12 posts • joined 9 May 2007
Re: More rip off again
Not an option. The reserve price on the 800MHz spectrum starts at £225 million
IT staff on benefits
So all these back office staff in Birmingham are so hopelessly unemployable that they are going to be on benefits for the rest of their lives? If that's the case maybe its better that they aren't working on important IT systems.
AFAIK, ServiceBirmingham is a joint venture between the Council and Capita, so any cost savings are shared, hopefully resulting in lower council taxes.
Spectrum analyser - everyone should have one
You don't need to pay £199 for a Wi-Fi spectrum analyser. You can get the new AirView2 for £69 + VAT. See http://www.wifigear.co.uk/category.aspx?category=69C0CD86-2A9F-4A04-800B-F979965CC007
C.L.U.E.L.E.S.S Philip Dagnan
Seconds of googling allowed you to find a camera that (1) was not available when Westminster specified their system (2) has a sensitivity of 2 lux so is a fat lot of use for seeing at night. (3) cannot stream full rate video.
Designing CCTV systems may perhaps be a little more complex than you think.
Traffic Management Act 2004
Whilst the Act was published in 2004, it makes absolutely no mention of CCTV cameras. Instead it talks about "Approved Devices" that can be used for enforcement. The procedure for certification of approved devices was only published in early 2008, probably well after Westminster's system was specified. This 47 page document http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roads/tpm/tmaportal/tmafeatures/tmapart6/certapproveddevices.pdf does mandate a minimum resolution of D1, but it also permits the use of digital zoom with a resolution up to 5 times worse than D1. So I fail to see why a solution which uses 4CIF resolution and optical zoom cannot be acceptable.
Not a directional technology
As the Cisco description makes clear, this is not about them "getting directional" - it is about using the combined signals to/from multiple antennas to produce a more consistent signal that is less affected by multipath fading. The antennas used at the access point will have spatial separation, but in most implementations would be omnidirectional (just as in 802.11n MIMO deployments). In fact Cisco emphasise the benefits of this approach over a directional/beamforming solution.
Nevertheless this does not overcome three other fundamental issues associated with poor throughput in microcellular Wi-Fi, which in my experience generally have a greater impact on enterprise wireless performance - non-optimal AP selection by clients, co-channel interference and packet loss during roaming. All these issues are solved in Meru Networks' architecture.
No I think Ralph B is half right. What it should say to be grammatically correct, albeit with an unusual sentence construction, is "Gates, dethroned as tech's richest get, thumped"
Note: "get" noun, derog slang a stupid or contemptible person;
The network in Italy may work, but it ain't WiMAX
"Alvarion BreezeACCESS VL" is a product that uses a modified Wi-Fi MAC - there's not a trace of WiMAX in it.
There is no "5.4-5.7GHz" frequency profile in WiMAX
What do the "Motorola BTSs" do in this network? They certainly won't talk to Alvarion clients.
How do they get 10Gbit/s fibre to the top of mountains?
I'm guessing it's actually an Alvarion access network with Motorola backhaul connections at a few 10s of Mbit/s.
There is a world of difference technologically between a low density rural network serving clients with external directional antennas and a high density urban network serving clients with low gain antennas usually mounted indoors, although I would say that both have to be executed very effectively to make money.
Maybe people think it's a phone because ...
On the Nokia site http://www.nokia.co.uk/A4630128 it's listed under "phones" and the page has a section called "Get more from your phone with Nokia accessories".
Shooting missiles at USA
They could shoot the missiles eitehr way round the world of course (if they actually had ICBM technology) - that's why the Yanks are also planning to have interceptors in Alaska and California where they don't need anyone else's permission. See http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6720153.stm#map
I'm afraid the poster has got his power sums completely wrong. I'm assuming he is getting his 27.9dBW figure from Ofcom's Sitefinder. This quotes power outputs in EIRPs (effective isotropic radiated powers), so is the figure AFTER all the antenna gains and cable losses. So the actual effective power in the main lobe is 617 Watts not 770 kilowatts.
In any case, his antenna gains are way out of whack. Firstly are the six antennas all part of the same array or are they covering separate sectors? Secondly are they transmit or receive antennas - receive antennas obviously don't count towards transmit gain? Thirdly, although 2 antennas will give an increase in gain of 3dB, you need to have 4 antennas to get 6dB and 6 would give 8dB - not 15dB.
RE: Can't overlap and others
I have to agree with others that much of Mr Kewney's article is a mix of the incomprehensible and the inaccurate (perhaps it was written by the other Guy?).
However on the 'can't overlap' issue he is generally correct.
Firstly with any vendor's system you can of course overlap the coverage of up to 3 11g access points because you have 3 channels that effectively do not interfere with one another. The problem comes when you have an office that needs more than 3 APs. You then have to reuse channels and in a 3 dimensional environment it is impossible to achieve the blanket coverage needed for telephony without coverage overlap (and hence interference) between APs on the same channel. Meru's single channel technology provides an effective solution to this problem.
Secondly, standard wireless access points are NOT viewed as a single access point. They may broadcast the same SSID, but they will be uniquely identfied by MAC address and clients will associate with a specific access point. This means that they need to roam when they move from access point to access point and unfortunately the roaming mechanisms in 802.11 are client initiated and pretty bad. By using a single channel and a common virtual MAC address, Meru shifts control of roaming to the infrastructure and hence delivers a much better user experience.