115 posts • joined 27 Jul 2009
The reality distortion field still hard at work, I see, if they really think think that's the best of the bunch.
"It's shoving it into a shredder and standing on the lid."
Err, no. No it isn't. All it's saying is that the current data isn't sufficient to show a pattern. It's not saying that the pattern won't appear (or will for that matter).
One of the reasons I generally pay little attention to populist media on this topic is that they have to present to an audience which struggles to think in long timescales and non-absolutes. The mass media have to be over-simplistic or they'll lose their audience. Big storms? - global warming. Summer droughts? - global warming. Makes a quick & easy headline, and guarantees a few more day's worth of stories as protagonists on both sides pitch in to ya-boo the others.
Have we as a species made climate variation more extreme? Well, right now, nobody actually knows. Lots of data about, lots of theories in lots of directions, but no hard and fast evidence in either direction. I personally feel you can't go around dumping loads of energy in to the system without something happening, but that's a feeling, not a fact.
It could be that the Hollow-Earthers were in fact correct, and Shamballa is now heated by a sophisticated system of heat exchangers drawing energy in at the holes in the poles; this is why we don't have tropical summers in Yorkshire or whatever global warming was supposed to produce according to earlier ideas. Of course, there will be excess heat, which has to go somewhere. I suggest that Shamballa is actually located somewhere under Yellowstone Park and is directly responsible for the so-called super volcano the geologists love to talk about. See - global warming will get you in the end...!
Re: Danger Will Robinson
So partnering with existing entrenched makers is a good idea, no? This is about stability of supply (if I've got big cash in the plant, I get first dibs on the output) and presumably increasing supply. Seems sensible to me...
And those skinny, presumably weight-saving, tyres would be how useful exactly on soft or dodgy terrain? Just curious, I have no experience to bring to bear, but it seems a bit daft to fly yourself into somewhere only to end up hub-deep in the sand...
Battery and storage
I'm now at pretty much the same stage. The only bits that really matter to me are decent battery life and storage (i.e. microSD slot). I carry a ton of different manuals, image files and software around with me - the smartphone's a productivity tool as much as anything else - with different subsets on separate microSD cards. I also carry a USB-equipped battery pack for those occasions when I can't get to a mains supply. Oh - and I sometimes use the device as a 'phone, too.
My next (and probably last for some considerable time) upgrade is likely to be the Sammy Note III, primarily for the big battery although the extra screen res might actually come in handy. The stylus is a must for that much res in such a small space though (and no, a stylus is *not* an anachronism, it's a tool like any other, I use whatever gets the job done best).
Re: Shurely Shome Mishtake?
Momentary performance hit? To rebuild a 4TB drive in an array that sod's law says will be almost fully allocated when it goes bang? That's going to be a long moment... although I'd be more concerned about a second drive failing before the array's rebuilt, personally. You can make yer systems robust, but you've got to pay for it *somewhere*.
An ARM world would be nice, but...
Remember that porting on any scale would only happen if there's a strong economic reason to do so. We can have all the debates we like about the difficulty or otherwise of porting, but these days money wins.
Now, demonstrate a toolset that makes it equally easy (as in just a compiler option) to build on ARM as x86 and you might get the software houses on board. Persuade them to make their licensing platform agnostic, and you've got a non-argument for corporates when choosing their hardware. Demonstrate that the cost of acquisition is the same or lower as x86, that's another barrier down. Show that you can knock percentage points off of your operating costs, that's the money men on board.
And of course you'll do all of this on the sort of timescale that prevents Intel finally working out how to make the x86 run at really low power (not sure personally that's possible), thus removing your competitive advantage.
Don't have to like it, but you can't stick your fingers in your ears and go 'la-la-la' either...
Eh? You mean some people blow whistles when they, err, go? Or is there a strange anatomical condition I wasn't aware of?
Re: I had the Sharp PC-1500 in 1992
Found my old PC-1500 in the bottom of one of those 'sort it out when everything else is settled' house-moving boxes a couple of weeks back when rummaging in the garage. Haven't tried to power it up yet (power block was there). Myself & a mate made a few quid programming them up for a company that wanted to send its salesmen out with a rudimentary estimator, they bunged us one each (with the bog roll printer) as part of the deal. Not bad considering we were basically schoolkids :)
What's the point of more mobile bandwidth...
