Re: USB ports - why not invert every other one?
It makes life even worse, as when you flip the connector over you'll move slightly and now try to put it in the next one - upside down.
1679 posts • joined 16 Jun 2009
It makes life even worse, as when you flip the connector over you'll move slightly and now try to put it in the next one - upside down.
First, check it's a GU10 and not an MR16.
The GU10 lamp has "top-hat" prongs, MR16 has straight pins.
Now look at the socket and note the four holes.
Two are round - ignore them, they are screws.
Two are elongated, these are the two to jam your top hat prongs into.
Align roughly with the fatter end of the elongated holes, insert, wiggle slightly and twist clockwise to engage.
If they're actually MR16 then the bigger holes are the screws, so you line the pins up with the two tiny holes and push.
In both cases the lamp will probably light up before you've inserted it all the way, burning your hand.
- Top safety tip - turn the damn thing off first. You can tell if its off because the lamp that doesn't work is off when it's off, and off when it's on.
Sorry, I should clarify.
No matter what you do or how much money you throw at security companies, as long as you have users or are connected to the Internet there will still be ways for malware to get in.
You can't sit on your laurels.
Excellent start, however constant vigilance is still required.
Vigilance, not just A N Other security tool.
There is an addendum you missed:
we have had 0 issues with being hit with malware/viruses since about 2002... that you know of.
It's plausible that some are zombies but you haven't spotted them yet - if their traffic patterns aren't too far away from normal and the end user hasn't complained, how would you know?
The average end user won't complain until the computer is "running really slow", so could be devoting an entire CPU core to malware without noticing.
I recall doing a Malwarebytes sweep and finding half of Sales with possibly bad things installed.
(And nobody in technical roles, but that's self-selection for you)
Electric handbrake seems pretty common over there.
My last US hire car had it, and that was a big-standard petrol.
I'm guessing its due to the prevalence of automatics, and idiots forgetting to put the brake on when parked.
But do Apple actually test the updates against all networks?
Or just the original firmware bundles?
Or neither, because Apple are completely in charge of both development and release of iOS?
It's the reason we've got cheap computing hardware at all, take away the x86 platform and you're stuck in the mire of widely variant hardware - costing more and much harder to code for.
Heck, mobile and tablet is the first wave of "impossible to really code for" - you can write software for them but not on them, and having done so you must supplicate at the feet of Apple, Google, Amazon etc before you can sell it to anyone else. Even for free.
The death of WIntel is also the death of Linux and BSD - they need each other. Ok, Windows can afford to lose a lot of market share - but not all of it.
Plus it's equally common to have a faulty ACB anyway.
A few years ago I blew one three times before the EC figured out it was faulty and not set wrong.
Brought up the building, and after about half an hour one corner went dark. So we reset and tried again...
- They don't half go with a bang when they trip.
When the eBook edition costs the same or more than the paperback, something is wrong.
When it's the same or more than the hardback, something is very wrong.
That's the comparison - why is an otherwise-identical something that clearly has a near-zero reproduction and distribution cost sold for the same (or higher!) price as something that clearly has a relatively high reproduction and distribution cost?
Never mind that induction charging is hopelessly inefficient, how much do you think it would cost to install that rail?
For an order-of-magnitude estimate, look up how much it costs per mile to electrify a section of the railway network. It's a lot more than that so add another zero, because you're digging up a road rather than stringing wires between poles.
Wrong metric - it's not % of journeys, it's % of calendar days.
For both hire and purchase you amortise the sunk costs over time, not journeys.
The only place you pay a hire car by distance is a taxi - except the meter still ticks if you're stationary, so not even then.
Personally, I need the long range for around 10 days a year, except I still need a vehicle at the other end which cranks it up to ~40 days. That's a lot of hire car charges!
Then there's the cost of the EV itself, which even with subsidy is higher than a new mid-sized people carrier - and unlike the people carrier the EV will be worth diddly-squat when I get rid of it, just like my laptop is worth nothing after a few years.
But a significant part of my annual mileage isn't.
So, I'd have to either buy and maintain two cars - one EV for commute, one diesel* for longer range - or hire a diesel* car every time I need the longer range.
At the moment, the EV simply costs far too much and depreciates too fast for either of those to be economically viable.
- I'm also very lucky in that I do have somewhere to charge an EV, most city dwellers don't so couldn't even consider it.
So my question is - where is the car that is both these things?
