Re: If you read it
So the thing my camera does, the one I bought a decade ago?
1631 posts • joined 16 Jun 2009
So the thing my camera does, the one I bought a decade ago?
It's "Use stock without any overlay changes and Google will pay some of your marketing costs"
So not only do you spend less on R&D to create an (almost always) trashy interface overlay that most people dislike, you get some extra cash.
Bad for the companies who were making a good overlay as they now have a hard choice to make, but good for everyone else as there is a direct incentive not to screw around with the interface.
Try the performing arts. Too many productions expect most of the people to work for free.
The worst case is the chorus.
Everybody expects dancers to dance for free. You know, because dancing's only "fun" and not "real work". Never mind the gruelling hours, the risk of injury, and the years and decades of continuous training...
Especially the promoters for big names who are raking in millions, because "exposure" is apparently enough to put food on the table.
- For example, Kylie Minogue's production team decided they'd pay the dancers nothing because "exposure".
- Don't blame Kylie, the big name knows nothing of the contracts and terms of work for the cast and crew. She is reported to be very upset at this!
Then there's all the smaller productions where half the cast and crew are expected to work for free, either outright or effectively due to excessive hours and unpaid expenses, the others (including some pretty big events and tours) where invoices are never paid (and the few where the producer never intended to pay them either) etc...
No Windows developer in their right mind uses .NET.
We tried it once, for one project. Never Again.
OSX is only stable because Apple have just broken EVERYTHING so nothing works.
Broken is stable.
I support some OpenGL applications that run on Win32 and OSX since the days of Windows XP and whatever OSX it was that ran on both Intel and PPC around that time.
So far almost every 'named' OSX update has broken something, Apple's support of OpenGL in particular is horrendous.
The only thing that's ever broken in the Win32 version are the drivers for external hardware, which have had to be x64'd.
(Although Windows 8's driver model is a complete and total screwup. We are NOT paying MS to 'certify' a bloody INF that points straight to a built-in driver!)
What makes you think this isn't one of the methods they were using?
They aren't going to list descriptions of vulnerabilities in use on PowerPoint slides meant for the higher ups.
Basically, if the NSA did not know about this before public disclosure then they are incredibly incompetent because it's something they claim to be doing, and if they did know about it, then how long do they sit on vulnerabilities like this before nudging someone else to disclose?
Given that a proper one-CPU autopilot capable of long and complex missions can already be found on sub-1kg drones, I fail to see why a triplet-set of the same hasn't been installed.
The pilot only needs waking up if the autopilots disagree or have confusing/missing data (pitot frozen, GPS fix jump etc).
You just *know* it's right.
More seriously, you know (or can measure) the tolerance of every component and thus can calculate the possible range of the total error.
In some cases this can even tell you the direction of the error - for example, car speedometers are (supposed to be) designed so they don't read lower than the actual speed. This does of course mean they nearly always read higher than the real speed.
The other way to tell is to build several and compare them, which was how it used to be done. That doesn't really work for very high accuracy clocks though because you have to wait too long before you see them diverge by a measurable amount.
(As opposed to other instantaneous physical quantity measurements, where it doesn't take too long to check.)
The grid will pull a small generator into sync almost instantly, accompanied by a loud BANG as the rotor is yanked around and the coils try to leap off the stator.
It's a very, very bad thing to do.
Thanks! Will bear with.
This morning the advert at the top of the mobile site became so HUGE that it pushed all the content off the bottom of my mobile (iPhone 4S) browser screen.
I think it'll be more than 1/2 the screen on other phones.
It's now so ridiculously large and annoying that it genuinely made me think the site had been defaced!
Can you get it squashed back up to being a simple bar again?
An advert that size makes me certain to scroll away from it as fast as possible - or use an ad blocker.
I've always turned off my ad blocker for El Reg as you normally ensure the adverts do not annoy. However, this one for an MSCloud service is incredibly irritatingly huge, and now my impression of MS Cloud is that it deliberately gets in the way of what users want to do.
