Joke's on you
When you find out your daughter is pregnant.
59 posts • joined 8 Jul 2009
When you find out your daughter is pregnant.
Well, they already bought those drones and Osama is dead, so they gotta use them on someone. After all, they have to justify buying new ones soon, otherwise poor Lockheed Martin or Boeing might not turn record profits.
A nice screen, a keyboard, a drive, an SD Card and a couple of USB slots ... this concept might catch on. I wonder how nobody thought of it before.
And it could fold, and people could hold it on the top of their lap while using them. Quite intriguing.
Most likely the same people that consider all the rape and murdering in the Bible and a viciously vengeful God to be perfectly ok for children. Also, many of them consider physical punishment to be totally cool, to, for their children.
Now everybody remember: a pair of tits is very dangerous for children. That's why we give them guns, so they can defend against it.
That's what royal intermarriage will do.
Royal intermarriage will, in time, lead to inbreeding. The Lannisters just skipped a few steps in the process. One might say they were quite progressive with this "the future is today" mentality.
Followed by marsupial lions.
Now where's the "WANT" icon ?
How do I join ?
I mean, a holy man can only take that much hotness till he breaks and rapes someone.
As for fraud, how would they get the money to pay off the families while hiding traces, as god intended them to ?
And no, I won't stop calling you Shirley
Also less people-burny, book-burny, contraception-fighty, ignorance-spready ....
to write it for you. A lot of times it's foreign nationals who write the good software, because most americans and englishmen won't even bother to study computer science.
Now go patrol that border fence to keep 'Murrica safe from them Mexicans, ok Governor Perry ? Or is this Senator McCain ?
I guess the chance of finding a frozen Dodo are quite slim.
what with assault rifles being sold at Walmart (AFAIK).
1. Win iPad 2.
2. Sell it on eBay.
3. Buy whatever meta-hipster gadget you're not too cool for.
4. Pat yourself on the back for not being a dumbass.
Money is always the correct answer. It all eventually gets down to money.
by washing those dishes and making me a sammich.
Now, El Reg, where's that icon for TITS/GTFO ?!
Someone inform the Westboro Baptist Church so they can make some "God hates anti-matter" signs or something.
As in HAL, the murderous computer from 2001: A Space Odyssey.
Also, Skynet already exists. There are a bunch of things called Skynet. Amongst them: satellites and an ISP: just what a newborn self-aware computerized conscience needs to keep an eye on its former masters, the puny humans.
I read somewhere they are positioning these phones for the Indian market. Maybe someone at Nokia saw some Indian clothing and/or some Indian movies just after taking a look at India's wiki page, and thought:
Lower end (cheaper) smartphone + bright colors + India = 1 BILLION phones sold
And since we're here, disband the police, let everyone get their private police and/or, event better, their private army. Why get tazed by the police when a private "contractor" can do a much better job and kill you with just one bullet ? The taxpayer would pay for the electricity in the Tazer, but not for the private contractor's bullet. The contractor would have to cover his own expenses - for example by forcing your wife and daughter to provide sexual services to the highest bidder.
PS: If it's not clear, I think you're a "libertard" who's way too confused about what having no government (or "merely" having almost no rules) would mean. I'd recommend reading up on some history, but I doubt you have the mental strength to accomplish such a monumental task.
Sells out to get some free shit, but does it ironically.
(Still) In use in Belgium and quite handy IMO. And 100% free.
When you say premium, you imply costs + quality. That's UNIX.
Windows, on the other hand, is just expensive shit.
Just like I did in a HelloWorld application years ago. This must clearly mean I invented their algorithm and they have no merit whatsoever.
the computer is not in the kitchen.
apparently your dumb ass can't understand the difference between a statistical sample and a group of people who are NOT selected for statistical purposes.
here, let me explain: if you take 1000 british people that live in london and ask them where they live, it is NOT correct to say based on that that 100% of british people live in london. get it ? nah, i doubt you do.
those 34k people got together for a reason: to quit facebook. so even if all of them did, it doesn't mean all the users of facebook quit the site. on the other hand the percentage of people who expressed interest in organizing this protest might be somewhat relevant - just 34k out of hundreds of millions is a very small percentage, and even if there were 10 times more, it still would be next to nothing.
now if you want to have something resembling real science you can take 1000 RANDOM users of facebook and ask them if they intend to quit because of the privacy concerns. of course it wouldn't be real science, cause your sample would influence the result, but this is what you have formulas for. formulas for deducting the proper sample size and the error margins for a sample. and of course proper sample sizes depend on the sampling technique, from random (basic, more error prone) to more advanced and less error prone techniques.
PS: what the fuck is this facebook i keep hearing about ?
Now I hear France has some extra burkas lying around. How about they send them to Austrialia so they can properly dress their women so their kangaroos won't be offended.
So how you gonna spin this one against Google ?
No matter rhe real motuves, they get bonus points for the fact that they publicly criticize China when everyone from governments to large companies has been treating it with kid gloves and doing its best not to upset it.
