20 posts • joined Tuesday 7th July 2009 23:24 GMT
Re: Engineers often simply lack understanding of emotional situations
>> Sales 'people' on the other hand are actually evil. Truely dead inside and would happily eat a baby if there was
>> margin in it.
Surely you mean marketing droids? Or legal?
Re: angry much?
> Facebook outs teens as gay, putting them at risk of their lives and enables murder and other crimes,
Not a fan of facebook, but teen in your example did themselves place that information on public forum. If they didn't want to be outed, surely they would keep that information to theyselves, hmm?
For a "pedantic grammar Nazi" (the icon you chose), YOU'RE pretty clueless about YOUR placement of apostrophes and the spelling of pronouns.
-- A real grammar Nazi.
Re: Simon Sharwood
What are you yapping about? I see no egregious spelling, typographical, or grammatical errors in the article. You sound like you have a personal grudge against the man.
Re: Ok, we can work out how they know it's Apollo 11 later.
> But first things first, what the hell are amazon doing at the bottom of the ocean in the first place?
Well, to co-opt an old lawyer joke, It's a good start!
Abortion! What a miserable shell. A mess. Useless for scripting. Stick to bash or zsh.
> The thing is, that they aren't intending to put it in the exact point behind the moon. It would orbit in
> a circular motion in a plane that is perpendicular to Earths orbit. That means that it would appear
> from the Earth to be travelling in a circle around the moon. I would guess that the NASA DSN
> would be used to talk to it.
The thing is that while it would orbit in a circular motion around the moon, the moon is orbiting in a circular motion around the earth. From the earth it would appear to be orbiting the earth at the Lagrangian point L2. Which is directly behind the moon. All the time. And from the moon, whose face is turned towards the earth all the time, the backside of the moon faces L2. All the time.
I don't follow the bit about L2 orbit being perpendicular to earth orbit.
saddles vs hilltops
> Above piccie shows the locations. L4 or 5 would be better choices as objects there remain in
> place where the others need to expend fuel to maintain position.
Actually the blue and red arrowheads show the tendency at the various points. Objects at any of the points will require some minor orbital adjustments from time to time. On a potential surface L1, L2 and L3 are saddles and a body there will have the tendency to run away in one of two directions; L4 and L5 are hilltops and the tendency there is to run away in any direction. The advantage to any of the Lagrangian points is that in their vicinity the potential curve is relatively flat and orbital adjustments required would be minor.
> Linux (all varieties) think their variety of Linux is a gift from heaven
Linux is a gift from Linus Torvalds. Using it may be heavenly, but from heaven, not. BTW, I have used OSX, Windows, FreeBSD, and other OSes and Linux is the only OS that doesn't suck. So there!
... except your own of course!
Re: I hate to say it loudly but
< this is one of those rare moments when Microsoft acted with professionalism and honesty. It
< means that even for them, GPL counts as a valid license.
`Microsoft', `professionalism' and `honesty' in the same sentence? Huh! No, dear AC. They were caught! Someone noticed! That is the only reason. It does seem significant, though, that to fix their problem they acknowledge the GPL rather than take it to court to attempt to have the GPL voided.
research into the bleeding obvious
How to be a fully funded college research professor: pick at random any urban legend or blindingly obvious bit of common sense and write your research paper based on your preconceptions and misguided notions, and possibly, just possibly, one or two interviews with those in your immediate family or group of like-minded friends. Then sit back and wait for the kudos and credits to come rolling in. What a load of bollocks! Some will not be able to cope with the new technology as they age, others will. Stating this kind of nonsense as if it were serious research is a coil, as is picking one side and stating that DOOM IS UPON US! THE END OF LIFE AND TECH SUPPORT AS WE KNOW IT, etc. I'm leaving.
road signs and english
The insistence by some commentards that driving requires/should require speaking/reading/understanding english is puzzling at best: do any of you out there drive AT ALL? At most you need to understand ``stop'', ``slow'', have a basic understanding that numbers like ``35'' and ``55'' relate to miles per hour (in merkia) and are speeds that should not be exceeded while travelling on various sections of roadway, and be able to distinguish between red, green and orange lights at intersections. Most signs are designed with the illiterate in mind and are reduced to symbols and graphic designs. It seems to me understanding english is required only to ponder the pearls of wisdom falling like rose petals from the esteemed police constable's eloquent lips. NOT.
Seems illogical to me that you can't look up a post code; I want to mail some bloke a letter, I know the street address, how do I find out what the postcode is? I have to pay Royal Mail #50 for that? How did this system ever take off?
I dont' care
They can claim to have juiced up SUSE as much as they like. I will not ever be installing another SUSE, be it 11, 12 13 or infinity. I have had more than enough of the appalling mess foisted on me that was SUSE 10. My next install will be Ubuntu.
- Xmas Round-up Ten top tech toys to interface with a techie’s Christmas stocking
- Xmas Round-up Ghosts of Christmas Past: Ten tech treats from yesteryear
- Review Hey Linux newbie: If you've never had a taste, try perfect Petra ... mmm, smells like Mint 16
- Analysis Microsoft's licence riddles give Linux and pals a free ride to virtual domination
- NSFW Oz couple get jiggy in pharmacy in 'banned' condom ad