1584 posts • joined 16 Jun 2009
How about an accurate analogy?
Let's say you were accused of nicking my car.
You make a bargain with the court where you agreed to pay my taxi fares for a few weeks, as it was pretty clear to your lawyers that you were going to lose the case and go to prison.
Then you don't pay up.
What happens next is you are in the dock for contempt of court, which carries a much bigger sentence than the original accusation.
It's a very old and obvious design
Go watch 2001 A Space Odyssey, and take a look at the tablets shown in the film.
Who copied who, and how much do Apple owe to Mr Kubrick?
Actually building a real device to that design was quite difficult, but that's not the claim they have made.
Re: I wonder what
We already did!
The microwave background radiation is the glow of the big bang!
It's just red-shifted a long way on account of the Universe being a lot bigger than it was then.
We've even mapped it, albeit not at a particularly high resolution.
Isn't science amazing?
Re: There isn't even a decent torch app in the WinPho app store
And bingo, there's the problem.
Why does your TORCH need your music and video library?
Those are completely unrelated to the primary function of the app, so can only be for nefarious purposes.
Re: Second Hand Background is Wrong
I have to disagree with you there.
Paypal's dispute behaviour is extremely important to their long-term health, and it's almost certainly their key strategic failure.
The reason for this is that the most important asset of any online payments provider is the trust of buyer and seller.
Both parties need to be confident that if the other fails to deliver, the dispute will be resolved quickly and effectively.
Without that trust, Paypal will fail because nobody wants to use it.
People don't use a service that they think will screw them over, and trust is extremely hard to regain once lost.
Re: Blatantly wrong operating model
You are correct.
They were (and are) only offering hourly rates in the "agency model", and apparently refused to pay for any of the incidentals.
Like being paid during training, or transport to and from the Games themselves.
It now appears that the reason most of their security staff didn't know when their shifts were because they never intended to tell them until a couple of days before each shift, yet G4S still seem surprised that many of them took up other employment.
Mr Buckles, here's a hint: A contract stating "You will work X hours each day from Day Y to Day Z for money W" is going to be fulfilled by far more people than a contract that effectively says "Don't call us, we'll call you."
Re: "They have promised to meet all costs faced by the police and armed forces."
G4S can take the monetary hit quite easily.
Last year their revenue was £7,522m, operating margin of 7.1%
The reputational hit is rather harder to quantify of course.
Re: @SoaG: Valve's entire catalog will move
No harder than a MacOSX version, and probably easier in many cases due to wider OpenGL support.
In some cases it's actually trivial, as if you picked a cross-platform SDK to build on then almost everything will work fine - games don't have to interact much with the window manager.
If you use OpenGL, then the hard parts are sound and joystick, both of which should be abstracted by your SDK.
That is why WINE works so well.
Terribly sorry Dave, but that's bollocks
The economy and the country would be utterly devastated by a vast influx of millions of people, as every unemployed person in the entire world who could raise the cash for a ticket came here.
Unlimited immigration only sort-of works if you have an empty world, transport links are very low capacity and no local infrastructure or other support is required. Even then it's nasty.
The influx rapidly overwhelms the local infrastructure and local population, resulting in poverty, death and disease.
Take a look at history and tell me if it actually ever worked - and remember that it was never unlimited.
Re: Lead time
...and shipping it on a slow boat from China.
Transport lead time alone is 6-8 weeks.
@AC 03:33 - They are ignoring decades of HCI research
For example, one of the basic fundamentals of HCI has been to make elements that you can 'click' on or 'touch' to activate look vaguely like physical buttons, using things like outlines, shading and drop shadows.
This has long been considered critical to a discoverable GUI interface, so much so that you'll even see that on the printed overlay for physical touch interfaces like microwave ovens.
Another is that anything 'hidden' must have an indication that it exists and how to get it - for example, comboboxes have that arrow indicating more options are available, all windowing systems allow windows to be partially covering others, and since the mid-90's the vast majority include a way of seeing the currently running applications (eg the Taskbar)
Metro is the very first GUI that throws away these fundamental ideas.
I cannot believe that every HCI researcher since 1970 was really that completely wrong.
My favourite are gold-plated TOSLINK optical.*
Because obviously the gold plating improves the quality of the light...
* I actually have these, because at the time they were cheaper than the normal ones and had physically stronger ends. Presumably not enough people were fooled and they had to dump them.
Amusingly, *none* of the iPads ever made meet any of the requirements
So does that mean that any iPads purchased by US Governmental depts need to be sent back because they do not meet the requirements?
