They have to be quick
Or either WhatsApp or Snapchat is going to eat their lunch.
My wife no longer uses Skype to talk to her parents as it became "too hard" for them to use it, so they have moved on.
2233 posts • joined 16 Jun 2009
Or either WhatsApp or Snapchat is going to eat their lunch.
My wife no longer uses Skype to talk to her parents as it became "too hard" for them to use it, so they have moved on.
That's just a rebranded version of Lync as far as I can tell.
It's even bug-compatible.
The four places that are really easy to hit with a mouse are the screen corners as they're infinitely deep, so let's put the "lose everything" button in one of them.
- and the "Start" button inexplicably a couple of pixels away from the corner in one Windows OS, I forget which. Snatched crushing defeat from the very jaws of victory.
The more recent removal of title bars is actually a pretty decent idea as it makes the toolbar buttons infinitely tall.
W8/10 further complicated it as the corners are quite hard to hit on a touchscreen.
As presumably the Trojan is inside something the user expected to find on the stick - otherwise they would not run it.
Perhaps part of a "System Restore" function for the particular air-gapped system that's either being repaired or being wiped for sale?
The queue for the security check.
Which will now contain many more people than the queue for the actual tube, train or bus ever had, crammed into a smaller space.
In other words, that kind of thing increases the danger.
The theory behind the 'night shift' is sound and has been tested quite extensively.
"Warmer" colours are soothing (fire, candlelight, sunset), while bluer colours like the D50 and higher colour temp used in LED backlights cause a waking response, resetting the body clock.
Mamy people suffering SAD are helped by a bright high colour temp light during the day to keep their body clock in sync during the dark winter months.
There have been Android apps to do this for years.
It's odd that Apple are so far behind though, this is the kind of thing I would have expected them to jump at it years ago.
It's the approximate spacetime curvature indicator.
It's both more obvious and less likely to give erroneous readings than the other more precise units in the instrument panel.
Apple know how their phone backup system works, and clearly the FBI do not.
Changing the password was an obviously stupid thing to do - when I change my backup password, my phone suddenly can't make backups! Shocking, I know.
The remote wipe is a command sent from an Apple server, and is thus quite easy for Apple to block.
I'm sure that Apple have done so several times after receiving a lawful court order.
Apple have also already handed the FBI the content of this person's iCloud backup.
The case really looks like it's either the FBI trying to cover up their incompetence and then ending up in really hot constituiinal water by mistake, or a deliberate attempt to subvert the rule of law.
Personally I think it's both.
You have several embedded computers with built-in keys that cannot be easily circumvented with physical access in your wallet.
The chip in a chip'n'pin does this.
The hardware is specialist but also very cheap.
The C and C++ standards don't require it to be, and so you cannot assume that all compilers will actually do that.
Char also isn't signed or unsigned. The compiler can choose!
MAX_CHAR and CHAR_BIT exist because the compiler can make char (and int and long) as big as it likes. As does CHAR_BIT.
C89 was a mess. If you actually need the size to be right then you needed compiler checks to confirm the size of char etc.
At least C99 fixed that nonsense by adding int8_t and friends.
Shame that VS2008 didn't support them!
We'll need good rockets and lots of in-space manufacture and assembly experience to build an elevator.
Even if we actually could manufacture the appropriate material, it'll take a lot of launches to get the factory on-orbit.
Doesn't count unless it's real.
Energia only flew twice - and succeeded once!
SLS has never flown.
Saturn V went rather well but cost way too much to attempt again.
No, there have already been two cases in court.
The other was refused by the judge.
Perjury is a crime. Time to prosecute the DoJ.
The guns and stockings are legitimate business expenses
As is the fine... Hang on, are businesses really allowed to count fines as reducing profit for tax purposes?
I would have more confidence.
It means they're actually testing the limits, not just spouting off a marketing specification.
Which doesn't help much.
Most "create installers" tools are pretty awful, and a lot do the wrong thing by default.
It doesn't help that most of the documentation is obtuse, and some is wrong.
That's before running into "virus scanner decided part X was a virus and silently removed it" problems.
Software installation is insane. Why is it still so hard?
"it be used only on government..."
Exactly. We already know how good they are at keeping electronic data secret.
We also know that given the chance, they'd use Apple's keys to backdoor every iPhone in the USA.
People's email is on their phone.
Including internal corporate "email" that normally only resides in corporate servers and has never been transmitted unencrypted.
Including information about private systems, that may include passwords.
Including access to password reset facilities.
That's before you consider the social engineering promise of being able to call someone from the CEO's actual phone.
And the general phishing opportunities if you have the entire contents of their phone.
It's lucky that it was in a VM.
A guest taking down the host is a big and clear WTF!? as it's supposed to be impossible.
In an organisation that knows what it's doing, that's an immediate "We need to know why" - it's a serious bug!
And the other hundred or so requests currently pending?
And the millions of requests this would unleash?
And the fact that every other country in the world would immediately demand the same ability?
This isn't a slippery slope. It's an actual cliff that the FBI are currently pushing us over.
