Re: Not another-
Not another- 'OS' X, 10 , 1010 release.
Marketing for the ID 10 T Generation perhaps?
66 posts • joined 30 Jun 2009
Not another- 'OS' X, 10 , 1010 release.
Marketing for the ID 10 T Generation perhaps?
According to the Beeb: ( http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35255384 )
"The 14-unit limit has been chosen because at that point, your drinking leads to a 1% risk of dying from alcohol-related causes.
This has been deemed to be an acceptable level of risk as it is approximately the same risk that someone has when they do an every day task such as driving a car."
"Prof Sir David Spiegelhalter, an expert in understanding risk from the University of Cambridge, said it was important to put the 1% risk in context. He said an hour of TV watching or a bacon sandwich a couple of time a week was more dangerous."
So, not only can't we get bladdered any more, we can't sober up with a bacon sarnie whilst watching telly.
Please. Won't someone think of the children?
Actually he was referred to as a Cyber-dog ... even more proof?
Either that, or it was hatched by the incumbant overlords at the time John PREScot & TONy Bliar ...
Don't you mean Thomas Edison?
Oh dear; I feel for you. I hope this calms your jangled nerves:
The headline is simply a pun on "Softly, softly, catchee monkey" which has nothing to do with mocking asians, and everything to do with Baden-Powell (of Boy Scouts fame) and possibly even earlier Scottish folk. It simply means "patience and steadiness will accomplish your goal".
And on that bombshell ...
Or was the logo inspired by Alan Turing? Or neither? Discuss ...
Tony H says: Oh do stop moaning and just watch Eastenders, Holby and The Voice...we spend vast amounts of cash on these gems to bring to our loving audience. Just be thankful that Auntie knows what's best for you. The fact that you like motorsport is meaningless when we take your money anyway and spend it how we like. Hic! More Champers, dahling??
FWIW I'm with you and dropped Sky 4 years back and stopped watching F1. After all, it's not like we didn't know the results the 'impartial' marshalls were going to come up with.
Now, if only Mr Farage had got voted in the Licence fee would be a dim distant memory ... (Obligatory beer/Nige icon) Hic! Burrp! Hurrah!
... I thought it was us Poms who were the whingers? Never mind, at least it's sunnier in Oz than it is here in the Northern Hemisphere ... Oh, wait ...
Fair suck of the sav! Have a beer to go with that prawn ....
It's a .dll, so yes. For your OS they have renamed it "systemd" ...
Am I the only one who read it as "so I can go back in time and *excrete* Simon Cowell" ...?
No, as Henry Davenport rightly said, it's the Moron Tax.
"Yes I can tell the difference, depending on what it's connected to."
Me too, but I really can't tell the difference when travelling at speed on Her Majesty's carriageways, despite a posh Bose system...although I expect the V6 engine doesn't help.
Colour me odd, but a CD rip to FLAC to the music server and then a script / batch job / Foobar to convert to MP3 on a handful of USB sticks for the car. That's worked for me for nearly a decade ... and not an Apple in sight, apart from braeburns.
Oh, and I can legally leave the original CDs to the kids in my will ...
OpenDNS fixed that as of last month....
Just block the controller from the internet. If you really want to turn your stuff on from another continent you'll have to use a secure connection to your server* as a gateway to the controller. It's quite simple*.
* you're a Reg reader, right?
I can't do without my rooted Android phone running Fing - it's the first thing I power up when something doesn't work. Add in Wi-Fi Analyer, an OpenVPN client and Terminal Emulator, it's the quickest way for me to check the basics. Oh, and I fully agree about saving the instructions - I convert to PDF and stick them on Dropbox, also running on my phone. I think of it as my Tricorder...
As for email, I have been running a 50 user version of VPOP3 on a (sucession of) windows box(es) for the past 15 years, and it hasn't missed a beat. Local. Cost effective. Straightforward.
Fully agree with the choice of Netgear, but I use a PfSense appliance as my firewall of choice.
BTW - Nice article, thanks.
Are you sure you're not just holding it wrong ...?
Old hand here: I started writing a long reply with all the techie details about how the POTS system works, and why this couldn't be done easily. But then I realised I am far to old and know far too many intricate details about 20th century communications to keep anyone interested long enough for them to understand. So I won't bother.
However, it can be summed up as too expensive to do, and not their problem anyway.
