Re: UK legislation
Please stop with the unlected lies.
496 posts • joined 25 Jun 2009
Please stop with the unlected lies.
Pay more. There, fixed it for you.
Sorry, you have no clue.
To remove the screen is not difficult.
The difficult part is removing the glass from the lcd.
And the screen (lcd+external glass) is quite valuable, as are all the parts.
They can probably get at least 300$ for them in parts.
I saw a project struggle because they treated it the same as Oracle.
They also thought they would get all the results, and if it filled up the space, it would stop graciously.
I had to fix myself some nasty bugs on Oracle 9 HP PA-Risk, basically reimplementing critical regions, etc, and:
1.It took a while to get it right.
2. It was slower than Oracle standard implementation (but that implementation was broken on a specific scenario on multiprocessor PA-Risc UX).
As for ACID.. if you really need ACID, then, GO ACID, if you need it in a few circunstances, you could just code arround it, or having two data repositories.
I don;t think that services like BlaBlacar are a problem: it really is carsharing (and if someone tries to make a benefit, they will be surprised to know you lose money).
With Uber.. no problem either: it can be used for private car hiring if the drivers have the licences. And respecting all the laws, of course, and that includes paying taxes, etc.
I don-t see the EC saying that we have to accomodate software piracy.. etc
AMD is essentially broke, and ARM can only compete in very specific scenarios... so I don-t see how we can see competition... IBM? no, they just don't care, expect Power (not the fabs, those are already gone) to be sold to lenovo in the not so distant future..
I was the administrator of a 360.. on 1999.
The system was disconnected just before 2000, so humm, maybe a 360?
Note: it was extremely UN reliable, as it was just too old, having been run nonstop for so many years.
Using the case as a heatsink is the best method, and some computers like the Newton V are doing that for the home/office/education, not only industrial ones.
It is the more expensive way of doing things, but also the best, unless you need serious power, then you really can't use this approach.
That is why you have to configure them to suck air and put filters... if you have positivepressure filtered air, problem solved.
Yrs, Python has many problems, and this is one of them. "Correct" spcaes and no ";" or end of line is another. I miss my curly braces.
They probably have their private keys, and can just update the firmware-
So they don't NEED apple, but would like not to go the big effort it is to get the keys in the first place: it is expensive, and keys change, also, there are many companies.
So they just wanted to have the precedence.
They say they want that, but then assign funds very much as everyone else, this is, based on impact of publications.. and a Nature article counts A LOT more than the very same article on a "free journal".
So yes, go and ruin your career for the common good.
You can make a UI as good as the old one, replace the old one and it would be a big mistake, as you have to get to know the new one, for no benefit.
Same happens with W10.
It is way better for tablets and phones: it is quite good for them.
But it is terrible for power users, admins and people who have poor vision.
It is also less efficient for mouse and keyboard use.. and the use of realstate screen is worse.
So it is worse for the majority of the users, and better for the non paying ones: you know, the ones that buy tablets and phones that MS makes no money on..
Having a "classis" desktop is almost no effort. I know, because I use start10 etc, mantained and created by fewer that 5 people. Microsoft CAN maintain two desktops at almos no cost, the problem is THEY REFUSE to do it. On top of that, w10 is almost spyware.
I still use Windows because I game a lot, and my games are mostly windows only, buy I am considering moving to another OS.
First problem, is how to feed the LTO Drive.
As you know, it can only "stream" data unto tape effectively.
And the data is compressed on the fly.
So you need hight performance HDDs, or ram cache, or wahteveer scheme you have.
If you have a local tape and backup from drives, that will be your limit.
Then, in order for this to make sense, you have to change the tapes. And THIS is the problem. Somebody changing tapes is EXPENSIVE.
So, it is a no no if you are colocated.. only works on your own premises and iomplies going inside the CPD.. or having a robot.
When you start having robotic arms, the cost of the drive starts being irrelevant, the backup device starts getting really expensive.
So at that point you might reconsider and just use an storagepod, that is less expensive to operate than tapes, much more reliable (you know, yo CAN get your data for sure our of the system) and is also random access.
If you are a huge player, tape makes almost no sense, if you are small makes no sense at all, so it is medium enterprises that MIGHT be interested.
Frankly, I don't understand why people buy tapes...it ends up being more expensive.. and I said the same about big and expensive HDDs SANs vs Flash.
On military projects, you get the specs, are NOT told what are they for and you program your small part to specs.
So, as you have no way of knowing WHY are you doing those ADA parts of the system, you can't catch the logic problems..
even if you steal that part of the program, alone it is of no use to anyone.
if the analysis is crap, the result will be crap and expremely expensive.
Almost a script kiddie can fake the type of usb.
I can do it, and firmware is just a hobby for me, my beans are Java, pl/sql, "smokeware" (a.k.a powerpoint), etc.
I goes to the internet, once it is able to connect on a different computer.
This is obviously not for monetary gain. This is state malware.
