391 posts • joined 17 Jun 2009
Why can it connect to any IP it wants to, where is the firewall that says it can only connect to one single IP address?
Surely this is the first thing that should be done with these machines. It has no reason to need any IP other than the one of the bank it talks to.
Kind of how any coupling should be set up!
Re: de-oxygenated copper
And any decent shop should tell you that too!
When I got my CM9 speakers and Cyrus amplifiers I asked what type of cable I should use. They showed me some chunky, but not expensive, cable (around 2.50 a meter IIRC). As that was the type of thing I was already using I didn't replace it.
I asked what the hideously expensive cable was for and they said they had to stock it for some people to take them seriously even if they never recommended it. Some people just didn't believe that you could spend less than 1000 on speaker cable and so didn't.
I loved that shop, they saved me huge amounts of money by focussing on sound and not price when I bought stuff (I saw some lovely speakers - looked lovely, and had a price tag to match, but they said they were a waste of money and that the CM9s at half the cost sounded so much better. And they did!). It's a shame the owner decided to retire when the shops rent came up for renewal...
Re: "I’ve been offered as much as $50,000 for it."
Maybe because he didn't want to sell it?
Re: Don't forget that 2.4GHz is a shared band @stacy
I had no idea I was only talking to you. I was merely saying that it's a problem that I have had with fanbois. Whether you consider yourself to be a blind fanbois as I said in my post is for you to decide.
Yes, the router was at fault. iPhones, Android phones and tablets and Windows computers all connected without a problem.
But the router is broken as the MacBook Pro doesn't connect.
Oh, and after a week or so of using it on the wired connection and it getting an update it worked. The Apple had the update, not the router.
The router was obviously broken.
Oh, and if I had a router where the everything except for one computer (or wireless dongle or card) worked, not matter the brand of the non-functioning appliance,then I would assume that it was a problem with that one computer. Not the router.
If everything has a problem with a router then I will accept that the router has a problem.
Re: Don't forget that 2.4GHz is a shared band
The thing I hate most about Apple is the fact that the fanbois refuse to accept when there is a problem with the kit. My father in laws MBP refused point blank to connect to his router. I asked for help on forums and to the Apple users I know at work only to be told by everyone that there is no way there could be a problem with the Apple, it must be the router that was broken.
When I pointed out that no other piece of equipment had a problem connecting to the same router the answer stayed the same. Apples work unfailingly and the router has a problem.
All computers have problems, MS, Linux, Android, MS or whatever else. Refusing to accept that your preferred one could have a problem is just wrong...
(And just to be clear - this is written on my MBP; so not a blind hater :) )
Ahh... A Chipmunk T.10 was the first plane I ever flew (OK I've only ever flown 4...). Great introduction to flying :)
Memories... (and wishing that I could afford to actually get my license!)
Re: because there's no other way to express an emotion
I do wonder why anyone would ever like those posts when anyone of the three options mentioned would be so much better...
Only worked in one company that used SAP
And it was unreal how much cash can be wasted, and how failure can be spun into 'opportunity'
In the nearly three years I worked there they were working on an online catalogue for displaying the products they sold.
During that time, and still when I left, there were still 10 internal people working on it, 10 SAP consultants and a multitude of consultants that came in for a few weeks then vanished again.
When, after about 2.5 years, they announced that they could put images of some of the products on a web page there were great celebrations about how amazing the new system was.
I couldn't help feeling that a small team developers working in which ever language they picked (.Net for me, but I'm sure that a J2EE solution would have been as quick) could have had the same functionality working in a couple of months (being really conservative here ;p)
Re: Not sure I get the ire
I did see that.
And I said that I don't like the ones with the flashing lights either.
But also said why I think and tablet for a baby isn't just bad, but dangerous for development of the baby, and it's relationship with the parent.
Re: Not sure I get the ire
Mobiles hanging over the bouncer or car seat are different on many levels.
Interaction with others: You can play with the mobile with the baby, swinging the toys backwards and forwards etc, the iPad is a single person activity, cutting the baby off from the world
Interaction with the world: Mobiles have different materials on the toys to introduce different textures to the baby, the iPad is a flat glass screen
Eyesight: This would force the baby to focus at one single distance for a long period of time. As the mobile swings the baby follows the toys and learns how to focus it's eyes, plus the iPad blocks off a whole lot more of the baby's field vision than a mobile does - it has no choice but to focus on the tablet.
