This is illegal in Spain
And should be illegal everywhere.
343 posts • joined 25 Jun 2009
And should be illegal everywhere.
Have one computer with 2GB ram,. and a radeon 4850, 1 GB ram: 100% GPU use on youtube, very slow. Used to be ok.
i5 laptop, 8GB RAM: ok. High GPU use
Why should I pay money to an artist because I want to have his music (witch I DO pay for) in my cellphone as well ?
They aren't offering any kind of service or good, they just want the money for nothing (and I'm not movind colour tvs..).
We could have discussions about piracy and compensation, but that is different. Here we are talking about charging twice.
IOPS per thread is waht you get if you go to SSD.
I prefer to have the flash inside the server, way faster, but a pain to manage.
Would you rather pay for cancer treatment in the US or the UK? In the UK NHS will pay it..
Dairy road was.. a bit "rowdy".
Right now it has improved a lot, and tearing down the distillery and making flats has improved the zone a lot.
I have some friends living there and it is very nice.
Also, if you go a bit towrds the coop and not in front of the cemetery, most shops are still open.
Live migration from one server to another. Windows Server 2008.
As a server side VM I think it is ok.. the only problem I see is licensing.
It means the consumers can fine badly behaved companies.
¿Are you serious?
That would be VERY expensive, as you would have to test all the binaries.. and support them.
When I still made C++ and VB programs, we just compiled for the minimum processor we expected as target. That would be a 486, but with Pentium div bug "fixed". And I'm talking up to 2001, compiling for 486 or Pentium.
This is also the reason why now, at the end of 2014, many programs are still compiled in 32bit: It will work in both 32 and 64 bit worlds, and you just haver to check one of them.
Maybe the price of your beloved 32TB server is a bit steep... and if it crashes, you lose the info...
I disagree with Firefox. They think that marking as invalid root certificates from CAs that are known to provide bogus certificates for MIM attacks is not ok.. and have tried to erase that discussion.
Therefore, I just don't trust them, and I prefer my data to be stolen by google...
It's just that CREE has eaten them...
There is money in making leds.. you just have to produce at low cost with good quality.
So now 9,9" chinese windows tablets are THE thing...
It is their fault.
It is fundamental to check for duplicates before charging, and to lock the account before charging.
After that, you have to check for duplicates.
The reason is many systems can guarantee that the transaction will happen AT LEAST ONCE (tibco, I'm looking at you), it is your responsability to check that only one is valid.
Happened to me once, years ago, won't happen again.
If we are listening to a broadcast, instead of a ipv4 broadcast we could have ipv6 multicast.
Or, you could use a mix of multicast and unicast.
Anyway, using high compression, the problem is (mostly) solved today... the only benefit of using DAB is that you bandwidth.. and it is going to be less important with time..
Talk is cheap.
Please provide a link for a radar than can track AND attack (lock) hundreds of high speed targets.
There are NONE.
Therefore, if you can't track and lock on them, exactly how are you going to intercept them?
wrong.. for 90$ I can get a quad core, 1GB RAM, 8GB Flash, Sd card, 5" IPS screen, scratch resistant mobile. android 4.4
That is more than good enough, and even cheaper.
If you need good quality GPS/Glonass and 8 cores, and 64GB internal flash, you can get that for 300$.
Problem is, formats like FLAC o Apple LossLess (ALAC) require a lot of space.
1378KB/s is what a CD has.. FLAC (and ALAC, monkey audio etc) can compress to about 670KB/s
Apple offers just 256KB/s bitrate... this means capacity would be reduced by a factor of 8.
A we know that Apple memory is 2.5x more expensive than regular one.. so... no FLAC.
As for SACD, 96 Khz 24 bit.. well, they can't even bother offering decent quality!!
And I am un 4.4.2.
I just got a chinese phone.. same Mediatek processor, 1GB RAM, 8GB flash, bigger & higher resolution screen, and cheaper.
They aren't a monopoly.
With 90% marketshare, Microsoft IS a monopoly in desktops and laptops.
the trick was gaining a big market share and then charging oems per system delivered.. even if it has linux.
therefore, you rest assured thet they will offer Windows, as it is "free".
If they insist on linux, you just have to cut them from "marketing expenses share", etc, and they will pay 15/30$ more per laptop.. effectively halving their benefit on cheap computers.
Intel did even worse things, but all of this is history, you can check it.
Note; I do like windows 8.1, and paid for it...
Let's be fair.
If Scotland doen't get the pound and 10% of the bank of England, etc, you can't blame them for not accepting the debt: you get both or none!!
It has its advantages: speed, reliability, etc.
