RE:Let's have it then
okay it's 127.0.0.1 ... there's no place like 127.0.0.1
112 publicly visible posts • joined 30 Jul 2009
My mistake I had presumed that the cities that the US bombed were a lot more populous. So I revise my previous estimate. Going from the wikipedia article it looks like between 150,000 and 246,000 perished in that attack. Then you can add in 200,000+ from Chernobyl, although some estimates are much higher.
So while I may have been inaccurate in my first post, this is still many times the number of people who have perished from any other source of energy we use, except possibly hydroelectric, where dam failures can wipe out entire valleys.
My point remains Valid that nuclear is far more dangerous than other 'human activities' as the consequences have not played out. We still have thousands of years to go just to conatin the deadly waste products.
We also have to contend with the very high risk of some hothead pushing the button (again) and nuking one or more cities.
As for environmental damage, all the nuclear testing has destroyed on entire island, and who knows how many hundreds of square miles of land, along with all the creatures and plants.
Solar is still a better answer, especially plants that can perform at 70% or more of their capacity at night.
"Operating nuclear power stations is not just very safe, or safer than other methods of generating power. It has to be one of the safest forms of activity undertaken by the human race".
I have to disagree, you need to consider the experiments and so forth that lead up to this technology as well as the waste products and consequences. So far millions have died, and millions more horribly sickened because of this 'activity' if you count the use of bombs and the Chernobyl disaster.
The particular nuke tech that the US chose to the exclusion of all others (and the rest of the world followed) is great for making those horrific weapons of mass destruction called 'nuclear weapons'. This particular tech also leaves behind 'spent fuel' that is dangerously radioactive for THOUSANDS of years. In order for your closing statement to be true you need to find a way to guarantee the absolute containment and decay of said waste for the several thousand year duration, without harm to our descendants, or the environment.
Had the US gone with Thorium fluoride molten salt reactors there would be no bombs, and waste products that decayed in only 20 years. What's more the entire industry would have been far less expensive from beginning to end. No high pressure steam cooling is required either, and its even more efficient. As if that wasn't enough these types of reactors can 'burn' the decay products of the current nuke tech the world is using.
Furthermore the thorium design uses the nuclear material as a molten working fluid, in a container with an actively cooled "freeze plug" so that in any emergency the active cooling shuts down and the molten material flows into a shallow tray where it cools and is not a threat. The test reactor built in the 50's demonstrated this method of shutdown every weekend. It was THAT safe!
As for safer activities, or even just safer and more reliable means of power production I STILL petition for SOLAR, and not horribly overpriced PV, or the big fields full of mirrors that someone needs to go clean. BTW both of those solar options can only generate power for about 8 to 10 hours a day.
THE method I'm referring to has been around for about 30 years. And due to its design it can easily provide power 24/7/365. The Aussies came pretty close to building one, but the coal lobbies and politics dragged it down.
Basic design, test plant: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-EvV90MeDY
Someone even came up with a variant design that is about 1/3rd the price of a coal powered plant (KW for KW).
Floating design very inexpensive: http://www.floatingsolarchimney.gr/
Cheers,
Charles
We've been testing IE9 and to be completely blunt, it breaks all kinds of web sites.
It sucks. I think text mode browsers might do a better job.
Even though most of our workstations are 7 or Vista we will NOT be deploying this pig. I can't imagine trying to use this poor excuse for a browser as a lure to upgrade windows.
Just an FYI people, if you want to know exactly how viable solar is, it would only take something like 2% of the worlds uninhabitable deserts to supply humanity's energy needs. Solar updraft towers which have been ignored for 30 years are safer and more reliable than even hydroelectric, and use about the same land area.
Geothermal is another huge energy source that has been almost completely ignored, and is also fully capable of suppling our (relatively small) energy needs easily for the foreseeable future, thousands of years at-least.
So WHY exactly are we having an energy crises?!
A) big fossil fuel companies do their level best to make us all think that 'alternative energy' are wacky, infeasible and expensive. Its called advertising, oh, and the stupid amounts of money spent on lobbying. In reality a few alternate forms of energy are only about 20% more expensive than the subsidized coal and oil sources in use today.
B) the oil/gasoline companies and futures investors LOVE IT when the prices go up, so they limit supply to accomplish this, OR they just by futures contracts up and don't sell till they get a big fat profit. However since peak oil production was in 2007 they don't have to limit this artificially (much) anymore. Also I think the greedy bastards that buy futures contracts should be required to STORE what they've 'bought' (and pay taxes on it) this would put a damper on the prices at the pump.
cheers,
C
Thorium power reactors have a few more advantages.
