Well, now we know:
BT = Back Tomorrow.
658 posts • joined 14 May 2007
BT = Back Tomorrow.
It's for this reason that C89 is still alive and well -.and long may it continue to be. I have a subscription to the Intel compilers for Windows, Linux and FreeBSD - and I've noticed that even the latest standard for C has become horribly complex and C++ - like.
As for C++, that has become a clusterfart beyond all recognition - and for those who are still blissfully unaware of its unmitigated horrors, I would recommend a shufti at the following presentation:
I think Benjamin Franklin was more succinct:
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
It's still as true today as it was when it was first written in 1755: Human nature has not changed.
Juniper probably saved a lot of money avoiding security audits of its code. A shame, however, because I would say it's probably going to cost them what they saved (and a whole lot more) in lost customer loyalty.
As is FreeBSD (particularly the idea of running Linux-based apps like these in FreeBSD jails, with access to a ZFS volume loopback-mounted over NFS.)
SELinux isn't much protection against an attacker with root access!
These days, they will just disable your badge - and you won't get past the automated barriers.
...I'm having the last laugh.
Who would have thought that "continued support and updates" would turn out to be such a liability?
Will it include the ability to visit Web pages without the message "A problem occurred with this web page so it was reloaded" constantly appearing?
I always liked Haiku's (formerly BeOS) error messages, viz:
Three things are certain:
Death, taxes, and lost data.
Guess which has occurred.
Pay 20% up front, and a recursive tax return is required to prove what profit is taxable. (Easily enough done with modern technology. It's one of the prime jobs computers were invented for in the first place!)
If the money happens to pass through a tax haven, where profit and cost can't be conclusively proved, then there is no eligibility for a tax refund on the 20% advance paid - and the tax would therefore be 20%. Quite soon, tax havens would find themselves going out of business, because the black holes in corporate accounts would instantly turn from being a huge asset into a huge liability, overnight.
Companies automatically respond to financial stimulus (that's capitalism for you), and if you make something more profitable, you can bet that companies will end up taking that route. Make opaque accounting hideously expensive, and firms will stop doing it.
They only have themselves to blame, because they aren't producing kit that people want to buy. Just cheap crap for the consumer market.
I have a 2009-vintage Fujitsu Celsius H270. It was one of the last models they made with a sensible screen resolution (1920x1200) - pretty much all their "workstation" laptops are now with "consumer" screen resolutions with a 16:9 ratio. I don't know who in their marketing department approved that decision, but they must have been snorting something pretty good at the time. From a workstation user's point of view, It's pretty crap - as even if I wanted to edit HD video, I'd need extra vertical resolution, so the buttons and menu bar would fit on the screen alongside the footage.
So, instead of replacing it with a faster model, it got a new 1TB Samsung 850 Pro SSD. My god, what a difference it made! I'll probably get a few more years of life out of that laptop, yet. Fujitsu's loss became Samsung's gain.
"IT is so expensive because the labour is so cheap."
"An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure."
Security is almost a zero-sum game, but it's asymmetrical: What you do not spend on security will be taken out of your wallet by the hackers, but you will lose more to hack attacks than it would ever have cost you to spend on defences.
The problem for managers and beancounters is that security risks are a latent threat, and they do not appear on balance sheets, where they can easily be seen and budgeted for.
Please tell that to the good people of Sheffield, Liverpool and Hull.
Inflation has been restrained because Western countries have pursued heavily deflationary policies, like offshoring jobs to the Far East, et cetera. Even today, an Indian coming from India to work in the UK has a huge tax advantage over a native Brit, because the playing field is stacked in their favour: The Indian gets to use tax structures and benefits not available to local Brits, and while it means they can be only in the UK for a total of 51 weeks, most UK employers are quite happy to chop and change every year, if it means they get cheaper staff.
Manufacturing has been totally decimated, and many services positions are in the process of being offshored as well. When this is finished, there won't be anyone left earning money with which to buy any of these "cheap" products or services from overseas.
4K native drives won't work on XP, period, unless you run them through a RAID controller that presents the raw disk blocks as 512-byte blocks.
512E (4K emulation) drives will work on XP (but are not supported officially), and they will work even better if you use Diskpart to align the first partition to a 64K+ boundary before installing the operating system (however, that requires extra buggerment factor, because you need to boot with a Windows OPK to prep the system before you boot with the CD media to install the operating system itself.) But it does work very well.
Windows 7 does take the aforementioned buggerment factor out of the equation by automatically aligning the first partition to a 1MB boundary. However, like XP, Windows 7 does not support 4K native drives - so, as far as 4K native drives are concerned, Windows 7 users are in the same boat at XP users.