Computers are easy.
Machines are not.
A single production line tends to start at £10 million and up, with an expected lifetime of 20 years and often a payback period of 5-10 years, bought via bank loan.
If the line still works and makes the product, what company is going to blow another ten years profit on a new line?
That money comes from the workers pay packets. Are you happy to forego a pay rise for the next few years simply to upgrade from XP?
No it is not!
At the time these machines were bought, there was no other choice.
It takes at least two to three years to bring a machine like that to market.
If you were starting to build a CNC machine a mere ten years ago, the only possible OS for the host control machine was Windows XP.
I know a company that tried to use Linux back then - it failed miserably due to the poor to nonexistent driver support in the 00's.
That's no longer the case for drivers, Linux support is now very good.
However, it is still the case for much of the proprietary 3rd party software that such machines need to talk to.
- AutoCAD does not run under Linux, and won't unless Autodesk decide to port it, while Solidworks only added a Linux version in the last year.
(Much as I think AutoCAD needs to die, it's still an industry standard.)
Or would that cause an infinite loop of headdesk?
That said, most domestic wall plate dimmers effectively lie about their rating. If it says 100W, it doesn't mean it'll actually run a 100W lamp continually.
They tend to be very low duty cycle.
Bzzt! Absolutely wrong, brimming over with wrongability.
Halogen lamps ARE incandescents.
The difference between those and "normal" GLS lamps is the gas fill, which uses the halogen cycle to deposit evaporated tungsten back onto the filament instead of staying on the glass.
- If you've ever been to the theatre, >90% of the lamps you see dimming so nicely are halogens. Bigger ones than you can get in Tesco, but still halogen.
It's job requirement to be evil.
- And if you aren't evil enough when you start the job, the civil servants arrange for the ethicectomy to be performed while you're sleeping.
The housing/landlord thing had specific laws about it.
The tenant may "enjoy the property without let or hindrance".
But then business to business relationships have always been less stringently policed than business to consumer.
Businesses are more or less expected to write contracts to cover this sort of thing, and only rely on the law to enforce that contract.
Given that they have customers in practically every legal jurisdiction, some of which have very strict privacy laws?
I'm absolutely certain they can do this with US customers emails, but I suspect probably not EU customers due to Data Protection legislation.
While that won't stop them, it would tend to make cases built on the data fall to bits and cause a civil complaint to be met with a criminal counter suit.
Regardless, it was bloody stupid to make such a mockery of their own anti-Google adverts. I wonder how much money they wasted on those, and if US customers can now sue for false advertising?
It doesn't matter whether or not any passenger has a roaming contract as the phone has to connect to the basestation before it can be fobbed off with a "no contract". Even then a GSM phone can still make an emergency call.
So if the plane went through a strong enough region of cellular coverage - over land - and if somebody on the plane had left their phone on then yes, there should be a record of cells it touched. It probably wouldn't touch a continuous trail, but there should be a few cells.and thus eliminate some possibilities.
More importantly, if the plane did land intact anywhere you can be absolutely certain that damn near everybody would try to turn their phone on almost immediately. Even if they were somehow being actively prevented from doing so, some of them would have succeeded.
> they would require a runway of c1.5km to land a 777
You can 'land' in a little over the wingspan - depends on the debris scatter.
If you want a "good" landing then a couple of hundred metres - like that 777 incident at LHR, where everybody walked off.
You only need the 1.5km for a "great" landing - ie one where you get to use the plane again.
The question makes no sense, because the Big Bang was the beginning of time itself, and thus there was no "before" because there was no time for it to be in.
This is based on the Big Bang being a "perfect" singularity, so if we were to find evidence of a "before" it would mean that the Big Bang was not perfect - which would be very exciting indeed.
Nobody has found any evidence at all though.
Except that the set of touch hardware supported by both Windows XP and Windows 8 is miniscule and may not in fact exist.