Further to that, whether the US Government can force a software writer to write something that they fundamentally disagree with.
That's the nub of the free speech argument. Is the US Government permitted to force a legal person to say what the US Government wants?
The only - and I mean only - reason why people install an adblocker is because they are annoyed by adverts.
By making advertising more annoying, more people are annoyed by them and install an adblocker.
The only way this spiral can be broken is to make adverts less annoying.
If you believe otherwise then you understand very little about human behaviour.
The advertising industry deliberately chose to ignore the wishes of the majority.
I am happy to let my browser download adverts that do not move, do not cause content to move, do not flash, do not make any noise, do not attmept to download anything else whatsoever and do not cover any content.
Basically, I'm happy to accept static images and/or static text. Just like Google used to serve when it first launched.
I only got an adblocker when adverts started moving around and making noise.
Almost everyone who has an adblocker decided to get one because of an advert that they found untenable - and most will never, ever disable that blocker.
A brute force attack on this type of encryption would take many trillions of trillions times longer than the age of the universe.
If you don't believe me, do the maths yourself.
2 raised to the power of 255 (half the keyspace) is a very, very big number.
They are asking for universal access.
To use a daft analogy that Congresscritters might understand:
Apple have built a pretty secure safe. It's almost impossible to break open that safe without destroying the contents.
The FBI want Apple to make a special lockpick they can use to open one of these safes.
However, that lockpick must, by definition, also open all safes of that type and once built it is trivial to copy.
Furthermore, the FBI have acted dishonestly throughout.
They claimed that the lockpick and the legal force used to create it would only be used for this one case.
Both of these are simple lies. It appears they now accept the latter.
They also did not allow Apple to present arguments to the judge when they asked for the order against Apple.
Put simply, this is a huge overreach by law enforcement.
Concorde did make money, but simply didn't have enough routes.
It was limited to EU to New York because of the boom.
If it could have been used for more routes then it'd probably still be flying.
The cost means that I'd probably never have flown on it, but there are plenty of people who would.
Snoopers charter isn't a Tory policy.
It's a Home Office policy.
Most of the content of this Bill has been put forward in every recent Parliament with only minor changes - Labour, ConDem Coalition and Conservative.
One wonders why that particular set of civil servants are so keen on these mass surveillance powers.
What is it that they have to hide?
If true then they burned the wrong bridge.
The "run apk in simulator" approach could have worked - and can't have been that difficult given that Android simulators already exist for development use. Even ones that handle graphics acceleration.
An Objective-C compiler might be more fun to write, but it will be much harder and more difficult to use. A project is more than just a compiler...
If the app has to be rebuilt, then nobody will bother.
This would only ever have been used if the developer didn't need to do anything more than submit it to an app store.
If a developer wants to develop in a cross-platform manner that requires work on all platforms, then they will use a cross-platform toolkit.
They won't develop in an outdated language and then burn a few weeks trying to port it.
Shortly after I realised that I hadn't received any calls at all since T-Mobile had enabled it.
Iterators are slightly slower and usually harder to read.
The former usually doesn't matter, the latter always does.
Readability trumps most things. Be nice to You-from-the-future.
They probably think you're an idiot, but hopefully you can make sure they don't think you're malicious.
They are being asked to create a toolkit that can be used to unlock all iPhones of that model, on demand.
Consider the following question:
How could Apple test that this software works?
Can't test it on the target device without risking wiping it by mistake.
So the software can be applied to any and all iPhones. By definition.
On top of that, we already know of over one hundred other petitions for this.
So no, you are simply completely wrong in broad and in detail.
Right now no back door vulnerability exists. The FBI want Apple to make one.
There are two major problems with this, one technical and the other legal.
1) Once a back door vulnerability has been created, it will become a target for malicious actors to steal and other Governments to demand access to (making it easier to steal). Eventually they will succeed, and then all iPhones of that hardware are pwned.
2) If a US technology company can be coerced into created a back door vulnerability in one product, all US companies can be coerced into making a back door vulnerability in all their products.
Which then exposes all US products to (1)
Thus if the FBI get what they want, nobody can ever trust any US product ever again.
Because it affects those outside, and probably won't even work.
Jamming is done by transmitting a "wrong" signal that's strong enough to make it impossible to detect legitimate signals.
It is physically impossible to limit the jamming to within prison walls due to actual Physics.
So there will be large areas outside the prison where phone signals are jammed.
On top of that, reliably jamming throughout a complex shaped space with lots of metal and other RF reflectors/absorbers is basically impossible.
There will be "live spots" in the prison where the jamming doesn't work but external signal does.
Most probable places for these is inside some of the the cells...
You can ask the mobile phone companies not to cover the prison. This is more effective but also means that there won't be any mobile signal within a few miles of the prison either.
The OS can do something - and does with ASLR and killing a process that tries to access memory the OS doesn't think it should.
The next line is the standard C/C++ runtime libraries, such as glibc, msvcrt etc.
These do the allocation and bounds checking.
If there is a bug in OS or standard libraries, then any application can have trouble.
That's before considering bugs in actual applications.