Hand eye coordination: If you take the above two points then you could also argue that this would limit hand eye coordination. The iPad is always the same distance away and all you can do is poke it, where as a swinging toy takes more control to reach.
Personally I don't like mobiles with flashing lights either, but even one of those would be better than this...
And the worst thing is...
Lots and lots of people would still install it without question...
And then the ones that know me will call to ask me to look at their phone...
Re: First things first
Or delivery companies that drop packages into compost bins to keep them safe when no one is home...
(Lovely way to delivery my mums 60th birthday present, Everyone is just happy that the bin wasn't being emptied on that day)
Is it that hard?
I want back ground music. Turn in TV, connect to my server, listen to music. And yes, for background music the sound from a my Philips TV is fine - it even has a built in bass speaker in the stand to fill the sound out. Great? No. But fine for background.
Easy, better quality music. Same as above, but turn on the amplifier as well.
Great quality: either turn on laptop and listen to FLAC files via the amplifier or just play the CD on the BluRay. Either via the digital or stereo connection to the amplifier, not via the TV.
Where is the problem - all my kit talks to each other, either digitally or using analogue signals (without everything being routed via the TV). Even my old cheap and nasty DVD player that we got for the bedroom had audio out on it so that you could listen to audio directly from it...
I'm not getting this article. The author has equipment he isn't happy with because they don't communicate. And now it's obvious, because he bought a new way of playing music. That doesn't connect with the rest either...
That XKCD link is so appropriate! :)
Thanks for the advice, but finally got around to checking it and it is definitely sleeping - that is logged each time I shut the lid, and clamshell never appears.
I guess Mavericks is just much worse with consuming resources whilst sleeping :(
Thanks Mike, I'll take a look!
Seeing as I am not that familiar with OSX - I'm going to ask how? (Which log, and where do I find it).
What I do know is that the according to manual it's sleeping (the light cycles glowing and out as it's supposed to and when you wake it up you have to log in).
Before the upgrade it would last about a week or so whist sleeping.
2011 MacBook Pro and I noticed this (though not so pronounced). 100% when closing the lid, and only 70% the next morning. Leave it sleeping for more than a couple of days and it's dead.
Much worse than it was.
Re: @Chris Surely there is another side to this...
Something isn't right here:
Suddenly the car in front came to a stop
Expert evidence and sensors in the car indicate that it was travelling at between 50 and 60km/h when it was hit by the truck
Logically one of those is wrong. Either it stopped, and was hit whilst stationary, or it was slowing down and was hit.
Stopping distance for a car travelling at 100kmph is (according to http://www.passmytheory.co.uk/learningcentre/stoppingdistance.aspx) 73 meters. For a car remember, so it should be much further for a 38 ton truck.
The truck driver was 40m behind the car. And so leaving nearly half the distance needed to stop by a car travelling at that speed.
No matter what else was happening this says to me the truck was too close, and not paying attention.
@Chris Re: Surely there is another side to this...
Absolutely, but the inference that I got was that she was not standing on the brakes but not concentrating on her speed.
Maybe I RTFA wrong :) but that is what I was basing my comments on...
Surely there is another side to this...
On top of whatever else is bad about phones...
The lorry driver drove into her car because she didn't have brake lights showing? Holy Crap!
Did he not notice that she was getting closer to the front of his truck? Did he take notice of what was going on around him?
If you are driving correctly then you should very rarely need your brakes to control your speed (that is what your throttle is for, your brakes are for stopping), you should look at what is happening and react accordingly. It makes your car last longer, it uses less fuel and it helps stop bunch traffic jams caused by everyone jumping on the brake rather than gently slowing down when the traffic does.
Yes, using the phone is bad - but hitting someone just because they slowed without using their brakes is worse!
Re: +1 for Crashplan
I've been using Crashplan for a while now - I have 700+Gb backed up (pictures, music, documents and disk images of the machines in the house) to both a drive in home for fast on site back up and their cloud should anything bad happen to the house.
I did a test restore from it during the trial period and whilst it is not quick it did work as it should. Hopefully I will never have to use it in reality, but if I do I think that speed of restore will not be my biggest concern :)
Try reading the comments again, there are plenty saying that is someone is wearing a skirt then she is asking for it, or saying that it is no different to to taking a photo of a face when someone doesn't want it.
Or it is OK if the situation makes it easy (the comment about being above or below).
