@JDX: Looks like they also have no problem skipping multiple versions of Windows - Vista, 7, and now 8. Guess they'll probably skip 9 too?
2869 posts • joined 21 Jul 2009
@JDX: Looks like they also have no problem skipping multiple versions of Windows - Vista, 7, and now 8. Guess they'll probably skip 9 too?
Invalid comparison. You are comparing a general purpose CPU decoding H264 against a chip designed to decode 1080p H264 content.
It's even more invalid if you take in to account that the minnowboard itself has dedicated hardware for H264 decoding (via VAAPI; your EeePC does not).
If you did a true CPU comparison, for instance, how many PPS can this shift, or IPSEC tunnel throughput, you would find that this is vastly more powerful than the RPi. RPi is a very cool and inexpensive piece of kit that can be used for a lot of things, but some things it cannot, and you might want a slightly more beefy CPU.
For instance, this thread is about using RPi as a router and it's limitations. RPi has no GigE port, and acting as a NAT router, can't even fill it's 100Mbit FE.
This minnowboard has a gigabit port - the Atom CPU probably wont hit 1.2 Mpps but it will get a damn sight closer than a RPi. It's also significantly cheaper than an equivalent high end router board like a Soekris 6501-70, which is ~$450, although that does come with a slightly higher spec Atom CPU and multiple GigE ports.
It largely depends upon the game engine and how it's lag compensation works. In very simple games like the original counterstrike (and, to a lesser extent, source), then someone with a 10ms ping vs someone with a 90ms ping will have *vastly* better game play and the ephemeral "reg" - when you have your crosshairs over someones face and press fire, does the game register a hit or say "sorry, try again".
In games like this, ping is crucial.
What a load of bollocks, it has nothing to do with trade agreements.
They are suing Baidu, who are a US registered company listed on NASDAQ and regulated by the SEC, based upon the search results they offer to US users.
This is why the US court has jurisdiction, not some "interference in the ability of American companies to compete in the Chinese market".
Is there an app to speed up those morons who think they can walk and use their phone at the same time, but actually walk slower than an old fat lady with a shopping trolley.
Why fixate on fixed line? Because of the USO, which propagates the monopoly position.
BT didn't invest in that area, the tax-payer did.
Another example, I just moved to a new house. The new house is pre-wired with BT infinity. In order to move my phone service and internet there I had to fight through the BT infinity sales team. BT use their USO to force me to at least discuss (repeatedly) that, no, I don't want your internet, thank you very much, just the phone line. Yes I'm sure. Please stop talking about BT Sport.
PS: In the area I linked to, you're lucky to get 2G service. There is BT, or there is nothing.
You misunderstood which bit was "comedy gold" in "one time state monopoly" - it wasn't the "state monopoly" bit.
Pluto is a "dwarf planet". This is a "dwarf planet". Eliding context fail.
But they do transition the heliopause each orbit - which is super cool.
The standard problem with this is that intuitive isn't a tick-box property. Linux is intuitive for a UNIX user; SQL Studio is intuitive for a Windows user. Nothing is intuitive out of the box, as everything relates to previous experiences.
What utter crap. UI/UX design and A/B testing has clearly demonstrated in a scientific manner that there are simple UI idioms that *do* make a user interface intuitive - particularly a well known WIMP system.
MS completely changed that interface in an effort to "win" touch. Ubuntu did the same thing with Unity, GNOME with GNOME 3, both for the same reason and both with the same result. All three continue to make efforts to reduce the differences with each point release.
Sure, anyone can learn to adapt, however why should we when we can continue to use the same interfaces we are comfortable and efficient with?
iOS (and most Android for that matter) is not intuitive because it is "cool to learn", but because it is impossible not to work out what to do. I've never had to show anyone how to do anything on a tablet, not one "family support" call, and yet they all have them. Windows Vista, Windows 8, those I get plenty of calls..
Eleventy billion dollars in the bank, but all the hollowed out volcanoes have already been snapped up.