Or does this EPEAT requirement only apply to stuff that isn't "cool"?
It's not just Apple though, there are no tablets that are EPEAT registered in the US whatsoever.
You'd still want compensating though.
After all, you pay for those services to be delivered, so if they don't provide them you should be getting a refund.
You also clearly consider them to have value, as otherwise you wouldn't be dropping ~£100 a month on them.
Come on, if you want to do it this way then your foxes have to be a similar cost to the number of mines each can destroy.
Otherwise it becomes an economic battle that you will lose.
That is why mines (sea and land) are effective, after all. Very cheap and fast to deploy, extremely expensive and slow to clear.
I am wondering why they think this is better than the traditional methods though, as it's slower and costs more.
I suppose kamikaze robots sound cool, and it is a logical evolution of the torpedo. Which probably answers the question. You don't torpedo mines...
Re: Geographical availability
This drives me utterly barmy.
I want to give you my money for $ELECTRONIC_FILE, yet you refuse point blank to take it because I don't happen to live in the USA.
I'm even happy to give it to you in US Dollars and take the currency exchange risk upon myself, yet you still refuse.
So I can either go without or infringe the copyright. (And in this case, infringing demonstrably doesn't harm you.)
While it might become available for me to buy months or years later, by then I've forgotten about it/am no longer interested. In many cases it never becomes available to me.
Either way, somebody else gets my money for something else. Well done, that region-lock was a great idea!
Re: Rasp Pis in school
He's a politician, ergo "Statement of intent == Achievement"
Never mind the real world, like almost all our current crop of politicians he's probably never seen it, having gone straight into lobbying or political researcher then become a politician.
And now they want to do the same to the Lords. $Deity help us.
Re: The alarmist scientists know
Postdoc researcher pay has always been piss poor and well below average income, and probably always will be as there are far more people than posts.
The difference the funding level makes is whether or not said postdoc position exists.
You cannot blame anyone for wanting their position to continue to exist, or be surprised at project leads wanting to have as many postdoc researchers as they can get their hands on.
Re: The alarmist scientists know
I'm afraid that's completely wrong. How are the scientists being funded? Funding for "Climate Science"-related areas is extremely high compared to other areas, and one common 'trick' is to imply that your research has a "green" agenda. That funding wouldn't be so high without the 'threat' of AGW.
On top of that, there is a massive "green" industry that is completely and utterly reliant on Government handouts, and thus has a life-or-death reliance on AGW. Namely that if governmental policy changes to take away those , they will go bankrupt.
On the other side, there are industries that rely on the general populace burning large amounts of fossil fuels.
In essence, the debate is beyond the point of no return. Nobody really wants to know the truth any more, everyone just wants their viewpoint confirmed and jumps straight onto anything that can be bent to fit.
Personally? It's fairly clear that consuming less raw materials (including fossil fuels) where possible for a given output is a good idea.
However most of the current low-CO2 policies are stupid, because they are pushing things that consume more raw materials towards the exclusive goal of reducing CO2 output, regardless of all side effects - to the economy and the environment.
And that pains me, because not only does it look like I'm going to leave a shithole to my kids, I'm seeing that shithole develop in the name of being "Green".
Re: The one that more than a single brand uses.
Microsoft Windows is not a brand of keyboard.
Re: Did somebody mention HDNL without an expletive?
HDNL are apparently extremely variable.
If your local geezer in a hatchback is dedicated and enthusiastic, presumably it's pretty good.
If they aren't, well, you're screwed.
Personally, I always get things delivered to my office. It then rocks up on my desk without any bother, usually much faster than if I'd ordered for delivery to home.
The only downside is that if the parcel looks particularly "interesting" then everybody stares at me until I open it!
Re: Level Playing Field
Good idea, except that's not how the FITs work.
Domestic FITs are quite simple:
You get paid a fixed price that's several times the "end customer" rate for every kWh you generate, regardless of whether you consume it yourself or not. Then you get an added kickback for 50% of whatever you generated at another fixed price that's just under the generation market rate, because they don't think it's worth metering what you actually export to the Grid.
The upshot is that Granny and people in rented accommodation are subsidizing the landed gentry.
Industrial FITs scale down the rate a bit, but it's still way above.
Re: Heads in sand - all of you!
You mean "If only we'd built the nuclear power plants", as solar cannot even get close to your domestic demand. Industrial and transport? Pah!
A thousand times this
More importantly, will British Gas train their installers on how they work and how to use them?
