Its not clear to me whether...
The move is to do with data legislation, or Dropbox attempting a little tax avoidance. Comments?
548 posts • joined 10 Jul 2009
The move is to do with data legislation, or Dropbox attempting a little tax avoidance. Comments?
Hang on? I've got 10.10.3 running on a 2007 iMac with 3Gigs of RAM. I agree about the stupidity of the new 21" iMacs not having accessible RAM slots, but if you've got one of those, it wouldn;t have shipped with less than 8Gigs.
It's here for download https://support.apple.com/kb/DL1804?locale=en_GB
Not exactly sure what you mean by 'babysitting a GUI app'. The Appstore pretty good at resuming interrupted downloads. Sounds like you want to be angry for the sake of it.
... Whereas you could be quite reasonably angry about them not providing patches for Lion, Mountain Lion and Mavericks.
> not sure how "startup" became a synonym for "new"
They aren't synonyms - as can be seen from the way that the article applies startup to a 2008 company.
Hence startup is a state of mind. You're the one confusing yourself.
It's been a few months since I wrestled with trying to reset a mail password on Virgin, but it used to be hilariously bad. The system disallowed my choices for being too long, then for having a space in, then for having the wrong kind of punctuation in the wrong places. Amateurs.
Quite often on long journeys, its nice for the wife to be able to channel surf or put some music on or whatever, while I concentrate on the road. This looks to be impossible with this set-up. Yes?
Personally, I think Newsnight did it on purpose to see if they could give the reg staffer some kind of smugness-embolism.
Did Kelly survive? That's what I want to know.
That make me yearn for the dear, departed 'rate this article' widget, so I could hit '1'.
> No. What caused their downfall was being forced to do what Microsoft wanted.
No. Their downfall was already well underway by then.
... Except for all the VNOs like Tesco who do just that.
Alternatively, Capaldi's been the best doctor for while and the writing has been imaginative, with a good mix of scares and laughs and a nice bit of nuanced character writing. In addition the plots have gone back to comparatively simple but entertaining story, compared with the overly baroque 'the doctor save the entire universe again this week, with some time-whimey paradox which is never fully explained'.
Not really. She started as magic-pixie-impossible-girl and ended up as a character with a bit of emotional depth and complexity.
Some fine acting from the The Doctor and Clara, a series in which the Doctor's morality is put under the lens, siome nice character driven episodes, a few properly scary ones. Some laughter, a few damp eyes and the return of the master (and no she's not dead).
Overall a cracking return to form for what is - let's face it - a kids show that adults can enjoy watching too.
> The idea that anyone is editing 4K images at 1:1 and needs the extra space for toolbars etc. is classic Apple iWank. If you're editing those images, you're zoomed in
How do you figure that? Why would I want to zoom in when editing?
All Macs come with really good calibration capabilities courtesy of Colorsync Utility. You can get an idea of what it does by watching as someone pootles through its menus here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ah_EpObQ1PE
> I'm not "Proud to be hetro" it's just what is.
Yes, but that's because you're not part of a minority who until recently were classified as criminal and who (for example) have to think twice before holding hands in the streets.
You don't have to think long and hard about the effect announcing your sexuality would have on family, friends, stockholders and customers.
... and they're already pretty nervous about what it means for all the game channels on Youtube.
See also Virgin Media, where their passwords have to be something like more than 6 and less than 10 and don't allow spaces etc. Sigh.
Its almost as if it's a really early preview and some boiler plate text and code has been left in there. Astonishing.
Hmmm, I can see how it would be useful to (for example) capture strings that were typed into the help box, or into command lines.
Why, what's Apple done 'of late'?
I was pondering the fact that England might be able to stick with BST all year around, perhaps with double summertime?
....should be generating plenty of false positives.
... From what I can tell.
I have my own domain, but mails are forwarded to my old NTLWorld mailboxes. I haven't seen any disruption today at all, I don't think.
Why? Because they have them with them, that's why - and don't feel the need to carry another piece of equipment.
I seem to remember that it started out as an e-mail newsletter didn't it - pre-Web. Or am I wrong?
Oops - quite so, thanks.
My guess is that this is a symptom of the Internet reaching 512 BGP routes today. I'm not a router expert, but as I understand it 512 is the default max size on some older routers. Shaw isn't the only one having some problems today.
Try Virginmedia's borked e-mail set-up - e-mail passwords, must be between 8 and 10 characters long, must start with a letter, cannot contain spaces. And apparently some word combinations are forbidden. Trying to generate something secure is horrendous.
