Re: "Moot" means many things.
I'd go as far as to say that the OP is a moot point.
535 posts • joined 17 Jun 2009
I'd go as far as to say that the OP is a moot point.
Won't Apple sue for patent infringement?
So how different is posting on a blog to posting on a forum?
Will we see a return of the Moderatrix? Or at least a return to the dark ages between the new "free post" system and the Moderatrix.
This means we'll need an edit button.
You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means
You say it as a joke, but I've seen it happen, it was about 6 months after a go-live and the DB server went bang.
There was no archive policy and they simply hadn't designed in any cleanup process.
The solution - bigger disks, worked for a bit.
I'm guessing maybe that the downvotes and the subsequent reply didn't get the reference.
It's Team America : World Police
But only if the "house" is outside America.
If it's inside America and pays it's taxes then it's fine.
They call it protectionism and they say that people shouldn't do it.
I'm guessing they mean that people outside of America shouldn't do it.
Why do you think that?
Freetard and Paytard are antonyms and are used by el Reg fairly regularly, if they are snide labels then at least el Reg is slinging mud in all directions, what you might call balanced journalism.
If all are treated equally in such a way then how can it be derogatory?
Biting the hand that feeds IT and all that.
Aha, your pseudonym is revealed, Ned Flanders.
@Alister, fix it by clicking on the upvote. I am led to understand that this cancels out aforementioned misclick
It's not like Apple can actually go for anything similar because of the precendent they themselves have set in their litigiousness, iPood, Driphone & Pad to name but three.
FFS the word is lose!
Loose makes me think of a dog crapping all over the furniture.
We probably would not have heard about the story unless maybe we lived in Asia and they reported it in the Asian press, never having been there I assume they have newspapers and the like.
I'm not sure why you'd expect to hear about incidents involving Americans and Asians in the European press?
Similarly, I had a friend who mentioned that during the reporting of the Costa Concordia incident that the numbers breakdown mentioned Spanish, British, Italians etc. the rest of them were apparently Asian.
I would expect the Asian press to break it down similarly, so there were Chinese, Korean, Indian etc., the rest were from somewhere else.
I think you may be a British with Asian origins or an Asian living in Britain who's a bit disgruntled about the lack of Asian reporting, don't take it so personally, it's just a different part of the world.
The money comes from the purchase of virtual items with real money.
Zynga is a top provider of freemium games. If you're not sure what freemium is then google will help.
I'm not entirely sure that their valuation is based entirely on genuine currency though.
Zynga valued at roughly $7bn, from what I can gather FB take a 30% cut (the Apple model) of transactions made on the site, so 30% of what Zynga makes is 12% of what FB makes.
If you go with the simplest of maths and use some poor logic still favouring facebook two and a half times the valuation of Zynga, roughly a fifth of the $100bn valuation.
I don't trade, but I have been on facebook and got bored of Zynga games so I find it interesting that they come up with these astronomical numbers.
I'm guessing the rest of the revenue comes from other freemium games, advertising and probably some "goodwill" which from what I can gather is a proper "virtual money"
So non-profit organisations, that's like a charity right?
So charities give the stuff they get given to the people it's intended for, like children in africa, that sort of thing, oviously after deducting their overheads (or "skimming" as I like to think of it)
What happens to the cash given to ICANN then? Presumably a hefty amount of "skimming" and maybe a chunk goes to the people it's intended for, presumably those running the DNS servers?
If I was looking after those DNS servers I'd be thinking - "Where's my chunk?"
What are you going on about?
You think a union is made up of only people who do the same jobs?
I'm afraid you're somewhat behind the times, by several decades.
But that only works to a certain point, if you are skilled and a good worker you get rewarded, whereas if you're not then you don't.
What is wrong with wanting a salary that reflects your abilities and effort?
Take what these companies have done to the extreme and you end up with slavery.
This is the sort of act (and logic) which keeps the 1% rich.
Like a union?
There should be more action by unions on behalf of IT staff, including contractors.
I'm part ot the way socialist.
Obvious troll is obvious.
And we're one step closer to the matrix
Can we not use semaphore it's got to be cheaper and cleaner too?
Think of the jobs created getting spotters and signallers installed on all the hills, mounds, mountains over the country, that'd be good for the economy too.
Of course binary data would need to be re-encoded into hexavigesimal.
What sort of censorship is that?
That's like playing hide and seek with a three year old where they put their hands over their eyes so that you can't see them.
Are these internet companies just pretending perhaps?
Making it easy to circumvent the censorship in order to maintain their presence and not lose too many page hits?
How many hands do you have?
Zynga are the people who have monetized Facebook.
I don't see that facebook on it's own has great value other than (another) advertising platform.
Is he not slightly more likely to be a Sith?
