Yes, I know.
1545 posts • joined 11 May 2007
Yes, I know.
Presumably the idea is to keep cached copies of data on your device to a minimum. With a web front end there might be some caching of assets but you'd hope that actual email contents wouldn't get cached. That's not the case if you run a fat email client, which is why they require the remote wipe capability.
Seems perfectly sensible and reasonable.
Put an album on then channel surf with the sound down till you find something that sort of goes with the music. Cool!
Companies just in it for the money you say? Wow, every day's a school day!
other than flagging the update as "don't show me this again"....
Really? How many private car sales are there a month? The govmnt just grabbed themselves an extra months road tax off every one. It's a cynical attempt to weasel some more cash out of the plebs.
If the car is taxed why should changing owner untax it?
Surely that's legal, you get charged for the whole month even if you pay on the 30th, so it must be back--dated...
Yeah, it's targeting freetards and maclusers....
Surely it's not how often it's used that's important, it's how often it's enabled.
What about Plan Z?
It's evil! It's diabolical! It's lemon-scented!!
Oh fine, as long as most routers are secure I won't worry. That's standard security practice isn't it? You know, just do the best you can, a few holes here and there probably don't matter....
Typical fucking SJW bullshit!
I myself prefer social injustice! (As long as I'm not subjected it, obv....)
Like we're going to listen to someone who uses Windows 8!!! I'm much more interested in the opinions of those who won't go anywhere near it, they give a much clearer impression of how shit it is.
Are you saying my arse is suboptimal?!?!?!?
Seriously? You think prohibitively expensive = cool?
Cool has nothing to do with how much something costs. This list is nonsense, the Fonz is not interested in any of these brands.
Ah, so this is just adding a more popular language so people don't have to learn Apple script or use graphics. Interesting. Thanks for the reply!
What are you saying? There's already a scripting language for OS X or just that it has the necessary hooks?
You've been buying the wrong albums.
I know! Imagine actually being that close to a real woman! Nightmare!!
Because it means Apple gets to decide which capabilities gain traction, not the market or the users?
I'm on 4.4.4, that's not 4.4 or under. It's a Moto G so not an unpopular handset.
None of those things are addressable from the other side of the world though. Anyone on the internet could attempt to compromise your intellifiridge, how many of them could access your house as easily?
Hey, he's only a terrorist, no need to get nasty!
..you can wipe it and put a PROPER linux on there!!!
Moto G has an fm radio, seems to work fine though I haven't used it in anger.
Didn't they say anything about Chrome?
>> Maintaining a large music library looks a lot less attractive when Spotify, rdio, Pandora or Apple's own iTunes Radio and Beats Music put millions of songs a couple of clicks away. <<
I have a friend who uses spotify. Whenever he's browsing his playlists for stuff for us to listen to there are gaps where music that he used to be able to stream is no longer available. I never have that problem with my large music library.
They're going caving in their pants? Extreme caving!!
Humans can have sex without "objectifying" each other. There's nothing wrong with an app that allows consenting adults to find sexual partners. I think the assumption that it requires objectification says more about you than it does about other people.
Yeah, you never struck me as someone who hits "preview" before "submit".....
I think it's an attempt to get people to post outraged comments....
Which Google chief? The one who said "If you have something that you don't want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place" or the one who said "Google policy is to get right up to the creepy line and not cross it"?
Which one of them said this? "I actually think most people don't want Google to answer their questions. They want Google to tell them what they should be doing next."
Yeah, MS are definitely the big bad when it comes to privacy.....
If a windows machine comes anywhere near my girls I swear I'll do time!
If you're not happy with the limitations of Windows don't buy a Windows tablet.
>>not willing to adopt the almost imperceptible changes that came in the latest service pack<<
The search in 8.1 is shit compared to 8, that's a major pain to me as it was the way I launched everything that wasn't nailed to the start bar. Now I'm back to nosing around the program files folder to find things. With 8 you search Programs, settings or documents, in 8.1 it's keener on showing me links to websites than finding my programs.
I wouldn't call that almost imperceptible. I'd recommend 8 over 8.1 for precisely this reason.
Why use your phablet to look prattish when a simple bluetooth earpiece does the same job?
I know! A way of transferring money from my bank where I specify the exact amount! How old fashioned. Give me Direct Debits anyday, I trust all the companies I deal with implicitly!
All your really showing there is that you have no understanding of religion and you're crap at taking the piss. Just paraphrasing the same stupid "man in the clouds" comment is not satire.
Science is about how, religion is about why. They don't really overlap.
Well I found the wanker comment much funnier than the muggles one....
That's the reg hacks trying to get the freetards to bite. Got to admire how well they know their audience!
Indeed, who can work without translucent windows!
Guess it depends on whether you're 3 miles from home or 300. (If your car isn't electric, obviously.)
it's "set foot" or "stepped.
Well browse to a html compliance test site in IE 11 and see what is says. No belief necessary.
Not really. The problem is they notice it's IE, but not that it's IE 11. They then render a load of non-standard html that fixes problems on old versions of IE but break the new one because it's standards compliant.
... will be using this as an excuse to make their usual noises.
That's you that is.
But what about those who are using their old devices purely as Sonos remotes? Will they appear on your stats? Quite probably not.
In this case the issue is a vulnerability that was around for 2 years and could have led to certificates being stolen. If those certificates aren't revoked then patching the hole that leaked them doesn't make you secure.
Did you read the article?