> Virgin leads a fine example of why this is not always the answer.
As does ITV Player.
... Which is why I stuck with CIX. Happy days.
I suppose the first question that I should ask is - what are the symptoms and what makes you think it's malware? I've seen a few occasions when people have suspected malware and it turned out to be something else - so what is the machine doing?
The most recent version also changes the license terms.
> 1. You have to pay for the content. There is a ton of free content on the Internet, I have never seen any need to go to pay per view sites.
Therefore you don't have to pay for content - no-one is forcing you to watch DRM'd content
> 2. You can only watch it on one computer. But I downloaded it on this computer and now I want to watch it on another one - not happening. Get your credit card out and pay for it again.
That depends entirely on the content owner and the way the content is licensed. You may be able to run it on multiple computers, but not simultaneously, or any number of computers on the same subnet, or.... the permutations are many. It's up to you to decide whether you like it or not. I don't like the DRM on iTunes movies, so never purchase from there. I'm fine with the DRM on Steam.
> 3. I downloaded this before my computer crashed. I rebuilt it, but now I can't play it. That's because the secret key is gone. Easily fixed, pay for it again.
Again, you're making assumptions about the way that DRM is implemented.
> 4. I saved it when I watched it last week and now it won't play. That's because it is time-bombed. Pay for it again.
Again, you're making assumptions about the way that DRM is implemented. This one is likely, but seriously - you have the choice not to buy it.
Actually, I think you've hit upon the most plausible reason, there.
Much as a nice bit of America-bashing is fun? Don't the questions look a bit off to anyone else?
Am I sure that the universe began with a big bang well yes - or was it inflation?
Am I confident that it started 13.8bn years ago? Of course not. I know it's meant to be about 13, but if I was asked on the street whether it was 13.8 I would certainly say I was "Not at all confident".
How many of you would actually say you were confident, without looking it up?
... the reason Apple products sell is because anyone who buys them are idiots. That must be the reason, obviously.
My new favourite phrase. Well done.
When we had our first sprog, she had a number of illnesses and I have to say that NHS was remarkably helpful at 3am giving good pragmatic advice about whether to take her into A&E or wait until morning.
Sad to see it go.
East London - nothing as far as I know.
The issue, as far as I was concerned was that I have 6 days to get an alternative installed on my 90 year old father's Mac. The notice was rather short.
For me, the knowledge-graph snippets marked the point where Google became evil-ish, from a Website owner's point of view.
The social compact between Google and a site had always been simple. "If I set my robots file to let you in, Googe - you can index my content and link to it from your search results. You get to put ads on your Google home page, I get extra traffic to put ads and cross-promote other services on my site".
With the new system, however that compact is broken. The Web site no longer (necessarily) gets extra traffic. Instead Google is effectively screen-scraping content into its own database and presenting the information to its users directly.
While it may be convenient for Google's users, it's not healthy for the Web as a whole. The solution? Robots.txt needs to be extended so that in addition to the allow/don't allow directives Web site owners can state whether they are happy for information on the site to be excerpted.
Some of us have Macs. (ducks)
To be honest, while I enjoy gaming in the office, if I could play TF2 or Left for Dead 2 or whatever on the big screen downstairs, I'd be tempted. Particularly as (for Valve titles at least) I wouldn't need to rebuy the software
Sounds like you need to tune into Radio 4Extra, you can get all the broadcasts of The Navy Lark, Round The Horn and The Men From The Ministry you desire.,
Hang on, that says that *your* wishes are pre-eminent, not your next of kin. What's wrong with that?
Since the last G3 iMacs were phased out over 10 years ago, that shows some remarkable longevity.
The Roberts DAB I have runs very happily for about 4 days of intensive listening on rechargable AAs, Personally I got DAB because I value the wider variety of stations - 6 Music and 4 Extra in particular. I also nipped down to Halfords and got one for the car.
I left my wife's machine on 10.6.8 but I have to say this is the first upgrade since then that has made me tempted to upgrade it. 10.9 is a really nice OS and there really isn't much convergent UI going on.
You made me check and yes you're right and I'm wrong.. I made the incorrect assumption that when I saw the Flash plugin running as a separate process in Activity Monitor it was sandboxed.
I'll leave the original post just so this thread makes sense.
The Flash plugin has indeed been in its own sandbox since Lion... as sort hinted at in the article. I'm confused as to why this is news now.