Wake me up when they can print bullets.
2756 posts • joined 21 Jul 2009
Wake me up when they can print bullets.
Why on earth would I want to concentrate all my computing power into something that can be dropped in the toilet?
Only because every time it happens they jump up and down and shout about how evil men and Twitter are, instead of ignoring the troll. Trolls be trollin, don't bite. Do you think the guy who registered @rapecreasy was trying to wind her up, or planning on raping her?
Extremely right wing? Check
Economy on the down? Check
Huge spending on military? Check
Wants to expand it's sphere of influence over the whole world? Check
The reason they think they own it is because they wanted to rip off scrabble, and came up with "word with friends". Good to see the pirates being boarded.
The "big deal" is that ISPs sell internet connections, not WWW connections. I use my internet connection for all kinds of things, if I'm abroad I use it as a 'home' proxy, it's a VPN server, it allows me to contact my home servers and do things like turn the heat on, watch video feeds of my front yard, all kinds of things.
None of these have any commercial bearing, so why should I pay commercial rates to use my personal internet connection?
More to the point, why should my entirely reasonable behaviour be something that is explicitly excluded by T&C? Why should my internet connection have the sword of Damocles hanging over it?
BTW, these aren't typical T&C. My ISP makes no limitations on how I use my internet connection, save that I cannot use it for commercial purposes, I cannot use it for illegal purposes, and they reserve the right to terminate my connection if I abuse the network.
You don't get it do you, if you get Google Fibre, the idea is that you have faster internet so can suck more from Google's teats, and view more ads.
The idea that you would use your unlimited bandwidth to stream content from your home to wherever you are is abhorrent - where would the ads come from?
Windows Phone doesn't crash. It's faster and more reliable than Android and iOS. It also doesn't slow down over time…
Unbiased truths here from the guy named after the OS running on his phone.
If MS had spent their WinPho marketing budget on giving free apps to users, they might have been on to something. I was thinking more like $50 than $5.
TBF - Talking about windows phone 7.5 when 8 is out is like complaining about Gingerbread when Ice cream Sandwich is out.
Most active android devices are still Gingerbread, according to Google.
That is a shitty analogy. At any point the F1 team can choose to turn up the wick and use the full power of their engines. With the phone, Samsung decide that you can only use the full power of the GPU if you are running benchmarks.
Yep, there is an HD tab on the Sky EPG. BBC 1 HD is on the third page of results…
Mine was for the cricket, then they got the F1 and I have to keep up the subs all year round :(
One of my decoders puts them in the order it finds muxes while tuning, ignoring the LCN completely
Presumably that doesn't have a Freeview sticker on it then.
It's got fuck all to do with popularity. My old man forked out for a HD TV, a Freesat HD box, but he never ever watches HD content. He mainly watches BBC 1 and 2, which are channels 101 and 102 on Freesat. He never goes beyond the first page to find BBC 1 HD (108) or BBC 2 HD (109). The popular channels are popular because they are on the first page of the EPG, even when better quality equivalents of those channels exist elsewhere in the EPG.
It's even worse for me on Sky. The first channels are 101 and 102, BBC 1 and 2. The HD versions are at 141 and 142, which is blessedly a relief - they used to be 141 and 169 IIRC.
Either way, if you're just paging through the channels, you have to go past 40-50 channels of shite to find it. OK, its not all shite, but it is all add filled till you reach 141.
It will be an innovation if the damn thing works seamlessly, and doesn't require you to 'scan' your finger along it and fail if you either go too fast, or too slow, or finger too greasy....
I too have had finger print enabled security kit for some time - it's all been shit. If this works, it would be pretty neat.
If you pootering about in the med, there's not much that can go seriously wrong - "Oh look, there's Africa, this aint right". At most you're going to be slightly off course.
However, if you're sailing from Med to Caribbean, not an awful lot of scenery. One degree here or there, and you're in Boston or Rio.
I agree to a point - I'm still very happily using the ipad I bought when they first came out - the new ones aren't magically different. It's a little slow in some things, but not so slow I want to spend £300-700 on a new one.
I suggest you pop over to the Sky Go On Android forum....
Sky Go on Android suffers from the one problem that this never will - too many devices, too many configurations, too many problems. This is one device, with no UI. You push a URL to it, it consumes it. This means the interface to do so can be a simple web interface, no need for a custom app, or even for anything resembling playback.
Why should the Premier League have to go through broadcasters to get to users?
Because the Premier League sold the exclusive rights to those broadcasters for £3bn?
On the other hand, there is no way to watch the Ashes using Chromecast, so the cost is irrelevant, or only to be compared against the 'standard' way of getting Sky Sports. It's still a little pricey; if you want to watch every second of every Test, get a Sky box, if you want to just watch the final afternoon of each Test, get a dongle.
This is what this article is trying to get across, Google can be as "disruptive" as they like, unless they've got the content people want it is irrelevant. I'm not sure he's right though.
A lot of commenters on Chromecast have been saying things like "Woohoo, now I can get Netflix without Xbox Live", so maybe they are banking on enough people giving them content. There is every chance that Sky will happily provide a chromecast interface for everything on their catch up service - they only care that you are paying, not how you are watching.
It seems to me that chromecast offers everything that a broadcaster would want from a service - they control the user interface for selecting content, they control what items are made available to you to choose, they get all the analytics about what you are watching, and someone else is responsible for ensuring the playback quality, interface issues and so on.
It doesn't have even close to the power to run games. It's a purely streaming SoC.
So it has the power to stream games then.