... if it costs you at least 10x more than non-mobile data. Most of the stuff I want to do out & about gets done by finding WiFi hotspots first where possible, as I'd rather not blow my month's allowance in a couple of hours.
Maybe Ofcom should have some pointed words with the networks before letting 'em anywhere near new spectrum.
Hi pot, kettle calling...
Of course, Microsoft have never done anything dodgy that folks might want to whinge about on a mug, t-shirt, water bottle etc. Bah, a pox on all their houses...
Could get fun if somebody goes for the retaliation, think I'll give my popcorn supplier a heads-up.
Re: Been there, done that
Yup, me too, no big deal. As you say, the biggest headache is the dynamic IP address, or more accurately how it's treated by other mail servers. Hanging on to my static IP address partly for that reason and also 'cos I run DNS for a couple of domains.
Re: I'm curious?
They don't take any old 'a' piss, they take fully patented 'the' piss. It's a high-end piss, as you can tell from the golden colour.
Re: Regardless of the merits of the Apple patent
I think it just means that if you have a good idea, make sure you've got the patent application well and truly lodged *before* you show it off to world + dog; presumably if you don't you're considered to have made it public domain. Just guessing, though.
No idea how you managed to get downvoted just for asking the question, btw.
Re: Wonder what they've broken this time
Right with you there. If I'm running "community" versions of a distro, I kind of expect to hit problems during upgrades and am pleasantly surprised when I don't get any. For critical servers, I'll run a commercial version and make damn sure I've checked the compatibility matrix before I start, although some vendors habit of changing chipsets without changing their model/type numbers can still catch you out. Mind you, given the budget I'll still put in IBM Power servers and AIX, damn near bulletproof upgrades across generations of servers and a piece of piss to admin...
A song for Steve?
Surely it's got to be Wrecking Ball(mer) (apologies to Neil Young...)
Re: Error in LTO6 capacity
Yup. The article suggests Oracle are positioning this against the IBM TS1140; a 3592 JC cartridge is 4TB native, but the LTO6 cartridges are indeed 2.5TB
Trading arms race...
So, the race is to get your better / faster system trading before the other guys beat you to it. So how long (even if it's not already the case) before the test regimes get pared back so far that a cockup is almost inevitable? After all, when did 'if I test for this, it might avoid a catastrophe' ever trump 'if you put this out now instead of next week, I'll make a shitload of dosh'?
Re: Neat idea BUT
Agreed, the IP6 gateway (DODAG root) is a SPoF. But then it's a logical entity; presumably all the usual tricks apply to make the platform as robust as possible physically (redundant hardware, diverse path etc), but then we all know that guys with big yellow diggers and back hoes are ingenious when it comes to cutting off buildings.
A *very* quick scan (I have a short attention span) of the RFC suggests that the DODAGID is based on the IP6 address of the root, so maybe the root node can be changed by just moving the address to a different location? I'm no expert, so that could be complete bollocks of course. Hopefully somebody with curiosity and more expertise can comment.
Re: Inward pointing spikes..
"So it's liquid under the icy crust"
Umm, if I've read it properly, then exactly not. Rather the supposition is that it's bloody great big chunks of ice (the roots) being held down by a seriously thick & rigid ice crust - rather than rising as would usually be the case. That leads to the lower density, thence to the gravitic anomaly; although personally, I think there's just a sodding great ice cave with a monolith in it causing the blip.
"This web site works only with HTTP 2.0. Please upgrade your browser."
Whoa there, calm down. You do realise that HTTP is only the delivery mechanism? Most web site developers never go anywhere near HTTP, in fact I'd be surprised if many of them even realise it exists. So, how will this play out?