The central heating installer I had didn't understand the simple 7-day timer he fitted, telling me a completely different tale to how it actually works.
What chance do ordinary mortals have?
Exactly the point
You could, *if you wanted*.
But you don't, do you?
I already have all the bits to attach my boiler to the internet as well, but I'm not going to bother.
I'll might attach the lighting and security systems once I get the firewall appliance for the PVR sorted out.
Yes, PVR. That is actually the killer home automation application.
Re: Advanced WiFi control system
Actually, while humans have a long latency to unexpected events, given suitable warning and a 'click track' most of us mere fleshlings can reliably hit a cue within 50ms, and some people down to 10ms.
It's all down to the rhythm of the dance.
Re: Advanced WiFi control system
Nobody even considers using WiFi for this.
This kind of event needs around 10ms accuracy, and WiFi cannot possibly do that as its latency varies wildly.
WiFi is great for email and surfing the web, it's ok for buffered video but it's utterly useless for anything that needs even mildly accurate timing.
Re: You know...
You need a better USB-Serial adapter then.
The real problem with these USB serial ports is that most don't actually support all the signalling lines and 'standard' baud rates. It's really hard to tell whether or not a given one will work either.
If your device needs 9600/8-N-1 and no flow control, you'll be fine. Anything else...
The quality is also extremely variable - I've used some really great ones and some real dogs.
Re: Isometimes need a floppy drive
USB FDD are about a tenner, I have several USB floppy drives because I support legacy products that have them.
However, what about the actual floppy discs?
The disks you buy these days seem pretty rubbish, not lasting very long and I gather there's only one factory making them.
When they stop, then what?
Re: insist on the Source Code?
AutoCAD is rubbish compared to the various solid-modelling packages, like SolidWorks.
(And heck, even Google Sketchup is better for most of the things AutoCAD is actually used for)
There's a reason the car manufacturing industry (and probably a lot of others) never used AutoCAD. SDRC Ideas was not exactly great, but it was actually 3D and not the 2.5D that AutoCAD is.
- I personally think that AutoCAD is probably indirectly responsible for a great many of the cost overruns on building sites. I see so many "Oh dear, we'll have to move that now the air handling ducts are in..."
Did he proof read this?
"I've never seen a brand like Coca Cola, a real mainstream American brand on ad networks. They censor that too."
No, that's not censorship, it's Coca Cola deciding where to put their advertising money.
I do agree with Lowery on one thing - "You can't argue with someone that disingenuous" - but that statement flies both directions, and to date the copyright lobbyists have been the most disingenuous of all.
What we consumers want is to be able to purchase music at a sensible price, know that a decent portion of our money is going to the artist(s) who made it, and that we can listen to that music which we have paid for anywhere, anywhen and anyhow that we choose.
We resent and fight against the way that the megacorps have tried make us re-buy the same music over and over again, treated us all like criminals and even got taxes applied to blank media to 'reclaim' some of that 'lost' revenue.
We further resent and fight against the ridiculous length of copyright. When my parents were teens, their parents' music went out of copyright, and was re-used and re-generated into new works.
When my kids are teenagers, everything my parents grew up with will still be in copyright.
Is it any wonder people don't have any respect for the music industry?
Personally, I no longer buy any music at all, I just listen to "MTV"-like channels and the radio. Why? Because I resent being treated like a criminal whenever I do buy music. I suspect I'm not alone.
Finally, SOPA was written by extremists. Is it any surprise that this pushed many 'reasonable' people into becoming extremists, as that was necessary to shoot it down!
@AC 7/7 17:42
I do work in a corporate environment, and you've missed the point.
You must never forget the risk of all external suppliers - what happens when the supplier changes their roadmap, decides to end-of-life a particular product, get out of that business area altogether or goes bankrupt?
The severity of these events are far higher for proprietary commercial software because you cannot fork it or take it over once abandoned - even if you have the source code (which you probably don't), your licence can evaporate so you can no longer use it at all!
If an Open Source thing gets abandoned you've always still got the source code and a licence to use it, fork it and even take it over entirely if you want. Thus the severity of the maintainer giving up is small.
The probability of these risks depends on the product you're using, the supplier and your contract with them. That's actually the hardest part about picking which product to use.
I know of several projects that have been completely screwed over by proprietary commercial software components going a different way to their roadmap at short notice.
I also know of projects where an open-source component lost the maintainer. It was merely annoying.
For example, we have to keep a copy of an ancient version of MS Visio because one of the commercial tools we use is a plugin for it, and their plugin does not run in newer versions. It's not an old or cheap product either.