I'm going to get down voted for this again, but seriously, the comments here do scare me - I may be that person in the skirt or dress, and these people may be on a train when I am commuting. So much acceptance of something like this is just wrong in this day and age.
Re: Expectation of privacy? @Stacy
I would agree that your situation is a tough one. But that is not what is being discussed here.
What is being discussed here is a person taking up-skirt photos. Not public wet t-shirt (which is still pervy unless you ask for permission), but up-skirt. Deliberately going out of your way to violate someone's person with a camera.
Again, how hard is that to grasp?
Re: Expectation of privacy?
OK, seriously scared now by the type of people on this forum...
Being down-voted for saying that you shouldn't take an up-skirt shot just because you are in the lower deck of a train and so are looking upwards, and someone may be in a skirt on the platform.
Which means that someone thinks that is what you should do in that situation. I hope that someone gets help.
As to the different types of pictures.
I don't like having my picture taken full stop, I never have done and probably never will. There is nothing I can do about it except never leave the house.
The same does not apply to taking a photo up my skirt. Ever.
With the exception of stalking someone, taking someone's picture where you have to bend to certain angles around someone else is not creepy. Bending around anything to get a picture of someone underwear is! How hard is that to grasp!
Re: Plead guilty, case closed.
Justice changing civilisation, or blood sucking morally bankrupt lawyers?
Re: Expectation of privacy?
I don't agree. Just because you are under a platform does not give you the right to take a photograph up someone's skirt. It is not an unintended consequence, it is a deliberate act. The same for trying to get a shot of someone's cleavage from above.
I don't think this has to be that nuanced. Trying to get take photos up peoples skirts = wrong - how is that hard to understand?
As for what a person intended to be visible, I would say that is very easy:
And I sitting with my skirt hitched up and sitting with my legs apart inviting people to take photos? If not then I would say that a person is not expecting someone to take a photo of their knickers.
Re: Expectation of privacy?
How the hell is an up-skirt shot a thing that is visible?
Taking a picture of people on the tube. fine
Should something in a normal picture be visible due to the way that someone is sitting, still pervy, but I can see your point.
Trying to go for up-skirt shots does not fall under the above though.
Re: Fucking perv...
How is that an extreme reaction? F***ing perv seems appropriate in this instance.
If someone was doing that to me I would also be mightily pissed off. The analogy to other sex games is incorrect. If this was two consenting adults, then so be it. Trying to get random up-skirt shots on trains is not two consenting adults.
Do you want an A-Team kill ratio?
At least in the original series almost no one died - they all got up afterwards, even if a Jeep landed on them! :)
Re: is it 'cause I is black
Firstly, wow could you try and be more offensive with your language?
Secondly, of course a transsexual / gay / lesbian / bi-sexual person can be as bad at their job. It's not supposed to be a get out of jail card for being useless. It's about ensuring that they can only be fired for being useless - i.e. the employer has to prove they are useless just as they do for their white middle class straight american employees.
It shouldn't been seen as a 'special right' to be afforded the same protections as the rest of the population!
Re: Cheap knives
I would say try some decent knives...
I have friends who do what you say, and when I cook at their house my knives go with me. Rather than use an OK blade I would much rather have one that glides through almost anything I am trying to cut through without effort. It reduces the effort involved in cooking and improves the look of the end result.
Sure they are not cheap, but at the end of the day a decent set of knives are not expensive either. Just don't buy from a trendy kitchen shop, but from a chefs shop.
Re: Sharp stuff from an engineers perspective on keeping it sharp
OK - you beat me. I'm happy that I have the knives that put my mum through chef school about 30 years ago. When she gave up cooking she passed them to me. I've had them since 2000.
And after that time they are still the sharpest I have ever used, with them being honed on the steel twice a year at most when my mum visits - she can do that far better than I can, and I really believe in knowing what you are good at, and what you should get someone else to do :)
As to topic, I have been told I can put them in a dishwasher by various people, but couldn't bring myself to do it! It's not like they take long to wash by hand (you just have to be careful)
Re: Coding's an essential life skill
I disagree with both statements.
I'm still of the opinion that before they start kids on any programming language they need to start with getting them to think (see my earlier comment).
As to what language to use in Schools? As many as possible! If you are going to be teaching programming then you also also teach them that the language is simply syntax (sure you need to know the underlying framework, but at this level I don't think that is the goal). Teach them to think about the language as a choice of tool for solving the problem they have been given.