It's actually extremely useful on corporate google docs, I don't know about Office.
You can configure "viewers" and "editors" so only approved people can change it.
Each user sees where the other users cursor/selected cell, so you don't really get conflicts.
There is only one version of the document in existence, so it doesn't accidentally get wiped out when Bob from accounts finally completes his section and puts it on the share.
You can chat to the other people viewing the doc, and they can see your cursor/position to see what you are talking about.
You can (just about) use it as a poor man's Trello.
However, the most commonly used example in our org is:
"Hi everyone. Can you fill in your row in this spreadsheet with your home working details over the xmas/easter/etc period please"
If the delightful lady who penned this missive reads this article, I'm afraid you have just trolled her and are now eligible for a 2 year sentence the next time you visit these shores from lovely Spain.
It definitely doesn't compare to £1800 worth of separates - in fact I doubt it compares to £500 of separates.
Google aren't in the hardware business? Who do you think owns Motorola?
On the contrary... a great many people, myself included, are saying loudly and plainly: "Disband the spies, police and military, and by all means, bring on the terrorists!"
And then voting Democrat or Republican.
The capitalisation of 'Trojan' gives mind to America's #1 brand rather than the malware.
Yes, 1000baseT is rated for a maximum cable length of 100m.
I'm moving house next week, in to a block served by hyperoptic, they run fibre to each block and then 1000baseT from the central point to each flat.
world police how? He was arrested in Seattle for a crime against an American company. Not sure what you are getting at.
He didn't commit the crimes in America. They are charging him in America. They are American crimes because the company is American. Hence, TEAM AMERICA WORLD POLICE - someone does something wrong somewhere else in the world, America involves itself.
Missing from the story is how someone who works in Russia and Lebanon ended up arrested in Washington without extradition. Presumably MS asked him to fly over for a chat...
Confidential data allegedly uploaded by Kibkalo to his personal Windows Live SkyDrive account…
…emails sent from a mail.ru account to a Hotmail address maintained by the blogger. The two allegedly chatted about the illicit exchange of information using MSN chat.
How not to leak from your employer.
Russian national Alex Kibkalo was arrested yesterday and ordered held without bail
Kibkalo, who worked for the software giant in Lebanon and Russia
Kibkalo, who was based in Lebanon at the time of the alleged leak
The case is filed as US v. Kibkalo in the US District Court, Western District of Washington.
TEAM AMERICA WORLD POLICE
The suggestion is not that hardware manufacturers absolve themselves of the responsibility to write their own firmware by calling in the "amateurs". They're free to do that, of course, if they want to see their sales plummet.
The idea is that after writing their own craptastic drivers that they then publish the code. This lets competent people look for security holes, and allows the amateurs to fix or re-write the code.
It also allows other competent people to look at what commodity chips the hardware manufacturer has put onto the breadboard and produce a knock-off for virtually no investment.
It also provides insight into any proprietary algorithms you use, eg wifi firmware frequently has (had?) proprietary rate algorithms, and nVidia and ATI keep the very proprietary bits of their drivers in their firmware.
Shuttleworth doesn't care about any of that though, since he is an ideologue and this gets in the way of his faith. Yes, it would be fucking awesome if we had at those bits and pieces, but it would suck balls if it meant that hardware was either more expensive, less readily available or not developed.
AMD have been publishing hardware specs for years. Nvidia started more recently - because it was to their advantage.
Bad example I think - AMD started publishing hardware specs for their graphics cards after they separated out the proprietary bits into loadable firmware modules that you load and run on the card. The firmware then provides the "hardware interface" that is described in the specs - this is what Shuttleworth wants to remove.
strum, science is a model constructed from scientific hypotheses. What is the difference between climate change hypotheses and scientific hypotheses? A scientific hypothesis can be tested.
Climate science produces models that describe what happened in the past in order to generate current measurements. The model takes historical data, and churns out the right number for today - hurrah!