Still beats when there's only one path and you find it doesn't go anywhere near where you want.
At least with a forked project it is usually possible to backtrack across to another fork if it turns out to be going the wrong way.
Re: I give it a month
How do you get the new key on there? How do you revoke the old ones?
What happens when the 'master' key used to do the above is leaked or discovered?
If you accept that you need a revocation mechanism because individual keys might get exposed and thus need revoking, you must also accept that all keys could suffer that same fate.
The 'master' key is clearly the biggest prize...
Re: MS Dirty Tricks Again
No, it'll be completely ineffective for Joe Average, because once the keys are leaked or discovered, there will be a massive spate of signed virus and trojan infections.
Cleaning that mess up will take years, probably making Melissa and DNSChanger look trivial by comparison.
And also the one that everybody outside of Microsoft has thought of, suggested, and yet UEFI rejected the idea for no reason whatsoever.
Which is rather odd, don't you think?
Especially as the 'security' aspect of this supposed feature would be better served by a "Woah, your boot sector and/or UEFI firmware just changed. Did you mean to do that?" warning.
For bonus points, adding a signed Flash copy of what should be there that the UEFI could use instead or copy back to the drive.
Or you could instead put in a system that deliberately locks out other suppliers and hobbyists, and bricks the machine if a virus did ever infect the MBR or UEFI. Yeah, let's do that.
Re: (Ok, "iOS, Android and WP7 only have one real browser. Not true of the others." WTF??
I somehow got the idea they all used the Webkit engine, evidently I was on crack.
Thanks for the reminder that Opera and Firefox do not.
StatCounter is more useful, the Net Applications tells you nothing
While neither tells you very much (of course), neither of them makes me want to buy their more detailed stats either as their comments imply they just want to put the other down rather than produce a useful dataset.
Both of these stats are about web browsing, and not applications, which means the underlying OS doesn't actually matter, you only care about the browser and form factor.
(Ok, iOS, Android and WP7 only have one real browser. Not true of the others.)
Net Applications bundling of "tablet" with "phone" commingles completely different form factors, thus giving no guidance whatsoever. How do I tell from that whether I should put more effort into making my site look good on a Windows Phone or Symbian? It feels like a statistic specifically invented to make iOS look good.
StatCounter on the other hand is useful, because it tells you how much effort to put into making your "for phone" version(s) of the website website look nice on anything other than the Android and iOS big two.
Again, it doesn't tell you whether it's worth working on the various tablet versions, but at least it's up front about that.
The argument about page impressions against unique users... What exactly is wrong with tracking both? I'd rather like to know if a huge number of page impressions is really only a small number of users, or if I just get a host of uniques who never come back, as these two are indicators that I'm doing different things wrong.
Re: So desperate
Nah, she had a lute, see?
"Zero-cross" switching is irrelevant, it's almost exclusively a marketing thing. It has no bearing on device reliability or whether or not it'll damage the telly. It merely reduces EMI switching noise - which is a good thing if you've got a lot of them, otherwise irrelevant.
- Consider a 3-pin-plug or the switch on the socket. Does that do zero-cross detect? Does the act of plugging in a TV damage it?
AC SSRs are actually a pair of back-to-back SCRs or a Triac, just like a dimmer. This means that the waveform they produce is not sinusoidal (both due to being non-resistive and having a recovery time during zero cross) and that they never fully "turn off" - there is always a small leakage current through the SSR. There is also a notable insertion loss (fixed voltage drop) which makes them rather inefficient compared to a relay.
Many power supplies can be damaged by these effects - continually feeding it a small current that's not enough to start it and making the zero-cross point fuzzy are both bad things to do to a power supply. Switch-mode PSUs also draw their current in 'pulses', which means the SSR may not actually stay turned on throughout the cycle and may 'starve' the SMP. (This has all kinds of strange effects)
Put simply, you need a physical relay contact that goes "click", because that's what the PSU in your equipment was designed for.
The best is a physically latching one as then no power is consumed keeping the relay "on" - this is impossible to do with SSRs as they must be powered to turn on. Thus relay-based ones can be considerably more efficient than SSR ones.
That's assuming you even come out ahead in the first place - if you have multiple items on the switch then it might be worth it, but just a TV is almost certainly pointless.
Remember that these switches are themselves in standby!
They're cheap, and have much lower-quality PSUs than TVs etc.
So how much power do they consume themselves? It is likely that some of them actually draw more power in their own standby than your TV does, and all of them will increase the power consumption when your TV is on.