First up, the likes of Apache et al will start including HTTP 2 support in their web servers. Mozilla etc. will start building libraries for it in their browsers. And guess what, there will be a negotiation as part of the initial handshake between client and server as to who supports what, just like there is now for things like HTTP 1.0 / HTTP 1.1 support, compressed data and so on. So, faced with a client only supporting HTTP 1, the server will simply deliver over that, but would take advantage of HTTP 2 if it were present. This approach is far from unique to HTTP, of course
By the time it gets to the point where a connection fails due to lack of support, it'll likely be for one of two basic reasons; 1) you're using a truly ancient browser / library, or 2) some fuckwit admin has managed to configure his server to only use HTTP 2 before the majority of the world can support it. Either case is easily remedied with a length of 4 x 2 with six-inch nails knocked through it
Re: Increased energy density leads to increased risk
"...on par with a hand grenade as it is"
Exactly my thought when going through Heathrow security recently with a colleague who was carrying a USB powerpack (i.e. big battery with USB connectors) in his kit. I was sure he'd get stopped, and he was - although not 'cos of the pack, as it turns out.
Checking the present regs, you can actually carry on batteries up to 100Wh. My colleague's pack was about 40Wh, and comfortably hand sized. Strikes me you can take quite a lot of energy in a small space; I'd be more bothered about these letting loose in the overhead lockers. Don't know if there's any sort of knock-on possible, but I think I'll be keeping my devices as separate as possible in-flight.
Re: TN Screen? That's not at all premium..
Curiously, Sony's online documents don't seem to state anything beyond the fact it's a TFT, despite providing mind-numbing levels of trivia on just about everything else (http://www-support-downloads.sonymobile.com/sgp311/whitepaper_EN_sgp311_sgp312_1.pdf). To an old cynic like me, that suggests it probably is a TN 'cos otherwise the marketing droids would be yelling it from the rooftops, rather than appearing to be slightly embarrassed about it.
That said, I'd have a look at it first. TN doesn't automatically mean crap - who cares what the technology is if it's actually good enough for how you actually use it? If I expected to have lots of folks trying to see the screen at the same time, or was constantly looking at it off-axis then yes I'd probably want an IPS-type panel. But most of the time? Not a lot in it...
Yup, from the bank account here too. Better still, it actually works; we claimed to replace my son's phone (Galaxy Note), no problem, brand new replacement. Mind you, he had fallen thirty-odd feet into a shallow river with a rocky bed, spent about 90 minutes in the water before being airlifted to hospital and another two weeks stabilising two crushed vertebrae and a cracked pelvis, so the insurance company couldn't really argue that it wasn't accidental damage...
Or rather this is what happens when you (or rather the bean counters) think you can safely outsource your data centre to a bunch (and I don't just mean FH here) whose strategy seems to be to say 'Look at us, we're really big, isn't all this stuff impressive,much bigger than you'd ever have so it must be much better. Oh, and have you seen how cheap it is? Think how much money you'd save. No, really cheap. Ever so cheap. You'd be a mug not to want to save this much money. Of course it's safe, how could it not be? And it's really cheap.'
So you outsource, things go titsup, and guess what? Instead of being able to escalate (to a single director if it gets bad), re-prioritise your recovery and so forth, you're now just one voice amongst lots, all clamouring to get those critical systems back on line, and you're probably nowhere near the biggest customer so how much influence do you really think you've got?
Economies of scale (for the provider) exist mainly when everything's going smoothly. Scaling your recovery so that you can get away with fewer bods requires investment in tools, techniques, developing robust procedures, testing... all those things, in fact, that cost. When the market's in its usual race to the bottom pricing mode, guess where the corners get cut (clue; it's not the director's bonuses). So, for those screaming at FH for not being perfect, I'd have to ask: what planning did you put in to make sure that when a big outage in your (now outsourced) data centre happens, your business didn't take a disproportionate hit? Or did you actually believe the salesman when he/she trotted out the usual soothing words? And how were the unicorns?
I'm not against outsourcing per se, despite the impression you might have got from the above. I'm against the school of thought that seems to believe that because you've outsourced, you can abdicate all responsibility as well. It's your business, not theirs.
Re: "the world's first commercially available 5GHz CPU,"
Actually, bunging a full POWER chip in to a desktop wouldn't be difficult - remember IBM will cheerfully sell you POWER blades, so that's roughly ATX sized. The footprint's similar to Intel chippery - in other words most of the space has to be given over to heatsinks. They're still air-cooled, but it's fair to say the fan noise wouldn't be living-room friendly...
Petabytes in minutes?
> '...allow petabytes of data to be backed up in "minutes, not hours".'
Oh, dear, who fired up the marketing hyperbole machine? Petabytes, only if you've got a *shedload* of interfaces. And presumably are backing up to the bit bucket.