The first and MAJOR advantage to my thinking is that they can safely 'burn up' existing high level nuclear waste and the waste products produced only need to be stored for a few decades at most.
Another nice thing is that thorium is pretty much evenly distributed so no country would be depending upon any other for energy. For instance the US has enough thorium resources within its borders to last 1000 years if thorium reactors were to be used to fully replace fossil fuels.
There is no energy *shortage*, only an artificially created crises.
I think I can hear them shifting too! It's that grinding noise you hear when someone is learning how to use a stick shift, right?
I'm actually tweaking a new install of Debian 6 right now, its nice.
The Ubuntu software center definitely has performance problems though, after you've installed a half dozen or so apps it starts slowing down, a lot. After a dozen more its queuing up somewhere where you can't see it and takes several minutes to install one app, with a local repository. I got frustrated with it and went back to Synaptic which still works great.
Although for polish and speed nothing has trumped PCLinuxOS, the kernel is compiled using the BFS scheduler. I don't know what kind of magic went into BFS, but its even fairly snappy on a laptop with a 1.6ghz Via C7 (yuck, I won't be getting another one of those).
With one of these baby's you can dice a hard drive if you fancy. I know someone with a CnC plasma cutter, he opens every window, door and the big bay door when he runs it because vaporized metal is decidedly unhealthy.
Here's a video of one :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFT__gESOfc
And its not just senior citizens either! Many people don't get computers all that well, they have other areas of expertise .. and yah some of them are just idiots. Sometimes perfectly competent people are in a hurry and get zapped, it often costs far more in wasted time than "$40 to $60". These a**wipes should have been fined at least 10 times what they were.
Maybe the punishment should include some mobster style 'incentive' to behave. Various appendages could be removed without anesthesia.
I despise people who cause this much stress,wasted time and frustration on a daily basis. Its not just a scam, its also extortion.
</rant>
They use a Solar Updraft Tower, like the one built in the 80's to prove it out...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCGVTYtJEFk
http://www.enviromission.com.au/EVM/content/technology_technologyover.html
These have the advantage of being more reliable than pretty much anything else, also due to the heat retention of the ground under its collection canopy/greenhouse they run 24/365.
A German civil engineer even has designs on the table with up to a 160 year lifespan.
http://www.greentower.net/exec.php
.. and Namibia may be building eight of those.
As anyone may know MS stands for "Maybe Someday"; as in Maybe Someday they will stop screwing the pooch.
MS has *never* gotten anything right and they are far to arrogant to admit or even realize they've ever screwed up. The only ones who don't know this are MS and the people who believe their 'marketing spin'.
They get them reliable. The last WD Black 2.5 drive I bought lasted about 6 weeks and had to be RMA'd. At least with the Bblack series drives they don't replace dead ones with 'refurbished' drives.
For now Samsung has proven to be the most reliable drives for me. I'll wait a few years to see if Seagate redeems themselves from the crap they've been slinging the last few years.
.. before MS bought it. Then (like everything they touch) it turned to "shite". Shortly after MS bought Hotmail (in 1998) I bailed in favor of the yahoo account I've been using with almost no trouble for many years since then.
One wonders if the reason MS bought Hotmail, instead of building their own, is because they could'nt figure out how to make a webmail portal. There was even the time they forgot to pay the domain renewal for "hotmail.com". Great management there!
A significant portion of the time when I email someone with a Hotmail account it takes around 9 + hours to reach them. THAT is a sign that something is VERY wrong. Gmail, Yahoo, or even GoDaddy's crap servers perform far better.
Does MS use Exchange to run hotmail?! That would explain a lot.
.. software out there will still only be compiled for x86, and x86-64. It will take quite some time to get your favorite non-MS apps on the new platform, some may never be ported.
On the plus side some 2.3million malware flotsam will be left hanging :)
My answer is still that after XP, I'm switching to Linux. Because Linux runs on more platforms than the so called engineers at Microsoft have likely ever heard of, and it always will.
What's more NT 4 had a usable GUI, not this bloated slow and convoluted nightmare that MS has dumped on us starting with Vista. Even if it had security holes you could sail a cruise ship through, sideways. Several years ago I found that if I copied the executables for the User Manager and Server Manager to an XP box on the same LAN (not domain, no trust either) that I could merrily manage any of the above with NO domain credentials what-so-ever. Yes it was patched and updated to the max.
Security holes don't get any bigger than that.
Again? Didn't we have an instance last week where MS cloud services screwed the pooch .. AGAIN. They can't seem to keep their own servers from barfing all over the place. They also swing between locking people out of their own email, or just letting anyone at it.