When I was first taught programming I went through Pascal, Ansi C, Assembly, some strange uni only language that was a mixture of Pascal and C and Java. Since leaving Uni I've been through Magic, Java, VB, and now code in C#. Who knows what I will be using in the future. I use MS technologies now, but that doesn't mean to say I wouldn't use anything else in the future - and the same goes for the other developers (some are using various other languages in private projects at the moment). To be honest, any type of evangelism for any coding language scares me - Microsoft or not... It means you automatically close out what could be the best solution to your problem.
Re: Coding's an essential life skill
As for it not being needed... In this day and age I rather think you do.
But still, you can use the site without knowing how it works.
Re: I've said it before
I'll go with the giving insights into logical thought as early as it's practical, but I think that starting with programming is the wrong way to go.
Starting with programming isn't going to teach this, rather the opposite, it teaches to try, try and try again until the damn thing compiles and runs.
We all know the people who think with the keyboard until they get the result that they want. Unfortunately most of the time take this approach leads to programs which are slow, clunky and impossible to maintain.
Teach them to think first, and then introduce a programming language. That way they can work out the solution and code accordingly.
Re: I'm not an Elmer - help me!
Wow, that Orange subscription is better than any I can get in Holland!
As for the 4G question, I'm afraid I can't answer yet - the contract starts at the end of this month :)
But you are right, mostly I use WiFi - but if it's available I will certainly try!
I got the subscription as it should work out much cheaper than my current subscription... My current subscription is not cheap for international calls, and as an expat it's useful to be able to call the UK from time to time without remortgaging the house ;P
Re: I'm not an Elmer - help me!
Looking at a couple of providers I found searching for US Data Cellular Plan they are *OUCH* expensive.
$20/month for 300mb data + $30+ for the mobile contract.
If it comes to that my phone will be WiFi only for data and emergency only for calls. Like it was in '94 when I got my first phone (OK, that wasn't WiFi for data ;p)
I pay 26 euros a month for 1.5GB @ 4G speed with 200 minutes of calls. I am not going to pay double that for 1/5 the data!
Re: New phone!
I will admit that it wasn't a 'You know what, I'm going to replace my Xperia with the Nokia 820'. It was more 'Oh crap! The screen is in a million pieces! Well, if I'm going to get a new phone anyway let's give Windows phone a try, seeing as I have already done iOS once and Android a couple of times...'
As for what I am missing... What I said and easily switchable (and timed) profiles. That an being able to change the volume of the ringtone (I want it LOUD so I can hear it) without changing the headphone volume (I don't want to be deaf!) and vice versa are really about it.
And dialing :) (OK, now I start to think there are things ;p ) The way that the Sony phonebook works is the best I have ever used. Start typing a number and it will give you all of the matches in your phone book - by name (or sub string of name) or by number, or you can just type the number to the end and dial it. You don't have to search for a person, or dial number manually, or search for a number separately.
Oh and the screen... That 720p screen was beautiful! Before I smashed it to pieces of course :)
Email and surfing are fine, as it the calendar. I'm not a big app addict and so it's really not bad.
Re: New phone!
Sound profiles and, as others have said, easy access to things like WiFi, Plane mode (seriously, in a settings sub menu!) bluetooth etc.
You can put your settings on the homepage (or use an app to do the same thing), but what I miss from the Xperia S that it replaces are simple homepage buttons to do all of this stuff, not an app to open a screen to do it.
Re: Sensible approach or is it?
OK, sorry. My bad.
I assumed that everyone had a right to the emergency services, and not just those with smart phones and data contracts.
My parents don't have a smart phone, nor would they have the faintest clue on how to use it if they did.
What happens to those people with no data contract, and so no access to those maps? (Like, I don't know, people visiting the country...)
What happens to those people who are seriously injured who can can just about make a call, but couldn't get to the maps app, wait to find their location and then try to remember what the map said and repeat it to the emergency services. Especially when in the middle of nowhere and your maps shows you a rather large expanse of green countryside.
You are right, the GCHQ are doing bad things (as I think I alluded to in my post). And you know what? They didn't have to steal emergency service data in order to do it!
Yes, take of the tin foil hats. The government (or at least the civil servants) are doing quite nasty things with our data. You don't need conspiracy theories to make that point.
Re: Sensible approach or is it?
Please take off the tin foil hats guys.
Should I find myself in the middle of nowhere and in need of the emergency services I would want them to know my exact location so that they could find me.
