Re: Larger Display?
And the 4.74 inch width they end up with means a less pocketable device than the 3.43 of the others thus removing one of the main reasons why people are buying 7 inch tablets.
175 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Jun 2009
I work on the 1 in 10 assumption. For every 10 items hoarded one will be needed at some point but that as you can't tell which one you have to keep all 10. Thus though I know the majority of the items hoarded will not be used I accept this as without them I would not have the few items I need when I need them.
"1: The "Antennagate" bollocks was bullshit of the highest order: EVERY bloody phone suffers signal attenuation to some degree if you cup it in your hands"
But SPECIFICALLY the way the antenna are on the outside of the iphone meant that holding it such that you fingers bridged the gap caused a drastic reduction in reception, hence the free bumpers to get round the issue. Yes all phones attenuate when you cup your hands around it but this was an instance where the design of the phone created a failure method that was found out immediately after the phone was released but which Apple were apparently unaware of from their testing. To me that gives the impression that they did not get enough people to test it before it was released.
To me this has got very much the same ring to it as why the original holding it wrong reception problem did not come to light until after the phones release.
The main reason being, I suspect, insufficient 'real world' testing.
You can put your phone on a stand in a special chamber and be happy with the reception and you can take nice pictures on test patterns till the cows come home. But its only in the hands of real people just using the device that this sort of things come to light.
Is this down to Apples near paranoia about stopping leaks that they are not able to do as much real world testing with their phones before the release that possibly other manufacturers?
My point was not that his judgement would stop oracle appealing as they almost had to to try and save face but that he built the decision in such a way that it would be very hard to turn over on appeal. hence all the bits about explaining clearly the theory behind and API knowing that it would be put in front of appeal judges who had less computer knowledge than he has.
i know a number of people who have work iphones and own their own S3. They only use their iphones for business calls now and use their S3's the rest of the time. One used to use the iphone to check his mileage but can't even do that any more. If apple may win the battle in the enterprise but it does not mean they will win the war.
Even in the enterprise I think it faces a greater threat from windows 8 than you think. For more business use I don't see a lack of apps is an issue for windows 8 mobile. How well a phone.Integrates with a companies windows infrastructure is possibly considered more important that being able to install angry birds or 101 farting apps.
But the punters will not get the majority of those phones for three weeks or so I don't thin the difference at the end of 2 months will be as great as is implied by your statement. That is not taking into account all the other android phones that are being sold compared to the limited range of iphones.
I would more use the word 'Herd' or even more appropriately "Shoal" than bunch as I think it more closely resembles the way they behave. No analyst wants to go out on a limb and suggest anything other than the accepted norm. If they predict the same as everyone else and are wrong they can point to the fact they were not the only ones that got it wrong.
"Everything I have read/heard says they were sold out everywhere, how do people conclude there is soft demand?!"
I assume they are referring to both those sold on the day and those preordered. The hardened apple follower will get theirs on the day so I assume this refers to a decrease in the preorders compared to expectations.
given that it has not been ratified by the judge and is by no means certain. See:
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20120923233451725
With this interesting titbit about the foreman primarily responsible for persuading the rest of the jurors.
"And what we see is the foreman being asked if he is chosen for a jury whether he will set aside all he knew of patent law from his own experience and just follow the court's instructions and judge based solely on evidence admitted at trial. He answers yes. That, of course, is exactly what he did not do, judging from interviews he and another juror gave to the media."
Tomtom maps do not have all problems that apple are having, e.g. tomtom satnav do know where stratford upon avon is. What it looks like to me is either problems importing the data or, more likely they are just using tomtom data for the roads and are getting the data on places from somewhere else.
I do feel they could possibly get to a situation where initially a patent is not thoroughly tested for 'obviousness' and that this is stated as such in the patent. Anyone who disagree''s with the obviousness of a patent should be able to say to the patent office "I believe this patent is obvious and should not have been granted" and in that situation the patent office should investigate thoroughly. That way they would only have to do in depth investigation of disputed patents rather than a limited depth on all patents.
"Perhaps the willingness of Samsung to destroy the evidence in the trial might have some bearing about intent here."
Samsung were told off because they did not preserve email from before they the case was bought to court. Apple were not told off despite apparently making no effort to preserve emails at all once samsung counter claimed.
"* In February 2010, Google told Samsung that Samsung’s “P1” and “P3” tablets (Galaxy Tab and Galaxy Tab 10.1) were “too similar” to the iPad and demanded “distinguishable design vis-à-vis the iPad for the P3.”
* In 2011, Samsung’s own Product Design Group noted that it is “regrettable” that the Galaxy S “looks similar” to older iPhone models."
Neither of which are proof that Samsung copied apple.
If you look at the Samsung documents you will see that they had several phone designs they were working on and one phone released before the iphone was released that looked similar to the iphone. In fact apple included the released phone in the list of phones they wanted compensation for before it was pointed out to them that it was released before the iphone.
There are a limited number of ways to style a phone around a rectangular screen. Samsung documents show they chose a design similar to the iphone at the same time as the iphone was being designed. That their phones ended up looking similar can be as much put down to coincidence as copying.
Interesting articles on Groklaw about the trial. It appears the Jury did not read their instructions and are quoted as wanting to make the fine punitive even though this was forbidden in 2 documents they should have read. Also that they answered the questions far quicker than was expected and made a fair number of mistakes such as applying a fine for one phone that they had previously said did not infringe.
Also interesting take on Samsung being told they had done various things too late. In one case Apple did something one day and Samsung were told they could do the same. When they tried the very next day they were told they were too late with no specific legal rule quoted as to why they were too late.
which is also a streaming service so I assume any Apple streaming service would fall under ofcom as well (I think there is a difference between VOD where its coming off a hard disk somewhere and live streaming?). If that's the case and they landed a significant number of games they could well be forced to offer the games to other distribution companies, e.g. sky and VM?
Comparing one high price ecosystem against an eco system with one with a large range is not a fair comparison.
I would be more interested in a comparison between iphone owners and owners of android phones that excludes the cheap section of the market, e.g. wildfires and the like. I suspect the results would be a lot closer for say iphones owners against Samsung Galaxy S 2 owners.