A closer inspection of expenses is now warranted
Title says it all.
26 posts • joined 18 Jul 2009
Title says it all.
"As long as He has not disclosed specific intelligence....like Wikileaks"
It was newspapers such as the Guardian that actually published the Wikileaks info (until the Guardian double-crossed Assange, possibly because he let them know he wasn't happy that they didn't publish stuff relating to Israel). It was also a Guardian 'journalist' who also published the encryption key for the whole archive.
"Making large amounts of saccharide-laden drinks available at cheap prices, and then consuming then is the problem, not the specific carbohydrate profile."
The low price of HFCS makes the former possible, so it is valid to make an objection to this specific carbohydrate
So justice is a fashion statement?
"When I was a US government contractor, the contractors worried about licensing, paying for things, etc." ...
then billing the government, what, 3* or 10* the price? Gotta milk the cash cow.
The US military can't find them.
Arms supplier: US military, please accept one boxed jedicopter.
I thought alcohol was banned in Muslim countries
"You must be a public sector apologist"
No - like British Telecom, British Gas, British Airways, British Aerospace, Virgin Media, Phorm, Enron, Goldmen Sacks etc etc etc - doubleplus fail.
"politicians aren't in the pockets of corporations."
In the good old days corrupt politicians used to take backhanders in brown envelopes, no its all in the open - "office expenses" is a good one, allegedly.
Ian Michael Gumby wrote "I realize I'm just a techie and my undergrad courses were all in Engineering and Science." etc, etc
The Amazingly Self-Deprecating Ian Michael Gumby seems to find difficulties with the concept of having to prove oneself innocent.
If it was, it would be big enough to be visible from Earth.
"Assange == Amateur
Nick Davies == Professional Journalist."
So to summarise, you are saying that Assange has rubbed up Nick Davies ego the wrong way?
The title is the message. PS I would like to request the option for multiple icons Joke and Fail in this case.
You will get more sympathy if you claim it was a stealth tax - the downside is that you would have to admit it was a stealth tax on the stupid. But hey, you may get your £30 back.
"He keeps going on about this 'dsgfsjkhhhhkjweeeeeeeeellaanasanswrrrrrr'.
Oh no, another Icelandic volcano. We're all doomed.
Ecclestone is on the same list as Zuckerberg OR Zuckerberg is on the same list as Ecclestone
They are driven by middle class chavs who think driving a BMW is beneath them.
Not so long ago the real terroists with real explosives (Semtex etc) were white, and spoke with distinctive accents. They are raising their heads again in Northern Ireland. Tell me, do you support helfire missiles being fired at their houses? If not, why not?
Of the 6 criteria you list, I conclude you match 4 - if I'm allowed to treat stupidity as a 'mental illness'
So Mrs Seal will be saying:
Is that an elarged submarine in your pocket or are you just pleased to see me?
"But who is a genuine 3rd party? " - we need a genuine 2nd party first. One that is not beholden to corporate lobbyists. And remember that the Goatse guy is a politician who deals with the US.
when he says watch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwcq04GzU1k
This is much more appropriate:
Damn, I should have placed that bet on how long it would take.
Option request: Allow users to select multiple icons in the same response
Who comes up with these names? I think I'll wait for the Boisterous Badger version.
What could possibly go wrong?
James Pickett said:
"I now have a form to fill in that asks: "Have you ever refused a criminal records check?" so that's that dealt with then..."
You have the wrong attitude. You need to think like our overlords. You did not refuse the check, you declined to accept their kind offer.