282 posts • joined 23 Jun 2009
Re: Real or imaginary
Agreed. There is a market for this data, but it's between companies, and not consumer facing. As such no value picked out of thin air by a consumer means anything - the actual value is what 3rd party companies are willing to pay for it.
When I first opened the article, it had a sub-heading about £15.50 (you can see the title has changed by comparing it to the URL) - I suspect that's what this figure is. The real, traded value of a full suite of information including address, employment history, etc that people regularly upload to Facebook.
But you know what? Most people know this, and reckon it's worthwhile. Nobody's going to start demanding £140 (or whatever other arbitrary figure a survey puts on it) to use things like Facebook, Google etc. The logical decision is that they are happy trading this info for access to some pretty extensive services.
Re: Oil subsidies...
That's nice, but you don't need to convince us (this is a UK site) that you (the US) is running a pretty messed up ship. We know that already.
Although some of your points can be extrapolated, the US really is the oddball of the developed world, in every single sense.
It takes money
I understand that - it's not free to run a large site.
But $50,000,000? That's a hell of a lot of money. I'm afraid I struggle to get my head round how they can need that much.
Re: also used in South Africa
Also used quite successfully in other East African countries, and certainly successful in, for example, Tanzania and Uganda. But it's Kenya which has really taken off.
Interestingly East Africa has, in some terms, led the world in terms mobile usage. No roaming charges between countries, cheap sim-only deals long before they were normal, mobile money (Pesa just means 'cash' in Swahili), very fast networks in urban areas, etc.
Re: It sucks but..
That site doesn't allow hotlinking, here is the link to the article with the image:
Re: MAGNA CARTA
Free speech is about interactions between citizens and government...
...in the narrow legal interpritation of one specific 200+ year old foreign document. Which isn't really relevant in this discussion about a website censoring comments.
Which, as others have already noted, the Reg hasn't done.
Re: Bonnet space?
We used to drive a Matiz, and if you took the (anemic, 3 cylinder, 1000 cc) engine out of that, but left everything else, you would probably only have room for 1 bag from Tescos. Shrink the space slightly and it's gone.
You still, after all, need to package bigger wheel arches, suspension components, all the fluid bottles, the radiator, the battery, the ECU, a few pumps and plenty of plumbing. All of which add up to substantially more space than the engine itself.
No, and there's a fair argument that they shouldn't be able to, as they should be doing what Rackspace and others are doing to invalidate these trolls' patents.
Re: A certain...
Let's not limit this to the far East. I stayed in a boutique hotel in Geneva, and the internet was down. I reported it, and they said the IT guy would be in later. So I had a poke around at 192.168.0.1, logged in with the old gem of 'admin/admin', and reset the router. Hey presto, working wifi throughout the hotel.
Why should netflix not count? Or did these people you know not appreciate how much bandwidth is used by streaming video content?
Re: slippery slope or lawsuit magnet?
Were you just glancing over the article, and did you miss the bit where it said the information from Google allowed law enforcement to gain a warrant, which allowed them to find all the other files and folders the guy had?
Are you trolling, or just stupid?
The electrical requirement of a satellite has nothing to do with the weight. You can put big panels on something small, or small on big.
A double deck bus has a 200 HP engine. So everything with 200HP must weigh 18 tonnes, right? So an F1 car with ~1000 HP must weigh 90 tonnes. Can't be very exciting watching them race.
Also, 0.72N is the first demonstrated prototype. There's this thing called development that I think you've forgotten about. Heck, they don't even really understand what's happening here yet!
Re: 50Hz hum randomiser
"...just turn the incoming mains off..."
So how do I do that in my hotel/office/serviced appartment?
Why not *just* set up an anechoic, faraday caged chamber and record straight to wax cylinder with a porcupine quill?
Re: 50Hz hum randomiser
Surely a notch-filter, to remove everything from 20Hz to 100Hz, would do the job nicely?
No hardware required, no exotic software, it can probably be compelted with open source software (eg Audacity) in a matter of minutes, and would completely strip the recording of any tell-tale signals.
That's if Google didn't automatically put it in the spam folder already. Along with the follow-up email asking the user to delete it.
How many is that?
We need more laws!
I hear nearly one in seven murders are committed on a Tuesday, and yet there's no law against murdering people on a Tuesday! Does nobody care?!
Can't see the gray area here
If the contract specified a blanket ban for a period the courts have deemed fair, and he broke that, then he is in breach of a contract he agreed to.
On the other hand if the contract specified activities he is not allowed to take part in, and he has agreed with Google not to do these things (and Amazon can't show he is doing them), then all seems good.
I guess it's too much to ask to figure these things out like adults without resorting to the courts.
Re: positively surprising
Bronek, I've gathered from what I've read in various places that (on top of other propblems) the code is in a mess, and this must be true since they've just admitted it. It sounds like you've got some personal experience - have you delved into it? If so, what did you find?
"Another example of why you mustn't tie up significant sums of money with Paypal."
"And another reason to pay with Bitcoin."
Oh don't be silly.