But, if you have functional problems in your system and you have to repair some "non expected use cases".. it is a real pain.
CAs are also known to to provide false keys to "law enforcement and similar clients".. so statesalready have the keys for MiM attacks..
As for Mozilla... well, they decided not to ban CAs that participate in MiM attacks by security forces, delete posts in forums about it, etc.
While I agree that at some point they should all be 2048 bits.. they are trying to fix something that is NOT the problems. The CAs are the problem.
The thing is... they are illegal where?
If a judge has determined that they are illegal, I agree with them: they should be removed in that country.
If they complain that a website is illegal because it allegedly contains illegal material and/or links to such material.. no way... a judge has to decide.
It shoud be 5-10K per person.
I can tell you that driving over a cyclist on a straight road is cheaper...
Waht they are saying, is that they have no idea how they got the user/password, but they do know that they patched the systems for heartbleed on JUNE.
He have to dump current certs.
Have 3-4 of them, on an independent country (swiss ppl maybe?), and if they leak the certs, dump them.
Otherwise, this "https" shit is that, shit.
Many big cos spy on their employees because they have systems that use bogus certs for MiM attacks. Law enforcement? They also have that. Some crooks also have it, as it really is in the wild.
So, me can't rely on todays CERTs. Fix that, and use certs for everything, and it is a done thing.
Is it worth 300 quid?
I will weight more.
The base model has an OK pricing. I would say maybe even good.
The problem comes with the "upgrades".. it is plain stealing...
My missus dropped water on her laptop, and I was able to repair it buying a new (all integrated) keyboard on amazon.. 18 quid as it is an OEM part (the "equivalent" was just 8). Good luck with that problem and an Apple laptop.
Also, my mother in law has had many problems with her iToys.. apple refuses to honour US battery recalls in europe, for example.
If you get into their computers, the very least you can get is how they operate.
Then, you can also infect their computers so their systems place nasty targeted malware into sticks, etc etc.
It WILL get to the systems.. just ask the Iranians..
As you say, there are a TON of solutions.
Either complete incompetence, or someone decided to get a little money on the side.
I would say that automated testing (including regression) is not working ok for them... and that makes you wonder what else is slipping...
It is very difficult AND expensive to corectly test everything.. and if it is for me (an we have limited interfaces and SW collisions) the OS is even more difficult...
Anyway, you are just proving what I guessed. Thank you for it!
The AAs and AAAs I use today are all low discharge rechargeables,
Not only they a rechargeable, but last double with low discharge currents and 4x or more in high discharge.
They cost about 2 pounds each.. and if you have a good charger, that is the way to go.
But he had the gut to say himself that he was a bad person.
If you must, please read this lively discussion we have some years ago:
This discussion should be DEAD years ago.
NAT66 provides NOTHING.
Just give an IP and block incoming internet traffic, there, solved it for you.
I would say it came from Georgia.. but not the Georgian government.
Is to track what you do:
Also, now you either consent to being tracked (a.k.a spied upon) or no smart tv for you:
So only dumb people buy smart LG tvs... or maybe uninformed ppl.
That is EXPENSIVE
I just bought a platinum ring for my GF and I can tell.. 1500$/Oz -> about 50$ per GRAM.
I guess we should also ban https, as it can't be cached...
Cheaper, almost as powerful.. but terrible GPS, single channel and nointegrated 4G.
I know they just introduced MT6595 and MT6795 .. but too late...
Rolemaster rocks. I played MANY long campaigns using it,
The problem is.. we ran out of players. We just have 2 qualified players.. the usual GM an me (the backup or short campaign GM). The rest of them either don't want to learn the rules or don't have time with the kids, etc.
So no RM for me.
Most pple who still play that I know play Pathfinder...
SATA? It is a big limit for SSDs.
First they moved to PCIe and now to DIMMs.. SATA is way too slow.
Looks expensive, but is about 30-40 quid. for them.
Those I would never accept payment with.. they can be forged.
You might even have luck, build all of those yourself.. and then be stuck with a security flaw.
As you have "secrecy" and noone checks your microcode/firmware, there you have it: a good backdoor you created... without knowing it.
So you can:
-Expend a massive amount of maney to make your systems secure. A keep expending for a long time.
-Reduce features: you crip yourself.
-Assume it is unsecure. It kind of defeats the initial purpose.
The idea ,I guess, is to do the design and have them built at a foundry.
While it would work, I think it is plain stupid to do so when your economy is so small.. it is way better to use OTS tech..
Of course, to be sure about HW backdoors, you would need to make the boards and some components yourself.. good luck with that if you don't have the volume the chinese have...