See this page:
They will stop selling them, because Microsoft will lean on them to stop selling them, just as they have leaned on Intel to make it extremely difficult to find drivers for XP x64 and Windows Server 2003 x64 for Ivy Bridge kit, which *is* officially supported on that platform.
What's the commercial advantage for Intel to reduce demand for its kit?
The drivers *are* out there, on Intel's site, but you won't find the latest ones with a simple search. Using the search will get you drivers from 2008, which certainly won't support Ivy Bridge. Yet it one knows the version number to look for, Google finds the requisite page quite easily - even if Intel has done a slap-up job of trying to hide it.
If it's being done to XP x64 and Server 2003 x64 now, it's not too much of a leap of the imagination to figure that it'll also be done to Windows 7, when the time comes.
Windows 7 will be going the way of the dodo when manufacturers stop selling hard disk drives with 512-byte sector emulation. 4k sectors are now the standard, and Windows 7 won't ever support them.
Just... well... you know, in case. :)
The answer is because Microsoft employs more people who think like this:
Speed is irrelevant. When an EMP renders most Western-based equipment obsolete, the ability to manufacture a machine that goes even at 800MHz will be beyond the capabilities of many in the West.
In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king: When we are returned to the stone age, even a Commodore 64 will represent a huge technology leap for the masses - let alone an Elbrus.
Not quite true: I have been building plenty of PCs - and they all had FreeBSD installed on them. One of the luxuries of putting together your own kit is the option of not having to pay the old Microsoft tax.
Most of the Xeons in my abode (and I have a couple dozen of them) were made in Malaysia and Costa Rica. Those are the 22nm Ivy Bridge Xeons (E3-1280v2s and E3-1265Lv2s respectively) - so we're not talking about ancient history, here.
I anticipate a huge change in the popularity of server, ATX, microATX and mini-ITX platforms based around the OpenPower platform. That would be a walking nightmare for Intel, a boon for Microsoft and not much of a big deal for Linux.
"Took MS 20 yeas to play catch up and they still haven't replicated all of the functionality yet."
Nor all of the 20+ year old vulnerabilities in X, either. Still, that hasn't stopped them from trying. :)
They certainly want to outlaw (or, for the pedantic, mandate backdoors in - which is another way of outlawing) encryption, thus seriously limiting the market for people skilled in information security.
If memory serves, the encouraging of mass immigration, IR35 and some special tax exemptions for Indian staff also limited the market for people with high-end IT skills, and the result is plain to see: They're now mostly working for (and paying taxes to) foreign countries.
I'm not UK born and bred - I hail from what is now Zimbabwe, and merely spent 22 years in the UK, but I largely agree with your experience: UK management is generally composed of myopic, egotistic navel-gazers.
They are a significant part of why I left: One learns from working with people who are better than you, not people who are worse.
Greetings from Switzerland, BTW.
Supply and demand meet at a place called price, as the saying goes.
Unfortunately, too many so-called execs seem to be ignorant of the properties of the price discovery mechanism: As anyone in Venezuela could tell you, when you fix the price of toilet paper (and other commodities most people take for granted), the result is an immediate supply shortage.
Can't have been much of a financial planner!
No, all they need to do is produce a product that people would actually want to pay for.
Please get over yourself. I run BSD on my Panasonic TV, Playstation 3 and, as it happens, on my web and FreeNAS servers, too. What most penguinistas are quick to forget is that the technology world functioned perfectly well without Linux, and many viable (and superior, to boot) alternatives to Linux exist, even today.
I will not be handing back anything.
Not true: Said customer base usually has a workflow that they would like to keep, rather than wanting to throw all productivity out of the window for the sake of nothing more than aesthetics.
If you had ever really worked for a living in the technology arena, this would have been obvious to you. Unfortunately, the technology industry has long begun to resemble the fashion industry - for all the wrong reasons.
Everything you want to run != everything other people want to run
I know that might come as a shock to you, but Linux has a ~2% desktop market share for a very good reason. Even OS X, which requires an extremely expensive fruit-themed dongle, has more market share on the desktop than Linux - and cost has absolutely nothing to do with it.
It's happening in many industries: Proper testing is expensive, and - as it turns out - completely unnecessary, because the lazy and apathetic customer base will no longer punish you for making them alpha-test your products.
You can't blame Microsoft, et al for learning (and then applying) this.
I want to see senior staff (like the CEO) doing porridge for an appropriate period of time (1 day in chokey for every customer affected seems reasonable to me.)
Only when these nitwits see a clear link between their own responsibility (which must be enforced!) - and their own personal actions, will they enforce the kind of corporate policies that will help to keep themselves out of jail.