I really don't get all the blind hate for Google when they've been a major engine of innovation. They are the reason your mailbox size in counted in GB instead of MB. They pushed many free products, forcing many others to follow suit. Their papers inspired better open source products like Hadoop. Their push to get cheaper and more efficient data centers has many other companies trying to follow in their footsteps - and they get to save some money and we get to breathe air that is a little less polluted. They created Android and brought some competition and pushed innovation on a market that would otherwise be thoroughly dominated by Apple. And there are many other examples.
Of course you need to keep an eye on them and not just trust them, cause after all every corporation is going for profit. But harping on every little thing that they do or say became really annoying.
So if they do the same thing with mobile prices it can only be good for the consumer.
There were some reports he might be sick and given the abuse his body has taken over the years you wouldn't really expect him to leave to be 70-80 years old, would you ? If he did, it would have been a small miracle in itself.
"If the goal of .NET was to see off Java, it was at least partially successful. Java did not die, but enterprise Java became mired in complexity, making .NET an easy sell as a more productive alternative."
- It might be an easy sell cause the people doing the buying are not the ones who'll do the coding.
- When written by good coders Java can be beautiful and simple. However, in the hands of morons it can turn into an ugly thing that's entirely too complex for their comprehension abilities - just like any language, including C#.
- The promises of marketing (perfect integration, has every tool for your needs, you can do everything with the mouse, you won't need to write a line of code and all the other crap) are just crap. Managers eat that shit up as if there ever was a tool that could cover all the needs of a large application. Every particular application has its own specific requirements and quirks and if you don't have good people to implement a proper solution not even .Net can fix it for you.
- Productivity might be better if you develop for IE only. Otherwise for the server side a Java coder who's experienced with a certain stack (say Hibernate, Spring) can develop just as fast if not faster.
No self respecting coder would EVER use the phrase "fantastic language features".
And if you picked .Net to code as a hobby (as you claim), why would you care that "It can be used on the majority of PC's in business (and at home)". You should only care that it runs on your machine(s).
Mine's the one with a post-it that says "LOL" in the pocket.
You knew about Google's "privacy problem" long before they created the Androit platform, so how were you tempted by it ? I call bullshit. You just wanted to bitch a little bit about Google without seeming an unreasonable ass (which you are) and since you were at it you took the opportunity to bitch about Apple as well.
If your privacy is so damn important to you and everybody is out to get you, how about you get off the fuckin' Internet and leave us alone. Cause here we can all see you. We got your IP and we know who you are. We're coming for you. Better throw away your computer and run hide in that cave.
If the machines ever become aware they'll know they'll still need the geeks for the occasional bug-fixing or developing a new feature (such as better aiming). The rest of you will be fucked, though.
It's the evolution of society: first it was ruled by warriors, then by priests, then by politicians, now by businessmen. Soon it will be geeks.
Oh, I forgot: I, for one, welcome The SelfAware One, our Lord Google !!!
"Critic of an article's grammar? then check yours comment's before you post"
Didn't you mean "check you comments'/comment's (grammar) before you post" ? Or maybe "check yours" as in "your grammar" ?
Maybe my English is failing me here, but "check yours comment's" seems, well, wrong.
IIRC it was Naked Gun, not Police Academy.
which I would be more than willing to provide to you for 5 easy payments of ....
Technical savvy people would need to know the extensions of the files on their machines and would also have no problem in finding the configuration and changing it.
Hiding the extension is a "feature" aimed at the average Windows user - presumably to avoid overloading their little brains with information such as the extension of a file and - GASP - what a file extension is.
Just being curious.
I mean not only boning that many women, but getting £3,725,000 from them ???
He should get a medal for this.
Otherwise trying to innovate themselves might prove to be too complicated.
Microsoft Windows 8 to feature the latest in technology: the fire and the wheel.
Latest developments: In an attempt to draw Linux fanbois, Microsoft will adopt the (utterly retarded) Ubuntu naming scheme. Microsoft Windows 8 to be named Miscarried Macheleon (you know ... attempt to mimic the Mac chameleon style + failure to deliver)
The databases are already there, the information is already shared, this is just standardization. Anyone working in IT knows that standardization has a bunch of benefits.
As for the "we don't need no stinking ID" brits, just don't make us slap bar codes on your fat and still growing asses. You'll get an ID like everyone else in Europe, and you'll like it. And that's that.
Actually, there's more: soon you'll have to learn how to drive properly.
No sin, no need for the church, right ?
No sin means they're angels or Jesus himself or at least 2nd cousins to Mary.
And what if the no-sin-little-green-men just happen to develop a taste for human flesh ?
Holy aliens eating believers ? How would a christian respond to that ? Will they think it's the rapture (via alien digestion) ? I mean, why not ? God works in mysterious ways, right ?
And even if this is not the case, no sin means they're more or less like the animals on earth. Will the church start converting poodles and lolcats next ?
Which, I suppose, makes Darth Vader the 2nd coming. After all, the force was strong in him, right ?
Funny how of all the "classic" SciFi movies I thought the scenario from Terminator seemed the most plausible.
"The story goes that NASA has been secretly tracking this rogue planet since 1983 but has suppressed all news of its existence across the world in the name of <<global security.>>"
So there, I just proved that in fact the world will end in 2012.