Re: So what about the auditors?
And always remember to take a box of chocolates and misleading signs with you whenever you take on The Auditors.
2794 posts • joined 21 Jul 2009
And always remember to take a box of chocolates and misleading signs with you whenever you take on The Auditors.
I would totally watch a live action version of "The Archers".
it’s hardly surprising that the tone of much of the BBC’s political coverage is sceptical. As Jeremy Paxman once suggested, it is based on the suspicion these lying bastards are lying to us.
Three currently only have bandwidth at 1800MHz, which is very very poor at penetrating buildings. This is universal to the Three network, all the other networks have bandwidth at 900MHz. Therefore if you are on Three, and have a good connection indoors, you are pretty close to the cell and so your experience is atypical.
Other networks have bandwidth at 900MHz and 1800MHz, and so have better indoor penetration. Three have a deal with (I forget, T-mobile?) to trade some frequency to give them some slots at 900MHz to rectify this, which I think comes in to effect in October.
It sounds good, but there is nothing to force operators to provide an adequate service in the zone that they have been allocated.
Could we not just make it more/very expensive for the network to be carried on competitors network where they do not have capacity? If they pass the cost on to the consumer instead of investing in more POP to reduce future costs, then they become more expensive and less competitive than their rivals that do have capacity.
This way, the whole thing becomes a market driven by consumer demand. If you don't provide an adequate network, you will have to raise prices, which will then mean you lose customers eventually to the networks that do provide an adequate service and do not have to raise prices.
From this moment forward you will desist from recording my stand-up and planning sessions. If you immediately hand over the previous months footage which you used to write this amusing article as well, I will consider this matter closed.
No not at all. Individuals work for an organisations.Individuals (working for an organisation) recording in public aren't covered by that code of practice (not law).
Individuals acting for the benefit of an organisation are not individuals, they are agents of that organisation.
One of the clues is in the initialism "CCTV" - it means Closed-Circuit Television. This code is not for individuals (whether they work for an organisation or not) wearing Glass.
As for "Paterson added that wearables containing cameras used by Glasshole organisations to capture video or pictures will need to adhere to the regulator's CCTV code of practice, which is currently undergoing a review."
This is false, people do not need to adhere to the "regulator's CCTV code of practice" at all. It's a code of practice (not law) and it doesn't even apply to individuals recording in public.
Clarified? In the UK, organizations do not have the same rights as people.
I don't know British politics that well, but imagine if instead of London Mayor if Boris Johnson were an MP given quite a bit more power and time in the media than he has experience or expertise for, but with more paranoia, much more sycophancy toward the Prime Minister (like Grayson acts toward the President), and a shorter temper.
Yep, wrong example - Boris is a rival to the PM, he doesn't go after him directly, his allies regularly send out stalking horses to try to discredit Gove/May/Grieve to strengthen Boris in the party and weaken Cameron.
I think the best analogy would be to Michael Gove - deeply ambitious and sycophantic, will do anything his master wants.
Baby boomers have generally been givers.
Are you trying to be ironic or funny, or do you actually believe this?
Yeah, well, how is that "legal"? Starting from the what one wants to conclude is not a good form of discourse.
And yet another thing to distract from work*. 5 years ago, I could quite easily say "this is a no email/phone day", put the phone on do not disturb and only check my emails at 5pm.
Nowadays, if people don't get an immediate reply to their email, they IM, and my browser beeps and pops up the message, regardless of what workspace I am on. Worst of all is flowdock, which I'm now mandated to be on several flows, most of which are irrelevant but still cause browser notifications to pop up - "@everyone ready for the call?" - not a call I'm on, but thanks for disrupting my thought processes to remind people about a meeting in their calendars.
Then, 3 minutes later, the same message arrives in your inbox and then your phone. Gaaaaaaaa!
* He says, posting on the register....
...then one in a million situations happen at least once a day.
Everyone knows one in a million shots come up 9 times out of 10.
I'm fairly certain that Labour intend, if they are returned to power, to choose someone else to serve as Secretary of State for Work and Pensions rather than keeping IDS in the job..
See, you've missed the boat again.
The first story was about how a technological nobody can grab £200k of public money. That is one thing.
This story is about her moaning about being called on it. That is something else.
Both deserve derision.
I think you are showing your own biases tbh. Is it not possible to criticise someone silly for being silly, without being accused of misogyny because the silly person is a woman?
Because the focus and tone of these stories is “lily the silly woman who squandered tax payers money on a frivolous website”
Take the word "woman" out of it, and sure, that is the tone and focus of the previous article - how silly people managed to get silly amounts of public money and do silly things with it. This article is actually about the irony of said silly person moaning about people complaining that their project is silly and a waste of public money. Silly.
