1401 posts • joined 16 Jun 2009
Erm, you might want to read the post before unleashing castigation.
ltzman was pointing out that large-scale "renewables" of all current technologies requires destruction of similar orders of magnitude as cutting down the Brazilian rainforests for farming - something that is generally considered a bad idea.
On a small scale they seem ok, even useful - solar panels on your roof, couple of wind turbines nearby, tidal generator in a couple of easy and effective places, the odd field of biofuel.
The trouble happens once you start to scale it up to the kinds of size a country needs - solar, wind and biofuels use massive land area, tidal destroys very large intertidal habitat, and then all except biofuels require near-equal capacity generation to be on warm or even hot standby - burning plenty of gas or biofuels to do sweet FA in case the wind drops/sun goes behind clouds and spun up in time for sunset/tide change.
Unless of course you're ok with the idea of simply blacking out large parts of the country very often, and probably doing a cold start of the Grid once or twice a year. Hint - we've never done a cold start, and don't really know if we even can.
The only current "zero-carbon" technology that doesn't require large-scale destruction is nuclear fission.
That bit made me laugh out loud on the Tube this morning
I did get a couple of funny looks.
That's because the British will rule the future
We ruled the past, and we shall rule again! Mwuhahahaaa!
Our main weapon is surprise! Surprise and comedy!
Among our weapons are comedy, surprise and a flag. Do you have a flag?
Apex Down is in fact correct - assuming pickups at each end, load in the middle.
Manufacturers of triangular truss actually recommend this way around.
Also see these for examples of how to wrap the string holding the truss to the balloons - you want the string to go around all the chords, not just the top two.
The reason is quite simple - many materials are stronger in tension than compression, so you want two bars in compression and one bar in tension.
With wood it's more complicated.
Along the grain sapwood is stronger in tension than compression, and heartwood vice-versa. Across the grain wood is weak in tension and ok in compression. So you want the grain to run along the beams - which it will as balsa rods would barely survive otherwise.
I doubt you're getting balsa heartwood - not sure it even really has any!
Re: Am I the only one
It's easy to poke a touchscreen while getting it out of your pocket.
I'm happy with that
"Using Voice Control to Unlock" is obvious and should have no protection whatsoever.
A specific method of listening to and parsing the voice command is a different matter.
Equally, a specific method of determining how a finger has touched the device (capacitive screen) could be a new thing.
Saying "The user touches the screen and slides along" is so obvious that not only was it being done before Apple filed, almost every touchscreen phone since the Neonode N1m has done it - iPhone, all HTC WinMobiles, etc.
If the US Patent Office doesn't switch from "approve everything, let the courts decide" to "examine everything like we're supposed to" soon, then there really is going to be an implosion.
Jai - no it bloody wasn't. Application D/282,837: July 30th 2007
Exactly one month after the iPhone 1 was released.
Re: If a car strikes you on the shoulder of the road
To use a car analogy:
LightSquared bought some train wheels. Then they realised that trains are too expensive and wanted to make cars with those wheels.
So they asked the FCC for permission to use these train wheels on normal roads.
The FCC replied with "You can use those new wheels if you can prove to other road users satisfaction that they don't damage the road".
It turns out that train wheels do damage tarmac, so they can't use them. End of story.
Now you could argue that the FCC should never have allowed LightSquared to try to show that they could co-exist with GPS. Unfortunately that does mean you want the FCC to always give a flat "No. Go Away" answer to any possible change-of-use in a band.
That's probably going a bit too far.
The UK buys about 1-2% of our electric from France already
And about the same from the Netherlands.
- At the time of posting this, UK demand was 44GW, with 1% being met by France (482MW), and 2% by the Netherlands (892MW).*
Wouldn't it be brilliant if we didn't have to buy all that power from the continent?
*This is instantaneous, but the France > UK interconnect is almost always importing from France.
About the only way a good steak can be underdone
Is when it's still going "Moo".
Steak tartare is lovely stuff.