The DOI has my vote for DUMB, and not just your everyday dumb, this is stupidity on a scale I have never seen. Come on, they are concerned that Google's cloud services ARE secure?! WTF?!
The whole idea that they are outsourcing web based email suggests to me that they are *completely incompetent* and are unable to host their own external email .. OR they are so damned lazy that the thought never crossed their minds.
Seriously I work at a small town library (county gov't) and WE are looking at slapping together an email server for internal and external use, sans MS software. Sheesh! Oh and BTW there are at least a few Linux based email servers that FULLY support Outlook.
Oh good, it filters out the loser web sites for me!
So their philosophy extended is if I don't clink on some stupid ad when I go to a web site then I'm stealing?! Get real, and grow up. How petty and stupid can people get?!
Seriously I have a hosts file installed from MVPS AND Ad-block. It doesn't matter if I use Internet Exploiter, soap Opera, or my favorite Firefox (v3.5x BTW), I don't see any of the retarded ads that I'm never going to click on. Most especially those disturbing stretch mark animations that make me want to hurl or any other gross, offensive, or disturbing Internet ads.
... Oh! That reminds me I haven't updated my hosts file in a while.
http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm
I keep a version behind, I like to watch the security fireworks from afar :-p Besides I like for the rest of my add-ons to work too!
I believe IE tab easily defeats whyfirefoxisblocked.com That is if a sad and petty website still had something I needed badly after finding out they block a browser because some FF users don't agree with their philosophy.
Oh, and nano / pico work WELL, since VI was created to torture people. :-p
because Skype uses YOUR computer and internet connections as "supernodes". If you want to try an experiment install it on a laptop, and connect said laptop do your DSL modem. Turn the laptop firewall on and make sure there is no NAT or other firewall. Then sit back and watch the CPU/RAM usage skyrocket .. what you aren't making a call? It'll peg your connection too.
What Skype does is not allowed by the policies of many businesses and government organizations. Its buried in the EULA, but basically Skype's EULA says, in so many words, that they'll use as much of your computing and bandwidth resources as they want for whatever they want. That would be to route calls, as many as your connection and computer can handle. Of course a good router or firewall makes it entirely too difficult for a bunch of connections from other NAT protected computers so most people don't notice.
Read the EULA carefully, our IT department did and had to remove it from several laptops.
Win 7 is nearly as big of a POS as Vista, it just has more shiny. Also it seems MS has found ways to break yet MORE apps, and who is the sick bastard who keeps 're-designing' the UI?!
Seriously, I'm pretty sure it takes about 4 times as much clicking and twice as much thought to get anything done!! You'd think MS doesn't WANT anyone to get things done with windows.
It bluescreens more than XP ever did, at least they don't take as long to boot up as Vista does.
From the perspective of our IT dept, Linux is starting to look more attractive for many functions, especially ones where functionality, stability or security is needed.
As a matter of fact *I CAN*! Oh, BTW Access isn't a real database, its more like MS "Works" in the respect that it does, barely. Even a paltry 100,000 records can easily kill it or hang it up for 10 minutes trying to find something. Oh, and I only have v3.2.0.
And BTW Open Office can access more databases and files than I even knew existed, clear back to "D the Data Language" for DOS .. Mail-merge THAT!
Speaking of geeks ...
That is *pure* gold :)
<rant>
Anyone else think "Microsoft Works" is an oxymoron? MS Office 2007 is pure torture, I get support calls for it on a daily basis, and it has been here for YEARS. And *why* did they take features out of Excel, unless anyone has found where you can still sort several columns of data by the column of your choice .. go try and see the error message for yourself.
And who thought it was a good idea to nix the older MS Orifice formats since Office 2003 sp3?! What about mandated archived documents?! Open Office to the rescue and don't look back!
Speaking of idiotic software design, has anyone else noticed that wordpad in Windows 7 has been ruined by that damned ribbon?!
There is also the MS spyware issues, go look in the Scheduled tasks in Vista or 7 and see how many times a day the MS Office version of WGA (OGA) runs!! Its right in there with the Google updater, notifier et all... big brother indeed!
Seriously how many times does a SINGLE license of the worlds most bloated word processor need to be checked?!
</rant>
LOL, Audits are purely voluntary! Tell them to go [insert insult here] and see if they get the message.
NEVER let software auditors into your organization, unless they are PART of your organization. They are ruthless leeches who are just as likely to plant 'unlicensed software' as they are to find it. Then they charge astronomical fees/fines while STILL not getting you any type of licenses for anything they find. Also they look for the SLIGHTEST discrepancy, including any shareware.
