Has anyone thought...
of looking for him on Facebook? Everyone's on Facebook, right? Or, failing that, G+.
139 posts • joined 22 Jun 2009
of looking for him on Facebook? Everyone's on Facebook, right? Or, failing that, G+.
More likely that it fell down the back of the sofa.
I'm still on contract with O2 until September, but I have a PAYG sim on 3 to use when traveling. The difference is a tenth the cost or less.
O2 charge £6 per meg, max £40 but also max 50MB, 3 give you data roaming for £10 up to 250MB (or 1G for £15). Call costs are "as at home" on 3, including free for incoming, O2 is nothing short of piracy IMO.
Can't wait for September.
Ok, well firstly it wasn't I that started with the whole dullard thing - it was from the original post and I used the word, personally preferring it over "moron".
All we're talking about here is the user majority opinion driving change, I have two points:
- if you think that users who don't know how to voice their opinions are dumb, and if they're not dumb they'd agree with you on the UI, that's a pretty arrogant stance.
- when a company is dealing with dropping market share they have to do something. Looking at who is winning those migrating away (i.e. Chrome) and heading in a similar direction is a legitimate strategy. Although that's *not* guaranteed to work it's better than no product development at all.
You've successfully built an argument on vapourware. We're all guessing and applying our own opinions to the mix, but "I don't like it and a few others I've spoken too (who happen to have my background in IT) agree" isn't grounds for assumption on opinion of user majority.
I'm only taking a pragmatic view here, though I suspect I know what the outcome will be...
I need a citation for the assertion that their user experience profiling only goes as deep as taking their developers own views. They probably go deeper than that (NB, I did say "probably").
Surely they have to pander to the majority in order to bring general user counts up enough to be able to sell whatever it is they sell to make FF and keep it free. My mum would never use half the stuff that "confuses her" about previous releases and she's glad their gone (after I forced it on her a few years ago by removing all the IE icons I could find). I suspect that this holds true for the user majority.
I would wager that El Reg users would in general agree with the above statements only because they're not in this majority. Indeed, I was also very confused when a recent update moved stuff around, but a quick add-on here, theme change there, customisation everywhere and I'm back on track for the most part.
Besides all that, what feedback have you given Mozilla on your experience as a result of the changes? If none, then they don't know you exist, let alone your views, and they will never be able to meet expectations of users whom they know nothing about. If the dullards demanding simple are more vocal than you, then you lose, I'm afraid.
We had a Mitel system in one office and ditched it in favour of something else when it became clear that we needed an organisation wide system to cover many offices and remote workers.
Asterisk is a great project and it's well worth looking into the many commercial systems built on it (some of which are charge free for basics and then billed for support or super functionality). And if you need something extra special, it has the capability even if you have to get a consultant or better DIY.
While that's broadly speaking true, it's not hard to train someone up, and if you have cash to burn it's even easier to find someone who in a single day can look over your existing kit and tell you what you need. All it cost us was a PoE switch and a UPS to power the PBX server (which a low power job), PoE and anything else on which the PBX relied. But then we also backed it up with a duplicate configured PBX at a separate location - press the button and everyone is back online (only from home or on their mobile instead of desk phone). It's a DR success story!
So by my read of the above (thanks - I learned a lot today), it *is* sort of to do with Doppler, but not on frequency, on timeband multiplexing.
Again, if the base station needs the cell to be at a known distance (rather than very specific frequency) my original suggestion of just placing it far enough away from the runway would work, as the change in distance away will be dampened by Mr. Sine and Cosine as the car drives past.
You could even place many cells parallel to the route and pick up the one that the car/plane is passing.
Or you could solve the problem by not using timeband multiplexing.
Surely the problem is solved rather than testing P2P links traveling in opposite directions, just have a relay point some distance off the "runway" such that the relative speed of distance change is not that great if not zero at the point where the vehicle is expected to hit maximum velocity...?
(I'm not going to suggest that the car drives around to maintain an exact distance, because ground based vehicles traveling at that speed don't do turning very well...)
"I don't care if anyone gets it, I'm going as the Doppler effect"
That's my kind of terrain. But where are the nearest schools? Will is snow in winter so I can build a snow man?
