Green screen of death?
Blimey, the Green Light of Failure I mentioned happened quick!
1631 posts • joined 16 Jun 2009
Blimey, the Green Light of Failure I mentioned happened quick!
But some people are idiots some of the time.
And all it takes is for one drafter to click the "Yes, go ahead" button and the entire company is compromised, because that drafter will probably have access to all the company's drawings.
Yet another reason why AutoCAD is damaging.
I see so many projects late and over budget due to AutoCAD - it doesn't help you avoid stupid mistakes, and actively causes errors in many cases because it isn't capable of solid modelling.
Drafting packages like AutoCAD are pointless, and have been for more than a decade. Get an actual design package!
I'd disagree, he hasn't actively damaged the advancement of humanity.
Yes, but how many TV manufacturers actually release firmware updates for old TVs? Or even new ones?
My previous TV had fundamental firmware flaws but no updates were ever released, and eventually it went back as not fit-for-purpose.
My current TV had one firmware update during the first year, and it's had no more at all.
My set-top PVR has had five or six firmware updates over the last four/five years (not sure as they mostly happen by the magic of OTA updates)
TV manufacturers simply don't support older TVs, and barely support new ones! They might work on firmware fixes while it's still on sale, but they drop them like hot potatoes not much longer than a year after they start making them.
Yellow is a secondary colour...
We haven't had a Green Light of Failure yet, and there are two secondary colours still available!
You are aware that there is a lot of rubbish on the Internet - after all, anybody could put anything they like there! Topmost on Google is irrelevant - and depends on your own previous Google activity anyway.
The only one of those figures coming from a reputable source is the 4000, which is still really an estimate - not "prediction" - that has been falling ever since the first was made, as most of those who may have been affected stubbornly refuse to die.
Check the UN and WHO figures, and (better) studies published in proper scientific journals if you have access.
The deaths are extremely low - 56 to 64 - the numbers of people affected by thyroid problems are notably higher but they didn't die.
I have noticed that these latter tend to get counted among the dead by some anti-nuclear protestors claiming to be doing studies. Clue - still walking around == not dead.
They will return.
Many already have, it just doesn't make the news.
Radioactivity decays, and contamination in general dissipates through natural weathering.
They'd be back even if nothing whatsoever was done to clean up, so the cleanup operation will get them all back within a few years.
Don't conflate panic with reality. Panic always causes greater suffering.
Nuclear decommissioning is already paid for by the industry via bonds etc, which is not true for any other industry, many of which can easily cause greater issues.
How much did cleaning up the London Olympic Park cost? The industries which put the contaminants there paid none of it!
Extrapolating "possibly slightly increased risk" into THEY ARE ALL GOING TO DIE!!!!!!11!
As to their fundamental premise that solar, wind, and water will save us?
How much sunshine do you get at night?
How often is there enough wind to power the country, even assuming we cover an area the size of of Scotland? Does that cover the nights? How many Giga-Watt-hours of storage would that need?
Finally, several hundreds of thousands of people have already been directly, provably and instantly killed by water power. No maybe or slightly-increased probabilities about it, just actual drowned, crushed and smashed into pieces dead.
I suppose a tablet (or smartphone) is a kind of pocket watch, so this is a wearable watch that connects to a pocket watch in order to work.
But yes, there's something screwy. Pretty sure the cheap Casios are "wearable" and they must have sold millions.
I hate video tutorials because you have to watch the whole thing, can't skip to "the bit that I got stuck on" etc.
Plus they are really hard to make and usually get outdated in the very next release.
Yet I regularly get requests from users for "A video tutorial on XXX", despite the actual user manual having step-by-step instructions complete with screenshots and usually more than one worked example.
Humans can't really read numbers without separators.
It's much easier to check for typos if you can check "block #2" instead of "digits 5-8".
You should never ask the user to type blocks of 'random' alphanumerics longer than ~5 characters, assuming you want them to be typed accurately.
Admin privileges aren't needed for software to make itself run on Windows 7 or 8.
Admin is only needed if it installs into Program Files or another "protected" folder, or adds keys to HKLM.
If it just installs into My Documents and adds auto run keys to HKCU, admin isn't needed and it can just go ahead and do anything to anything the user could.
This isn't a privilege escalation, it's just doing anything a normal user could do - rearrange their Start menu/start screen, and mess with the user's files.
If only somebody could think of something like an Execute flag that only an admin could set?
In the Standard Model + General Relativity, there are several constants and changing any one of them by a small amount gives you a universe where life is impossible.