Of course it does need to be a good steak.
Sorry Mr Hanff, but you didn't do your research this time.
Google are offering to pay $5 for joining and $5 per three months of snooping, up to a maximum total of $25.
So that's $25 for a one-year snoopathon.
Just one year, not forever.
It's also a browser plugin, thus trivial to disable or uninstall - and you could decide to do most of your browsing on a different browser without the plugin. If Chrome isn't your normal browser you'll probably do that anyway out of habit.
This is a step in the right direction - it's saying "We value your personal info enough to pay you to collect it".
I agree with you that the price they are offering is too small, but at least they're now making an offer.
So what's the problem?
It's opt-in and you're being paid for it.
That's a much better deal than even the on-street surveys - those are normally a £5 gift voucher for half an hour of your time. This is a £15 gift voucher and none of your time.
Those of you who are frothing about it - would you let them do it for £1,000,000?
How about £500,000?
Now we're just haggling on the price!
$185,000 to ICANN.
It's well published.
I think they should go for it - there's no better way to prove that ".brand" gTLDs are completely useless.
The RIAA don't want to become irrelevant. That's the point.
Presumably they are the organisation stumping up the silly money to pay ICANN for the .music TLD, thus as they would own it they can of course do whatever they want.
Doesn't mean anyone will go there.
What they appear to have missed it that refusing to accept musicians makes it very clear that they have never had any intention of assisting musicians and other content creators, preferring instead to ensure ancient history stays in copyright.
They also became irrelevant a long time ago - but like any trade association, they live on subscriptions from their members and will do anything at all to keep them.
That rather surprised me as well
It does appear that you can't stream from your local storage, which is weird.
- Netflix/Lovefilm is nice, but I've already got both iPlayer and ITV Player on my PVR.
I would like to stream back the recordings I've backed up, it's tedious to copy back and forth to the PVR.
Tom's Hardware ****ed up.
That particular 'story' was extrapolated from a garbled rumour they scraped from someone else and totally misunderstood*. They have since posted an update.
But please, carry on believing it. More chance of me getting one from the first batch in 10 days time.
The educational package is Q3 2012. This should not surprise anyone, on account of that being when schools start in the UK.
*I'm stretching to give T's H the benefit of the doubt here. I'm not exactly convinced they deserve it.
@quarky - Nope. Maybe melting, maybe freezing.
Either way, it's very small.
It's rather like saying you've "lost" 50g of bodyweight by using your bathroom scales. The tool just can't measure it.
However, it is definitely not melting at anywhere near the rate that was predicted/previously claimed - I've lost track of which that was.
When I switched away from BT it was pretty seamless
In both phone and broadband I had a maximum of a couple of hours with no service - probably less. I don't think the phone stopped working at all line rental magically transferred.
No "engineer" or anything.
So why does BT insist on it when nobody else does?
Even Virgin usually don't charge when they really do need to send a real person to drill actual holes in the walls and pull real wires.
It's great to finally see a competitor to the Foxsat HDR
It seems utterly insane to me that it has taken this long for anybody to catch up to the Humax Foxsat HDR - two to three years? Every other field of consumer electronics has been through at least one if not two generations in that time, yet Freesat HD+ is unchanged.
So it's not exactly surprising if Humax have been somewhat resting on their laurels - perhaps now that Samsung have a device that is roughly as good they'll hurry up on bringing out something even better.
- I would love a set-top box that would let me stream video from my home network. I can stream from my Hummy, but not back - and that is a great shame.
One comment on these reviews though - only one picture of the remote for any of these devices, and no pictures of the EPGs at all.
It's fair enough that you don't go into much detail in these Ten... reviews, but those are the two things that we'd be looking at all the time.
- The manufacturers seem to try to avoid letting us see the remotes whenever possible, and the remote can often make or break a device.
They have done a lot of work on booting faster.
Vista went to sleep by default, to flatten the battery in your laptop faster!