We then look at the future predictions of that model and turn it into policy and taxes, but at no point is that model tested - it fits the old data, and it is right now, and that is good enough seemingly for most people.
It also seems that when you have new historical data that then doesn't fit the existing model, or changes the model forecast, then the implication is that the model is wrong, and it is tweaked until it gives the forecasts that are desired.
There shouldn't be comments at the top of a file declaring ownership because you should not "own" the code you write, it leads to terrible confrontations when someone refactors or otherwise rewrites "your" code in a way "you" don't like. Oh snap.
That's what fridges, freezers, and store cupboards are for: you stock up in advance, then cook as and when you see fit.
What if you don't live in SmugGitopia?
Do you only get hungry when your convenience stores are open? Never been hungry after 5pm on a Sunday?
Plus, you aren't taking in to account that all the time that you are walking to the convenience store, shopping, walking home, making the dough, making the sauce and so on, I can be sitting on my arse watching TV.
You can still pick up a decent 1TB drive for about 60 dollars, working out to the low price of $5 a month over a year versus Google's $9.99.
This is why you are a journalist and not an engineer or an accountant. Your drive costs you $5 a month, but you have not taken in to account the costs of the server to put it in, the electricity to power it, and the network connection to make it accessible. You would also normally buy hard drives that last a bit longer than a year, so running the depreciation over one year seems unnecessary.
They might run dedupe on specific datasets, but the example you gave - uploading audio to the Play Music service - definitely would not use dedupe, it performs psychoacoustic fingerprinting to the file, and only uploads if it does not already have a match for it.
Dedupe is insanely expensive computationally, you need a really good dataset for it to be useful.
Which bit of that was the joke?
No John, I did not forget that the patriot act puts any US registered company in the NSA's pocket.
You however failed to grasp that the entirety of my post was that US registered companies choose to be US registered. They could choose to not be a US registered company, if what the NSA asked them for was so abhorrent - they make out that it was, now that we know about it.
Actually, the worst we can do is fuck it up so badly that all the humans, possibly all the large mammals die.
Give it a couple of million years, the old girl will get going again.
None of these companies have a choice in 'co-operating' with the NSA, it's all done at the end of a metaphorical gun barrel. Point your hate in the right direction, the US and UK govs.
No, you are absolutely right, when the NSA comes to those companies, they have to obey. Except those companies do have one thing they can do - they do not have to have physical nor corporate presence in the US. If google were *so* upset about it, after the first order came in they could have announced that they were upping sticks and moving everything outside of NSA's explicit reach.
"Due to the current political climate and state intrusion we can no longer operate in the US. Please direct all queries to Fort Meade."
Yes you can rotate it, but I've yet to come across a desktop OS and monitor that automates the screen rotation … Windows 8.n, MS's tablet OS, can't, likewise Linux.
Well, I personally I use FreeBSD, this works pretty fine for me:
> $ grep xrandr .xinitrc
xrandr --output DP-0 --rotate left
xrandr --output VGA-0 --rotate left
I guess you meant "automatically detect what way up a screen is".
Its alarming just how many routers one can find in the internet with open admin logins and for which the name 'admin'; and the password '1234' will actually work..
This only became a problem when ISPs forced/cajoled router makers to allow the possibility of remote logins by your ISP. There should be no management interface of your router on your WAN iface. Ever.
But Dell aren't charging for distribution, they are charging for installation, configuration and support of the installation. If Mozilla isn't careful, then Dell will just stop offering this service thereby ensuring that the only browsers available are IE via the OS and chrome via Google nagging...
That is just weasel words, they are charging you to place firefox on some media and deliver it to you. That is basically the definition of distribution.
The cost paid is above what you would pay if you did not have firefox distributed to you.
Plus, no-one will ever choose to pay an extra £16 for Firefox. If they know they want it, they will know to install it themselves, if they don't know they want it, they will forgo paying for things they don't want.