Did you just wake up from a 13 month coma?
Imagine being able to see the world feed whilst the cars are out of view, or see the pit stops if you aren't opposite the start/finish line?
It still only solves one problem - "how do people at the event view more of the event". It does nothing to decrease the ever growing on demand traffic, which TFA suggests it will.
The fact that it is cell specific should make improving the experience of people at events easier - they can provide special cells within the stadia that broadcast the content.
There is certainly a need for it when massive traffic volumes are generated by large sporting events such as the World Cup. EE has reported that the goal scored by ex-Everton player Tim Cahill for Australia at 5.21pm on Wednesday 18th June resulted in the biggest ever single data spike across the EE network as people took to social media and streaming services to watch replays of the goal.
So this technology would not help - these people were not watching a single stream broadcast to all users simultaneously, they were all individually served the content as they demanded it.
So yes, super cool to be able to broadcast TV within a cell (although, if you're at the game, just watch the game?), but it will do sweet FA with managing the demand of people who are not at the game and want to watch snippets of it at a time that suits them.
Can there be levels of trust? I don't fully trust SSL, but I trust it more than plaintext....
It's hard to see how why this should be labeled boring when it includes a bunch of patches that "are a little too experimental."
The patches are experimental because they alter API or ABI. BoringSSL is boring because it strips back what an SSL library does from "everything + the very latest in development protocols" to "enough to make an encrypted connection and verify keys".
One of the main reasons heartbleed had such an effect was that almost anyone who offered OpenSSL on their webserver had been forced to upgrade to the newer, "more secure" OpenSSL 1.0 series in order to pass "security audits" which are simply "Is version > x".
Wonderful, I love paps.
COTS is great when you agree that the function performed by the COTS will be what the COTS currently performs.
It's not so great when some dickhead thinks that he can buy COTS (cuz it's cheaper, natch), and yet still thinks he can customize every single damn thing about it, and change his mind constantly about what each customization is.
Consultants don't give a fuck, if the customer want "cheap" COTS, then they send an integrator and make their margin on the customizations, where as if they can convince the customer that you need bespoke, they send the architect and make their margin that way.
it will sound much more like an IT tech trying to explain why THIS kind of thing is exactly the reason why he/she requested that $500 switch instead of the $200 one that the boss eventually bought from the local store.
What do you think happens in that scenario, PHB goes seppuku-o-clock, or shifts the blame to the vendors/beancounters?
If you don't open port 5000, then you also probably are unlikely to leave a link to your (closed) port to your NAS on a web forum where it can be picked up by a google search?
"Raw talent" in interviews means that the interviewee has enabled BS mode on the interviewer and the interviewer was impressed/did not detect BS mode.
At most ISIS can take over the Sunni areas in the north. Most of the fighters are not ISIS, but Sunni militias taking advantage of ISIS dispelling the army.
If half of all vehicles switch to electric, you'll have a surplus of petroleum.
Really? I'd imagine that what would actually have is a massive reduction in extraction rates in order to maintain current petrol prices.
Before half of all vehicles switch to electric, we need a battery technology that works at scale and is cheap enough to be used in half of all vehicles. Li-ion is already the most popular kind of battery ever made, and electric cars use the most popular kind of li-ion cell - the Tesla S has 7,000 of them. There simply isn't the scale for li-ion, despite it being one of the most mass produced items on the planet.
Without any hint of irony?
I meant England deserved not to win, they only deserved the draw with such negative play. 360 in 100 overs means the opposition will play a bit more than 390 in 90 overs.
New Members Bar: The "New" refers to the bar not the members (who very much have not been described as "new" for several decades.
The pavilion at Lords is a weird stratified place. Members is where you go when you want to get a good view of the action, its on the top tier next to the big pavilion stand, but don't want to suffer the stuffiness of the Long Room or the crush that is the Bowler's Bar. When I worked there, it was also next to the media rooms, so you had Trueman, Blofeld, Johnners, Frindall et al having lunch up there, but sadly they are relocated to the other side of the ground now.
Mind you, it got me wondering if they would ever transmit multiple sound channels, one of the crowd, one of the commentators etc. (or a choice of commentators) then you could switch the wankers off and just watch the game but keep the crowd response. That would be nice.
Lots of sports on sky these days gets transmitted in 5.1, with the commentary on the centre channel, crowd sounds on the other 4 - I just unplug the centre.
Shame this doesn't usually work with BBC or ITV.
Crikey Spartacus, the Lords Hamper is a bit outside of my range. I've only been twice as a punter, ticket £90, beer £5, burger+chips £12. I think I enjoyed it more when I worked there as a barman (New Members Bar, top left of pavilion, good view of the wicket from the bar).