Plug-in EV for my daily commute, diesel genny for my occasional long journey?
How ****ing hard can it be if even Top Gear can cobble that together?
* For low-carbon long-range, diesel is the only choice.
The veg oil you see in the supermarket is Rapeseed oil, not corn oil.
Rape grows plentifully and is not a staple food of anybody (except possibly the Scottish), and it's dirt-cheap too boot.
Many parts of the UK countryside are wrapped in the wonderful yellow of rape already, and given that we're supposed to be cutting down on frying with it, driving on it instead sounds like a good idea to me.
Does this mean they intend to screw over PMSEs yet again?
We only just finished repurchasing all our kit as it became illegal to use after the Olympics (raising the cost of same by a fair bit), and this sounds like they're going to take those away yet again in another six years!
I'd say it was time to send in the clowns, but it looks like they're already here...
We use multicast almost exclusively for realtime control, and something we have trouble with is the time it takes for the tree to reroute when a link is broken. We've had reports of it taking 10sec or more to get going again, which is frankly terrible and tends to trip failover responses.
- We don't need anything like the bandwidth of Gigabit most of the time (only when sharing with streaming audio/IPTV), so we have no need whatsoever for 10G - however latency and jitter are seriously important.
Secondly, how long do these take to boot - both from cold and warm restarts?
Moost of our customers are not networking types (usually no IT dept at all), so being able to deploy configs using a USB stick sounds very interesting - is this available on the smaller Dells?
The USA and other places with similar electrical codes are the only place you could use Neutral/CPC like this.
However, many local US jurisdictions now require 5mA GFCI (RCD) circuit breakers in domestic properties - which will definitely trip if a device did this!
(We use 30mA here)
In other words, the only place you could use this - you can't!
The diagram shown is indeed uniquely American. Most would call it bi-phase - the two Lives are 180 deg apart, each 120VAC to Neutral and thus 240VAC from each other. It's done with a centre-tapped transformer, usually very close to the house.
It's also common to have few domestic appliances using both phases - eg tumble driers, ovens.
There are more crazy things over there - "wild-leg" 3-phase is probably the most insane...
It's a 2D printer that prints and glues a stack of paper together.
You then manually trim away the unglued paper using a sharp blade - a rather important step.
So still not safe in the "let the kids do it" sense - merely exchanging "might burn yourself if touch it when operating" for "might cut yourself if you slip".
Aside from that, the article was about 3D printers that make plastic articles, not paper ones.
There's also Superspeed and Ultra.
Now available with even less crashiness!
They'll actually get the £1000.
If the compensation was set too high he'd simply go bankrupt and his bank and the lawyers on both sides would take most (all?) the money.
In that case the company might well get nothing at all.
The high compensation payouts you hear about are paid by insurance companies or councils, generally on a "shut up and go away" basis rather than letting it go to court. Presumably the lawyers fees must be quite astronomical for this to be cheaper.
That the average voter both understands that they're paying for this in higher taxes and that there are more or equivalent number who pay more than they receive in these handouts.
Plus another more hidden assumption that taxes would be lower without this spending - which isn't necessarily true, as Governments also get money from borrowing and inflation.
Inflation hits the ones not getting handouts, borrowing hits your old age and your kids.
Once an app instance has been authenticated once, it's authorised forever.
So if a miscreant has your username and password, they can log in as you using one of these apps - and keep on tweeting as you even after you've changed your password.
That's rather foolish, don't you think?
A "rescue bubble" is quite easy:
Make a foil balloon (like the helium ones for kids) about the size and shape of a sleeping bag, wrapped in a few layers of suitable fabric to protect it from scrapes and micrometeorites and padded on the inside to protect it from the occupant.
Then inflate it with cabin air, and put a crewmember inside with a nose-clip style oxygen mask as used by the crew of commercial airliners (or some firefighters).
That will last them an hour or so*, during which they can be manhandled from A to B. Probably one-use-only, (crawl-in-and-glue-shut, then cut open,) so you'd need one for each crewmember plus spares.
Making a spacesuit that allows a man to do useful work is very difficult.
Merely surviving is simple - NASA did do some work on these, don't know what happened though.
* The biggest risk here is actually claustrophobia, as spending too long inside that kind of thing may cause panic.
Spacecraft-to-spacecraft transfer does not require a 'tunnel', just a static line and enough spacesuits for the people you're transferring. Everybody has a spacesuit because they wear them during launch - and for a short time a simple bubble would suffice!
