Re: LAW ABIDING
In a lot of cases 'looking for any excuse possible to take it away'.
464 posts • joined 22 Jun 2009
In a lot of cases 'looking for any excuse possible to take it away'.
THEY phone YOU, withholding Caller ID (which can be spoofed anyway) and ask you "security questions"
The only response to that idiocy is to start by insisting they answer your security questions. Their only response is 'but I cannot give out any information'. I then report them to their fraud department as an attempted pishing. Probaby wasting my time as they still do it.
'Only in the US.....'. Tosh.
In the UK there are shops on the high street who will unlock your phone for a tenner. I think every one of the high street mobile phone retailers sells unlocked versions of popular phones (possibly not every phone nor every shop: I cannot check everything). I have bought nothing but unlocked phones for 10 years now.
In curtailing personal freedoms, the US is turning into the world leader,
I won't even go via the states, not even on just a refuel stop.
Every person had to be 'imigrated' (passport inspection, stamp and fingerprint), we were not allowed any further that the single room overlooking the aircraft, and as soon as they reached the last person, we all had to be 'emigrated'. It took four sucking hours.
All this for a sucking refuel stop and the sucking plane had finished refueling within half an hour.
You could just go to a hundred other more welcoming and friendly countries.
You try telling either party that they are more closely related to each other than Europeans, Africans or Asians; that Palestinian DNA falls slap bang in the middle of the Jewish groupings, and so they are all basically blood brothers....and wait for the fireworks to fly (....or rockets, bombs, shells whatever).
Mind you expecting 'we hate them because they are "X" race' to have some logic or sense to it is just wasting time.
'middle easter'. Is that like saturday evening, half way throught the long easter break weekend?
(Sorry, couldn't help myself)
One email does not cost squat. What sent the share price tumbling was the 'buy...buy..sell..sell' speculators who act on rumour and half truths, and the automatic share dealing system who all jumped on a small dip and kept on pushing it down and down.
The share dip was temporary anyway so the only actual losses where by those who play with short term rises and dips in the market. Long term investors lost squat.
Oops that site has been blocked. Never mind, google pirate proxy, couple of clicks and away we go again. (Other options are available. Results may vary)
Her job is to create favourable headlines in the press, produce statistics showing how marvelous they are ant not create any embarissments for their minister. What made you think otherwise?
Having seen first hand the Deli finest at their finest. I can state with confidence that the real reason is one of the following
'not my responsbility'
'it is some elses responsiblity, but i dont know who that is'
'not being paid (bribed) to do it'
'it will just mean more work for me'
'Why would I, Ive got a second job that earns me more'
"It's a Penal Tracking Device - you are supposed to wear it aroud your ankle."
For a second there i read penile tracking device and had a scary moment wondering where we supposed to wear it.
"open shops now, I wonder who did that first?"
(Not a clue if they did it first, but I just picked an example of a hi-tech retailer selling their own products in their own shops on the high street years before the Apple resurgence on the back of the Ipod....let alone being first with the idea of opening their own stores)
Say the police are not allowed to search the phone of someone who is arrested, they take him into custody and then apply for a warrant from a Judge presenting all of the evidence leading to the arrest. What exactly have they lost?
I can only conclude they want the ability to arrest someone, and then look on the phone for reasons to arrest them.
" don't remember what the passphrases are"
So you are guilty of a criminal act.....you just haven't been charged for it yet.
That is how this law works, right?
I'm trying to be sad....but I just can't.
"SAP said that, in practice, the company had only ever applied the clause to initial licensees and not to third party acquirers"
Sooooo. You are spending large sums of money going balls out to defend these terms in a court because......you were never going to them???????
"putting the annoying one in a Golf"
Sorry but can you give me a better clue?
"80% of deaths on country roads occur on bends because 80% of country roads is made up of bends"
Yeh well, outside my house, where there has been 3 serious accidents and one death, every one of them were caused by going around the bends TOO SUCKING FAST. Its a 40mph zone,, but the local copper reckoned they were all doing at least 60mph. The accident investigator estimated that the guy who died was doing between 70-80mph. I have had people screaming at me for daring to slow them down when turning into my driveway. The road is quite safe if you are doing 40mph, but some people seem to think it is their right to go as fast as they like regardless of condition, speed limit or other road users
What. You mean you have NEVER been asked to fill in th bit on the registration form stating your nationality? Hmmmmmm.
What. You mean you have NEVER been asked to fill in th bit on the registration form stating your nationality?
I foresee an increase in the sales of......
Downloading the data is no problem, just as long as he didnt review it.
That's the rule, isn't it America?
So now what incentive is there for companies to put their patents into standards?
I predict that standard setting using the latest technology will grind to a halt.
Apple can get a ban on 100% of the phone when the patent in question constitutes probably 0.1% ?
They should have downloaded that server software update..........again.........and again.........and again
In 2006 i had a Google Motorola RAZR V3i gold
Well I liked it
Cut and paste an advert for a rival airline...or even an advert for check-in vacancies at another airline
"EasyJet has never denied boarding due to comments on social media".. written by the PR department....so it must be true
Ha. You joke........but
Several years ago I read a report from a passenger who smelt petrol. He traced it to the overhead locker where there was a leaking chainsaw.