So they'll have to replace ALL of their hardware, not just the desktops but the displays and touch overlays, at Government-procurement rates.
How much money do you have?
I saw the LG 77" OLED in John Lewis last week. Looked gorgeous.
Ever so slightly more expensive than I could afford though, you may need to sell a couple of small children as spare parts.
That is very odd, as my Humax does genre-searches, and the EPG data stream itself contains that genre information.
It's often wrong, but it is there.
It's not just Panasonic, all the TV manufacturers do the same. It's the nature of the TV industry.
They gain nothing by updating extant TVs, because all that will do is delay the time when the customer buys a new panel.
Which is why I do NOT want a "Smart" TV, just a really good panel - and the less onboard processing the better.
Those heat pipes are already being used.
The reason this is interesting is scale - heat pipes are physically many orders of magnitude larger, what with all the tubes and flow, while this works on the nanometre interconnects which are already there.
That said, it does rather sound like another, cheaper process might give the same result. Is this simply due to the annealing effect of the application process, or does the graphene itself do the work?
Or rather there were no companies willing to pay a decent wage for a recent graduate, so I left the country.
The real problem is the complete lack of respect for scientists and engineers from politicians and society at large.
In other societies the title Engineer commands respect. Not in the UK.
If any of my banks did that they'd be dropped like a hot brick.
As far as I'm concerned, a bank gets up to two chances - one annoying screwup is forgiveable, two might be ok as long as they apologise and compensate properly, three is an immediate goodbye.
So I don't have an RBS account anymore.
The variety of cryptocurrencies now in existence doesn't really matter.
While I could easily start up "Richard12Coin" in my shed, it would have zero value unless a critical mass of people agreed that it had a value and began to accept it as payment.
It's the same as if I printed out notes with my face on.
Currencies work because people accept them as payment.
Bitcoin itself may or may not be doomed, but if it dies it'll be replaced by an alternative crypto currency because it's clear that there is a market for these.
It may be that a small number survive the next couple of decades and become at least as dominant as some smaller countries' "real" currency, or that they rise and fall in quick succession, with speculators losing big each time.
Who knows? I'm not going to put my money behind any of them, but others will.
They explicitly stated that Internet Explorer was "an integral part of the OS as their get-out-of-jail argument during the monopolist abuse lawsuits.
So don't blame people for believing them.
I learnt wire wrapping just last year.
Was a lot faster and much less error prone than stripboard, I quite enjoyed it.
The problem is that there aren't enough sockets, so replacing something that can be daisychained (multiple BS1363 four-ways) with something that's purely radial (so massive bundle of cable) is going the wrong way.
Aside from that, PoE is only 13W anyway, and even the new PoE+ is only ~20W after cable losses. As the wattage increases the efficiency drops rapidly due to the thin wires in Cat5/5e/6.
10W USB sockets could actually replace most of the adapters in an average home.
You can already buy a big block of 'fast charge' USB sockets for not very much - eg This one from Maplin. (Oh no...)
That EU idea of standardising laptop PSUs is basically the only hope of more-than-10W supplies. Once you have a standard voltage and connector the market cna provide.
There are a lot of other human activities that have a vastly greater effect than any amount of CO2 emissions.
Deforestation, desertification, building on flood plains, draining swamps, paving over soakaways etc.
Some of these are being actively encouraged by the climate change policies - eg palm oil plantations created for biofuels are likely to destroy entire rainforests in the coming decades. Goodbye orangutans, you were sacrificed to the altar of climate change policy.
Desertification or flooding tends to follow the above.
None of this is climate change but all of it has a much greater effect on the ecosystems and indeed humans.
A server with the requisite power is easy, but nothing on the hard part:
How does that remotely-rendered stuff get displayed locally quick enough not to wipe out all productivity?
There is nothing more irritating than a machine that's a little bit behind on you, causing you to overshoot the adjustments all the time.
There's only about a 40ms latency window to do the entire round trip before it feels "slow", and while getting a ping that low isn't too hard, this needs an entire 1080p or higher (4k?) resolution screenful of rendered content to be delivered to lots of workers in various locations at the same time.