Re: Mmmh, its definitely a cock-up when it becomes world-wide news ....
If I set up a shop and accept payment by paypal, you don't need a paypal account to pay; you can just use your credit card, through the paypal platform. I'm willing to bet he doesn't have a paypal account, so this is what's happening.
Is this really a worm?
I thought things like viruses, worms, trojans etc all managed to either spread themselves directly, or by sneaking inside other bits of software.
This looks more like the "delete system32", or "sudo rm -Rf /" line of attack.
This relies on a user:
1. Enabling installation from untrusted sources (isn't this normally only done by fairly advanced users, with a clue?)
2. Following an extremely suspicious link, in badly worded English, with nonsensical content
3. Downloading an app from the linked site
4. Installing the app
And at the end of all that, it installs an (easily removable, and harmless) app.
Hardly self-spreading, or even particularly worrying, is it?
Re: ok.. who sets the base reference for prices?
Most books have an RRP printed on the back, which is presumably set by the publisher. This presumably uses a fixed-ish ratio to wholesale price. This is certainly the price Amazon use to mark themselves against. Adjusting it would either mean lowering the wholesale price, or lowering the profit available to all book sellers. Neither is as easy as Amazon adjusting a number on their website.
This is obviously quite different from the "75% off!!!" that you see on strawberries in Tescos right through the summer (because they cost 4 times as much when they're out of season).
Is the only way to activate and interface with these things by voice command? In which case, I can't see how they will ever displace a phone, as they will be effectively useless in:
Any quiet public spaces
Anywhere it is not socially acceptable to randomly start talking, without making people around you feel very uncomfortable, I can't see how these will work.
Re: I suspect
How much Boffinry though? Come on Lester, we expect the exact answer to the nearest deci-Pyke.
Re: Don't worry
Actually I'm confused by the stat of 5 million years per month.
That means there will be a total of 60 million years per year in 2018, or 60 million unique streams at any one time.
This doesn't sound very much, considering the number of people accessing video this way - I'd have thought 10 times that would be perfectly believable.
Reg, is there something amiss here?
Reminds me of Ian Banks
In his book "The Bridge," laws only exist to allow things. Anything not specifically allowed in law is, obviously, illegal.
Re: Quaint already
Landlines have been leapfrogged in many developing countries because the cost of infrastructure is too high, so it never got put in. From your suggestions, automated road systems are actually the equivalent of landlines and visual processing is the equivalent of wireless.
Since initially in every location in the world, automated vehicles will need to operate along side conventional ones, there will be no immediate need to upgrade the road system once the automated ones can cope with the existing systems.
Re: Motorcycle blues
"If I have to supervise the car I may as well control it.
You'll not be allowed to supervise the car while asleep, or drunk (though people will), and you won't be allowed to have it return to base without you, which for me eliminates all of its potential uses."
Yup, because technology never improves and laws never evolve.
Re: I don't think I could trust a self-driving car
Yup, it'll never happen.
Oh, wait, wasn't that a video of it happening?
Re: Naming suggestion
Sounds like a lovely bit of the world you live in. Afghanistan? Chad? Somalia? Texas?
I think these things are aimed mostly at the first world though.
A proof of concept has been developed which has a sensor thinner than a contact lens.
Cue sensationalist headlines.
Just out of interest, where does the battery live?
I'm struggling. Can you give me a TL:DR?
Re: Everyone knows...
> Everyone knows that monkey only like banana's, it's no surprise he turned his little nose up at an apple...
Which monkey? Banana's what?
Re: It's obvious!
I thought Xenu flew DC10s?
Re: Ah, but...
Actually I disagree. I am, I suppose, squarely the sort of techie the article is on about - PhD in mechanical engineering, and working for a large vehicle manufacturer in Northern Ireland.
I'm no Obama when it comes to communication, however, when our customers (large fleet operators) or suppliers visit, they much prefer a presentation from an engineer, working on engineering solutions to engineering problems, then a polished, high-tech, all-signing all-dancing presentation by someone in a suit, who doesn't actually work at the sharp end of development. Even if I say "um" and "like" too much.
I think the article is spot on. Stick intelligent, educated people into traditional industries, and they'll get to know everyone relevant in their sector, they'll attend seminars and meetings, they'll spot opportunities and they'll attempt to solve problems in larger, more integrated ways than simply "get that guy to drill that hole there."
Re: Very sad indeed...
"The odds of dying per mile are
by car, 1 in 100,000"
Going by your numbers, the average trip in a car is 16 metres, and the average driver dies after about 10 years on the road.
Re: Maybe just maybe (@ Boltar)
Four points off the top of my head, every one of which shows your theory not to be plausible:
1. There is drag, just less of it. But for a microscopic dust particle, it would be enough to bring it back down eventually. Even if that 'eventually' is years (very unlikely), there wouldn't be enough dust suspended like this to cause a visible haze. There would also be a hell of a lot of collisions between bits of dust, since there would be no uniform orbit direction, and the 'orbitting' dust would cause one hell of a constant storm for anyone on the surface.
