Re: Can we please...
The Reg has ads? When did that happen?
1548 publicly visible posts • joined 20 Jul 2009
What, the unnecessary SMB weirdness isn't enough for you? You want to support another, even flakier, fileshare protocol too?
I think you've come in the wrong door, fellow -- the masochists' club is just around the corner. You'll know it when you see it, it's the one with broken glass set into the doorhandle.
...which gives one to wonder about the negligence or lack thereof of the rider, who presumably as a "lifestyle cyclist" should know better than to ride on a seat that's going to wreck his wedding tackle, and who certainly has a more compelling interest in the care and maintenance of said tackle than the seat manufacturer would.
Yes, but no one has felt the need to do so, because it's really only thickos who have a problem with this. The difference, put as simply as possible, is:
In a programming language, one programs, which instruct a computer in how to do something.
In a markup language, one marks up, which instructs a computer in how to draw something.
If what you're doing isn't telling a computer how to draw something, then you can't do that in a markup language -- you'll need to put on your Pull-Ups, climb up in Daddy's swivel chair, and use a real programming language instead.
Clear?
ISO standard public dotage again -- why do we let it go this far? There ought to be some kind of charitable organization tasked with going around and collecting our honored dodderers off their street-corner soap boxes and giving them a blanket and a chocolate biscuit or something, it's just shameful, a judgment on our society, to leave them on the street and let them go on about global warming or aliens with prosthetic nostrils or whatever they've fixated on.
It'd be too obvious while you were setting it up; no one who knows about it is going to let it slide, for the same reason everybody agreed back in our parents' day that FOBS was taking it just that extra little bit too far for comfort. (Which is, for those who might be wondering, why Kim Jong-un's favorite new toy has everyone so worried.)
...Apple bought Acer? When was that, exactly? I mean, there's a hacked-up image of an Acer laptop on the first bloody page of the article, either you're thick or you've just got a point to make.
Or hey, maybe both, who knows.
Special to whoever spent an hour yesterday going through my back comments and downvoting each one: lol, u mad?
The purpose of agitprop is to stir people up; the purpose of this is to cool people down -- and while we're on the subject of agitprop, Comrade, perhaps you've heard about NPR's recent admission that Mike Daisey's "expose" was in fact a tissue of lies?
to learn, after my comments in the thread about that Java exploit that everybody but Apple fixed months ago, that I have no problem at all with Apple's contracting manufacturing work out to Foxconn, or with Foxconn's treatment of its workers.
In this it appears I agree with many of those workers themselves -- not just those featured in the video linked from the article, either; those claiming that the suicides of Foxconn workers point out some kind of problem, for example, need to explain why it is that a suicide rate, which is actually much lower at a given company than for the surrounding population, is a sign that that company has a problem -- rather than that they are treating their workers rather better than is the local standard. (Note that the suicide rate didn't decrease at Foxconn after the much-derided installation of nets around the stairwells; it was already below the local average.)