"don't tell me what to do. I have habits that are older than you are."
This is The Register, where technical people read articles on particle physics and reminisce about the days of computing when there were punch cards, or you had to do your own memory management malloc & calloc etc.
Surely we can be as condescending about tech idiots as we like, it's our domain.
People are just as condescending if not more so about us (techies, geeks or nerds) when they're in their domain, so I'd say they're fair game for cendescension here.
If you don't like it go read the daily mail.
There's some awesome Star Wars Lego out there -
I work on a CJ account, we run SLES albeit on VMware, we've been running it for years, we've got some IBM stuff too, which is where I reckon a lot of money goes.
I suggested open source AV instead of paying McAfee, but that was basically laughed at, other open source stuff does tend to get jumped on if you can make it work though.
I keep going round in circles on this one, I start out looking at ebook readers because I haven't enough space to store all the books I want. Hmm, a kobo touch at £99, or a kindle, at £149 would be good, but for a few quid more I can get a tablet, I could then use an ebook reader, but I'd also be able to watch youtube videos and look at colour content on the interwebs, but I have a netbook already, and that has a keyboard, what am I getting with a tablet?
Then I twig I don't need any of it, and I wonder why I wanted it in the first place.
Then I realise I'm being upsold and it's all marketing hype. THANKS el REG and to think I trusted you!
So I've placed an order for the basic kindle wifi at £89 after a lot of uming and ahing about other ebook readers, I'm going to give it to my wife.
Meanwhile I'll keep reading books until something comes along that does everything I want and has some advantages over existing technology.
Colour e-ink, decent refresh rates & decent battery life.
$199 translates to £219 is my bet.
But surely there's some multinational corporation with enough money and vision to Trademark an entire species as a foodstuff?
They could copyright the genome, and sell sterile ones as pets (called Pickwick)
Think of the possibilities for profit!
Tasty, I for one welcome these new and exotic meats that were obviously prized foodstuffs of the time.
They should bring back the dodo too, that was apparently tasty enough to be made extinct from it's edibility.
And a thousand years in the future they could bring back Anchovies.
I think "fair and balanced" is not something that applies in search engine world. The people with the bigger budgets get the top slots in pretty much all the search engines and if you're not on a search engine then to some people you don't exist.
The problem's wider than abortion clinics as I see it, you're guided by your choice of where to look for services, so if that's google then as pointed out you get the places that google knows about and they'll push you in the direction of the one giving them the most money.
The solution I can think of? Use different methods when assessing which service/product provider you want to use. Not just one search engine, not just search engines.
However, as every fule kno, the business is to make the money, ALL of the money, the option to do data mining is not mutually exclusive.
How do you know?
Is descriptive of the colour, not to be associated with the fruit of the same name.
Did you complain saying "There was a grasshopper in my salad, I want my money back."
And they wrote back saying "Aha! You can't have your money back because it wasn't a grasshopper, it was a caterpillar."
I'm not sure whether the species of invertebrate should really matter.
It's still a fucking stupid idea
I saw a show recently on kids TV which had my sons rapturous attention, it had 3 different shaped windows, a big ted and various other toys, it was very similar structure to how I remember Play School, and who was one of the presenters? Only Floella Benjamin.
I wasn't paying enough attention to catch the name of the show though. I think it was on CBBC
Ironic Publicity Stunt?
I think this has probably increased the value of the pile of rubbish^ESC<dw><dw><dw> installation and the artists other "installations" by drawing attention to it.
I'm always getting hassled about version numbers, there seems to be some deep rooted desire to have every bit of code/configuration even database record associated with a version number. It drives me nuts, whenevery I'm forced into giving a version number to something which previously didn't have one I just say it's version 1.
It's completely meaningless, the only real thing of worth are the SVN repository numbers and the build numbers, but try saying it's version 4447 (SVN revision number) people get upset, no idea why.
Lose not loose please.
I think I agree with the decision, but I wonder how this applies to companies that rely solely on advertising.
Is it then the company paying for advertising that is the "customer" of the website so they would have been able to claim goodwill if one of the companies advertsing on it's site was British?
Then how does that apply to Advertising Companies which stream adverts to sites, is the Advertising Company the customer, or are customers of the Advertising company then considered customers?
Consider a US based search engine, in a hypothetical scenario, it's widely used in the UK, but it only streams adverts which are paid for by an advertising company also based in the US. There may or may not be customers of that advertising company who are UK based.
Could the US based search engine assert rights over a UK registered trademark? By this ruling I would assume not.
I bet that was the first reaction of the judge.
Is that possibly the logic that the judges are applying? After all in law precedent is important.
Oh, they've done it, we should do it too.
If all your friends jumped off a cliff (or bought an iPhone) would you do it too?