2. Mountains. If this theory was true, there would be no dust below the levels of the highest peaks. This would be very easy to show.
3. Luck. Certainly impacts can throw stuff out of the lunar gravity well, but how many bits of dust would land exactly in the orbit level which aligns to the speed they have? Basically, none. So the orbits would all decay, and the dust would clear.
4. If this did happen (which it doesn't), there would also be rocks of all shapes and sizes doing the same. There aren't.
The point is that just because there isn't consensus about what exactly is happening, there are some things which are clearly not happening. A lack of an understanding of the physics is not the same as a lack of the physics.
Re: The paper notebook computer sounds intriguing.
The applications listed all sound interesting, but can anyone with more foresight than me explain why it needs to be a pluggable form factor? I'd have thought maybe you'd want your bird-feeder and notebook both working at the same time. Isn't part of the idea that things like this will become so cheap that we can have lots of them, each doing one specific task?
Honest question - is the loser not ordered to pay costs in US civil cases?
Because to me, it would seem absurd to not order the loser to pay costs.
In the UK, the level of costs to be paid is determined by the judge, and is split according to what's deemed reasonable, and where the fault lies (not always entirely with the losing party), which seems like a pretty sensible way of handling things.
I'm struggling to see the point of this
Dropping barrel bombs on Aleppo neighbourhoods may be dispicable, but at least there is a military purpose (you know, once you've killed everyone, there won't be any rebels left. Much like the WW2 bomber command tactics). Attending peace conferences while continuing to drop barrel bombs? Again, I can see the point - it might just convince some people that you aren't heartless murdering bastards, or at least wish you didn't have to be.
But hacking facebook? What could that actually achieve? How would it benefit the butcher and his henchemen holed up in Damascus even one iota?
Re: because of dumb shits like this
I'm struggling to see why that automatically counts as clueless. They're a computing company, selling computing services for customers with computing needs - of course a large chunk of their costs are going to be for computing.
It's as if you just pointed at First group, and said "They spend 25% of their revenue on diesel! Clueless." Yeah. They run buses & trains. They need a lot of the stuff.
I'm not saying you're wrong, but a company spending a lot on one thing, even if it's a thing you don't personally use much of, doesn't make them automatically clueless.
Re: No Brainer
Refusing to serve your site to someone using a specific browser that you haven't tested for?
Why yes, that seems like a sensible way to behave.
Re: The NSA is just a symptom ot a (corrupt) Corporatist obese and evil government
So what you're saying is... you need more guns? So, how's that working out for the USA so far?
Re: Bit surprised about the weight
I have a Portage R500, bought for a similar price in 2007. It has an optical drive, similar resolution of screen, and weighs under 1 kg. Now 6 1/2 years old, and comprehensively abused for every miserable year of its existence, (including 20,000 miles through Africa, recording images and data while shoved under the passenger seat of a hilux) it's still running well. I'm actually very impressed with it.
The only down side is that, to get the weight to 997g, they made it of the cheapest plastic they could find. For the last 3 years it's been held together by araldite and duck tape. As the abuse continues, the quantity of duck tape slowly increases.
Re: Well done China.
You mean other than the fact that they weren't there in the 'before' shot?
Are you serious? Those are boulders, so when the light source is to the left, the shadows are to the right. Just like the lander and rover. The other shadows are from craters, so the shadow falls on the side of the crater nearer the light source.
Simple language: Sticky up thing has shadow away from light. Dippy down thing has shadow towards light.
I suppose the advantages of it not being a ring are that one size fits all, and it's very easy to put on, take off, and pass around for others to use.
I guess it would be easy to drop too, but if that's a real problem it would be pretty trivial to create a version that is, actually, a ring. Or for an owner to mod one themselves.
Re: Some people have too much time on their hands.
3) Comment about it on a website, slagging those who chose option 2
Since, as you say, you've never even had one of these leaflets, your ratio of time spent to time wasted by Virgin is now infinitely higher than the two people who chose to contact the ASA.
No doubt once this is out, there will be 3D 4K (maybe it's there already?). Then there will need to be a new generation of media formats to replace blu-ray, as it will only be able to hold 25% of a film. So on top of your £5,000 telly, you'll need a £1,000 player, and a fibre-to-the-house data connection. You'll need to wear annoying, bulky glasses (only 2 people can watch at once, unless you want to spend £150 more per person). And of course you'll need to to re-buy all your existing films again at £45 each (remastered yet again, so they'll have to be much more expensive).
So remind me again, what's the real benefit to the consumer? Where's the problem needing solved?
- +Comment Anti-Facebook Ello: Here's why we're still in beta. SPAMGASM!
- Vid+Pics Microsoft WINDOWS 10: Seven ATE Nine. Or Eight did really
- Analysis Windows 10: One for the suits, right Microsoft? Or so one THOUGHT
- Xbox hackers snared US ARMY APACHE GUNSHIP ware - Feds
- George Clooney, WikiLeaks' lawyer wife hand out burner phones to wedding guests