Re: A cynic writes...
170 posts • joined 17 Aug 2009
...and yes Mongrels and half a dozen other things that 20 years ago would have been on BBC2 at 9pm - opposite the 9 (where it should be)o'clock news.
In other words, having lost the case Google are going about complying in the most juvenile way they can manage. Presumably it's their turn.
...So, unless a swarm of hornets happens to pass between you and the targets downrange...
Funnily enough my dad was at Bisley the other week when shooting had to stop for 20 minutes after 3
large lumps of venison fallow deer wandered onto the range. The rule is if anyone shoots a deer the entire club is permanently banned from the ranges.
...and for Tony's chinless wonder read retired millwright.
That's a pity - the book it's based on makes perfect sense. I suppose the ending was a little grim for hollywood.
If memory serves the fine will be paid to the Lord Chancellor's Office (the government), probably out of the bank's reserves, so the banks owners (the government) will pay, albeit indirectly.
It may seem a little silly for the government to fine the government but the point of the exercise is to give the impression that someone got a bollocking.
I thought the get out was that the missy being killed special effect was suspiciously similar to the missy teleporting special effect.
In other news UNIT now has a competent CO and he's bullet proof...
I was indeed real.
My first year of uni I shared a flat with an ex-member of Strathclyde police who'd been in the SPG. He was doing a psychology degree and after a few jars would claim it was so he could find out why he didn't like hitting people.
Given that Constable Savage was written by a police forensic scientist need I say more.
Agreed, at least in part. It was also avoiding the nasty bit of Keynesian economics when in a boom the government is meant to pay back some of it's debts rather than ramping up spending and claiming there is no boom.
A sane move would have been to regulate the multiple of earnings that could be borrowed.
The running order I've observed since the early 80s is
(i) there's an excess of savings looking for somewhere to be placed so
(ii) banks /building societies increase the multiple of income they'll lend and relax the criteria for mortgages (5 times income rather than 3.5 and of course we don't need to see evidence - self cert's fine)
(iii) with more (mortgage) money to spend prices go up until they hit a maximum and activity start's to slow unless or until
(iv) there's a contraction in lending either (a) government action to prevent overheating (1988 -Nigel Lawson & MIRAS) or (b) Government does SFA to prevent overheating and it all collapses in a pile of shit (2007 - Northern Rock).
(v) at this point house prices (aka values) drop through the floor. It might be sensible for the economy as a whole for lots of places to be repossessed and for the banks to take the hit in lost equity but as no one wants to piss away most of their wealth all that happens is activity drops with only those who really overstretched themselves and those who bought so early that they still have equity willing to sell. Since wholesale repossession is political poison interest rates drop enabling home owners to survive negative equity.
(vi) when a combination of increasing wages and increased lending erodes the cost of entry the market picks up. A few years later it goes nuts.
The major difference in this cycle is that with interest rates at near-zero and a banking system recovering from serious burns there's no pressure to increase lending. Whilst the economy has finally picked up wages haven't as we are employing more people (both native and migrant). Which puts the mockers on the usual recovery mechanism.
So, with a lack of new entrants, we're falling back on landlords to keep the market alive. People with savings have to put them somewhere so instead of giving them to the bank to lend to other people to buy houses they buy them themselves and let them out. In most places this has stopped house prices dropping rather than boosting them - the exception being London & the big cities (where the population is expanding) and indirectly places within commuting distance.
I think the real issue is that the barrier to entry for my kids generation is the equity of my generation. With 66% of households owner occupied good luck getting us to take a significant drop for the rest.
"He may have a point,..."
er...no. However SHE does.
No - however the oxygen level was higher and their bones were hollow.
If Wikipedia didn't exist, it wouldn't be long before someone would invent it again.
...or everyone started using H2G2 again.
The accusation is that in two cases women went to bed with him on condition he put on a condom and he didn't. As I remember it in one case she said she would drop the complaint if he had an AIDS test.
It could just be me but I don't think that sounds like "a well crafted set up". To my mind a well crafted set up would suggest he'd taken money to edit the information released. A few deposits in a bank account set up in his name, a few spooks at the same hotel and a suspiciously detailed official denial would have done the trick.
Many a true word...