But what if you change several of them, or all of them? There will be other sets of values where life is possible.
To use another example, your motor vehicle has lots of components which must all be well-tuned to make it run. Change any one of them - piston head radius - without changing any others - cylinder radius - and it stops working.
But if you change many of them in the right way, a working car becomes a working motorbike.
(Thanks to Jack Cohen for the analogy)
Champion of cheap interplanetary launches, hero of our time etc etc..,
At the moment the active online system will have a very short list of valid users, only containing the paid alpha and beta testers. It may well be in a different domain as well, and likely IP or router-MAC limited to keep it away from 3rd party eyes.
They will only open it up to "any XBOne owner" just before the official release date.
This is all usual practice for any closed-beta online service!
EULAs are generally not worth the paper they (aren't) written on.
In most of the world, if they are inside sealed packaging they are completely unenforceable, null and void, and even in the USA there isn't much in the way of precedent that implies they can be enforced.
Nobody wants to be the lawyer that creates a precedent invalidating all the legal work that goes into writing an EULA, so none of them go to court on the EULA itself as opposed to general law.
Aside from that, under EU law a consumer simply cannot give up their statutory rights under any circumstances - and two of those rights are "I bought it, it's mine", and "It has to be fit for purpose".
The clause "We don't say it's fit for purpose"? Legally, that's utter bollocks in the EU.
How exactly does a photo ID have any bearing on how likely or not somebody is to hijack an aircraft?
You are a prime example of how Governments oppress and subjugate their population - by convincing them that "pink is a fruit", to give a harmless example.
"We need photo ID before flying to stop terrorism"
"We need to strip-search everyone flying to stop terrorism"
"We need to sedate everyone and fly them unconscious to stop terrorism"
"We need to lock everyone up if they look a bit foreign"
Here's an idea - Every single time you see an advert that uses "Unlimited", complain to the ASA that it can't possibly be true.
If they spend every single day handling thousands of complaints about that word, eventually they'll just "ban" everyone from using it.
(Or rather, they'll make a gentlemen's agreement not to use it)
Unfortunately the implementation will probably screw it up, rather like the Heathrow T5 Business pods.
"What do you mean, 'electrified track'? That's just madness! The pods can charge up at the terminus."
So after about 9am, they are all flat and stay that way until the last flight empties, because they never sit idle for long enough. And thus they are effectively useless, because you end up waiting 20-30 minutes for one to get enough charge to take you the half mile.
I do wonder how often the batteries need replacing.
I suspect these pods will do the same, though at least they have a good reason not to have electrified track.
Send them an invoice.
I've heard of people trying that, not sure whether it would actually get paid and I've never got around to it myself, but it sounds like a good idea.
Looks like you didn't read the article.
That thing is not just a USB hub, it's a USB Ethernet adapter, and USB video card.
Which makes it the one thing on the list that I am very interested in, because it would give me a third monitor and second NIC.
It would do so very neatly given that the current Dell laptop docks have USB3 ports.
So yes, I want one of those.
Nope, but the UK is more puritan than France and many other parts of mainland Europe.
The USA was originally formed by groups of people who wanted to be more puritan than they could manage in the UK. That's why they went over there - to escape the depravity being permitted in the UK.
Recently our Governments have started to move towards the US views rather than the continental ones, which is likely to be the normal pendulum swings of opinion, but it's possible that it's caused by the exportation of US values via Hollywood et al.
Which is a shame, because BOOBIES!
If they had put 1/4 or less of the money towards improving PV efficacy, then we'd have better PV arrays that might actually make sense commercially (even if not in Britain), rather than just pissing our money over rich people's roofing.
(And maybe not need to guarantee double market rate to Hinckley C as they wouldn't have already guaranteed the same for wind and quadruple for PV)
Having an actual plug-and-socket means breaking the skin barrier, which carries a much greater risk of infection.
Given that this has electrodes to the heart, that could be very bad.
There's not really a good solution other than good and published encryption over close-coupled coils - not radio or even NFC per se.
As long as every device has a different key, and the key is appropriately protected, the risk would be very small.
Of course, this almost certainly has no encryption at all and just blindly follows commands sent, because medical devices generally don't consider the possibility.
That would be the "normal" range when using the carefully-designed and highly regulated transducer.
If one didn't care about targeting a specific unit, or EMC and other pesky regulations limiting the broadcast power and bandwidth, one could greatly increase the range.
That's always been the problem with NFC - while the proper transceivers are very short-range because they were carefully designed to be, the ones an attacker could use have several orders of magnitude greater range because (by definition) a black hat is not working to the design brief of "short range and comply with regulations!"
