6 posts • joined 16 Jun 2009
Not necessarily two sockets
Nathan Hobbes wrote: "Not to state the obvious, but this explicitly talks about having 2 separate sockets, one for handsfree (mic/headphones) and one just for headphones"
Claim 1 ends with "said input-output and output interfaces to be jointly employed for said first and second headsets where said first and second headsets being the same headset" which at a stretch capturess the single connector with a single headset option.
In that case the prior art would be a mobile phone which played music/radio before 2001.
Vineyards in York (-ish)
Just to add another post about the irrelevancy of the Romans having vineyards in York, a vineyard is currently operating just down the road in Leeds:
@ John Savard
"one thing that wasn't mentioned was latency - or single-thread performance. Not everything can be parallelized well."
If your problem doesn't parallelize well and single thread performance is your main concern then you would buy a different (and much cheaper) machine.
Yes it was safe
The pilot was right.
RDX is very stable.
They could have used it to boil the water for the in-flight drinks because it burns rather than explodes (although it's not something I'd advocate trying).
Chris Simpson wrote:
"What about Folding@Home, Granted not one single computer but 5+ Petaflop"
What Folding@Home does is millions of slighty different small problems.
What a supercomputer does is one very large problem.
The difference is tolerance to latency.
The answer to one F@H problem is independent of the other problems and so it can be task farmed. If you're dealing with one big simulation then you need as fast as possible communication between all the CPUs otherwise you'll be waiting an eternity for your answer.
Let's say you want to do some molecular dynamics on a piece of material the size of a grain of salt. Just holding the coordinates and velocities of all the atoms would require about 10 petabytes of memory. The drive for larger simulations, smaller approximations and finer resolutions will continue to feed these machines although Amdahl's law and other software engineering problems are raising their heads.
The reason they want to close down FM is so that they can flog the frequencies to mobile networks
- Hi-torque tank engines: EXTREME car hacking with The Register
- Product round-up Ten excellent FREE PC apps to brighten your Windows
- Review What's MISSING on Amazon Fire Phone... and why it WON'T set the world alight
- Product round-up Trousers down for six of the best affordable Androids
- Why did it take antivirus giants YEARS to drill into super-scary Regin? Symantec responds...