As a smartphone user, I couldn't give a stuff about all of this "my bus is bigger than yours" marketing guff. Just give us more battery life. Please. I don't care if you do it with 64 bits of a bus or fragrant tufts of camel hair, just make the damn phone function for a week between charges like the good old days of Nokia. (Kids: You won't remember)
As I'm also an agnostic, I'm bitching at Apple, Samsung, Google and everyone else. Please just get your act together. Copy each other for all I care. Just do it.
Where's Ballmer when you really need him? "Battery Life, Battery Life, Battery Life ....."
(And if you're wondering, I currently get 2+ days out of my smartphone. It's simply not good enough)
Don't you mean "Massive Phorm"?
I don't normally defend the reporting standards at El Reg, but in this case the previous story / vomit was about the young lass tracking the perp; This regurgitation / story now informs us that he's been charged i.e. there is a bit more new news to report.
If El Reg had published the aforementioned upskirt photos then your criticism would be justified, but in this case there was nothing to cause further distress to the poor lass.
Agreed, it's not much of a story for a tech website, but it's worth it for some of the comments!
Am I the only one who heard Cilla Black's voice in my head saying "Tara Bunch"....?
I hate to sound like an accountant, but even capitalised software should be depreciated over 4 years. Companies can set their own rules in this regard, but the last 3 places I've worked at use this figure. The argument runs along the lines of if you buy a new machine with (say) CAD software, you should capitalise everything: Hardware, software, delivery & installation & training. After 4 years it's probably worthless, so should have been written down to zero by then.
"Upgrading" an existing machine by just putting new software on it doesn't really change the argument - it's still worthless in a few years.
Also, just to be picky, there is a lower threshold before anything is capitalised - usually a few hundred quid. Start8 for a single licence wouldn't be capitalised, but a site licence probably would.
I bow to your superior recollection! Apologies all ...
I think you'll find most squid are damp...(apart from the proxy servers of that name)
You meant "squib"
Eadon? Is that you?
No, Tony says "GRRRRREAT" .... Grr, as in growling. Geddit?
I think he's actually friended Gareth Gates...
Try reading earlier posts ...?
You obviously are, and you're obviously losing some of your marbles. Everyone knows (knew?) that EPROMS need UV to clear them, but EEPROMS don't - they are Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory. It looks like Stob is a typical softie who likes to pretend they know enough to blame hardware people for their bugs ...
As for me, I'm old enough to still have two of the things laying about, together with a collection of programmers. No, they're not used for new products, but lots of old kit is still in circulation which gets repaired from time to time.
>> Mine's the one with the light saber in the pocket
...or are you just pleased to see her again?
Does this actually affect anyone who knows about computers & stuff, like the people who read El Reg? It's an eight step workaround - that's all - and if it's too difficult for the masses to comprehend then they get to look at adverts, as they do when they're watching the mindless drivel on TV. Not our problem.
I'm sure most of us round here won't be that troubled by a bit of minor tinkering.
Are Google within their rights? That's up to them. Will I "carry on up the Android"? That's up to me. And no, Mr Fanboi, I don't care what you decide is right for you - we're different, see?
While I'm ranting, I'll let you into the best way I've found to get rid of in-app adverts. Simply pay for the app ... no ads, and a warm fuzzy feeling that you're not such a freeloading git after all.
Now where's my beer ....
It's still available, and is still used in a couple of our 20+ year old designs! (Our industrial customers are a conservative lot and still want "what they bought last time" - who am I to argue if they're willing to pay for it?)
Mind you, the updated versions use all the techniques mentioned in the original article and end up costing far less overall, not more. In short, stop the product from radiating in the first place and you don't need to stick expensive filters everywhere.
They're here, split into 4 parts
We may snigger now, but it will be reality soon enough.
Anyone else old enough to remember laughing at Hyacinth Bucket putting her milk bottles through the dishwasher? Who'd have imagined back then that we'd be forced to wash baked bean tins too!
Oh it gets much worse: I want to see your handwriting too, and see if you can spell without hitting F7....
No, I'm not in the recruitment business. I employ people for my own company. By all means call me old-fashioned (which I am) but there comes a point where any candidate who wants to work for me gets to talk over their CV ... and guess what, we don't huddle around a monitor, we print it out.
I'm guessing that many aren't aware of the latter stages of the interview process because they fall at earlier stages.... now why might that be?
But thanks for making me feel even older than I am. Bloody kids ....
No. Anyone who sends me their CV in ANY editable format gets a downvote from me. All I want to see is either a paper copy or a PDF. Why on earth did it become the social norm to send out absolutely everything so that it can be modified by the recipient? Who taught these people?
But I have one - Humax HDR-FOX T2 with *ahem* updated firmware. You know how to use Google, right?