Joking aside, Windows 7 does appear to start up fairly quick compared to previous, and is immediately usable, as opposed to the XP 'now wait until ready' behaviour.
Plus they did some clever pre-fetch stuff, esp. for SSDs.
There is a lot of useful stuff under the bonnet, unfortunately the GUI re-designers seem to snatch defeat from the very jaws of victory on a regular basis.
One wonders what hardware and applications these GUI designers are using on a daily basis, as it rarely seems to match common reality.
So there is a Start button, you just cannot see it
How exactly is that better?
That is almost as undiscoverable as it is possible to be!
- Why would a user blindly click on an empty space?
I think the only thing to top that is the 1-pixel gap between Start and the edge of the screen in Win95, a truly massive victory for the graphic artist over usability.
The ribbon is worse when 'hidden'
For some reason in that mode it pops up hiding everything in the top of your document.
Thus you can't see the thing you're changing.
It's true that menus do that, but only for a section rather than full screen width, and toolbars do not!
The ribbon is also always at the top, at a time when widescreen monitors were rapidly becoming the only ones you can buy.
So, while a change in UI might have been excusable, the ribbon is not.
Mostly because they already have a set-top-box for Free(View/Sat)(HD)(+), Virgin and/or Sky.
They may well have also forgotten what the actual TV remote looks like by now as the set-top-box remote is all they ever use.
Of course, they could not care less which OS that STB (or even smart TV) is actually running, because they never, ever see it.
Which is exactly as it should be - those are appliances, not computers.
Windows, not Microsoft
People in the street talk about 'Windows', and even 'Windows Office'
The Microsoft brand isn't big outside of people who work close to IT.
The Xbox doesn't say Windows anywhere. Xbox is the brand, and it is doing quite well.
That's nice Chris.
Nokia need to ship phones now though, and not sometime next year.
I can't recommend a phone based on what some marketing dept says the next version might probably have.
When getting a phone, you will be locked into whatever hardware is shipped for 18 months to two years, and as there is no certainty of updates on anything, it had better do everything you actually need to begin with.
As shiny Apple and Android phones are already being used by our own sales and marketing people, and those same people remember Windows Mobile, the question has already been answered.
Maybe in two years, except by then there will probably be some killer app on our existing phones that we can't do without.
Rather like the Windows lockin on the desktop.
Atlantis was in the Mediterranean, anyway.
Most of it is still there, and it is being excavated.
I saw a TV programme about it last year.
Of course the majority are complaints!
I work in support, and I don't think I've ever had a call/email along the lines of "I just wanted to say that your stuff is brilliant and I love it."
I have had a few callbacks to say "The thing you suggested worked, thankyou".
However, almost all my calls are "This thing doesn't work". When I fix it I usually get a "Thanks very much, bye!", and that's all I want.
No matter what 'spontaneous' contact method you use, most people simply are much less motivated to go out of their way to say "That was great" compared to "That was terrible". It's human nature!
You see it everywhere when comments on any service aren't directly solicited - you'll only get much in the way of positive comments if you ask people immediately afterwards, even and that runs the risk of annoying them.
Most satisfied customers usually think "That was good, I'll go there again.". And that's all I want.
- As to that practice manager who was fired? That was the correct decision.
My employer has a forum, and quite often someone will post a nasty comment on there. If it isn't spam, then it stays and somebody will try to give a useful reply. Being rude back doesn't help anyone.
A desktop Windows *without* legacy?
They tried some of that before (Vista) and it was a disaster!
Going further and making none of your old applications or hardware work would truly utterly destroy Windows as a desktop OS.
It's about the only thing that MS could do that would ensure everyone on the Clapham omnibus would return their new computer as "broken", and within weeks nobody would even consider Windows on their new computer.
Even Ballmer wouldn't be that stupid.
It means you touched the bagging area
They have a set of scales in the 'bagging' area, and at least in Tescos and Morrisons touching the scales will trigger that alert.
So if you try to open a bag to put your shopping in, it alarms.
