448 posts • joined 19 Aug 2009
Don't often find myself praising the BBC
However, on this occasion, they're doing the right thing. Google seem to be vulnerable/defending themselves from disgruntled competitors but it seems to me that the right to be forgotten is nonsensical. The example cited by the BBC themselves is a case in point.
As the crims themselves say (apparently) if you can't stand the time don't do the crime.
If you do something that attracts public attention you didn't do it in private. No doubt there are counter examples (e.g., Max Mosley might have interesting tastes but he was indulging in private and he was stitched up) but English Law at least, is based on remedies not rights.
face palm, who cares?
"UK Music has claimed that the reforms will cost musicians £58 million a year in lost revenues."
Just quoting but is there a provision for self-parody? If not will UK Music be suing itself?
micro v macro
Has the discussion on reliable OSes moved on from Tanenbaum-Torvalds debate?
For me it seems that it's all about risk - you throw it over the fence and hope it doesn't come back to bite you (micro) or you attempt to contain it and avoid getting bitten (macro). Neither approach eliminates the problem
learning from history (not)
In 2011 one of those think tanks published a study for digital government "System+Error" lots of hoopla and government support at the time
In "making the case for change" the report begins by highlighting online vehicle road tax as an example of successful IT. Unfortunately on the day the study was published the DVLA site was "down for essential maintenance" screenshot for posterity.
If you know the notes to sing, you can sing most anything
Re: Why not
pay your taxes first. Until that point we don't care Apple
It's not clear to me that the Linux kernel, or X, KDE, Gnome, Libre Office (list continues on p93) are in need of TODO.
Let's not forget that Facebook and Twitter also contribute to improving open source infrastructure. Possibly there are niche projects that might benefit. However, TBH, this feels like an initiative in search of a reason.
how will LG's spinners present this?
Or will they just hang the execs out to dry?
Re: Bigger Losses
You actually have to pay the rent.
So while Amazon will be able to deduct it from their earnings they will only save the %age rate of corporation tax - JUST like every other company.
Unless you are aware of some cunning asset stripping plan, in which case you are either in tax planning or should consider a career change.
Cycle helmets need ventilation slots
As with bikinis the less you get the more you pay.
From the photograph it all looks pretty solid (unlike motorcycle crash helmets, they don't protect your head from anything really serious) which would make it fairly uncomfortable for anyone travelling so far or so fast as to actually benefit from wearing it.
Solve that and it looks interesting.
And how much of this is from open source providers?
And not Microsoft Windows based?
However, as El Reg predicted: UK.gov's Open Source switch WON'T get rid of Microsoft, y'know
Re: Google are no angels ..
Google are a profit maximising enterprise just like many organisations.
However, they appear to want to win by open competition and do quite a lot to make life easier for others that fancy their chances in open competition, for example Google shields open source cloud tech from patent trolls" versus "Really? Apple's lawsuit against Google is REVIVED"
Is Google my friend? Who knows. Luckily they seem to be my enemy's enemy.
why look a gift horse in the mouth?
Everything we know is wrong
"A highly influential paper by Dr John Ioannidis at Stanford University called "Why most published research findings are false" argues that fewer than half of scientific papers can be believed, and that the hotter a scientific field (with more scientific teams involved), the less likely the research findings are to be true. He even showed that of the 49 most highly cited medical papers, only 34 had been retested and of them 41 per cent had been convincingly shown to be wrong. And yet they were still being cited."
BBC Radio 4 listen again
Then there's Retraction Watch
See their FAQ So why write a blog on retractions?
Re: They've got you...
There's interesting case law about this. For example Knuller v DPP (1973) HL
There exists a common law conspiracy to corrupt public morals and outrage public decency.
D published a magazine containing advertisements for homosexual acts amongst consenting adults.