The computer is your friend citizen. We will promptly send a Troubleshooter team to deal with the problem.
Mainland china is not communist.
USA is more communist than mainland china.
Cloud computing is very very expensive.. but if you have a startuo, you can concentrate on delivering the product and pay more for a service that "just works".
As for a big CO using a public cloud.. well, it speaks volumes about their mismanagement.
SNP.. quite clear, the current UK government is Tory, with more than 50% of the votes on 36.9% of votes.
Scotland voted SNP and Labour, just 15% voted Tory, yet we have to be ok with not being able to choose...
As for sovereignty.. well, I disagree, international treaties and commerce tie all countries.
How about using the private signing keys that you have pin protected in your if?
Oh, no id, I see......
There are beancounters that will help you.. for a price.
Anyway, it is a bad idea for small shops.. don't deal with the gov.
Not only that, but they saw the very real risk of losing relevance.
If the market is tech driven, the beancounters provide no value. So, declare that the tech has no value, therefore an external company has to deal with it. They simply won.
They don't block all VPNs, as I can watch iPlayer while I go on vacation back to Spain.
As for charging that much for content.. really not worth it. I would then DEMAND to have the content available after it is broadcasted.. and I mean the minute it is started to broadcast, and to remain some months.
I used to block:
And the hacking attacks diminisshed by more than 50%, no legitimate user was affected.
Had it been possible, I would had blocked the US and UK, and then almost all malicious attacks would have stopped.
Just for the free speech, I prefer to format and restore image.
I can understand that users use adblock, as I have used it myself, and these days I just don't have flash and don't go to several websites.
But blocking ads at network level? probably illegal, but most certainly bad idea. I would block all traffic from three.
A TCP IP Stack can be implemented with way less that 512MB KB of RAM.. still, very slow but feasible.
Note:check TCP/IP implementation on pics:
16KB are needed.
Most telcos know that they aren't really good at telecommunications, and they have outsourced the works on the network and most of the planning, so why not sell the network.
They are also last on customes retention and satisfaction, having also outsourced these services.
They also no longer bill their customers.
My suggestions is that they should just be a brand that resides in bahamas. And, of course, outsource marketing and the directors.
There, closed shop.
The problem is the same as with the pc: there is almost no money to be made on them.
I don't think they were wrong.. they probably got more money than doing it otherwise..
HDDs will stay in the long term, at least for backups.
And then the directors are still puzzled, how come where sell less each quarter?
If a supermarket stops selling milk as it makes them no money, people will stop buying there.. it is quite simple.
Same with IBM, yes, they will send me a unix box, or a mainframe, but now x86, pcs, and many related technologies are sold by lenovo... etc etc.
Re: "... retailer’s smart phone app. "
I would like them to be shot.
I refused to make a similar system for a banch of the Spanish Police.
Had we all refused, no such system would exist.
In order to kind of fix this you would have to block transfers todirectly or indirectly to tax havens. That includes ireland.
That, of course, creates a new world of problems...
That is why you pay a few pounds/dollars/euros in taxes.
The problem is the uneven playing field, that removes income from the society that generated it and damages those who do pay. Good luck fixing it.
The problem is that you are proposing is a regressive tax system, and those systems tax the poor more than the rich, and the differences in class increase dramatically. Now we have something similar as the rich pay relatively almost no tax, but the middle class do pay.
Problem is, if no company pays any taxes in the uk, bankruptcy will come.
And we are headed to that with tax avoidance... It is one of the reasons for class inequality: the rich tend not to pay taxes at all.. ask the Scottish government...
It seem you had one too many at the pub.
We are speaking about tax avoidance. I care not about the founders or owners of google, amazon, etc.
The problem is big companies all avoid tax all ove the world, and the problem is caused by tax on benefits for companies ad tax on income for people.
This causes a transfer of income to companies, and then tax comoetition and cost transfer. In my opinion if you do this, it is fraud. Spanish law says it is fraud, but if you are a big co, you wont get sued. In the uk it seems similar, and I don't think it is easy to fix.
Errr, Jira etc?
Well, the problem is Microsoft knows you like it because windows called home telling them so.
They had excellent reasons not to make them reusable.
Same here, one w7 pro in Spain and one w8.1 in Scotland, both got the spam.
I guess the idea is to have just three (no pun intended) telcos to set prices an lower service quality, as in Spain. Very profitable for the companies
worse still, on my phone it insists on using the noise cancellation mic instead of the regular one.
The only app that does that.
It is not.
The rule of law should be respected.
It is not about efficiency, as in spain for example they have been pushed with different excuses.
In spain they are used to control if the house/flat is in use, and by how many persons. The sw has been available for years, but was extremely unreliable with analog readers.
Apart from the illegal control aspects, if you rent it and don't declare and pay the required taxes you will be caught.
Add tablets and phablets.. and there you have it.
Right now I am writing with a 5.5" phone...
Add SAP to the list of "designed to be convoluted/mangled by design".