The only one I could find that gave consumption values was a US version, and it said 0.08W in standby, and 0.50W when on. Let's assume a UK version is the same (it's probably worse due to the higher voltage)
My Plasma TV is specified to draw 0.30W in standby, thus I would save 0.22W when my TV is off, and cost 0.50W when my TV is on.
This means that simply to break even, my TV has to be off for 2.3 times as long as it is on.
Now take a look at a modern LED TV. Oh dear, 0.1W in standby.
That's before you consider the damage the SSR (solid-state-relay) -based ones will do to your delicate electronics.
Nope, they're not less likely to happen
Corporate fines are at best a lagging driver. Nobody takes much notice until somebody else has been hit with a big one, and then it takes a long time to change course anyway.
Aside from this, the risk severity was already as high as it could get - this current disaster would probably have triggered a state takeover of RBS had it happened when they weren't already zombified.
Even as it is, they are going to lose a lot of customers.
At the end of the day, the probability of this kind of failure is directly related to the complexity and importance of the system, and inversely to the experience of the people looking after it.
As they get amalgamated, more financial astronauts come up with more or more complex 'instruments', and experienced staff retire, "retire" or are made redundant, the probability increases.
So this is very likely to happen at least once more, and the only difference is that it's more likely to take a CxO with it next time.
Re: No victim.
Rubbish. Utter tosh.
If the US wanted him, they'd extradite him directly from the UK, as that's much easier than arranging for Sweden to extradite him and then extradite him again from Sweden.
Sweden aren't going to allow an extraordinary rendition either, because it'll go VERY public very quickly - how would that play in the media? Assange extradited and 'vanished' on the way over? Not going to happen.
So, ask yourself - Does it really make any kind of sense to fight two legal battles, one though a puppet and the other in person, to extradite someone instead of just one?
On top of that, the UK has a 'special relationship' with the US, including rather lenient extradition terms for any time the US want somebody. They don't have a similar agreement with Sweden.
If you're looking for a conspiracy theory, this is not one.
Re: Equally, it fails in multi-path
Bugger, that should read "..if they're at a petabit/s scale in fibre already without OAM..."
The fail is clearly me..
Equally, it fails in multi-path
Once it gets reflected about a bit, the information on the OAM gets lost very quickly and is no longer recoverable.
Thus this technique is really only usable for point-to-point tight-beam transmission.
Which really means it's a bit 'meh' for radio-frequency below the tens-to-hundreds of GHz (when you have to do point-to-point tight-beam anyway as nothing else has reasonable power requirements for decent range), and equally not that useful in optical until you're in free space as the photons get scattered by the atmosphere.
I do think it would work pretty well in single-mode fibre though, which is interesting - if they're at a petabit/s scale in fibre already with OAM, OAM might add another order of magnitude.
As long as you stay on the surface of this world, and don't go up any particularly tall mountains.
Going down any particularly deep mines is also obviously out, as they don't have decent beer down there.
Re: @Fibbles on 'leaks'
Go on then, why the downvotes?
@Fibbles on 'leaks'
Yep, that's the smart thing to do.
Never announce something until it's in a container on the way to the shops or sat in your warehouse.
Then pretend to be really surprised when somebody 'accidentally' leaks the details while you're still developing it.
All the exposure of a premature launch, none of the risks of the cries of "vapourware!!!"
Re: "because the company continues to purvey the myth that TV viewing is growing"
Thus assuming your daughter still lives with you, you do still have and use television receiving equipment.
So you or your daughter does still need a licence and the TV licencing people remain accurate in their assumption.
If you only watch iPlayer and other on-demand "repeats" and never at the same time as it's broadcast, that's when you don't need a licence.
- Incidentally, there's no longer such a thing as a 'TV detector van'. Many years ago they could tell by the CRT baseband squeal, even knowing which channel, but it's now much easier and more accurate to assume that 99.9% of the population have and use TV receiving equipment, coupled with the database of TV receiving equipment purchases.
That said, Capita do have themselves to blame over continually bugging people who genuinely have no TV receiving kit. And even repeatedly visiting people who already have a TV licence - that one really annoys me.
- Product round-up Coming clean: Ten cordless vacuum cleaners
- Product round-up Too 4K-ing expensive? Five full HD laptops for work and play
- Review We have a winner! Fresh Linux Mint 17.1 – hands down the best
- 'Regin': The 'New Stuxnet' spook-grade SOFTWARE WEAPON described
- Worstall @ the Weekend BIG FAT Lies: Porky Pies about obesity