Conspiracy to corrupt public morals ... really means to corrupt the morals of such members of the public as may be influenced by the matter published' by D, with 'corrupt' being synonymous with 'deprave' or amounting to 'conduct which a jury might find to be destructive of the very fabric of).
Regarding the offence of outraging public decency: 'the substantive offence ... must be committed in public', i.e. before more than one person. "'Outraging public decency" goes considerably beyond offending the susceptibilities of, or even shocking, reasonable people'.
Obiter... it's based on Shaw v DPP which was quite an interesting and relatively famous case as he had sought clarification from plod as to what would be ok before he published.
On the other hand some argue (pdf) this is contrary to Section 7 ECHR.
better value for money...
Does anyone actually know what "better value for money" actually means? Until then a requirement to "comply unless" is vacuous.
Actually, "value for money" is part of the boiler-plate in the topsy-turvy world of the rules of appointing Departmental Accounting Officers; the ones who have to report to HM Treasury on how the money has been spent.
Imagine having an accounting officer who did not have to achieve value for money? But we need to know what they value before we know what is better.
no it isn't
<funny>this is a joke</funny>
"For similar reasons, Novell's dalliance with MS a few years ago may have done them no favours"
Paying customers looking for interoperability?
Or those ranting from the sidelines who didn't notice it was Novell that stepped up and spent seven years in a lawsuit defending the Linux kernel from an MS and Sun funded attack.
never thought it would happen, hoping it finally has
I want to congratulate them, but I'm several times bitten, now shy.
However, the word "must" in the official guidance is particularly encouraging.
Re: But Who gets the patent.
For the hard of reading the answer is in the penultimate paragraph:
"All intellectual property for the winning designs will remain with the inventors."
let's remember some history
2007 the accountants: HMRC's 10-year IT contract balloons to £8.5 billion
2012 the techies If HMRC’s experience is anything to go by, outsourcing can, in the long-term, at least triple an organisation’s IT costs.
Francis Maude failed to do anything about it but luckily a Parliamentary Select Committee has noticed so who knows what might happen next
Re: so how are you therefore entitled to compensation?
"...is a shocking abuse of process, and one which may well be found to be unlawful, when reviewed against the UKs undertakings to the European Convention on Human Rights..."
You are just grandstanding. Parliament is sovereign and ultimately makes the law. Democracy changes Parliaments.
If something has got out of control then retrospective legislation is used. It's not new, albeit rare. It has been used to undermine aggressive tax avoidance schemes
Come back and condemn that and then I'll listen to you about welfare reform
By the way from the article "The judge also pointed out that retrospective legislation was not prohibited by human rights law, although there is a strong presumption against it"
"It's not that they inherently WANT to work in lower paying jobs"
such as programming?
...I succumbed in order to watch the final series of Breaking Bad after crashing the box set 1-5: sad, I know.
Got a month free trial (actually wasn't expecting that, felt faintly guilty). Yes they asked for my c/card details. I cancelled after watching BB6 free; it was extraordinarily easy.
Received a polite email regretting me leaving reminding me (in terms) that I had approximately 20 days left and I should feel free to indulge.
Perfect marketing. Netflix will be my supplier of choice should I ever subscribe to a streaming service
"Plus the world service is still a great service"
Perhaps not universally known BBC WS is/was a window out to the world (funnily enough...) and used to be funded by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
It is/was remarkably high quality - e.g., IMHO, best election coverage in 2010, thoughtful and without ranty point scoring politicians shouting over each other.
Now it's funded out of the licence fee - I hope but don't hold out much hope that it will stay as good. Already there is increased programme sharing with R4
history repeating itself
I seem to recall another government project in which all the technology was junked and it was only rescued when those involved came out of retirement and rescued stuff they'd stashed away
what is it that people are watching, that needs this level of tech?
I recently watched Waterloo Bridge using my DVD player; the one Vivian Leigh thought was her best film. B&W, monaural sound, probably fairly rubbish picture definition. A truly gripping film. I think it had something to do with the screenplay and the quality of the acting, but I might be wrong.