How were those panels manufactured, transported, installed, cleaned and maintained?
How will they be disposed of when they wear out or break?
What poisonous and polluting chemicals are used and discharged during these lifetime stages?
If we're trading CO2 emissions for emissions of poisons and heavy metals, is that a sensible thing to do?
Where does the energy come from when it's dark or during bad weather, which is when the most heating and lighting is required?
Swindon is not known for its bright sunny days!
If you're saying "storage", what is the environmental cost of that storage?
"Here are some satnavs you might be interested in!"
Erm, no. I only just bought one, right? If I wanted another I'd have got two!
They have several good venues, and they always give visitors a great welcome.
Plus volcanoes, so what's not to like?
That does have really nice crab cakes.
Also lots more fresh and really nice seafood, on account of it being a small Caribbean island.
- Oddly, Hell is located there. It wasn't as fiery as advertised, and there was a distinct lack of brimstone. Hell does however have a post office and a petrol station.
That's exactly what I mean.
When the "smart" is a separate device, you can choose something with the features you want, and it's also more likely to get firmware updates, new features and to have a nice UI - because you have lots of choice.
When the "smart" is built-in, you have almost no choice (Sony/LG/Samsung/Philips/Tesco Value) and rarely, if ever get updates or even have a nice UI - you don't really like yours!
I now have a nice PVR set-top box, it does everything I want from a "Smart" TV (iPlayer, ITVPlayer, 4OD etc) except for DNLA sink (it can be a source though).
Most of those features have actually been added since I bought it, and cost me nothing extra.
When I decide I really do want to have that feature, or some other cool killer feature turns up that I want, I can buy a new STB or 'HDMI Stick" to do it, either replacing my current STB or in addition.
It's down to the cost. A good panel is expensive - £700-1000 and up. I'm only going to buy that once in ten years or so.
Good smarts change every year. Most users are not going to be happy being two-three years behind on that, but are not going to buy a new panel just for that, it's too much money. They might buy a new STB every couple of years, especially if it's £50-100 - or even less.
Everyone who has the slightest idea of what they're looking at sees the "Smart TV" as a lock-in to a poor service that will only get worse.
When you can buy the "Smarts" as a $50 external box, why on earth would you want to pay $100+ for internal smarts which are probably poorer and are highly unlikely to get any better?
I tried it once - I got a TV with built-in PVR. It was awful to use, crashed and burned regularly and with no prospect of any firmware updates, I sent it back as "not fit for purpose" and replaced it with a simpler, cheaper TV panel and 'smart' set-top box.
That STB gets over-the-air firmware updates and has a much better UI for using its "smarts", because the company that made it succeed or fail on their UI.
TV manufacturers don't. They see the smarts as a simple tickybox on the marketing, and to date have paid almost no attention to either sensible UI or to offering firmware updates (whether over-the-air or manually).
I have never even used the tuner in this TV. All I want is plenty of inputs, and an easy and simple, preferably automatic way to switch between them - plus routing of proper 5.1 audio out to external amp.
I'd be happy with just one input and an HDMI + audio switching box, except that the MPAA decreed such a thing can never exist as it would break HDCP.
Of course, there don't appear to be any TVs out there that can actually do this, they're all intent on being throw-away, non-upgradable junk.
Followed shortly after by a bit of aquabraking and a lot of lithobraking.
The margin the energy companies are allowed is pretty tiny - 5%
Until the banking crisis, they'd make more money putting their capital in an ISA (or equivalent) instead of using it to buy fuels and sell gas, oil and electric.
They only make notable total profits due to their scale.
If I remember correctly, about 70% of the price rises over the last decade and a bit have been directly caused by the green charges and renewable obligations.
So not much is due to either profits or the wholesale cost of energy, it's almost entirely the Polly-ticks.
The question is, how much damping is needed?
If too much is applied, the system will never reach the target value.
If too little is applied, the system will oscillate around the target value.
Right now it would appear that the housing market has no way to drive it down, while the other markets have no damping at all - there used to be the simple delays between trades, now with the new methods those delays are gone.
Of course, much of the profits are being made by causing those oscillations, which explains why traders are very much against any form of damping.
So, what is the transfer function for a market?
If that's even 1% true then the banks are insane and already took the utterly stupid risks.
I find it really hard to believe though, XPe is cheap and incredibly easy to deploy on a massive scale, while full-fat XP is neither of those things.
- Our manufacturing has one-button XPe and Win7e deployment to take a machine from blank drive to everything installed and configured. That button is the power button.
