7 posts • joined Friday 14th August 2009 04:12 GMT
ESXi on Mac Mini server 16Gb
I am going to get a Mac Mini server, upgrade to 16GB and run ESXi on it for about 4 VM's.
We are a home shop, so power constraints are my biggest concern. The Mini will only ever
draw 80 watts maximum, so that is within my power allocation with the other computers.
I want to use ESXi as there are benefits down the track if I need to grow the infrastructure more.
Our home systems are all Mac, but as I work in the UNIX realm, need a couple of Linux
and Solaris VM's to work with. The ESX image needs a couple of tweaks to work with the
Mini, but there are images out there already pretweaked - google it!
long time user.
I was using CDE on Solaris SPARC until January this year, when my Sun workstation was finally
replaced by an iMac with Lion on it. I used to always get comments from various co-workers that I was actually a dinosaur, but consultants were always impressed by my ability to navigate, admin and modify CDE to do
my bidding and look the way I liked...... Now the iMac gets a lot of comment - I am apparently not a dinosaur
anymore but a clueless hipster with aspirations toward wearing black and making everyone else jealous with
the very shiny 27" screen.....
No to the Murdoch Empire
I am glad this happened. Regardless of the leaks,
Murdoch does not deserve to represent my country given his
endorsement of Right Wing media politics. I do not want such an organisation responsible
for the message that is sent out to Asia and the region. Such affairs require a fit and proper person,
not an all consuming mogul empire looking for more ways to skin a buck.
Let's just save Sun first
I'm a big user customer of Solaris. I would have to say that I have a career made out of it. I am quite interested in seeing Oracle save Sun as the technology stack Sun has collected over the years is just to good to break out and sell off or obsolete in parts - so that will tell you where my viewpoint will come from.
When Sun bought Mysql, there was a lot of upset in the Open Source community, but I did not see Monty complaining about the payout at that point. I am certain that Sun and the representatives for the Mysql company would have had arduous negotiations prior to the sellout of the IP and branding.
I do not recall at any point reading that the Mysql reps argued about what Sun could/could not
do with Mysql after they bought it, otherwise we would already have seen several lawsuits
for breach of contract or whatever the legal jargon is for when you do a deal and then break
the terms and conditions of that deal. Now I suppose there had to have been a "cooling off"
period prior to the Mysql buyout by Sun and I suppose that has passed.
So that basically leaves Monty with is $1.5b or whatever it was and Sun got something it
probably could have just licensed for a lot less.
Now it is all a moot point. Sun is now in the hands of a bigger fish. Oracle bought Sun,
not a bunch of components. Mysql is a brand but it is also basically just another part of the Sun
product suite now, just like any Sun product that was acquired from another party. The Sun guys I spoke to love Mysql and have suggested that it will remain under a GPL style agreement but I do not know how far that will go.
I think it is unlikely Oracle will rename Mysql in the short term - Sun I believe would have. We would probably see (under an existent Sun) something like "Sun JES 7.5 Application Database Layer 5.1.4" or similar brain numbing nomenclature. Oracle will probably maintain the Mysql
name for a bit and then I reckon it will become something else, perhaps "Oracle Application Services Database" just like they have used Apache to do "Oracle Application Server" and the like.
Monty has a fork. He knows what he can do with it. But he took money for his product
and has to live with that fact. I reckon he's just sorry he didn't ask for more......
The Fail is for Monty - I don't feel sorry for him. I am annoyed that Oracle just have not been given full permission to acquire Sun already so I can stop watching people panic everytime
the hold up is mentioned in the media.
A good time to mention
Gibson is now owned by the evil Henry Juszkiewicz. He ruined some big deals in the
music tech industry. Have a look on the web for what Gibson did to Oberheim, Opcode
and a poor person by the name of Lynx Crowe.
Mine is Evil Bill, since Henry Juszkiewicz can't be properly seen in a mirror, or photographed.
- Xmas Round-up Ten top tech toys to interface with a techie’s Christmas stocking
- It's true, the START MENU is coming BACK to Windows 8, hiss sources
- Google embiggens its fat vid pipe Chromecast with TEN new supported apps
- Pic NASA Mars tank Curiosity rolls on old WET PATCH, sighs, sniffs for life signs
- Microsoft: Don't listen to 4chan ... especially the bit about bricking Xbox Ones