And God help you if you forgot to put all your re-usable bags on the scales before you started, or use put your handbag on that handy shelf to search for your cash.
It is primarily due to stupid requirements and/or implementation - seriously, if somebody is trying to steal stuff they aren't going to scan the barcode or put it on that shelf.
That's not really new.
The only real choices for this kind of thing are Linux or WinCE.
- VxWorks is more of an industrial control thing, it's extremely reliable, but pricey and only just got graphical support.
Linux has been the primary OS for home electronics for at least a decade, because it's very lightweight, easy to customise and supports a vast range of hardware.
Thus if you choose LInux, you can choose cheaper hardware as well as having a free licence.
- You'll probably want development support either way, and that costs about the same.
When you go mass-market, the development cost becomes almost irrelevant, but the per-device cost becomes critical.
Saving 10p of FLASH or RAM per device saves you £100K in a run of a million. Imagine saving a $10-$25 licence fee...
The other fun fact is that WinCE6 is end-of-life, and according to the Windows Embedded Compact site it appears that you can't run WinCE6 programs under WinEC7 - it now wants Silverlight.
So for BT to keep shipping volume they'll have to redevelop everything anyway, so better pick something that supports their existing hardware - and PACE already have experience with Linux in their other STBs, probably on near-identical hardware.
So why use a flash at all?
Why not some nice CP tungsten halogen? That is after all what "Colour Photography" lamps were made for!
- Or even some of the better LED fixtures. The Royal Wedding Dresses were shot using static full-spectrum LED lighting. (Not "White" or "RGB". Those do have odd colour casts.)
Perhaps I'm biased as I'm a lighting designer (flash kills lighting), but flash photography always looks shit to me.
If you don't flash, then you don't end up with overbright, washed out, high colour temp, patchy odd-looking skin that you have to spend a long time editing out.
If you don't flash, you can actually look at the model and see what they'll look like in the image.
While your eye has a much higher dynamic range than a film or digital camera, it's still easy to see what the camera will.
Modern digital and film simply doesn't need high light levels - in HDTV we dropped the lumens quite a long way, and we actually got better pictures that way.
(For a while the same light levels were kept, and ended up racking the iris almost as tight as it would go.)
Or for some multiple of the time the ad was being shown?
If the campaign ran for 5 weeks, ban the product for 10 weeks after the complaint is upheld.
As they should have the right to appeal, they get a couple of weeks after the complaint is upheld before the ban goes into force, and if they do appeal then the ban (both of campaign and product) doesn't go into force unless the appeal is unsuccessful.
Obviously if they continue to run the campaign while appealing, then the ban gets longer.
The thing I really don't get is why the ASA don't seem to fine anybody.
Every single complaint gets the same "action", namely "Please don't do it again."
Then when the same advertiser does exactly the same thing again, what happens? The ASA just asks if they could possibly consider maybe not doing it again, again.
It makes me sick, really.
@Piobairean and the river
The damage to that river has nothing whatsoever with CO2.
Acid rain is caused by sulphur dioxide (and similar), and never CO2 - and coal electricity generation has had effective scrubbers to take out NO2, SO2 and the like for decades.
Environmental damage like that you mention is made considerably worse by many of the supposedly 'green' technologies we are being pushed towards in the name of Climate Change.
Perhaps the most obvious is that CFLs are a major source of mercury pollution, a lot of other nasty chemicals and are almost impossible to recycle.
In fact, most of the 'low energy' and 'green generation' are indeed low CO2 - but involve much higher emissions and releases of rather nasty pollutants that are genuinely poisonous to life.
CO2 is temporary, mercury is forever.
London being underwater won't prove anything
Well, unless we have cut our CO2 emissions before then, in which case it proves cutting was pointless as far as climate change is concerned. (Reducing reliance on religious nutters is a good idea though)
In chaotic systems it's rather difficult to prove "If we had done X in the past we'd have Y result by now." - there's the same problem in economics, and that much easier to measure!