"... the worst weapons procurement programme ..."
It depends if you think the purpose of the programme is to defend the realm or provide jobs for favoured areas.
Gordon Brown signed a contract which meant it was cheaper to build the thing and throw it away than to stop work. Rosyth is in the neighbouring constituency to his. I think there may be a link.
That's the one my lad has just spent two years on. However the final decision is in:
They're replacing the tasks with the new ones available 15th September but anyone who has already started on the existing tasks can submit the work providing their teachers give their names to the exam board by the end of September.
It looks like it's just the usual departmental turf wars. A bit of a disappointment but no real surprise.
I am slightly worried about the DWP, especially as they've been doing a Sir Humphrey over the whole UC thing, but then even that's a default position.
Sean, I agree with most of that except the first sentence. MS came up with an app launcher for perfectly decent reasons but they inflicted it on the user base in the way they did out of pure arrogance.
A while ago I wrote: "...I reckon a fair few of my users would be happy with TIFKAM if they discovered it for themselves. If I imposed it by diktat - not a chance." Nothing I've seen since then has made me change my mind.
What I'd like to see is a drop down at logon so you could choose between "Classic" and "Modern". I'm not holding my breath.
An engineering graduate writes an article about some social science research. The research suggests social science graduates are more likely to get a job. The engineering graduate notes it's likely to be a crap one.
In the ensuing discussion, everyone views any subject they didn't do as:
(1) Piss easy
(2) Deathly dull
I'm no exception.
" In 2013, one simply doesn't need a 20 year monopoly in order to make money off of a better mousetrap. "
mmm...depends on the industry. When Dyson prosecuted Hoover for infringement in 2000 it was over a patent dating back to 1980. Dyson itself wasn't founded until 1993.
The original idea behind the patent system was a deal - the state gives you a time limited monopoly on your invention and in return you tell everyone how it's works. If how it's works is in the public domain then what's the point of giving you a monopoly?
There's a lot to criticise about how it works now (and I expect some choice examples in this thread) but the underlying idea is sound. Before patents new inventions would be kept as trade secrets the extreme case being forceps in child birth which one family kept under wraps for 150 years.
It has been since 2006. Originally it was the Special Irish Branch until they decided it wasn't just the Fenians they wanted to keep an eye on.
They're not uncommon here either.
I resolve the microwave issue by not bothering. We don't use it as a clock so I don't see the point. In fact the only clock I bother with is my wife's alarm clock which is easy.
Oddly enough I think they did. I was reading the Official Secrets Act earlier (as you do). Section 8 - Safeguarding of Information has provisions in it for "an official direction to return or dispose of" confidential information. The alternative would be to prosecute under section 6 (informational given in confidence to other states).
To be honest, I don't think they care that much what the Guardian has on its servers - it knew what to details to redact and those servers aren't going anyway soon. I think the real concern was what could be left on the train by a pissed hack. Of course they could have wiped the drives but then 5 minutes with a lump hammer is much more fun.
So instead of prosecuting them under section 6 of the Official Secrets Act 1989 (up to 2 years inside plus fine) they gave an official direction for its return or disposal (under section 8) - which had they ignored it would have earned them up to 3 months.
"...for the umpteenth time the concern is that personal data is destroyed in line with ISO 27001: 2005. We accept, albeit reluctantly, that you have the data and will run stories based on it. Even you realise that there's some things that shouldn't be broadcast or you wouldn't redact them."
"So you're not going to arrest me?"
"No", Agent Smith sighed "we're not going to arrest you. We just want to make sure that equipment you no longer need is disposed of securely".
...20 minutes and 3 wrong turns later...
The big boss was clearly confused, as he struggled to remember my name. "This is er....our...er..."
"Hello Dave, what brings you down here?"
"Security audit basically. We need to make sure you don't leak the data that was leaked to you. If I could take a copy of the secure destruction certificates I'll be on my way."
"No can do...we do it in-house I'm afraid. Stephen can show you if you like?" I say as I pick up the Head Beancounter's Macbook
...Five minutes of the PFY with a sledge hammer later...
"I think I can safely say that's securely destroyed" said Dave as he brushed plastic fragments from his suit.