I started to report fake pages when they started to appear, but after about 100 reports I stopped, for two very good reasons:
1. Only *2* of the reports I made had a response from Facebook saying "thanks for your feed back, that post has been removed"
2. On those 2, they were feed back at least a week after I reported them.
These fake pages rely on the message being broadcast to a lot of people in a short space of time. By the time they were removed they would have had the desired effect - dupe meeeeellions of people.
For facebook at accept posts from new (throw away) users as genuine is just irresponsible. Now I just hide what I don't want to see, because having to stab away at my screen another 2 or 3 times to report what I've hidden just isn't worth the effort, even if they are now planning on "tagging" these reported posts (hey, has anyone thought that real company's competitors and their clients may not be so honest in their reports? At what point does the markup appear? There are too many holes for this to work IMO).
Use the phrase "hey, I've got an idea!", involve at least one MS product and one non-MS product in conjunction. No need to think about practicalities, efficiency, or even a *requirement*. I didn't think it would be possible but this actually beats their "whole room immersive experience", a solution with no problem and merely "meh" until someone stomps on the cat/dog/baby/breakable item.
Still, it could be worse... they could be suggesting that mobile phone manufactures put a solar panel on the surface of the phone so that you get into the habit of not putting it safely into your pocket but rather leaving it on the table in a crowded coffee shop, on a train, etc... Oh...
That's what several people are saying above.
I have a client who needs to be physically where they are. They have 2 live ADSL lines, one of which breaks every 3-7 days and the other of which is dog-slow. Having battled with various ADSL "providers" (i.e. bill generators) and OpenReach for 5 years they have no better a connection now than back then. Each successive "fix" doesn't actually fix anything, only restore service temporarily.
However, unlike 5 years ago their suppliers have moved all their services online. The companies that provide their business management software have removed the dedicated server they had on premise and put them in the cloud. Their clients have insisted that everything is done electronically.
So the upshot isn't that my client is in the wrong place, but people and companies assume that "everyone can use the internet, right?"... wrong, I'm afraid. Very wrong.
If so I assume it's a game for the Amiga, SNES or something...?
A child with asthma, so we have one to hand always. Couple of quid from eBay. The other children without asthma love it. Let's play "who can make their heart go the fastest by running round mad"... Let's play "what happens if I hold my breath".
The only people I can see buying this teddy are misguided NHS management (who will pay 10x the price) and overly concerned parents who don't need to look at these stats 99% of the time and will worry when they do, even in the normal range. And when something *does* go wrong, asking where the f-ing teddy has gone isn't the best care provision. Reaching into the childs emergency bag for a 3xcmx3cmx4cm finger monitor is the answer.
Clearly we need his IT-Oracle-like guidance here...
Have done for years. There has never been a feature I wanted and couldn't do in PaintShop Pro that would warrant switching to PhotoShop, despite having both. However, now I'm rethinking...
By 'eck Trev, if this is how you take to mosquitos I dread to think of your opinion on other "parasites of humanity" (I could name you a few). On average a mosi bite is just an annoyance, with an unfortunate end to a very small minority, an average that could be moved further towards benign by assisting developing countries with known defense and treatment for some of the diseases. I say just go buy Jungle Formula and sleep under a net. I personally could live without them, but I don't want to live in a world where we can make the decision to wipe out a species just like that...
Unless you want to use parental controls provided by BT, when doing this will cause the router to intercept all traffic to web sites that it didn't provide the IP for and show a "naughty naughty" page.
Clarification: by naughty naughty I didn't mean ooh matron - instead a big blue error message saying "use me for DNS or else no access for you"
I asked him wtf he was doing, he responded:
Taking into account the educational nature of the security issues found in your home, and what seems to be an appreciation you have for arbitrary security research, we hope you will make it possible for us to complete our work.
Control? ... Dammit, Abort. Control are at the pub.
Penketh High School style: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntkjTbUG_QE (skip first 45 seconds)
(Not really a parody, but pretty cool how close they got)
I'm happy to report that the backlash from my email was astronomical! Maybe sending it round a team of developers was a bad idea...
"... it doesn't matter what.".
One of the <opposite>best</opposite> management strategies, right?
I'm just going to send an email round my office telling them to be on their guard for viruses when using the internet or reading email...
I dealt with a support team once that before anything could ever be looked into they changed the login password back to it's default so they themselves could log in.
Me: "Wait, you did what now?"
Them: "We reset the password back to default. You can change it back once we've finished our investigation"
Me: "... and you have a mechanism that allows you to do that?"