I have still not seen any evidence showing that meeting the CO2 targets would actually have a notable effect on global temperatures at all - nobody even appears to have published a "Carry on!" against "Kyoto" (or whatever agreement) prediction.
Not sure what that implies - possibly that it really won't make much of a difference, which may be why China can't be bothered. People won't forgo jam today if there's no chance of jam tomorrow no matter what.
(Pie in the sky when you die works. Hell and damnation regardless of your actions? That's a hard sell!)
Some politicians talk of us being on a cliff edge, but that seems to have been approaching for a decade so...
There seems a dearth of checking of the predictions at all really - for example, use the 'best' model with the data up until 1990 to predict 1990 to 2010, and compare against what happened in reality.
- I'm really hoping that this latter was done and is just buried in the publications that us mere mortals cannot read, but I would expect it to have been made public by one side or the other if it matched particularly well or badly, which implies it was probably inconclusive each time or just never done.
For a long time there has been an appearance of a requirement for the "science" to give the "right" answer if they want funding next year, so is it any wonder there is so little trust?
It's a mess, and it's the politicians and lobbyists who made the mess, and made the science so hard to do properly.
It's very easy for it to become the only copy you know of
You forget that a backup can quickly become the only copy in existence, and stays that way for quite some time.
How many people have off-site backups of everything (or even anything) in case their house burns down, or a power surge wipes out their in-home backups?
Of those that have off-site backups, how many people are using a "cloud" service as their offsite backup?
I suspect a lot of people had a copy on their hard drive and a copy on MegaUpload - treating the MegaUpload as both distribution and backup.
It's a good bet that every week a large number of people lose their 'home' copy of something important, whether due to HDD crash, virus or accidents.
If any of them have suffered the above since MegaUpload went down before they could find and use a suitable alternative, then that data is lost to them, even though they were only using a (cheap) "cloud" for backups.
You also forget that upload speeds are really slow - it could take a long time to get your data back into a cloud, even if you find a suitable alternative immediately.
The review and summary don't quite match
If the Lumia 710 barely makes it through the day and costs £300, why would you consider it for your second phone?
For most people, the use cases for a second phone are:
A) A phone you can rely on to be working when you can't use your 'primary' phone - usually because the battery is dead. Possibly if you need to use a foreign SIM etc.
B) A phone that's so cheap you can take it walking, sailing, canoeing and bungee jumping* without caring too much if you lose or destroy it.
So you'd expect a second phone to have a battery that lasts much longer than your main phone, and be dirt cheap - something like the £10 jobbies from Tesco, or that Energizer-bunny one.
The Lumia 710 doesn't fit either of those use cases, so I really don't understand which demographic you see using this as a second phone.
I can however see the Lumia 710 as being a second choice if you can't afford the smartphone you really want. That's especially true as there's so little reason to pick the Lumia 800 over the 710.
*Ok, maybe not bungee jumping. Skiing?
No, you don't
You publish an API, one 'proof-of-concept' implementation of your own and tell everybody else "Here's an API. Use it with the following conditions, we promise to publish any changes at [place] before changing this public API. Enjoy."
- The conditions might be non-commercial or "zero-cost app" use only, defined maximum hit rate, must give credit etc.
Within a few weeks there will be multiple widgets and apps for every single gadget, operating system and desktop environment used by more than one geek. Probably widgets for ones only used by one geek...
This will have cost you the same as making a widget for a single operating system.
Or you could use a proprietary system that's going end-of-life pretty soon, and end up paying to develop your own widgets several times while supporting very little.
So, it turns out that two people like WinMob
Good to know - thanks for the downvotes!
I haven't heard of any other CEOs who managed to wipe 30% off the share price with a single memo.
Perhaps you could enlighten me as to how that is a good idea.
Most bad CEOs kill companies slowly over many years with repeated bad decisions (Kodak), very few manage to take a company from $11.73 to $5.08 in less than a year.