"So everything's OK" said the Big Boss
"Yes, we can call off the black helicopters. Thanks Simon - pint later?"
I think I've found your problem - it's not mod.gov.uk it's just mod.uk - which then redirects to https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-defence .
Well it's a thing certainly...
As it stands, if I replaced Office with LibreOffice I would get away with minimal grumbling but if I switched them from Outlook to Thunderbird I'd have a user revolt. In the future, as more of them use other endpoints, that may change.
For me though, our membership & accounts system is a bigger hurdle. There are viable alternatives (CiviCRM for one) but until I reach a point where I can justify the switching cost we're stuck with it.
"...what exactly does Office 2013 offer me that LibreOffice doesn't?"
Still not dead...
I'm still getting updates...
I think they're awful but SWMBO who drinks a lot more tea than I do loves 'em. She has been known to kick off when I buy decent tea instead.
...he should be taken a bit more seriously.
No, he shouldn't, he takes himself far too seriously already.
Funnily enough the same question came up almost 2 years ago when they nicked the lad. I think I can quote from a post I made then:
"The guy's had "issues" since he was small. Diagnosis of the sort of disorders we talking about is a bit hit and miss (see last week's New Scientist article "Bipolar Kids") and we could reasonably argue about what label to pin on him but you don't end up at an EBD school if you're playing with a full deck. Unless you all think he was planning his future defence aged 5."
I should have said at the time EBD = Emotional & Behavioral Difficulties
In case no one's noticed the Two Cultures thing is going strong. And Cameron in common with all of the current crop of politicians is from the other one. The reason he sounds a bit ignorant is because he is.
However despite the fact he doesn't really know what he's talking about it I think they're moving in the right direction. A few years ago my daughter did GCSE ICT and it was pathetic, essentially just MS Office training. My youngest is currently doing GCSE Computing and it certainly isn't. His school also opted out of the GCSE as not being hard enough and instead use the iGCSE for the sciences.
I have more sympathy with the criticism of Cameron's comments on Maths. Arithmetic shouldn't need to be the focus at GCSE level and children should leave primary school with the ability to add, subtract, multiply and divide. Unfortunately many of them don't. How we square that particular circle I don't know.
I think it may have something to do with a post on their site a few weeks ago, where they had a 10 year old testing some of the returns. It quotes an issue with people using an out of date image (or in one case not flashing an SD card at all) sending multiple units back.
This isn't about taking away the learning curve, it's about getting them as far as the bottom.
The more I read about the trial, the more I expect the judge to start proceedings wearing the black cap (to save time later) and to introduce Manning as "the Flanders pigeon murderer".
It's framed on the underlying assumption that MSFT's patents have some legal basis.
No it's not. It's framed on the underlying assumption that veiled hints about litigation to come were enough for GUI projects who might be at risk to cover their arses.
MSFT didn't need to prove its case - in fact it didn't even need to go to court. It just needed people to believe it could and that litigation costs would be significant. There's not a lot of point fighting if the best you're going to manage is a pyrrhic victory.
I'd be happy if they were at least up front about it. "You will serve 2 to 8 months, subject to behaviour" is easier to take than "you will serve 8 months" and then they're out after 2.
Shotgun gun barrels were proofed to ~4 ton per square inch whilst rifle barrels were done up to ~18 ton per square inch. From a quick google, 1 tsi is about 130 atmopheres.
SWMBO has pet ducks and chickens, who produce so many eggs that the excess pays for their food. I was also daft enough to get her an incubator for Christmas so we've 6 or 7 who aren't old enough to lay yet.
Whilst our egg consumption has gone through the roof she won't eat chicken any more.
No, I'm afraid I didn't.
I had the funny idea that "...I didn't mean to make a fraudulant claim but they said it didn't work on the reg and thought I'd test it" would be much of a defence.
But hey don't let me stop you, feel free.
The site's from 2009...at least that's what the pop-up says when you hit the "Crown Copyright" link.
If you were to try and "Launch services and benefits online" with a modern browser (Chrome 26.0.1410.64 say) then a pop up would appear allowing you to claim services and benefits online.
I realise that's not the disaster we'd been banking on. Ah well.
Be careful what you wish for.
It would leave SWMBO with a lot of free time to discus relationships (..shudder...).