Them: "Yes. We find it's the fastest way to resolve customer issues"
Me: "... Goodbye. *click* *unplug*"
I up-vote because I can, and because you deserve it for that observation.
I think the reason is simply that we as a culture are so poor at rational, thoughtful complaint (not slander) direct to the appropriate party. We, as a nation, somehow feel "protected" by the anonymity of the internet, not having to deal direct with the person that has perceptively disadvantaged us.
I wish that it was possible to prevent anyone posting a review online before at least trying to speak direct to the owner/manager about the issues. It might not stop you wanting to post a bad review, but will at least give them the opportunity to put things right or express their side of the tale, thus giving you more of an objective view (or confirming that the reason the establishment is so poor is bad management). Of course practically it's impossible to do this, so I guess keep calm and carry on...
Who's have thought that an article about Russian space activities would end up in a topical discussion about the proper way to cook a bird (and which bird too). Thanks to all for a good chuckle and some fresh ideas, which I'll pass on to the head chef of this years glutton-fest.
I was thinking this: http://jamesbond.wikia.com/wiki/GoldenEye_Satellite - though I'd forgotten about the Spectre capture rocket which in my mind is a blown up version of a Red Dwarf scutter.
I've run out of tin foil now. The turkey will be a tad dry this year...
"Naturally, the tendency is for everyone to start panicking about the Cold War and assuming that the craft is some sort of war satellite or an anti-satellite weapon that’s going to start shooting all of the other sats out of the sky."
I'm interested - is this the first time that a satalite has gone up without anyone knowing what it's for (or rather not being told what it's for, because let's face it, who really knows what hidden functions relatively benign "communications" satalites have)? Or is just just because it's Russian?
I must admit though, I saw the title and thought "Goldeneye"...
Extra wide tinfoil at the ready, captain!
My wife started paying back a loan (student loan to be precise) and was surprised several months later to be sent an arrears letter, given that she had paid several months by that point. On phoning the company they said "no, don't worry, you're not in arrears". This continued for several more months until she finally spoke to someone who knew that their system would show "arrears" to the telephone operators *only* if it was the *last* payment that was missed. We're still at a loss, having not received any kind of notification from the bank on a refused payment, as to how the first month was missed. My money is on their system not setting up the DD with the bank before trying to take the initial payment.
And what do you think that did to her credit rating?
I wouldn't put it past their target audience... so probably, yes.
Who's going to want to attach one half of the brick holder on to the back of their nice stylishly designed phone permanently anyway? And having the rotation of the steering wheel while driving is going to make navigation a real... joy...
I wonder how long before smartfem ask to have their name withdrawn...
"They were also thrilled that the comms link with Rosetta and Philae was working so well, pushing scientific data back to Earth at around 26Kbps."
So about the same speed as my super-fast broadband then. #fuming-at-rural-adsl
On my last trip I was about to inform my credit card company (you know, the one who I booked the flights and hotel through and therefore knows I'm taking a trip) when I read this on their website:
"There is no need to inform us that you are going abroad as normal authorisation rules will continue to apply regardless."
Thank goodness for sanity.
No, no, they take that into account. Like when I go to the states and try to log in at the equivalent of 2am when they'll call my friends to make sure I'm in the states!
The mention of wearables is made several times - so we're replacing a password that I have in my head plus a mobile phone that I have in my pocket with a password that I have in my head (typed in my own unique way... you know, wrong, wrong with caps on, wrong typed slowly and then right when I remember I changed it last week) while wearing a device (which of course will never get lost unlike a mobile phone, right?) at a particular location (unless I happen to be somewhere else).
Failing to see the benefit so far.
I'd love to see a realistic remake of the video including the time taken to process the voice, send it to the cloud, download the response - something like:
- Alexa, what time is it?
... ... ... ...
- The time is 2 minutes after you asked that question.
Edit: Ok, I'm tainted by circumstance. My broadband speed this week thanks to a combination of guys digging up the road and BT's inability to run a reliable service has hit 120kbps.
Yes, the finding is significant, but:
"What McHugh was able to do was to add binary data to the end of two different JPEG images such that the two modified files gave the same hash value"
Surely the point is to take two different files, a target like a security update file, and a payload like a malware package, and only modify the payload until the MD5 is the same as the target - if you have access to the original on the source server to make changes to it, you could completely bypass the need of MD5 breaking in the first place.