Re: I read this as...
I was reminded of a comment by the late John Mortimer QC to the effect that he preferred having to defend murderers rather than act in divorce. With the former, once the deed had been done there was a sense of finality. With the latter he'd get a ranty phone call at any hour of the night along the lines of "do something, he's only gone and taken the toaster"
@Anonymous Coward - While I'm not sure which point of mine you are riposting, if you dig even deeper still you'll find that all draft legislation is scrutinised for constitutional implications. So yes you're right, all statute law forms part of the constitution, but only in the sense that they're not making it up as they go along.
"Is there really legislation that says anything written down in a contract overrides all other laws?"
It's actually the complete opposite: contract law is essentially common law, non-statute. Its structure has been sorted out through legal dispute over time.
Legislation is used to trim the enforceability of a contract
I've used iFixit - they're amazing
Friend's son's Apple laptop - dead, obviously a power supply problem, couldn't swap battery as short term measure with his sister's Apple laptop as they were not interchangeable (natch).
Apple "genius" - "it needs a new logic board £600" (about 10p less than a new laptop) - iFixit second user dc conditioning thingy - about $29 IIRC and $10 IIRC air freight - arrived three days later. With aid of iFixit guide - about 90 minutes work
Re: Ray Winstone
Where are the Time Lords when you need them?
I'm fairly sure patent dispute shenanigans contravene the First Law of Time creating a distortion of history
Re: Of course the ICO...
"Yes, they should. And, giving a huge wodge of donated cash to a Quango does this... how exactly?"
The ICO a quasi-judicial body and it issues fines for infractions.
BPAS charges for its services and advises on how to get the NHS to fund it.
Donations in 2012 were £9000 and fees for services were £26,380,000 see page 12
Its objective is to get more NHS funding see page 7
Three people were paid between £100,000 and £130,000 see page 20. I'm sure everyone else is on minimum wage and no-one, not even the consultant surgeons, does it for the money.
Perhaps all fines should be abolished as once someone has "been told" they won't do it again?
Re: Of course the ICO...
If we're discussing money, the charity gets tax breaks in order to meet its charitable objectives.
I should imagine given BPS claim Confidentiality means that what a woman says to bpas staff stays private" they have failed to meet their charitable objectives.
So, do nothing? because it's charadee?
The trustees are personally liable for the charity. No-one forced them to become trustees. Let them find out they should have taken the role seriously.
Most tin shakers are out of work actors on a day rate. A government study showed that it takes eighteen months of the average direct debits to recover the cost of recruiting a new donor.
BPAS are "horrified"...
...according to the 1 o'clock news.
Not because they couldn't find their arse with both hands, nor that they didn't have a clue how much information they were actually storing insecurely.
but at the size if the fine.
Let's ask one of the women who had an abortion in circumstances where confidentiality were paramount.
It will be quite easy to find one, apparently.
Let's hope the trustees work out they're personally liable and are supposed to take this stuff seriously
Kolab originated as a security measure by the German security services
10 years ago, precisely to deal with the concerns we are seeing with the NSA, GCHQ and back doors.
It's all part of the KDE ecosystem - though it's available for other desktops (for some reason KDE never seems to get the coverage c.f Sanity now: Gnome 3.12 looking sensible)
so, if I understand your arguement correctly
TOH gives you options that are not available with other devices but because you have to pick the one or two TOHs you need for your day's activities you'd rather not have the options at all?
May I just mention KDE...
...Qt5, Frameworks 5 etc...
- Review Xperia Z3: Crikey, Sony – ANOTHER flagship phondleslab?
- Pics Whisper tracks its users. So we tracked down its LA office. This is what happened next
- Human spacecraft dodge COMET CHUNKS pelting off Mars
- Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
- Downrange Are you a gun owner? Let us in OR ELSE, say Blighty's top cops