BBC online news is carrying the same story, citing the Sunday Times: www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-33125068
120 posts • joined 15 Jul 2009
BBC online news is carrying the same story, citing the Sunday Times: www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-33125068
This video appears to be about Prince Harry. He was a bit of a clown when he was younger, but then he demonstrated that he is a guy with plenty of guts. I am not usually noted as a screaming royalist, but frankly this link is out of order in the context of this story.
Just what I was about to post. The alternative to locking the legitimate person out would be to let everyone else in.
No. No. No.
I was about to upvote you until I read "virii". If you're going to use Latin plurals, please get them right.
Defending Copernicus during the life of Euler does not make someone a Mathematician. Botany was not a Science until Wallace and Darwin, whom I'm sure the Inquisition would not have allowed on their patch. I made the challenge to smoke out the Exception that proves the Rule. I completely agree with the comments about the Cathar genocide (I have been to Montsegur and pointedly wear a T-shirt with a Cathar Cross every time I go to Leicester). However, my point here was not about the Inquisition as the Crime against Humanity that was but that it also cut Spain out of the game as far as Science was concerned, despite being the Superpower of its age.
More seriously, during "la convivencia" of Jews Muslims and Christians under the Moors, Spain was intellectually the most advanced part of Europe. Los Reyes Catolicos put a stop to this. So far as I can gather, in the time until Napoleon abolished the Inquistion, Spaniards were quite good at collecting flowers but had not a single mathematician or physical scientist of note. The Netherlands and Switzerland - much smaller countries - had lots of them. Can anyone contradict me on this?
How am I supposed to do this in a supermarket queue?
Good list but I don't understand 9 and you may also want to reword (negate) 8 and 10.
We Reg commentards can formulate our own arguments and opinions about this, but it would be interesting to see a synopsis of those that were presented by the complainant and respondent and those that were accepted by the judge.
It's all very well for us smug Reg readers to say that we will never install IoT equipment in our existing houses, but what about when you move house? Recently I moved from an old house (with minor structural problems such as loose plaster) to a modern one (with problems created by its previous owner, such as a leaky shower). In future, we will have to re-fit the IT/IoT in a house when we buy it, but in some cases (eg "smart" meters), this may not be allowed.
What moron decided to change the system of electoral registration in the year of a general election?
My father's career in the 1960s and 70s was the design of the analogue oscillators that drove the electomagnets that were around the neck of the screen and dragged the electron beams across the screen. When I first saw a concave screen I thought, how the hell would he have got cathode rays around that?
Exactly: it's the obvious application of RFID "loyalty" cards and "Electronic Shelf Edge Labels".
I was wondering how far I would have to skim down the comments for someone to ask this important question. Do we understand that the (unedited) Electoral Roll is F***b**k's quid pro quo for handing over its users' information to GCHQ?
The other side of this coin is that it kindly translated Zur Geometrie der Alten as "On the Geometry of the Elderly", when "Ancients" would have been the appropriate word in this context, since it was the title of a journal paper that referred to Archimedes.
You can fondly imagine that not giving anyone your number will help, but it doesn't.
Obviously I tell my friends what my number is. I admit that not putting it in the directory or on forms does not completely eliminate nuisance calls, but there are very few of them.
Obviously a BT employee here.
Aside from all the things above, I left BT Retail because they were structurally incompetent.
Specifically, when I had what turned out to be a simple exchange fault (probably the line card had been nudged out of place), for four months they were not only unable to fix it, but prevented me from communicating with any technically competent person. Eventually there was an occasion when the fault only affected the ADSL, which was with another company (ICUK). They got the fault fixed within a few hours and also provided me with a letter of explanation, which I used in my subsequent complaint against BT. Needless to say, the "Ombudsman" whitewashed BT. Since then, ICUK has looked after my phone line too.
The problem with not answering a call from a WITHHELD number is that it may really be important. Once I did not answer such a call because I was being pestered by someone else who was withholding their number. However, that call turned out to have been from the hospital where my father was, to tell me that he had suffered a life-threatening incident. (He actually died six weeks later.)
