Re: If everyone is back in the office..
...but is BORING being stuck on your own all day.
What's even worse is that the rest of my family might be working from home too. Don't make me talk to them.
1582 publicly visible posts • joined 30 Jun 2009
I had a whole series of friend requests on Facebook, at one point, from attractive young ladies who seem to have forgotten to put a blouse on this morning.
Fortunately, even when I was young and smooth, attractive young ladies of that sort never showed any interest in me so I'm under no illusions now.
This is also almost identical to the ongoing incident at a large corporation I happen to work for, but in this case we turned off a working (sort of) Oracle system and turned on a shiny new SAP system.
I have just finished talking to an outside contractor who provides a very important service for us, and while he was apologetic he won't be working for us anymore because he no longer believes our finance people's assurances that he will be paid on time.
Fortunately for me, I can make this someone else's problem. I also have a job interview next week.
The point the GAO is trying to make is a little bit lost in the details, but it amounts to the fact that the oil and gas industry is important to America, but is not very profitable to the companies that run it, so what they need is an injection of taxpayers money to help them solve their security problems.
Ah yes, context. My thought when I saw the headline was "I will never pay Twitter eight bucks a month because price isn't the same as value" but everyone to their own I suppose.
The thing about Twitter, (and Facebook and all the rest) is that if Elon continues to destroy it and it goes away, it will make exactly zero difference to anyone not employed there, because something similar will spring up to take its place and people like the author of this piece can pay that website money if they choose.
If you're an independent artist or musician and Twitter has your entire identity you've made a very poor business decision.
With Facebook and Snapchat and whatever else available I can't see it being too hard to transfer their entire identity to another voracious corporation.
We're in the middle of a multi-year effort to send everything into the cloud. Everything.
I suspect that if I hang around long enough I'll be able to witness it all coming back, but I'm looking for a new gig so probably won't be.
About as well as can be expected, thanks for asking.
He deserves every penny, and more. There is literally no-one else in the world who can do the things he does.
He is also kind and handsome and if you ask nicely, he'll come 'round to your place on Saturday and wash your car.
Whatsisname is quite possibly the cleverest businessman in the history of business doing, and should be paid more.
I'm using Win 11 on my work laptop as part of our testing process and in my opinion its not worse than Windows 10 which about the highest praise I have had for a new Microsoft OS for as long as I can remember.
I have several Dell Latitude laptops that are EOL for the business, but still working fine so I have factory reset one back to the standard out-of-box experience.
After the various updates install, it offers to test if Win 11 is an option, but fails.
However, if I download a Win 11 .iso and install from that it works fine, so I am completely confused.
Can my laptop upgrade to Win 11? The answer seems to be No, maybe, yes.
"Quiet quitting" is absolutely "work to rule" and is a reaction to the unwillingness of employers to engage properly when it is time for pay negotiations.
The fact The Register is publishing nonsense phrases like "Employers will be unable to increase pay at the same rate of inflation – that's a fact, tells me that I might need to start looking for a new place for my daily dose of tech news.
The whole article is just an anti-worker rant really and not a very convincing one.
It looks like Google is at the point when the beancounters start saying things like "...reduce waste and get better results..." which means they're not going to be doing anything cool or new or clever, they're just going to watch the bottom line.
It's where IBM and HP have been for the past 20 years or more and is the start of the long, slow slide into irrelevance.
I had a complaint made about me one time when I told a user that I could not recover a document "from the mainframe" because she hadn't saved it at any point.
She had worked on it for 4 hours without saving even one time and claimed that that I told her that I wouldn't recover it for her.
Fortunately my manager explained to the HR lady how those things work and the complaint went no further.
Sometimes users won't be helped.
Every time I read about crypto-currencies I'm reminded that the US economy was crashed multiple times in the 19th and early 20th centuries by various unregulated or poorly-regulated financial opportunities.
Those who fail to study history are doomed to repeat it.
but on his track record he could want powers that Parliament will refuse.
No he won't.
Charles knows exactly what a monarch is for in 21st century Britain and won't be rocking the boat.
Despite my low opinion of almost all of the current members of the Royal Family I don't think Charles is actually stupid.
The chances are high that he will be the best of the Charles's so far although that is a very low bar.
I've refused to itemise my timesheet, as the vast corporation I work for doesn't pay me by the hour, they give me the same amount of money every month.
I told the last beancounter who tried to lecture me about it that she could feel free to charge my time wherever she saw fit.
I haven't heard back.
Which public sector ? is a fair question.
I work for a vast American corporation and recognise all of the same frustrations commentards are pointing out here, except no minister to take the blame.
22 months delay makes them amateurs in the delay game. I've been waiting 6 year for my replacement phone system.