Apparently the chainsaw had been seen by the security personnel, but had been waved through because a chainsaw was not on the banned list!
So you can have any amount of beam forming or focusing you like, you can still have a maximum of 4 watts radiated.
This also means that no matter how efficient/beam formed/focused you receiving antenna is, you can still only have a maximum of 4 watts (and the recieve antenn
has to be as big as the transmitting antenna). Using iphone 5 as an example, with capacity of 5.45Wh, you could charge it in a bit over an hour........assuming of course 100% efficient transmitter beam forming, no loss of power over the distance, 100% efficient receiver antenna, 100% efficient power conversion from RF to DC and 100% efficient charging circuit.
Add up all the real world inefficiencies and i recon the whole thing is bollocks.
Catching the ferry from UK to Europe -
At UK end, full passport check, full security check including metal detectors and about three gates before even getting to the ferry
At european end, basically wander off into town.
Catching ferry from Europe to Uk -
At European end, wave the ferry ticket in vague direction of single security guard.
At UK end, full passport check after queueing for an hour and customs pulled us over to check how much booze we were carrying (as foot passengers, just how much did they think I could get in a couple of carrier bags?)
Or getting a job in the private sector where they actually create wealth for the country instead of spending it.
Replacement IT systems may help in some areas, but not going to help at all if the actual work behind them is glacial. I one had a tree with a TPO (tree preservation order) blow down. I wrote to the council to ask what should be done (basically two options, TPO is revoked or new tree planted. I had to get something in place as I was intending to sell the property. For various reasons I asked for it to be revoked.
1 month later - they lost my application.
2 months later - they had logged my application
3 months later - they were considering my re-application
4 months later - they guy doing mine went on maternity leave and they were appointing a stand-in.
5 months later - Stand-in claimed TPOs can NEVER be changed/revoked as it 'is the law you know'. Had to read out the act of parliament which gives councils powers to alter/revoke TPOs. Stand-in now well over his head and "cannot do anything 'till original guy returns".
6 months later - original guy returns but has a huge backlog. My application goes to the bottom as it is non-urgent
9 months later - Decision made. TPO will be revoked, but will take a long time to enact. Ask for a letter to simply state their intention to present to prospective purchasers. "not a problem, it will be sent out today"
12 months later and a house sale delayed due to this single issue, after many calls and finally threats to put in a written complaint, I get a letter with a single sentence stating they intended to revoke the TPO.
I had various scripts for answering the phone.
"Ying Tong Chinese Takeaway. What nummer you wa?"
"Secret Pleasures emporium. Congratulations you are out hundred caller today. What address shall I send your free vibrator?"
And my special response for any female cold callers (very rare unfortunatly), "Sorry for my heavy breathing, I've just run to answer the phone. Now, what colour panties are you wearing? ".
Any of my friends and family got used to telling me to shut up
There has been more taxpayer money spent to show that the money taken from the taxpayer and given to the taxpayer is too much.
Money well spent I say.
Patent 7912501 has got to be ripe for prior art or obviousness. I have gone through it and it seems to me a very long winded way of saying that it detected whether the jack is a 3 or 4 pin with appropriate components on the end by using impedance detection circuitry and/or using pull up/down resistors to produce hi/low signals. It then goes on an on and on about various other methods but it is all basically doing it the same way........all of which are blindingly obvious to anyone who has designed detection circuitry. I personally designed a circuit to detect whether two different types of antenna were being plugged into an transmitter by determining the impedance or a high resistance resistor in circuit.
It seems that Apple are using the 'patent every bit of the design and ignore prior art or obviousness' method of patenting. Basically throwing mud at the wall and see what sticks. Considering the state of the Patent Office, it seems that all the mud sticks.
Get in touch and tell us in confidence
Nobody will find out......well apart from NSA and GCHQ obviously
How do you read the third or fourth nested comment? It ends 1/4 way across the screen and is impossible to read. Please change it back
Why has the layout changed. The threaded comments are unreadable now, and following the comments by newest or oldest is impossible.
Change it back please
we not paying > we paying
I do some running to raise money for testicular cancer research. I always run n a teeshirt with the tagline, Saving the Boys......for the Girls. Its probably raised me more money than the running sponsorship. Please feel free to use.
And the Americans still fervently believe in democracy and go to war to impose it without a trace of irony.
"App Store brand had grown strong enough to not require additional legal protections"
You mean there wasn't a 'likelyhood of confusion' as Apple has been claiming all along? I assume that they were not using the lawsuit to try to intimidate competition, and it wasn't the Judges comment that made them realise they were not going to pull the wool over his eyes, so the sudden increase in 'strength of their brand' reason must be true
The lest that should be happening is that every one of these shortfall claims should be passed to independent Auditors for checking against the raw data. The fact that the software was checked and some bugs were found is not the real problem and is not the way to cure it. People were put in prinson for 'stealing', not for software errors.
It took a Professor to tell us that it a load of tripe?
After I changed my own wallpaper on the company laptop, my (very) computer illiterate boss started telling everyone i was a hacker. Worst bit was that everyone started coming to me with their IT problems and expected me to fix the photocopier.
After the last time they responded to an OFCOM consultation exercise and got the right royal 'fuck off'.
"American officials confused and increasingly frustrated. "