure.
It's perfectly possible to have a secure infrastructure that you can easily add new devices or types of devices to, you just need to make sensible choices about if/how you lock down those devices and what kind of access they have to your internal systems (if any).
Bought my parents lunch on Sunday, 'cos they don't use the internet at all, so all tablets are useless and expensive to them.
Nice roast with all the trimmings followed by apple pie & custard then home for an afternoon nap.
And all for £8/head. Bigger bargain.
Re: a simple real experiment - results
>Is anyone else trying this??
I just did a quick calculation and I think my life's too short.
Re: It isn't a huge prblem...
I don't remember any particular complaints about the WP UI, just the usual round of complaints that it didn't do absolutely everything that a given competitor did and was, therefore, "crap" or "useless".
Personally, I quite like the look of it, to the extent of trying to work out how I might migrate my current setup and what kind of functionality I might lose (or gain) in the process.
It is possible, but it's just slightly too much pain to be worth the effort/risk for me at the moment and much as I like the look of it, I don't covet it - if you see what I mean.
As for Surface, I would take a look at it if I didn't have anything already, but there are no compelling arguments to switch from anything else unless you have a specific requirement that is only fulfilled by Surface - can anyone think of one?
>I am not sure what other fathers think, but I would rather my son sees boobies than a beheading...
Fair enough, but how would you feel if he were looking a willies instead?
Re: Yes yes...
The problem appears to be that analysts only understand one business model, the one where you have the most "market share".
Apple are using one of the other options, the one where you make the most money.
I'm not an analyst, but I can predict with some certainly that at some point in the future Apple will be in financial trouble, it's not rocket science, it's what happens in normal business cycles. We've seen it with Dec (who went to the wall), IBM (who narrowly missed the wall), HP (hit the wall and are now in plaster casts), we're seeing it with Microsoft (just realised they left it too late to stamp on the brakes) and in the future we'll see it with Apple and Google.
The trick is to keep churning out these "OMG, they're going to fail if they don't follow my advice" stories in the hope that you're the one who calls it at the right moment and so reaps all of the glory and reputation for being the person who correctly predicted the collapse.
You need to pay attention, iLife & iWorks are free on *new* mac kit, the same as they are on new iOS kit, not existing stuff. I imagine it will work like the iOS ones in that once you buy new kit they will become available to all of your existing stuff via the Mac app store.
This may sound a little harsh, but given that they dropped support for your hardware at the previous OS, why would you have an expectation that it would be supported this time?
I know Apple buyers hang on to their kit for a long time because it keeps on working, but expecting OS updates for something that's over seven years old and on a different architecture seems a bit of a stretch
Re: Maybe Leo was right
Unfortunately, the right call would have been for HP to get out of the PC business in the 1990s and not buy Compaq in the first place.
Still, better late than never (if they're lucky).
I think they forgot the word "smart".
And I think, at the very least, you're forgetting the earliest landline phones, a lot of which had curved handsets.
Curved telephones have been around for probably 100 years now. Curved smartphones not so long.
I have to admit that I am wondering how well you can hold this to your head as it looks like there would be a gap between your ear and the earpiece.
Re: This report is complete and utter rubbish (NOT REALLY)
>Have you noticed that Mercedes came out with a C Class that starts at $29,900 USD?
There was a reason for that: The BMW 3 Series.
It turns out that a large number of people who buy luxury cars tend to be very brand loyal, once they start buying a particular brand they tend not to switch unless they have a really bad experience (or they have sufficient money to own several cars - a guy from Bentley once told me that they were typically the sixth car in someone's garage).
BMW started at the bottom end of the market (with things like the three-wheeled isetta) and worked their way up. Mercedes were at the top end of the market and have gradually moved down.
Why? Because the lower priced cars get "ordinary" people in to the brand and generally they work their way up. In the 1980's BMW's 3-Series acted as a feeder for the 5-Series and the 7-Series. Mercedes cheapest model was twice the price and once people were in BMWs they had to have a bad experience to even look at something else.
In order to counter this, Mercedes started with the C190 and then as that still wasn't an low enough rung on the ladder, they followed that up with the A-Class.
AFAIK, the mobile phone market doesn't really inspire quite the same brand loyalty at this point. I doubt there are many people buying a cheap Samsung who would automatically upgrade to mid-range Samsung next time rather than any other Android phone. A lot of people still just take whatever phone their operator offers them for free.
So, unfortunately, not a terribly good analogy.
I did read the document, I did see this, but it was wrapped in a lot of very thinly veiled threats.
All they needed to say was that they were investigating the site and believed it breached EasyDNS's T&Cs and would they review it to see if they agreed.
There was no reason at all for any of the other stuff at this point, if ever.
It's all very akin to someone asking you if you'd thought about taking out house insurance while striking matches and saying "It would be a real shame if there was a fire and you lost all of this".
Re: UK unaware
>Unless it's led by a bloke whose father was a Marxist.
Yes, I've been struggling to figure out what the problem is here. My father & my father in law both hated the Germans so much that they joined lots of other Brits (and latterly Americans) shooting them (with guns and everything) around 70 years ago.