Maybe I missed it in the article, but has *that* been done yet?
I wondered why O2 charge £6/MB roaming in the US.
Wishing for end of contract so I can move to 3...
Interesting - on O2 I can tether and get reasonable service (i.e. I can work) all the way to the tunnels - after that it's dicey.
However, that's the best experience I've had with O2. Even major hubs of community, such as inside Addenbrookes hospital itself, or one of the many large villages around Cambridge has next to no signal and no chance of data at all.
It would be far easier to pretend to be a courier delivering a "brand new laptop" to the IT dept. (which has been stuffed full of sniff software). Even if they're not stupid enough to plug into the corp network, some bright spark in IT will think "we didn't order this and there's no way to RMA it - I'll use it myself", load up vpn and all his software and is owned.
I've never done this, by the way...
EDIT: The new laptop is stuffed full of sniff software, not the target IT Dept. though if done right, shortly...
Nooo, I think not. The partial months kept will only be a single month of the duty (1/12th) in profit for each car sale (from the start to the sale date for the buyer, and from the sale date to the end for the seller), so if total yearly was 6bn and a quarter of cars were traded that's about £125m in this "double take" duty.
Plus they have to pay the people to process the transfer for ownership, etc. Since it costs nothing to change ownership of the vehicle itself, the admin costs in processing V5's (or whatever they're called) has to be taken from somewhere... You could call the extra month that they take a "stamp duty" on car sales to pay for that admin.
But despite this I still think the whole duty calculation and collection isn't right. I'd rather see an increase on fuel and road tolls than have a set price to pay irrespective of actual use.
"Personally, I would much prefer to get a patch ASAP than wait until a Tuesday."
Do you imagine the developers sitting there are deciding to release a patch next week just because they couldn't be bothered to produce one today? I personally thought that their arguments were well reasoned given the circumstances. They have to trade off getting a complete patch out on Tuesday vs. missing Tuesday because of the coordination in getting out a patch on Saturday, Sunday and Monday as well.
On at 100+ deployment I would personally put in place mitigation factors immediately while I wait for a complete patch to be provided, then roll out the patch. I'm not particularly enthusiastic about extending a 2 touch approach that is 100% effective to 5 touch because a new patch has been issued on each successive day.
I appreciate that for some mitigation factors won't be appropriate or implementable, but those people would presumably be shutting *everything* down until the all clear has been sounded rather than running a system that may or may not have an effective patch.
There is "common sense" here - "what can I do to this phone to have people watch it and give me a load of ad revenue, more than enough to buy another one for keeps". At the end of the day, it's all about the money.
I assume that someone checked Rantic (autocorrect wants me to put Rancid...) didn't actually seize the domain in question, i.e. that they were always the host of the original site? If they didn't, that's a pretty poor effort to raise publicity and I expect them to have the sort of publicity that they really don't want in the near future...
Rebuild, send Lester up with it, open a window on the ISS and lob it out. Job done...
Oh, you want to recover it too.... never mind.
In the last article the majority of the comments I read were to do with the frankly laughable claim that "it couldn't be done" - it was refuted time and again with novel ideas on how it could be done, yet at the same time many of the commentards would state "but of course there are much easier ways of tapping". And here we are again...
Beer, and lots of it, because if I'm going to wake up this morning again tomorrow I won't have a hangover. Nice.
Step 1: Pay for some bandwidth across the link of interest
Step 2: Have crew near shore on standby alert
Step 3: Miles out at sea sever the cable with an anchor or dredge net
Step 4: Open a ticket and wait for the notification (as you are a customer) that they are sending a ship to repair
Step 5: Make like the blazes with your near-shore crew to cut and splice the cable before the ship gets there
Step 6: Let them fix the fault, none the wiser that someone has tampered with the cable in the meantime
[Steps 1 and 4 are to avoid fault-finding blowing your cover]
I hardly think that's "physically impossible without them knowing". Just, as has been pointed out, very unlikely given the myriad of other ways you can tap comms without the operator knowing.
There are other aspects to this
- how good we are at keeping on top of updates, anti-virus, etc.
- how good UK companies are at securing their sites with two-factor (or better) security compared with DE/FR/US,
- or how good they are at catching and preventing fraudulent activity.
We may be targets because it's easier to break into the PC's or sites we visit, not necessarily have an increase in click-yield from these emails.