That doesn't sound like shareholder value to me.
Presumably the double dividend last year was a sweetener, though paying a dividend while getting rid of nearly all your R&D looks rather short-sighted for a technology company.
You've got a point there
Windows Mobile is a very toxic brand - almost* everybody who has ever used it dislike if not outright hates it.
Windows CE was pretty much "meh". Nobody cared about it, barely anyone really noticed it. (Although they're pretty much the same thing)
So MS rebranded the new one as Windows Phone.
Unfortunately the memorable part of Windows Mobile, Windows CE and Windows Phone is the "Windows" prefix, not the suffix.
So the rebrand isn't working - at my workplace, the only person who knows that Windows Phone isn't the same thing as Windows Mobile is me, and that's only because I'm about as pedantic about terminology as it's possible to get and still meet people.
So nobody wants to even give it a try.
*Everybody I know hates it. It's possible that someone, somewhere that I've never met might not.
That's what they mean by "deflecting"
Pushing it in pretty much any direction can make it miss - the first time, anyway.
The key is to decide which direction to push so that we can (a) actually do it in the time required and (b) ensure it's not going to hit the Earth in the foreseeable future either.
- It would be fairly annoying to nudge an asteroid so it misses on the way in towards the Sun, but smacks straight into us on the way back out...
Can't, as they already exist.
Too short for copyright anyway.
They might be trademarkable but they already have a recognised usage so you couldn't do that either.
Editing and Copyediting does not cost anywhere near that much.
I occasionally do this at work, and it does not take anywhere near that much effort.
The only way that could be justified was if they only print a single issue.
They don't. They print a lot.
It's price gouging pure and simple - the typical and predicted result of a monopoly.
Shit product, really high prices.
You don't need a transparent display for that.
Sorry. You don't even want a transparent display for that!
Dropbox is trivially easy - you just have to install this random application as a service and it just goes ahead and eats your bandwidth throwing files up and down.
True, it's really hard to use if you don't install the service, but almost everybody does that.
@John Smith 19
To summarise the summary:
Have real consequences for failure, at all levels.
If the project goes overbudget in time or cost by more than 50%, demote the senior civil servant in charge because they are clearly incompetent. You can't get it that wrong if you understand what you're doing.
Over by 100%, gross negligence so fire them.
That way the civil servant in charge will do two things - artificially inflate the time/cost budgets before the project starts and actually do some managing.
The former is fine - less projects will happen, so we'll only get the ones that really matter.
The second means we might actually get the ones that really matter.
It'll never happen though, those senior civil servants are onto far too cushy numbers to allow the risk that they might actually need to do their jobs.
Who said it was a typo?
Perhaps his job really is to alert erogenous zones.
Ouija board rather defeats the whole "beyond reasonable doubt" bit
Given that it will only be used if they are doubtful.
The result will probably be their subconscious bias, thus probably about as inappropriate as you can get without being properly contempt.
There are 30ph limit four lane roads with central reservations in London.
I drive down one most days. The buses undertake me - they usually do 35-40.
A little further on the limit rises to 40mph, where it reduces to a 2-lane road outside a secondary school.
Madness, pure insanity.
Interesting, given that I wouldn't have recognised it as a Lumia anyway
Channel idents tend to be pretty much bobbins if not properly batshit insane.
Ok, I like the BBC HD doggies and the BBC One swimming hippos, and some of the Channel 4 ones are clever.
Not going to make we want to buy a hippo or a block of flats though, so a waste of Microsoft cash even if they didn't get done by Ofcom.
Though thinking about it, maybe the intention was to risk Channel 5's licence simply to get headlines?
- 20 Freescale staff on vanished Malaysia Airlines flight MH370
- Fee fie Firefox: Mozilla's lawyers probe Dell over browser install charge
- Neil Young touts MP3 player that's no Piece of Crap
- Review Distro diaspora: Four flavours of Ubuntu unpacked
- Sysadmins and devs: Do these job descriptions make any sense?