Memory management is a very hard problem in general.
Recently I've been banging my head against a memory management bug in a commercial hardware driver - which glibc detected.
I can't fix it because it's closed source.
Lenses are still heavy - and are unlikely to get much lighter due to the physics of optics.
A camera sensor with a tiny lens is useless at that distance. Even assuming fixed focus it needs a really wide aperture to be any use - and a telephoto lens adds a lot more glass.
It's not NTP.
Not sure what it is, but it also includes timezone data.
Been on one ship that had a set of not-yet-properly configured femto-cells, and it confused the heck out of my phone.
It could get five hours ahead simply by walking through the ship!
There are a lot of bugs in "big software" that automatic regression testing should have found.
It also seems to be quite difficult to get good testers in general - it seems like many just want to follow The Procedure and do nothing else.
Which rather crushes the enthusiasm of the ones who don't.
So they're definitely totally dead before starting to freeze them.
This is not the cryonics you're looking for.
Everyone can decrypt.
It doesn't matter who the first Eve is, very soon it is all.
I have a great idea. We give the keys to a member of Congress.
They will soon be kidnapped, tortured and murdered, by a miscreant who really wants those keys.
Then we change the keys and give them to another member of Congress.
We keep doing this until we run out of politicians who want to hold the keys, then we canforget the whole idea and go back to living in the real world, where only Alice and Bob have keys.
The problem solves itself. It's quite elegant.
show me a drop-in replacement for Excel capable of operating any given complex, macro laden spreadsheet in full, without deviating from the behaviour of the version of Excel in which it was created
Excel doesn't do that either, new versions just quietly changes your results when you open the sheet.
Because it's stored in an opaque binary format, you can't even spot it until it mysteriously costs you.
If you want full, unchanged results you can't ever change Excel version. Ever.
Not even that.
They have now publicly stated that they do not intend to comply with the Criminal Law.
Dear ICO, please "educate" them.
When you're done, EU Information Commission, please also "educate" them.
The query explicitly states that it will return one row at most!
How does a memory optimisation ignore the explicit limits set in a query?
How about we withdraw that from the EU Parliament for the next week?
See how they cope with no radio mics and no simultaneous translation services.
I recently found that ABP was even explicitly allowing some video adverts - with audio to boot. Scared the living daylights out of me.
So goodbye. You do not get to do that ABP, you are now dead.
I sent you the complaint so maybe you'll change that before everyone leaves, but goodbye.
Fusion requires that you bang the rocks together really hard.
You can either do that by physically squashing them together, eg by gravity, or by making them go really fast and hope some of them hit each other.
Fact: He is accused of rape. That is a serious offence.
(It has also been used as an instrument of torture, but that's not important right now.)
Fact: Under Swedish law the accused has to be interviewed face to face and charged at interview.
Fact: He ran away before they could do that, and they did not block him from boarding because they believed that he wouldn't run away and so didn't apply for a travel ban.
Fact: That interview is what the Swedes want. They think there is a reasonable chance that after interviewing him they will want to charge him. Their law requires him to be present to argue his case.
That's actually very similar to here.
In the UK, you're arrested "on suspicion" and interviewed, perhaps "under caution".
You may then be released to go back to your daily business. Often are, in fact.
Later on they may ask you to come back in for further questioning - they want to clarify something, new evidence has appeared or similar.
At that later interview they may decide to charge you - or decide that there's no case to answer. Or that there isn't enough evidence to charge, but they're going to keep looking.
Note that even formally dropping it doesn't mean they can't re-arrest you. If new evidence comes to light then they are bound to come knocking.
Fact: He is guilty of breaching his UK bail conditions. The sentencing guidelines are published online, and while IANAJ he ticks almost all the boxes for the maximum possible sentence which I believe is 40 weeks imprisonment.
- He is certainly fully culpable and intended to cause maximum harm, is definitely flouting the authority of the Court - and deliberately did so again yesterday.
He was held in that mansion while he was appealing against his EU arrest warrant
The moment that appeal completed, he was offered bail.
That's the way appeals work. Trials are similar.
You get arrested, and you are held while you and your lawyers argue that you shouldn't be extradited, and the other side argue that you should be.
At the end, a judgement is made and you're either released as innocent, held until the plane is ready, or offered bail on the basis that you are honourable and will present yourself for extradition on a given date.
This is called a "legal process". It's clearly hard for the UNWGoAD to understand, but most people do.
He continued his appeal for as long as is possible. That's fine, he has the legal right to do so.
The judge then offered bail, believing his friends who claimed he was honourable and would abide the ruling.
Regardless of whether or not he did rape anyone, he is now a criminal on the run for breaching his bail terms, no different to any other.
So the order is:
Arrest. Sweden for questioning. Imprisoned for rape, aquitted, or charges dropped.
EU Arrest Warrant issued by the UK. Arrest. Extradition to the UK. Trial, imprisoned for skipping bail and contempt of court.
If he was genuinely afraid of being extradited to the USA, then he's a ****ing idiot because almost every action he's taken since leaving Sweden has made it easier for them to do so - if they cared.