RDP doesn't really cope with that in my experience - at least, not on commodity networks.
It's perfectly fine for "do this series of commands" but horrible for "up a bit, down a bit, no, looks like too far nudge it back" types of adjustments that all visual (and presumably audio) creatives do all the time.
If they do not solve the latency problem, it simply will not be used.
China's just on a much bigger scale.
Nobody is using the fossil record to predict what animals will look like in the future, and thus whether individuals should be allowed to breed.
That's one difference.
Aside from that, fossils are used to model what the world looked like millions of years ago, and when new fossils are found, the models have been updated.
There are hundreds of examples of radical changes in fossil reconstructions based on new evidence.
For example, Velociraptors are now believed to have looked completely different to how they were portrayed in Jurassic Park!
I thought it often took an hour or more to finalise transactions as the block chain updates around the world, so much slower than cash or even BACS.
I also thought the block chain of a given coin can be analysed to discover the history of every wallet it's ever been in.
Is that right?
Surely as a photographer you should love the term?
It makes it very clear that the image was simply taken on the spur of the moment for a laugh, and quite possibly while doing something they'll later regret.
The very antithesis of a paid-for photograph.
Your signature is not a private key in any sense if the phrase.
It's pretty much as public as it gets!
You publish it to everyone that cares to look for it by the act of writing it on the cheque.
Written signatures are also known to be relatively simple to fake to a high enough standard to fool a bank, and if given enough time, to fool even the most detailed scrutiny.
A certified signature is needed for some deals - A solicitor trusted by both parties takes a record of the document and can later be asked to confirm whether the document is unchanged and the right person signed it.
That one is similar to "signed executables" or signed drivers, except different because those are only saying "Hasn't changed since signing" as the trusted external party has never seen the document.
You have to fully trust the signer to be nice - and to look after their private keys.
GBP is an internationally recognised currency and anybody can use it for their transactions.
An independent Scotland is welcome to use it if they want to.
If he thinks he can have any control over it then he's sadly mistaken, because that's simply not going to happen.
I think the idea here is to completely disprove classical mechanics, so if the only way it can work is because of quantum at either end, then it still works.
It's probably quantum.
Yes, the code style is rather odd.
I "assume failure" at the start of this kind of thing and only set 'success' if all steps succeed. There's lot of ways to arrange that depending one how much detail you'd like of the failure, and no reason to ever directly return the result of any one step.
I'd always assumed everybody else did the same. Perhaps I'm just pessimistic.
I'm not a lawyer, but an app whose apparent purpose to "an idiot in a hurry" may to be incitement and facilitation of the publication of possibly libellous comment might well be risky from a legal standpoint.
The "red" honesty bar in the screenshot is particularly interesting. *innocent face*
It's been advertised for a few years, and I'm sure we weren't the first.
Where do we send the evidence of prior art?
If I put a towel over my head will they cease to exist ?
Or would that make me one of them?
Terrorism - the unofficial or unauthorized use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.
Interesting, by that definition state-sponsored terrorism cannot possibly exist, because sponsorship is clear authorisation, and thus such acts could only be war or violent government repression, such as in Syria and the Ukraine.
Where is that particular definition from?
"We can't get visas so had to hire locally"
"Good, that's the point!"
If they wanted to stop that legislation, why announce that it's working as intended?
If you get a small number of my journeys, you will know exactly where I live and work.
How personally-identifiable is that?
Historical location data is simply impossible to properly anonymise because of what it is! It's simply not a thing.
Current location can be anonymised, but only by disconnecting it from all other location data, including the next GPS fix.
Those are the two sides of the same coin.
The people who rely on benefits vote themselves more benefits, while the corporations lobby for more benefits (so they can pay the staff less) and tax breaks.
And the idiots in charge give it to them both.
It works beautifully until suddenly, it doesn't and everybody is screwed.