annoyingly, I have to side with Apple.
I feel dirty now.
275 posts • joined 2 Jul 2009
I feel dirty now.
Let's face it. A keyboard issue is not exactly going to tax anyone's brain.
The easy problems get good service. It's those slightly less obvious ones, where most customer service starts to fall on it's face.
You don't get this sort of shit from Apple because there are no Apple OEM's.
This is not Microsoft's fault per-se. They didnt put this software in the image for Lenovo laptops, Lenovo did. Had they also been an Apple OEM and Linux OEM, they would have put the same or similar on those laptop images also.
....in the face of the fact that if this were to pass, it would do exactly fuck all to help the spymasters (MI*, FBI etc) to catch terrorists. They will be the ones still breaking the law by using encrypted comms. Its the rest of us, law abiding (generally) citizens that will suffer! As always!
That made me spit coffee.
Isn't satellite broadband inherently latent? Delays over a second on a round trip?
I'd rather 56k latencies tbh. At least I could game on that, just barely.
...MUCH rather risk the infinitesimal chance of being blown up in a terrorist attack than have all my conversations monitored.
This is too ridiculous to even imagine it could pass through. Another case of politician doesn't get IT.
Why do a story about a huge tanker, and use a picture of some baked beans as the headline picture?
I want to see the tanker goddamit. Oh well, Google it is!
You mentioned a political party on an IT forum. Dumb move Reg...
Now all the Daily Fail militants and professional offense takers will run riot. Thanks.
Starting to see your point with the tactical view. This was really simple on DAO, but seems to be in console mode on the PC version of DAI.
I'm constantly struggling to keep a target under fire with the character I'm controlling - often forgetting to hold 'fire' ('R' or left-click) when outside tac view, and then forgetting to set a target in tac mode.
Hoping they patch that in the next release. The X-hair on the ground is completely pointless, and they need to adjust the control system to match DAO when using tac mode (e.g. you still maintain control of the selected party member when using WADS, instead of it switching to move the camera).
Just have to chime in here as a lot of people comparing the console version to the PC version.
I have the PC version, for which I paid £60 (digital deluxe, for the epic mount and starter gear, cos I'm that sad). I do NOT regret it and do not think it's overpriced. The game is beautiful and incredibly detailed, and I personally believe it was priced fairly.
It does NOT feel like a console port. It feels like Bioware has spent the time to make the PC version feel like a proper native PC version. I haven't even seen this weapons wheel that people are speaking of here (then again I've seen nothing of the console version of the game yet) and it feels JUST like DA:O did when using tactical view and using the power bar.
For me, this game is brilliant. The effort they have put in, in response to criticisms about DA:O and, in particular, DA2, really gives you the impression they listened closely to the fan feedback and made sure they got it right. It's the perfect balance between DA:O's engaging narrative and excellent gear/loot system and DA2's excellent combat style. They have got this one spot on.
Conclusion: Well worth the money. Best in the series so far (not even completed it yet at 90+ hours gameplay).
I tend to find BMW man has been replaced by fake-4x4 man. Anyone driving those pointless pretend 4x4's are usually the ones driving like utter cunts. The kind of 4x4's which, while actually being 4-wheel drive (and possibly offering decent performance), offer no functionality beyond making the driver look like a pretentious cunt with a higher viewpoint so they can look down on all the other drivers. Then they go and drive like one.
The kind of 4x4's where they have all the equipment to tackle some majorly precarious roads, but will never be driven near a patch of mud due to the 20" pristine alloy wheels they are equipped with, or the 2-tone paint job some pretentious cunt paid loads of money for, and lowering springs to reduce comfort.
I'm talking any BMW X-series, Merc ML series, Audi Q-series. And lest we forget the Range Rover Vogue. All pretty much the same car.
Also has more factual non-fictional information in it. Even if it is a self-professed work of fiction.
I think you'll find its more than 1% who prepare and send emails for a living.
I thought we all liked technology and science.
Am I at the Register? I seem to be surrounded by cynical old bastards.
"One developer claimed this was because the new operating system was a "nerd release" aimed only at power users."
....So a DEVELOPER is moaning that this is a "NERD release"?
That... didn't escalate quickly.
that is all.
Makes sense to pay CEO less based on company performance?
Why is discrimination of some kind the first thing people look at FFS. So it's not really an insult to women anywhere, only the BS that the author has put in the article.
This is Daily Mail territory.
I respectfully have to disagree with most of your sentiments there Mr. Pott.