By coincidence I've just done the sums for backing up 125TB in 8 hours; a tad over 32Gb/s sustained. So, assuming I could sustain 16Gb/s and I'm backing up 2 petabytes (their plural, so it's got to be at least 2!), play fast 'n loose with decimal/binary PBs to keep the sums simple and that's what, 32 ports give or take a couple?
Re: I think this calls for a recital of Vogon Poetry !!!
Hmm, X-Factor. More like a rectal of Vogon Poetry...
> "Why somebody would want such large bandwidth is beyond my understanding"...
Actually, despite more years in the industry than I really care to admit, I still find myself asking the same question, and it inevitably turns out that something appears to provide the answer "ah, that's why". LAN to the desktop? Why? 10Mb switched to the desktop? Why? 100Mb... you get the picture.
It seems to be a genuine case of if you build it, they will come. I still recall when putting video conferencing on the general (not dedicated) company LAN was considered A Big Thing, now it's pretty much taken for granted even on mobile.Yes, techniques have improved, but it's mainly the higher bandwidth at cheaper cost that drives these things. So big bandwidth - bring it on!
Re: Activist Shareholders
Agreed. Although sometimes you need shareholders to stand up and hold a board to account, if the board's not acting in the best interests of the company and its longevity. Except that's the kind of shareholders that are a) knowledgeable and b) interested in a *fair* return on their investment over a period, not a maximum return in as short a period as possible.
An awful lot of 'investors' seem to have forgotten that the idea is to help a company survive and grow, to mutual benefit, rather than to trouser as much as possible then move on just before the train wreck to the next opportunity.
Re: "...It's just you really have to work at it."
Right, here's my bit of tin-foil hattery:
So, Linux desktops have never really taken off 'cos it's so difficult to get it to be 'nice', like the Microsoft Windows environment (other excuses may be available). So, Microsoft, in a far-sighted attempt to avoid accusations of anti-competitive niceness, decide to level the playing field by producing a system that you have to put effort in to if you want to avoid those pesky WTF moments. But if I've got to do that, then...
What we have here, people, is simply MS's way of trying to persuade the great unwashed that there might just be another way. Which will, naturally, lead to increased competition in the marketplace, to the betterment of mankind and happiness all around. So in fact Microsoft's introduction of a bit of a dog's breakfast of an OS is simply an altruistic attempt to make us all happier.
Yup, reckon that's it!
Re: So much infrastructure for so little reception...
Disguise 'em as Leylandii; seriously tall, just as likely to piss off the neighbours.
"Britons are vociferous adopters of new technology..."
I presume ms. Gill meant 'voracious'. Don't remember hoards of folk taking to the streets yelling and screaming about their new tech, 'leastways around here. Maybe near a fruity store around Oxford St occasionally?
Re: Have a gorilla...
Try one of my Monkeys, they're milder...
Re: Deliberately misleading nonsense.
"... you get through to a Yorkshire call centre"
Yes, granted, but it doesn't mean your problem actually gets fixed. As it happens I have both VM and PlusNet (work reasons, also the static IP from PN). The one and only time I had a real problem with PN - total disconnection - it took them the thick end of six days to work out they'd cocked up a configuration. Oh, and they actually closed the original call I made after two days, something I only found out two days after that when I called to find out why I hadn't heard anything.
Bit of a shame really, 'cos otherwise I've been pleased with PN for years (since before they got borg'd by BT), it's just when it really mattered they screwed up. At least you *expect* VM to be a bunch of chocolate teapots, although I have to say the actual engineers that get sent out have been pretty damn good.
One can only hope that your doctorate was subject to better proof reading than your post! It may have been a literary nothing, but presumably you worked out where the exit was eventually?
Muphry is real...
Re: Wife acceptable
That answers a question I was going ask - the OBi110 with RasPBX. I have a, errmm, window of opportunity to muck around with this (couple of knackered DECT phones in the house). 35 quid for the OBi rather than 56 for the Cisco (on amazon at least) makes it easier to put the cost case to the CFO (wife...). Have an upvote, squire.
In the light of recent, errmm, misdaventures, possibly something anti-shipping would be appropriate?