Technology has nothing to do with bugs.
Bugs are merely a symptom of the kind of tolerances we have developed for bad quality products, and our greed in wanting to see (or sell) a product before it is ready. You can see what bad buying habits have brought about: Cheap crap everywhere, no quality control and no attention paid to detail. Even Apple, which was once prized for quality, is now missing beats on hardware design and operating system bugs that interfere with even basic functionality.
When buying habits change, so will the quality and quantity of bugs. Until that happens, though, I expect the problem to get worse. Technology cannot help us if we're willing to continue paying good money for shit quality.
rm -- -rf (or rm -rf -- * if you want to recursively delete everything in a directory) will do the trick.
SMF also has a decent debugging facility: If your service did not start, you can ask it why - and get a sensible answer.
I've long gotten used to the fact that software is getting steadily worse, and it's mostly down to crappy design decisions, rather than poor coding. My work laptop forced an install of Lync 2013, which has roughly the same feeling as typing on a text terminal operating at 9600 baud. As if that wasn't enough, gads and gads of screen real estate are just wasted - as if I could never have too much.
It's karma. Or something...
"I think we're starting to see this in the UK already, too many people not enough jobs, yes some of that is due to lax immigration policies but also a lot of jobs have disappeared due to automation already."
Ebola is planned to fix that.
I say "is planned", because rather than letting the disease die out, most Western countries seem fairly intent on shipping infected bodies (or soon-to-be-bodies) to Europe/USA, where the infection then spreads.
Even our ancestors had the good sense to check for infections at ports of entry.
Windows 7 does not support native 4k sector hard discs, though - and it will be useless when you can no longer find 512e drives ("Advanced Format", but with 512-byte sector emulation.)
Windows 8 *does* support 4k native sector drives, but it has all the appeal of a three-headed Alsation.
The biggest argument in favour of FLAC is that it's future-proof: It will keep your music in its original fidelity until something much better comes along.
Assuming some real breakthroughs come along in the future (which is reasonable enough to assume, given similar breakthroughs in the past), would you want artifacts imposed by TWO encoding systems (MP3 + whatever else comes along), or would you just want to recompress the music from a lossless FLAC archive and get the best out of the new format?
I know what I'd prefer: Ripping CDs is hard work, slow and very boring.
Interesting that you imply Windows is the only alternative: It clearly shows the limits of your thinking.
To paraphrase Oscar Wilde, to have one level-10 vulnerability in one year in open source software is unfortunate - to have two in one year looks like carelessness.
Pay peanuts, get monkeys; pay nothing, get what you deserve. :)
The real reason is probably that Microsoft decided to save a buck or ten by outsourcing testing and quality assurance to a certain country with a fondness for curry and a cultural tendency to "fix" the test case so code passes - rather than fix the code so it passes the test case.
As a stalwart Windows XP x64 user, I'm breathing a sigh of relief that XP updates stopped in April!
It's a brave new world out there - and just as well, too. :)
I remember an excellent Outlook plug-in called CryptoEx by a German firm called Glück & Kanja. I worked for Siemens, back in the day, and they used it for encrypting commercially-sensitive e-mail. I really wanted to buy a licence, so I looked into it.
PGP Corporation bought the rights to CryptoEx and promptly took it off the market.
As far as I'm concerned, PGP Corporation's issues with user-friendliness are entirely self-inflicted.
Security is not a profit centre, so the beancounters will not give it any attention.
Even when a security breach causes untold damage to reputation, customers have not learned to leave - so ultimately, the issue doesn't affect anyone who cares.
That's the price of apathy.
I frequently use Google to get access to company web pages, because most firms have such an atrocious Web structure that it's far, far easier to find the page you're looking for via Google than to try and find it from their home page.
In many cases, educating end users is not the solution: It's Webmasters who need to be (re)educated.
It was entirely predictable (I should know, I've been predicting this since 1992.)
Britain is not a country that can claim forward planning as a plausible competency. What you see today is the result.
If you think that's bad, just wait until the Russians start cutting off EU gas supplies and start parking a few of their submarines near your LNG terminals.
Yes, and no: The user profile location is indeed kept on the network, but is cached on the local disk - so network performance is less of an issue than it might seem. (It also allows me to log in from home over a VPN - I'd be a bit stuffed if my profile and documents were only available over the network.)
In any case, the same pause can be seen on non-domained Windows 7 PCs with more than a few files in the Documents folder. By comparison, my XP x64 folder is overflowing with files, yet I don't have to wait ~5 minutes every time I open the folder after logging in.