PS: SL didn't deserve the draw, England did - they should have declared the night before, silly sentimentality to give Ballance the chance for a ton. They would have had 10 overs at them with the new ball that night, another 10 overs fresh the next morning with a newish ball, and 20 overs at the end of the day with a new ball instead of 10. Über-conservative.
It's natural state is dullness, livened up by brief moments of skill/luck. It's like cricket, but without the pimms and cucumber sandwiches.
When I first got their service I was receiving only 0.5 MB/s.
Do you mean 0.5MB/s, ie 4 Mbit or did you mean 0.5 Mbit?
Isn't this just an "ADSL can be shitty" scenario though? I expect there are people with VM ADSL that get a shitty 0.5Mbit too.
Braindead support is braindead though. Be had excellent support lines, even the Bulgarians were super knowledgable and could fix any time I had issues.
Downvote for using "bing" as a verb meaning "search", yet still capitalizing it as a proper noun.
You might heart the fuck out of microsoft, but keep your neologisms (google¹ it) to yourself.
If you're soldering things, that sounds like Electrical Engineering.
Most schools have a clear divide between Computer Science and Electrical Engineering. Some students might do classes from both departments, but they are separate departments with different goals.
Computer science is almost an academic discipline, it actually relies very little on physical computers. Electrical and/or software engineering are disciplines that use computer science, they are not computer science. Computer science is "physics" to software engineering's "civil engineering". One tells you why bridges stay up, the other tells you how to build bridges that stay up.
I couldn't read any of the "facts" because you were so excited to get all these facts out there that you failed to make it at all readable.
You can tell when Tom (and the rest of the sheeple) can't argue the facts presented when they start bleating about paragraphs and name-calling.
Ah, I see, I'm the one doing the name calling? I do apologize, presumably the sheeple behind me will also apologize.
You can tell when Matt is really frothy, he forgets about paragraphs.
No - birds are dinosaurs, theropods to be precise. We just call them birds because we don't dig them up out of the ground.
How come I can buy a tablet with 2560 x 1600 resolution for $399, but if I want to buy just a screen with the same resolution, no attached tablet, it costs a metric fuckton of monies?
Or a wildcard cert, one IP per domain wildcard.
I've never tried asking for subjectAltName with multiple wildcard domains, wonder if that would work, one public IP per server farm.
Technically, if everything went mobile, wouldn't that include the back-haul? ;)
I don't think this breaks their charter, as they offer all the "popular" social networks. If they just had facebook maybe you would have a point, but they always offer facebook, twitter, delicious, digg, reddit, g+, linkedin and stumbleupon. No MySpace though, or "other social networks are available".
Similarly, they don't have to give all political parties time for party political broadcasts, just the popular ones.
TBH most journos these days seem to think that "newsworthy" means either "people talking about it on twitter" or "people unable to talk on twitter", it isn't just a BBC thing.
-bis (twice) and -ter (thrice) are suffixes that ITU put on to specifications to indicate the second and third revision of that specification.
Eg, the first 600 baud standard was V22, this allowed 1200bps and was shortly followed by V22bis, which allowed 2400bps.
Basically, he's saying the current spec is bollocks and we'll wait for V2.
urged businesses and governments […] to act swiftly and adopt IPv6 without any further delay.
Hah! I'm sure that's what they're going to do, and not just roll out CGN to their end users.
Crikey you are a cretin aren't you. A gay joke and a dwarf joke in one thread, nothing else useful to say? Why don't you try keeping your idiotic "humour" to yourself.
Which has fuck all to do with whether the advert is misleading or not.
You're so right that in the UK we now have officials which measure and estimate how much hookers and drug dealers add to the economy - and its a LOT.
There is a fascinating BBC article on the data:
Extrapolating from research for 2004, the ONS estimates that there were 60,879 prostitutes working in the UK in 2009. Based on Dutch research they assumed that each one serviced 25 clients a week, with an average price per visit of £67.16.
What's important for the measurement of the national accounts is the margin taken by dealers, except in the case of half of cannabis consumed in the UK, which is assumed to have been grown here.
The ONS took figures for drug sales from a one-off Home Office survey of drug use in 2003, which gave them an average amount of drugs consumed per person. It took retail prices from a UN report and adjusted for purity using evidence from seizures by police and border agencies. Comparing this value with the UN's wholesale drugs prices gives the margin that the ONS is interested in.
Each year's figures for demand are derived from the number of drug users shown in the Crime Survey for England and Wales. That gives a figure for 2009 of £3.6bn for drugs other than cannabis and £830m for cannabis.