Re: Very good indeed
Yup, real-life case beats uninformed opinion every time. But am I the only one that interpreted this mainly as the engineers benefitting from getting decent kit, rather than getting W8 as such? If developers are taking the opportunity to put better and more relevant/functional frontends on their applications (mobile or otherwise), does the underlying OS actually matter these days? Just asking...
Re: Glass platter
For 'glass' don't think in terms of the stuff that's held up by your window frames. Can't give you the physics / chemistry behind it, but glass is a state rather than a specific substance per se. I would imagine it's pretty damn robust, whatever they're using.
Re: ssh @caption veg
IIRC, there was a recognised problem with the HDMI config in some combinations. Especially cheapo Chinese TVs... Can't say I've seen a problem with feeding my BenQ monitor. Once I remembered to plug the other end of the HDMI cable in, that is :-)
Re: The vi thing
@Pirate Dave "so was EDLIN on MSDOS boxes..."
Yup, and eventually it got supplemented with EDIT, a full-screen editor as opposed to the line-mode EDLIN. Equally, vi is a full-screen character mode interface for ex, the line editor that came before it, which helps to explain some of the more err, quirky, corners of vi. So your reference isn't quite on the mark - har har, have at ye, matey!
Bear in mind these editors appeared before the world of GUIs, and in some cases before terminals with cursor keys, and some things make more sense. Doesn't make them obsolete, necessarily; surely one of the lessons we learn as *nix admins is you use whatever tool does the job best for you. Nano, Pico, Kate etc. are excellent tools, but give me an AIX image that I've had to take to a minimal maintenance shell 'cos some daft bugger's fubar'd the OS without a backup, and I'm bloody glad I can navigate vi!
The vi thing
I know vi isn't the most instantly intuitive tool out there, not surprising given its heritage. I think the thing that throws most folks inititally is the separate insert and command modes.
I usually make the point that it's the one editor you're likely guaranteed to have available to you. So it pays to spend a few minutes working out a bare minimum of commands (insert, delete, save, exit without save). And if you stick with it, the vi command set is remarkably powerful, more so if you get the hang of regular expressions.
Re: You paid WHAT for a DVI-HDMI adapter???
But do be careful to get the right one; DVI-I or DVI-D. Could make a couple of quids difference!
Re: My PI
@Annihilator - dead right. eBay for the adventurous, CPC / Farnell etc. for slightly more reputable, even Amazon Basics.
Do a bit of homework and you'll generally find that for short cables, there's little or no difference between cheap and expensive cables. Go long distance at v. high resolutions and you *might* get some issues, data rate definitely falls with distance. That said, I can happily play full HD over a 5m cable that I paid less than a tenner for.
for the EU. Normally you have to really dig in to the fine print to work out what the scam is. This time they're outright asking to create a money trough to get some snouts into.
I'm never quite sure where I stand on the EU, it's got good bits and bad bits like everything else. Stuff like this doesn't, in my opinion anyway, help to enhance its reputation.
If the idea of Google's ring on your finger seems iffy, just wait until the Internet of Things gets to personal health monitors, with all that yummy data. Google won't be able to resist; we can tell you your diet's crap 'cos we've got our finger on your ring...
Err, the idea of this is to get coverage, not performance per se. Miles would be good. And you wouldn't be using it for time-critical applications (like road trains), so if there's no white space, no problem. Unless, of course, you're driving a camper van and your cooker was trying to chat up the multimedia system in that feck off swish wagon in the queue behind you....
Re: " ...an office in France with its entrance in Switzerland."
The stationary cupboard will be forever in Basildon. You could let the stationery cupboard whizz around at random though.
Sorry, couldn't resist, hence icon.
Re: @Denarius - "Penny for your thoughts?"
Ferries? Pah, kid's stuff. Niven has his slicing huge swathes of countryside and cities, IIRC. Long time since I've read the Ringworld books, though.
- Bugger the jetpack, where's my 21st-century Psion?
- Something for the Weekend, Sir? Why can’t I walk past Maplin without buying stuff I don’t need?
- Review 'Mommy got me an UltraVibe Pleasure 2000 for Xmas!' South Park: Stick of Truth
- The land of Milk and Sammy: Free music app touted by Samsung
- Privacy warriors lob sueball at Facebook buyout of WhatsApp