As was said this already happens with home emergency calls, so why not make it mandatory on mobiles?
I'm all for protecting privacy, and against the mantra 'If you have nothing to hide then you have nothing to fear', but I fail to see the Mr Burns like 'Excellent' moment for the spooks here to makes mobiles do the same as fixed phones already do.
This is not the same as the government collecting information on all of your phone calls, who to and at what time to see if you are a bad person...
Re: News from the trenches
To all of those saying that people should move and not subsidize the connections.
Fine. But that means that all of the online only services that are provided by taxes also have to have a real world presence in those places.Ouch, there goes a lot of money! (Or should people living in the sticks also be denied anything provided by the government that requires online access?)
What about getting people into jobs (many companies these days have online only applications)? Or should those in the sticks just take benefit instead (you can at least do that over the phone still...)
What about the swathes of the population who would be consumers if they had the connection to do so? Or if people live in the sticks is their money not worth anything to the economy?
There are an awful lot of selfish people in the world who can't see past the end of their nose, and if it's not directly benefiting them then obviously it is not worth doing. Wonderful people trying to create even more of a two tier society...
There are a lot of things that do not directly benefit me, but are provided to those who need it. And I am very happy that they are - the world would be a much worse place without it.
(That said, if it is subsidized then the right people should also make sure that a company isn't milking the system and making a mint whilst claiming that subsidy)
I was thinking more
Terrahawks cubes... But then that just may be my age :)
Re: Easy solution...
This is an area that Holland does need to improve. When on my run earlier this week I got back to my own street to see two delivery vans from AH (Dutch supermarket) delivering to two houses within 5 front doors of each other at the same time.
What a waste!
I have never understood the English system for unmamnned tills
Here in NL you pick up a scanner as you enter the store.
You pack your bag as you shop, scanning each item when you pick it up.
You drop your scanner in a machine at the end and pay.
So simple, and so quick. Rather than having to unpack your trolley after you are done, scan everything, repack it again and do all of this in a tiny space and a machine that does not work!
If I need to nip to the shops for one or two items that we may have forgotten in the main shop I can be in and out of the store in less time that it takes one person to go through the ordinary till. Perfect.
OK, not always - you occasionally have the 'I need to scan 5 items to check that you are scanning them all' checks, and sometimes the hand held scanners crash - but i have had both no more than a few times a year and even with them it's normally easier than the pain the UK ones seem to be when we come back to visit!
You forgot expensive home porn :) Sundays seem to consist of buying cheap houses, and then selling them on or simply people wanting to show how much money they have by going on a program saying we want to move to the country but can't find anything in our 800,000 budget...
But I do think that the BBC is damned if they do and damned if they don't.
If they make high brow stuff then they are elitist and accused of making programs that not many people want to watch. If they make low brow programs they are slated for dumbing down and producing things other channels can easily make.
Re: @Dave 126 You beat me to it.
I'm not sure it is carrier specific.
Clearly the carriers are worse the manufacturers, but I have never had a carrier branded Android phone, and updates are still months or years behind Googles.
The problem is that carriers then either won't roll out the manufacturer update when it does, eventually, come.
Having owned an iPhone, WP8 and a couple of Androids from different manufacturers I would say that the iPhone and WP8 are updated most often (I've had a few updates for the WP8 in a couple of months and the iPhone was updated for about 3 or 4 years before Apple stopped support (midway through an OS version I have to say, and the last update it had stopped it working, with the bug fix to the introduced bugs not being released for it, making it an ornament...)
Good phones and good OS
I know I'm going to get down voted here for daring to say something positive, but...
I gave up on Nokia after the dismal experience that owning an N73 was - I even replaced it with a cheap Samsung flip phone long before I could upgrade on my contract as using it was just so painful.
I now have an 820 - and it is a great phone. Sure the app store needs more apps (kind of like the Android App store when I moved from Apple to Android a few years ago) but most of what is there is useful).
If you don't download a huge amount of apps then it's a stunning little phone that is, mostly, very intuitive.
Lets see what they can do now...
- Review This is why we CAN have nice things: Samsung Galaxy Alpha
- MEN: For pity's sake SLEEP with LOTS of WOMEN - and avoid Prostate Cancer
- Ex-Soviet engines fingered after Antares ROCKET launch BLAST
- Hate the BlackBerry Z10 and Passport? How about this dusty old flashback instead?
- Apple spent just ONE DOLLAR beefing up the latest iPad Air 2