This is the kind of thinking that keeps ones company moving along as a major competitor for a long time to come.
Also keeps you in high regard with the people that count, and the propeller heads and uni students, and others who live on the cutting bleeding edge of drama don't.
Carry on!
One word 'reliability'
It seems very likely that he's trying out some kit on a small scale, keeping up with what the little guys are doing and the innovation happening out there.
But the risk is his JOB to keep low. Imagine how long it would take to restore a 10PB backup. Would you REALLY want to have every manager and CEO in the company breathing down your neck while you twiddle your thumbs waiting a week or more for a HUGE restore job? I think not.
That is the kind of scenario that loses customers, kills your reputation, likely gets you fired, and shunned in the industry.
It sounds like many people here like to live on bleeding edge. You don't play games with your livelihood, if you're smart.
One has to plan ahead and find drive enclosures for these puppies!
The 12.5mm drives and some limited equipment is out there, it sounds like this will become the minimum form factor.
At a guess if you wanted a 2.5TB drive in the 2.5" form factor, that puppy is likely to be 25mm thick or 1 inch, with 8 platters.
This would be even more useless on an XP box. How hard is it to change the DL location in Firefox?!
Notice also that they've got the Firefox download manager set to auto close LOL, of course you can't see what you've downloaded that way!
Better yet, just use a version of windows that doesn't take 6 extra steps to get *anything* done.
Oh and yet *another* useless search indexer to help your quad core 3ghz machine run like an old 486.
Wine Is Not an Emulator.
It is a set of APIs, there IS a difference. You might want to learn about it someday.
If I emulated windows then I would be looking for a horribly designed UI with even worse security, seemingly designed to drive me raving mad .. it would be easier to run Windows Se7en.
I use Linux for STABILITY, then friendly *useable* UIs where I CAN find and use things. Also Linux security is light years ahead of the F-Troop security that clanks along in Windows AND for speed and best of all, no more nightmare DLL (or dependency) issues; and yes Vista and 7 STILL have those nearly 20 *years* later.
MS also fails to fix 11 year old bugs that, you know, LOSE login profiles. MS also loads more DRM in their so called 'Operating Systems' than everything else *combined* ... this is a dictatorship that you pay to be abused by!!
No Windows is not just a badly designed framework for drivers, there is a LOT of bad design in there!!
Did I mention the UIs in Linux are functional, intuitive, AND shiny?
Go try PCLinuxOS 2010.1 you can just boot from a live CD without any risk of Linux inadvertently changing your precious windows files. http://distrowatch.com/?newsid=06052
Has no one here ever heard of PC Linux OS?! Really? It's number 5 on Distrowatch right ABOVE Debian, and 2 spots above Mandriva. Some lame writer just skipped right over it.
First off its far better and more popular than Mandriva, which it was originally derived from.
The developers are pretty stubborn about stability and quality. Besides now you can be middle of the road for package management, Apt with RPMs and it works very smoothly, you'd never know if you didn't look under the hood.
Everything is clicky pointy, super noob friendly stuff.
Hardware detection is unmatched IMHO.
And yeah I like Mint too, just not as much as PCLOS
Mint is a slightly fancier version of Ubuntu, great stuff.
The latest release of PCLINUXOS (PCLOS) has blown me away! Not only that but this reviewer probably needs a towel...
http://cristalinux.blogspot.com/2010/04/pclinuxos-2010-review.html
The between the two I had a tough time deciding!
Then I found that PCLOS has a PAE kernel (yes it is an *easy* clickety-click install) that supports up to 64GB of RAM. I find the control center in PCLOS easier and more complete. It has more hardware information and options, cuz I like to meddle.
Also its *much easier* to get all the software I want installed on Mint, or PCLOS, I don't have to manually hunt down a bunch of obscure updates and huge bloated service packs, I just go through the list, check what I want, and when I'm ready, I click "Apply" and go make a sandwich.
Windows Se7en?! If that is the answer I DON'T want to know what the question was! Sure, Vista blows, but when they fixed the worst of its psychotic issues did they have to move *everything* around *AGAIN*, I call that FAIL! Worst of all they REMOVED many features that I used!
Seriously folks, this is the same company that hasn't been able to squash a bug from Windows 2000, where it sometimes loses the users profile when they log on .. Vista SP2 still carries this around, and it even more frequent.
But hey! Its SHINY!! It's also crammed to the gills with DRM, and the UI looks to have been designed by a sadistic psychopath.
Why anyone expects MS Orifice to be any better is beyond me. If you want "standard" skip the garbage from MS. Personally I've been more productive since OpenOffice 3.x came along.