H264 is unequivocally better quality at a specified bitrate than WebM. H264 is practically free to use for anything; its free for non-commercial use, and if your commercial use is not going to be profitable due to the pennies paid to MPEG-LA, its unlikely it would be under WebM either.
This device supports WebM, but much much more importantly it supports H264 at High@L4.1, High@L4.2 and High@L5 - High@L5 is so much better than WebM, you'd have to be smoking crack to think WebM is better. WebM works well at "low quality, low bitrate, fast encoding" scenarios, but only marginally.
Not a $60 one, how about £28?
HDCP can be broken by buying the right $10 cable from China...
Usain Bolt should pay UK taxes? Why?
For the same reason as Starbucks and Google should pay tax in the UK, they profit from economic activity they undertake in this country.
He earns money over here, advertising things, wearing fake beards and running very fast. He gets taxed on what he earns over here, advertising things, fake beards and running fast. He's OK with that.
The previous government also wanted to tax him on a percentage of his worldwide earnings, pro-rata with the number of days he spends in the UK. He wasn't OK with that, and that's why he didn't used to race in the UK. I think this was changed for the Olympics, which is why he ran here the other day.
This entirely spurious argument - "Tech companies are in your retirement portfolio and therefore can't be taxed" - is so completely and obnoxiously slanted towards the baby boomer mindset. They own the country, their politicians have loaded us up with public debt, and now we can't tax profits because it upsets their final salary pension? Fuck off
... and it was Lorenz who coined the term "Butterfly Effect".
Pretty sure it was Ashton Kutcher dude, I've seen the film.
it can sling absolutely any content […] including local video etc.
Citation needed, because from what I've read, this is explicitly the one thing it does not do.
Is it canals and Rembrandt, or tulips and Anne Frank?
Obvious troll is obvious.
I'd still be using my iphone 3G if I hadn't accidentally put it on a 40°C cotton cycle and tumble dry along with my very dark sheets. I think it was probably the 1 hr tumble drying that really killed it.
New phone is a white one, that ain't happening again.
It's never free. To use this, you either have to be a virgin customer, and tell them which one you are, or provide some other personal bit of information, like a mobile phone number. Virgin receive value from collecting this data, and this is paying for it.
I also like how they will add a 4G base station hooked up to fibre throughout most of the city, but will only be providing wifi (the carrot) in some undefined "city centre" location.
100% legal battery not made by Samsung with a Samsung logo on it? Might want to re-check your definition of counterfeit.
This has very little to do with Tory views, and has everything to do with the growing power of those self righteous know-it-alls at mumsnet. When Labour were in power this very nearly happened, all politicians bow before the mumsnet lobby.
That's like walking down the High Street saying "I'd like to buy some drugs".
Works in Camden and Brixton. Allegedly.
Is Grammer Kramer's little brother?
Why all the hating on infographics? Yes, they are a way to Fisher Price spreadsheets and numbers so that idiots who can't understand numbers can understand it, but they are a way to make idiots who can't understand numbers understand it!
Of course, all great things can be used for good or evil.
Utter bullshit. You used to have to wait six months just to get a phone line back then, on which you could only use the piece of shit phone that you were required to rent from BT. You have no clue, or just do not remember.
She's so fierce and in our corner now she no longer has any hand in running the show.
If you think you are getting a worse service now from BT plc than you were from BT (GPO), then you probably weren't alive back then. I can think of no scarier prospect than BT being nationalised.
"their" - unless you are implying that business users actually embody the solution.
It's amusing you think exchanges are run by bankers.
Zones and Containers are a form of virtualisation - para-virtualisation, or OS level virtualisation, I suppose - but I take your point.
Most of us don't get a choice of using such tasty OS, though. We're in the process of ditching FreeBSD (sob) for Linux VMs running on Xen because FreeBSD jails (which are like Solaris Zones) don't support disk 'fairness' quotas (I'm pretty sure Zones do).
Using VMs allow you to allocate resources (and enforce thoise allocations) to particular VMs. Running multiple apps on a single OS instance does not.
DNT doesn't say "do not advertise to me", it says "do not track me".
I've got no problem being exposed to advertising, the only thing I care about is not advertising specifically to me, based upon what I do on other parts of the internet.
TV ads don't change what ads are shown to me because I'm watching, my magazine doesn't have ads tailored to me specifically, when I go to the movies they aren't showing different trailers to each viewer, and yet TV, print and movie advertising is hugely successful.
Targeted advertisements using tracking are naff anyway - the purpose is to make you buy something that you've already looked at. Spend a few minutes browsing the "Optical express" website, and all your google contextual ads will be about laser eye surgery.
Once you've expressed an interest, they cover your eyeballs with this ad until you give in and buy it. Actually, that's not true - there's no confirmation you buy it, so you continue to get the ads.
There should only be one big naval base on the south coast beginning with 'P' - I bloody knew it went to Portsmouth, dunno why I wrote Plymouth :/
STFU! GTFO! FOAD! and er .. .F4?
Is that Alt+F4 or Ctrl+F4? F4 yourself right up the A3. And it's not your A3, it's a road for anyone that wants to drive between London and Plymouth pal.
No-one uses lynx anymore, it's a bit pap. We all use links2, which is to lynx what vim is to vi.
Million to one shots crop up nine times out of ten though, any fool knows that.
Did you not notice BT, Virgin, Sky and Talk Talk bought all the decent ISPs already? Yeah, it's fine, I'll go with PlusNet - no, its really BT? ok, BlueYonder - oh they gone too? - BeThere - gah, fuck Sky. Ok, I've been saving this choice for real disasters - Pipex. Wait, TalkTalk did what to Pipex??