When companies (hospitals, universities) send out letters they do so on headed notepaper. When they send emails they use their own domain names. How is it acceptable that, as policy, their outgoing phone calls look like scams?
PS The most effective way to stop cold callers is to get a new phone number, not have it in the directory and never write it on forms.
its techniques could be used to identify plagiarism among computer science students
I found that laying one printout next to the other was an adequate technique!
Though, it is true that the spaces and tabs were a giveaway, when the indentation was, shall we say, merely decorative.
"Two of the three banks in the top 500 list did not use defensive typosquats"
No, who who have thought that such a thing could happen?
Africa, maybe? Sounds like the Next Big Thing after the Wind-Up Radio.
> who promptly sold me down the river to a party which I despise
> The Lib Dems are off my list for the rest of my life for their treachery.
Wrong. Gordon Brown had to go. The Lib Dems were in the Coalition to rein in the wild animals of the Tory party, which they have done pretty successfully.
The problem is that the British electorate does not understand what a "coalition" means.
I have studied the trial of Galileo but I do not see the connection.
Also, the Romans (at least the ones who spoke Latin rather than Greek) were never scientists either. Pliny the Elder might have got a job on New Scientist but that's as far as they got - they never did any original science or mathematics for themselves.
Please can we have a link to this Ofcom report, and maybe to any other available statements of what ADSL speed it is "reasonable" to expect, because I am getting nothing like what it says here.
I now have to translate from Fahrenheit phrasebook-style, so I happen to know that 68F=20C. I haven't got a clue what 40000F means, I just divide by 2. Negative F temps leave me completely flummoxed. Completely unsuitable for scientific or engineering use.
ICANN should not be allowed to sell standard English words (.home .book etc) as top level domain names. If we really must have this nonsense then it should be restricted to trade marks that have already been registered in the old fashioned way.
I don't want to defend Iran, where they execute people for being gay, amongst other things, but...
If Amazon were ever to go bust then I am sure that courts would not hesitate to sieze their newly and expensively acquired .book top level domain (which by the way stikes me as being appropriation of the English language).
But in the case of a sovereign country, siezing the Internet domain name .ir would make as much sense as siezing the telephone dialling code +98 or the name of the country as a postal destination.
Surely there must be longstanding international or diplomatic law preventing such nonsense. The legal argument that this judge has used seems to be rather contrived.
and the remarkable thing is that a court managed to follow this bit of logic that is obvious to Reg readers.
I get a letter about once a month, alternately a "reminder" in black print and a "demand" in red. I ignore them all. It is unsolicited mail. I don't reply to the pizza leaflets to tell them that I don't eat pizza, so why should I reply to the TV licensing authority? I am not their customer, I don't want to be on their database. At least while it is a criminal issue there has to be "proof beyond reasonable doubt" but if it is decriminalised then administrators will be able to impose penalties without due process.
They make you perform cartwheels to log in just to check your balance.
They send you personal information and PINs in letters with "if undelivered return to Internet Banking" on the back.
THEY phone YOU, withholding Caller ID (which can be spoofed anyway) and ask you "security questions".
They send emails that ape phishing emails, whose Received: lines indicate Cloud providers, not their own domains.
They invent textbook examples of Man-in-the-middle network attacks.
We don't often get straightforward tutorial posts here, so thanks for writing that.
(I have used Unix/Solaris/FreeBSD/Linux for 28 years so I personally didn't need it, though I would appreciate tutorials on other topics from time to time.)
Because Outlook uses the core editor from Word, it won't allow you to quote contextually, as it refuses to allow you to break up the quoted material into blocks for Question/Answer, Q/A, Q/A...
Thanks for explaining to me why so many people insist on quoting the entire email back but don't edit their answers into the questions.
Excellent description, Brenda! Some airlines let you pay extra to jump one of the queues, except that it is not the one that actually lets you sit down in your chosen seat on the plane any quicker. It may just let you get on the transfer bus first and therefore off it last.
One might hope that this will result in some toughening up of operating systems and improved virus detection software from South Korean sources.