Windows XP Professional for Embedded Systems - released December 31, 2001, Product Distribution End Date December 31, 2016.
That's distribution, in other words, MS will stop selling XP Embedded licences then, but won't necessarily cease support at that time - and definitely won't stop support before that.
Go home PCI, you're drunk.
For this kind of shoot, you generally mount the camera on its own stabilised gimbal.
This is the only way to ensure the camera stays pointed in the chosen direction while the 'copter moves around to manoeuvre and stabilise the overall frame.
A two axis, tilt and roll gimbal covers the stabilisation motions a 'copter will do, then pan by rotating the whole airframe.
I would genuinely love to do that.
Unfortunately, I'm based in the UK which means I can't afford the commute.
Yes it is. You can see two of the rotors at one point.
Guessing hexaopter, but harder to tell
It's the only sane way to get this kind of footage - no helicopter pilot is ever going to agree to fly that close to an operating rocket!
I think some of the apparent CG-ness comes because the camera gimbal is too good!
And if we did that, what do we do with all the spare chicken heads and feet?
She didn't choose the costume, the network did.
She had no choice in the matter - refusing to wear it would have got her fired.
The right person to fire is the person who said the costume was ok - that's the producer and the network management who commissioned the show.
The costume designer probably won't work there again anyway.
Not that surprising though, given Turkey's recent behaviour over Eurovision et al.
We've been building these systems for many years.
Itty-bitty ARMs at <50 cents each are used for the myriad of end devices from disparate manufacturers, the small number of edge "servers" run on MIPs or mid-range ARMs and finally, the core, campus-wide, machines are Atoms.
In other words, the Internet of Things requirement for Atom-class devices is roughly two per campus (main & backup).
The place we use Intel the most is actually GUI interfaces - large touchscreens, and the building-status widgets on the normal office PCs.
Intel needs to bring the cost down a lot to stop the large touchscreens drifting towards ARM and MIPs - as the panel prices fall and ARM GPUs get better, it gets harder to justify the price and power budget of an Intel SBC.
Confusing a live for neutral, a wild leg for a normal one or an actual phase-to-phase short can destroy things, merely connecting incoming phase A to equipment B, in B to C and in C to A would have no effect at all, and getting them in the wrong order just makes the motor spin backwards.
Electricity does not work that way!
Nope, it'll be a flashover between busbars about 1-2" apart.
There are many possible causes of that, from "somebody left/dropped a spanner/ring/washer/screw in there" to "circuit overloaded and breaker didn't contain the disconnection arc"
In many cases there's basically no evidence left as once started, the arc vaporises everything nearby.
The six months will have been the blamestorming of "it's the designer's fault", "it's the contractors fault", "it's the downstream equipment" (impossible), "bad breaker", "bad busbars", "customer overloaded it" (which actually means bad breaker or shoddy design/build) etc.
My wild guess would be a screw in the chamber.
But this is the USA, where electrical standards are generally poor and different everywhere. It's only recently that live working has become frowned upon!
"Ok guys, nobody answer any emails today, that way we won't get caught out"
The day after this 'test' is what worries me, because they'll be rushing through everything to catch up, thus ripe for social engineering attacks.
I just use Git GUI.
Almost everything I need to do is a click on a button or menu option, and when I've needed to do something more esoteric I just Google it and add it to the "custom tools" menu so it becomes just another menu option.
There are annoyances with it - the tags list gets too long & can't easily edit a custom tool (have to open config file), but overall it's much easier than VSS or ClearCase so I'm happy.
Mercurial may well be better but I've not used it.
I hate the datatype "char" and refuse point blank to use it.
I use quint8/qint8 or uint8/int8 for an 8-bit unsigned/signed value (depending on whether I'm Cute at the time).
"char" should be banned. It's confused.
Cook's big mistake was talking to the guy in the first place. I think we can safely say that Jobs would not have done.
Icahn should be ignored under all circumstances, nothing good ever comes from talking to him.
You're sounding very foolish now.
Are you trolling or is English or Americanese not your native language?
The word "Most" was used because Apple, and Apple alone, do not comply.
Thus I could not say "All" without also claiming that iPhone 5/5S/5C are not modern phones.
We can discuss the merits of that argument another time.
BlackBerry's key strengths are their email, messaging and OS.
Microsoft didn't want any of those because they already have Exchange and Windows Phone 8, both of which are clearly considered core to their business plan.
Nokia's only remaining asset was hardware. They already threw away all their software.
Thus, what do you buy?