Now, they're not that bothered and personally I've always got on well with Germans (and Austrians) that I've met.
I'm not saying the views and actions of our parents have no influence on our outlook, but if we only ever mimicked them then we would never progress as a society.
I use Adblock+, but sometimes I disable it and have a few minutes fun clicking the "hide" button on the ads and then reporting them as "inappropriate" or even better "sexually explicit".
I'm sure it doesn't make any difference with little ol' me just doing it, but if more people did that FB would become seriously bogged down in investigations.
One can dream.
Re: Go on then Chad...
I know I'm going to get downvoted for this, but WTF.
Apple normally issue two press releases for the launch of a new product. One for pre-orders and one for launch weekend.
Previously pre-orders have sold out in around 24-48 hours, at which point there's no point in delaying the press release.
This time, pre-orders have not yet sold out (looking at the Apple website, you can still order any 5c for delivery on the 20th).
So far, so good.
However, we have a big unknown in this mix: How many have they made for pre-order?
There's an unstated assumption that they have the same number of handsets available for pre-order as they have had in previous years (normally around 2m), but given that the 5c is essentially a 5 in a party frock, it's entirely possible they have 30m or 100m available for pre-order.
And that /could/ be the reason why they haven't sold out and also why we haven't had a press release. We'll have to wait until next week to get a better idea,
I thought most phones were stolen for the hardware, not the data on them.
In addition to that, the police say that the majority of thefts are "snatches" - phones taken out of open handbags, pockets, off tables in public places or even just directly from someone's hand as they're using it.
I can't see this technology changing that at all.
BTW, your unpleasant incidents in Hong Kong appear to be one incident in Malaysia in 2005, at least that's all that's turning up on a Google search.
"I wonder what this is going to do for obsolescence of the older phones. If apps start coming out that are 64 bit only? Worrying."
We already have this situation and have done for years, there are apps that require minimum versions of the OS that can't be installed on earlier hardware, sometimes because the drivers aren't there or quite often because it simply won't fit.
In common with other operating systems, I expect iOS will maintain backwards compatibility for a few years and then drop it when the majority of applications are 64-bit; expect Android, Windows Mobile and BlackBerry to follow the same path - although with such a relatively small market share and number of apps the last two could opt to just make a clean break at the next major OS release.
Re: Here on the small island ....
Vodafone might put up some resistance, probably for some very spurious reasons, but VM are a virtual operator (like Tesco, TalkTalk, GiffGaff, et al) and so may well welcome this.
IIRC, VM did use the T-Mobile network and are now be benefiting from the greater coverage as a result of the merger that created EE. They would presumably be able to benefit further from roaming charges being dropped.
Re: Good point
Even with 'droid (some of) the libraries that link the OS to the hardware have to be provided by the manufacturers, the OS only provides a framework, so you still have closed elements - I don't know of any manufacturer who publishes those libraries.
This really isn't a straightforward problem, except to say that you shouldn't carry a phone at all if any of this stuff is an issue for you. At the very least, don't buy an iPhone 5S; it's not rocket science.
Re: Pay more for a plasticky inferior product?
Nope, read that three times and I still have no idea what you're on about.
It's more likely that their blocking software is throwing up lots of false positives.
The filters at my workplace block access to all sorts of random but innocent sites, such as the landing page you are sent to when the NoScript plugin is updated by Firefox or even some news sites (can't think of an example off the top of my head).
In fact, about 3-4 years ago even sites like Facebook were blocked. That was until management decided they wanted us to push the company to friends and family ('cos they all have a massive requirement for managed server farms, right?) and then realised the irony of preventing access to the very sites they wanted us to be promoting on. It took them six months, of course, but they did eventually realise.
Not that I know of anyone who *has* promoted the company to friends or family.
Re: Think of the fanbois - El reg.
>I bet you can use your iPhone to turn on a coffee maker.
Quite a bit more than that, it would seem.
Yes, I can see the comments following next week's announcement already:
"This is just an incremental change from the iPhone 5, Apple aren't innovating any more."
(New phone has new feature X)
"Apple claim to have invented X, that my <whatever> had years ago! They're just copying <company>, who should now sue them into bankruptcy!!!"
(Please ignore fact that X existed long before <whatever> had it or that <company> didn't invent it. Or that Apple licensed it from the actual inventor/patent holder.)
"How much? My <whatever> does all of that and cost me half that!"
"Meh. Loads of features I'm not interested in. I'll stick with my <whatever>."
And, of course, some stuff about Fanboi's, crApple, idiots, fashonistas and the death of Apple.
Same as the last few years, really.
- Fee fie Firefox: Mozilla's lawyers probe Dell over browser install charge
- Did Apple's iOS make you physically SICK? Try swallowing version 7.1
- Pics Indestructible Death Stars blow up planets using glowing KILL RAY
- Neil Young touts MP3 player that's no Piece of Crap
- Review Distro diaspora: Four flavours of Ubuntu unpacked