We all know about the common confusion of the Internet with the World Wide Web. There seems to be another one between the WWW and Google underlying this. I don't particularly want to defend Google, but there it is. I am already concerned that their searches show me what they think I want to see or what they want me to see or what the Govt wants me to see, instead of what's actually there.
At this point you might be wondering if this is to do with the units in which you choose to measure, but no, this phenomenon is unit-independent.
It's exactly because it is unit- or more accurately scale-independent that it works. I am a little surprised not to have seen the word "logarithm" in the article.
Scale issues make me a little sceptical of its value for fraud detection: I would imagine that credit limits and common denominations of payments would obscure the distribution.
In British system the usage is clear, for example www.birmingham.ac,uk and www.birmingham.gov.uk. Without the intermediate level you have to express the same information in an ad hoc way, for example
www.tu-darmstadt.de and however they name their local authorities.
It would be much better if we introduced new intermediate level domain names for each of the things for which there is some regulatory authority, eg lloyds.bank.uk or smithbrown.law.uk, to go with .ac.uk .gov.uk .nhs.uk .sch.uk etc.
Nowadays I am not aware of a hosting provider that doesn't use Microsoft or Google services for email.
I have been a satisfied customer of primexeon.com for several years now. No, they haven't paid me to say that.
They use cpanel and various standard LAMP tools under that. Frankly the cpanel interface is a pile of ****, but the freedom it gives me is far preferable to the home-grown ones that other web companies provide. In particular, I can write my own code for my webpages and email as I wish.
whilst the rest of Europe was enjoying the Rennaisance the Brits were in the sway of the Puritans ...
The Rennaisance was well out of nappies and on its way to school by the time of the Puritans. Might be a good idea to look at some dates.
I've known bipolar people and haven't a clue how you deal with them. They can be very scary when they're at the wrong pole and no amount of telling them that you want to be their friend seems to help matters. Surely interacting with a colleague or friend with Asberger's is a doddle compared to dealing with bipolar people.
So what if someone has Aspergers. Other people have a squint.
Other people are female, gay, of other ethnicities, physically disabled, etc.
However, in all of these things it is no longer acceptable to discriminate, and more or less everybody now knows that. The problem is that autistic spectrum behaviour --- which many of us here do not regard as a "disability" --- remains a perfectly acceptable reason for discrimination.
Totally agree on the noise pollution thing. (Classical) music is fine, so I listen to Radio 3, but that all too frequently degenerates into airheaded chat from conceited arts graduates - the "opera" from the Met, for example, seems to be ?50% chat. "Just play the f**king music!", I frequently yell at it.
Altogether an excellent piece, as I see many other Reggistas also consider. However, the only events that I could find on the website autism.org.uk were lectures, not self-help groups.
My friend bought a fridge in Spain. The guy in the shop said it would be delivered "mañana mañana" and it duly turned up at 10am. Better service than Currys or Comet.
Evidently you understand the condition, so you should be capable of making allowances for it, particularly given the link between Asberger's and technical competence. We're not talking about someone with a mental illness that might suddenly make them violent. Nor is it dementia.
But there are also googleapis and googlemaps and ...
Increasingly, you cannot opt out of Google without opting out of the Web altogether.
Please just let me email my repeat prescription requests to my GP's surgery, instead of making me go there one day with a note and two days later to collect the prescription. Then let me take it to whichever pharmacy I feel like on the day. The existing and proposed systems for involving pharmacies in obtaining repeat prescriptions just add to the time and the complication.
Also, I should be able to get my complete medical records by turning up at the surgery with a USB stick and my passport.
My way of doing it would take next to no additional IT. Any proposals from computer-illiterate politicians are likely to be expensive failures.
If possible, especially if the amounts of money are small, it is easier just to pretend to be the person or say that you are doing things on their behalf than to tell bureaucrats that someone had died or that they have Alzheimers and you have lasting power of attorney for them. If you tell them that there is some legal piece of paper they will stop doing anything until they have the original. Spoken from experience.
Does this mean that I can now refuse to read Word documents from people in the public sector?