It may be a result of my line of work involving a primarily Mircrosoft server fleet, AD and exchange, but I use Powershell every day, for a huge variety of tasks (not just fettling with servers). I have written scripts for various other parts of the IT dept, all in Powershell, and even other parts of the business.
Its value to AD and exchange is incalculable in my eyes when working with large forests and exchange environments (we employ over 10,000 people, across the world, 3 domains in a forest trust and an exchange cluster in each main region). The GUI is just laughably useless for managing this.
The only thing that I cant do with it is administer our small fleet of Linux machines. SSH for that.
But, go ahead. Stick with your old alarm clocks, saucepans (which I can only assume don't get used since the non-stick surface would have gone long before now) and old man attitude. If you want to use a keyboard that's older than the surface of the sun, thats fine. Just don't act like I should be doing the same, when there are much better NEWER things around.
Consumerism drives capitalism, which ultimately drives society forward (whether you like it or not doesnt matter). If we all clung to our beloved old shit all the time, the damn society would collapse. I think your designing for obsolescence has a ring of truth to it, but ultimately reeks of conspiracy nut theory when applied to technology as a whole.
Why all the hate? It's the best thing Microsoft has done. Ever.
They completely fucked the GUI on Server 2012, so I dont even bother with that any more. Powershell and remote Powershell are the way forward if you are managing a Windows box. PowerShell 4 enables you to control everything the OS does. It's easy enough to learn the syntax and learning the commands is just a matter of repetition.
Seriously, its the only thing that's kept Windows alive on server. I imagine all the hate comes from BASH admins, who probably havent tried it.
I think you are missing the point. You only think its fugly because you have a limited capability to imagine a phone as anything other than a long, thin glass slab. This is aimed at business professionals, and brings a lot of innovative features to the market.
Who cares what it looks like when it does its job better than anything else available?
I for one would seriously consider one for work.
Good to see BB actually returning to their roots with this. I could never understand why they headed down the path of churning out el-cheapo consumer grade crap, along with their overpriced and over-complicated enterprise software.
Let me get this straight.
The content is free to watch in both countries.
The content is already paid for by the UK license fee payer.
Where then is there a problem with punters obtaining the content from other source? Surely, if anything, they are doing the BBC a favour by lightening the load on their content network, right?
Some of what makes great programming great is in the fact that it is freely obtainable by anyone from anywhere. Product/content will only gain popularity if this happens. All I can see the BBC losing from this act of "piracy" is some metric data as to who is watching it and where.
Its all a load of cobblers if you ask me. BBC Worldwide trying to justify their shitty existence.
The term "piracy" on free content is laughable.
The big players have decent nix drivers. It's the other guys, like Broadcom, Realtek, Asus etc. that suck. You need more than just graphics drivers to run a machine ;)
but I predict greatness for this platform. Just need game developers on side, and driver devs to sort their crappy *nix drivers and we're laughing.
The reason they havent switched is simple;
They'd have to pay someone who knows what they are doing.
Even the Beeb doesnt do that.
My point was that if I had £899 to spend, then it's more than likely I was originally in the market for a mid-high range computer in the first place.
Regardless of your take on inflation, there are some much more reasonably priced mundane-task-specced laptops for less than half the cost! In fact, some of those are even BETTER specced than this.
This computer is specced in the low-end market, but priced in the mid-high end market. People will still buy it though, cos you know, fruity fanboys and all that.
I would certainly not even consider this.
Totally ridiculous price for those specs.
lol no it wont.
DPI does matter.
Particularly working with a lot of text, and imaging (photographers, designers etc). Current 1080p displays, even at sub-24inch are absolutely terrible and a massive backward step from where we were with CRT.
Then they go and start packing in outrageous DPI's on mobile phone displays, like anyone actually uses those for work?
IMO, 4K monitors are not good enough and have taken FAR too long to get this far. It's not like we haven't had the technology or ability to mass produce it cheaply for the past 5 years. Pure price fixing by the panel manufacturers, and this article points quite clearly to that.
Yeah but unless you're buying the Globetrotters, they won't be nearly half as useful as this.
Yup, it makes absolutely no sense.
Whoever said viewing distance - thats bollocks. I can see pixels on my 1920x1200 24" desktop monitor from 1m away and it annoys me. If my desktop screen res was the same as this phone, I'd be a lot happier. Higher would be better, but there simply isnt a desktop screen on the market that goes any higher within a reasonable budget.
Higher res laptop and desktop displays. MUCH higher.