Which is hidden at the bottom of the download page, and is a less bloaty 7.8M
Try LBE Privacy Guard if your phone is rooted - nicely restricts rights on a per-app basis.
That said, I do agree with a lot of this - even as a Linux die-hard and Nexus S owner!
5. wannabe ginger. person who dyes their hair ginger and calls themselves ginger, but they aren't a natural ginge.
.... 'cos it wasn't MS Office. Now that the wingers have decided they don't like the ribbon either, they've been really happy with this LibreOffice I've given them - "it's so much better than that awful OpenOffice". (*cough*)
We know it's the same thing, but the users don't know that. OOo has taken the flack for being a poor rip-off, but now that LibreOffice is actually *good enough* for most people let the name stay, and let OOo die. It's no different to the rest of the software industry: Killing off Vista when the "All New" (*cough*) Windows 7 came out. Or the iPhoneN when the iPhoneN+1 came out.
I do think the developers should re-merge and make an even better product, but don't give Oracle any change to mess about with the name. Just leave it be.
If there is any blame to be apportioned, then it has to go to "The System". The way the patent system works is broken as far as most non-lawyers are concerned. However, the law system is also broken as it assumes a ruling as upheld if enough lawsuits are successfully won. I predict that MS will be able to go after Google / Red Hat etc. once enough little lawsuits have been won. They are simply doing the groundwork, that's all.
If you were in MS's position you'd do the same things to protect your business. That's just how "The System" works.
The same argument can be made against Apple and Oracle. It is the way it is.
Disclaimer: I dislike MS, their products and their business practices. But I use Windows because it gets the job done at an acceptable price. I use Linux where possible. I don't succumb to Apple marketing because I prefer Android. My money, my choice. If you prefer something different and are willing to pay for it yourself then go right ahead - I won't mind. We, the little people, should be allowed choice. That's all.
You know about computers, right?
Hang on a mo. They get fined £20k (which ends up where?), and also have to pay £150k ish to another wunch* of lawyers for their "work" which most of us would have done pro bono**. Meanwhile the real victims end up with absolutely nothing for their ordeals, and no real certainty that it can't happen again, and again ....
Maybe I'm just jaded that these "professional regulators" seem to extract all the money that's about, and leave the little people with nothing. Anyone who's had a customer go bankrupt on them will sympathise with the "Oh, they had loads of assets but our fees came to their value+£10k, so there's nothing left for you. We're all in this together don't you know, as we've lost £10k on this too....."
Greedy, parasitic wasters.
* It's the collective term for Bankers. I couldn't think of anything better in this heat ...
** No, I don't like U2 either
That is all.
At last count I had about 10 paid apps on my Nexus S - good apps deserve money. After nearly spending ooh, £25, my phone now does everything I want it to*. Everything else comes with the OS - just like MS really. I use my phone for nerdy techie stuff like Lan monitoring, Wi-Fi audits, logging into servers and such like. Apparently I can play games and watch videos .... but I'm too busy getting stuff done...
I agree that iApple have a fantastic marketing department, even better than MS, and their customers tend to be fashion victims rather than techie types. iTunes & App store are the best of their breed - everyone else needs to work hard to catch up. But there is a price: Vendor lock-in. Most "Freetards" hate that more than spending money. But most non-techie types haven't a clue and will just pay what MS/Apple/Murdoch/PC World tell them to do.
Why should we worry? As long as there is a supply of "early adopters" to seed the market, then the "me too" brigade will happily follow - at a vastly cheaper price.
* No. It still doesn't fart. Should I spend some more ££ to make it do so?
...they have no option, as Microsoft won't let them have IE9 unless they buy a new PC.
Yes, yes there's Chrome and Opera etc - choice is a *good thing* - but each to their own. Not grazing, choosing.
I choose Beer. Free, or otherwise.
I can't help thinking that this is a media storm to appease all the iPad/iPhone users whose mates point out that their new "Shineys" won't render half of the internet. This 'demonstration' gives them the opportunity to go "Ahh, but look at this! Marvel at what will happen when the rest of the internet catches up with us!"
TBH I don't care either way, but we do need extremists to push technology. I can't imagine any ElReg reader would defend Flash applications as being the best in the world - I've had far too many browser crashes (all of them apart from Safari, of course*). The only thing wrong with the H.264 bit of HTML5 is nothing technological, it's just that the big boys have included the ability to demand money out of the rest of the playground.
All standards (in all walks of life) should be fully open, royalty free and promote competion for the benefit of the consumers. If there were less greed around this could be possible...
* Safari? Never bothered using it.