This is basically a rehash of the Dell/MS tax on PCs with no OS, I wonder how much they are being bunged now drive IE usage. Of course, now Dell are privately owned, we need never know.
I don't get it, how will fresh milk make me feel better?
The other thing with ikea kit is that a lot of their pieces - and I don't know if this is accident or by design - are precisely the right width for 19" rackmount kit. Yep, instead of seeing it as "the 4th goddamn coffee table we've looked at this morning", look at it as "my new AV unit and projector mount".
Ideally the test subject that stays on the ground should not have been to space before at all, in order to properly test the effects. Mind you, you wouldn't want to be the one left behind.
I suppose if you're spending $3bn in opex, sometimes it can be worth speculatively spending $50m in capex to try and reduce that to $2bn, but delivering 4 times the capacity.
Plus facebook imagines itself a disruptive company. You don't pay IBM $50m when you can put some geniuses in a shed with some credit cards - much more disruptive.
The point of the exercise is to knock things up quickly and cheaply from commodity components.
Yeah, but they did it by defining their own commodity components in way of the open compute project. All that stuff is custom, but its now "facebook custom".
If facebook said "We're going to order $100m worth of 5" SSDs each year for the next 10 years at least", there would be companies falling over themselves in Taiwan to assemble them for them, and anyone else using OCP spec kit.
Did you not see the bit where it has workstation graphics and drivers?
Yes, that is the entire purpose of the data controller, they are responsible for ensuring an entity confirms to the DPA where they deal with personal data. Admitting they had no clue they were even storing the data just demonstrates their failings in regard to the act.
BTW I said misfeasance, not doing your job competently. Malfeasance is deliberate wrong doing, completely different.
BPAS chief executive Ann Furedi said: "We accept that no hacker should have been able to steal our data but are horrified by the scale of the fine, which does not reflect the fact that BPAS was a victim of a serious crime by someone opposed to what we do.
"This fine seems out of proportion when compared with those levelled against other organisations who were not themselves the victims of a crime."
This sort of attitude makes me angry - yes you were the victim of a crime, that crime exposed your own illegal practices, ergo fine.
Someone at BPAS was being paid to be a data controller, and was plainly not doing their job. They should not be appealing the fine, they should have dismissed their data controller for incompetence and sue them for professional misfeasance to recover the fine.
The whole thing can be described with one word: Hipocrisy.
Want to try again?
Maplins have to keep stock, pay staff and rent prime (ish) retail locations, which is why it does cost more. On the other hand, you can walk in to a shop on your high street and buy a lot of useful kit that you cannot get other than online.
I miss the old fashioned kind of ironmongers/everything shop that you went in with a sheared bolt, gave it to the old timer who would wheeze, then scurry off to an impressive wall of cabinets, rummaging around and then pulling out the exact thing you were looking for. B&Q does not compare.
This may be rose tinted, as when I was a kid almost every saturday involved Dad popping off to Martin & Newby's to get the one thing he was missing. I was talking to him about this the other day, it was brilliant when it worked, less so when it didn't...
Tulip Mania wasn't a ponzi scheme, it was a pricing bubble. Your "real physical" money is exactly the same as tulips, prone to fluctuations in value.
The blockchain address is not a real address, it does not enable you to find an entity.
Instead, it is an identifier. When BTC are transferred from one address to another, all you know is that ID <n> now has <x> more BTC. When <n> sees it, he adds the BTC mentioned to his wallet.
Buddi's founder claimed the MoJ wanted a system that was a "figment of their imagination" … said in a leaked email to staff that the ministry wanted "the development of a product which does not yet exist".
Crikey, she's never come across the idea of someone developing a new system that does exactly what the client wants?
Or the concept that a client, having paid you a lot of money to develop a new system, would expect you to hand over the IP that you generated developing that new system.
I make my daily bread developing things that do not exist yet and only exist in the figment of someone's imagination, have done for quite some time.