More 4x3 aspect options (WITH higher-res than 1280x1024). Seriously we dont ALL watch movies/TV on our monitors. Some of us actually do work.
Also, the abolishment of Captcha.
Bigger batteries in phones. Or just better out-of-box settings, like turning off ALL auto-update bollocks by default.
I dont understand why Chrome is particularly "untrustworthy"... weren't Google the company that did no evil at one point? (disclaimer: I dont buy into that personally, but you gotta draw a line somewhere between paranoia and sense).
Also, my issues were obviously exaggerated. Except the Flash problem.
I also noticed it wasnt suffering the same issue on all of my computers, particularly with the speed thing. But that's part of the experience I guess - Chrome behaves the same no matter what machine I'm on.
Have they sped it up so it doesn't take half hour to load (on an SSD)?
Have they fixed the constant crashing issue every time you load a page with flash in it?
I stopped using FF grudgingly because of these issues specifically. Not really tempted to go back since Chrome just works so much nicer.
Nothing. Or even workable.
Even if they do it on resolution, instead of screen size, all it will do is mean that poorer families watch nothing but 480p on their 1080p TV's, ruining the experience.
This dude shouldn't be working for a movie company if this is his thinking.
I plan on brushing up my skills when the time comes. My point was that until this hypothetical situation of yours occurs, there is zero benefit to switching to IPv6. If anything we lose certain securities etc. The differences in protocols are huge in places from what little I currently understand of v6.
My other point was that this magical device I conceived, armed with my in-depth knowledge of IPv6 (utter lie), would be able to dynamically NAT v4 > v6 addressing and vice-versa, storing a local NAT table so it can remember what client was requesting what site.
That magical v6 to v4 NAT box of doom would be a piece of ISP kit that bridges the customer equipment running IPv4 with the ISP equipment running IPv6.
So IPv4 is running out of address space and has been for years.
But surely this is only a problem for ISP's and big public data network providers?
As a network engineer for a large corporation, we have no intention of changing our LAN or WAN to IPv6. Quite frankly there is no reason to. Our network is private and we only require a handful of public IP addresses for certain services. NAT fulfills our needs fine for this.
In order to get out of trouble, at least in my little head, the ISPs should be deploying IPv6 networks and supplying customer kit that does IPv4 to IPv6 translation/bridging. So essentially all customer networks would be a private IPv4 network, and in order to get online they would need to hook up to an IPv6 ISP network via some kit that does some clever translation between the two IP stacks.
Maybe this is just pipe dream conjecture, since I dont fully understand how IPv6 works. There are a lot of fundamental differences - I know at least that much.
I'm tired of 1920x1080 and 1366x768 displays.
We had higher res back in the old CRT days, and DPI this high is fucking useless on such puny screens.
For the love of god give us this DPI on desktop displays!!!!
Sums up the thought processes here nicely.
Seriously, who thought that a touch interface on a SERVER OS was a good idea?
Take a bow whoever that was.
I can tell by the pixels. And I've seen some shops in my time.
Organic food is the same as normal food, except overpriced and probably less healthy.
I ALWAYS avoid this shit in the supermarket. People come at me with opinions all the time saying how this chemical will kill you slowly or this GMO is unnatural and thus directly causes cancer. Guess what? These are OPINIONS. Not facts.
Fact is, GMO foods have many benefits over non-GMO and pesticides help to increase the resilience of crops to undesired insects, which have BOTH been proven over and over again to have zero negative-impact on human health.
Any of you organic food-fuckers come at me with anything otherwise, I want some peer-reviewed scientific proof, or I smack you upside the head with my GMO-enhanced marrow.
Nuke power should be along side renewable for 'green-ness'
CO2 is good for trees and reforestation.
Greenpeace should rename themselves to Guerilla Hippies.
You dont know how much of a tech-hipster you sound like right now.
Is this sort of thing now common? I was sure this kind of use-case was very minimal (in global terms). Desktop use may not have changed much (in generic terms) in the past 2 decades, but the usability of the technology has, as well as become very much more refined. You XP hipsters are holding that up, which is where a lot of this weird hate seems to stem from.
In any case, you lot can rage all you want. Fact is, Microsoft are a corporation, and like all corporations on this planet, here to make money. Lots and lots of money. How can they do that if you tech-hipsters won't buy their new stuff?
How did you ever like Microsoft in the first place if you feel this way? Why aren't you using a 10 year old Linux kernel instead?
Now, can we get out of the 80's mainframe man mindset and continue pushing technology forward?