String a wire between the two airlocks using the existing safety line clips, and 'zip' along. Perhaps five minutes each, plus airlock cycle and suiting-up time. Last guy out is a bit more fiddly as you can't put NASA spacesuits on without help, but not insurmountable.
This does need an MMU to get the static line set up (and maybe dismantled), so send that in the rescue craft.
As they hadn't planned a spacewalk in the mission, presumably there weren't any MMUs on Columbia and thus the only way to look is sat on the end of the arm. Don't think that reaches underneath so would have to send a person rather than simple camera.
While that isn't the kind of thing you just "pop out" to do, they could have done it had NASA accepted the need to take a look.
I suspect the real reason they didn't look was indeed "What if we find something?"
A very human fright response, and the same reason lots of people don't go get tested for cancers when they first suspect, instead waiting until it's too late to do anything.
You'll still buy it anyway?
If Apple roll a turd in glitter and put it in an "iPad N" box, you'd buy that as well?
I doubt it, yet that's your argument here.
Optional or Default?
How many UK or EU people here believe their management, right up to CEO and board know what SkyDrive is and therefore that using it may breach the DPA and EU Directives?
If you think Office 2003 to Open/Libre Office will be tough, then you are going to have loads of trouble with Office 2007 or later.
When we did that switch the whole company stopped "office" work for several weeks*, and many users still cannot cope now we're a few years down the line.
The Ribbon is a simply massive culture shock.
* To be honest it was somewhat refreshing to get quick info in emails rather than as attachments.
So it's that old chestnut, eh?
Oh, how the might have fallen, that they need a scam to get subscribers to their flagship product.
Watch TV adverts for a while.
Do you think every single company advertising on TV has a copy of Avid?
(Avid is the industry-standard video edit suite.)
I doubt any of them do - and even the TV Ad production companies don't, they usually hire them from studios (eg BBC Resources) as needed.
Go to a corporate shindig. Do they own the video projectors, screens, set, lighting and control hardware/software used?
Nope. They pay an events production company to provide the complete event, and they usually subcontract parts out - eg I can earn a fair wodge of cash by bringing myself, and hiring a fourth company's hardware and software.
So Company A is buying the output from Company B, who is buying my services, and I'm buying part of my services from Company C.
B is also buying services from a whole stack of other companies - one reason A didn't hire me directly.
This is normal in all creative industry.
Google Docs no longer exports the older MS Office formats. It still opens them.
However, that is of course the danger of both Office 365, Google Docs and any other "cloud" solution.
If they want to take a feature away, they can and there's nothing you can do about - not even sue!
Your only possible action is to stop renewing your subscription, and then what?
If you're running your Office application locally, that can't happen.
(That's not completely true of MS Office though, as Windows Update will automatically update it. I'm sure they won't cripple it intentionally.)
That's the number one reason it did well.
Cheaper than the competition, cheap enough to take a punt on.
Also, it launched at the right time in the economic cycle, but there isn't anything Nintendo can do about that for the Wii U.
You can tell because both companies are making money on them.
Although Apple have been known to deliberately ignore this, and not all consumers are either certain enough of their rights, or well-connected enough to make enough noise for Apple to acknowledge it.
Nah, Labour self-immolated and keep on relighting the match, the Lib Dems have had a rude awakening that "sometimes being in Government means making decisions" and the Conservatives are continuing their ongoing tradition of self-harm.
Nobody in their right mind could vote Labour next time - last time they were in power they killed the economy and created a benefits system that rewards refusing to work and having as many children as physically possible, and have continued to show that they no longer have any "core values" whatsoever, their opposition has been one bandwagon after another, interspersed with "we oppose that but wouldn't change it"
The Conservatives do at least have some core values left, so even if you disagree with them you can at least understand their goals. (Although it's rare that any Government policy of any flavour could actually achieve them!)
I rather think this is what happens when you get a "Political Class" - these days you'd be hard pressed to name more than ten of MPs who've had real jobs for any length of time. I think there are none at all in Labour, and very few in the other parties.
You missed out both "Queueing" and "Getting Pissed".
Anybody who could read and memorise the handbook would pass, and the majority of people who did not read the handbook would fail.
You could simply take a course on English language instead of doing the "Life in the UK Test" - just to hammer in that it wasn't really about knowing anything about the UK.
The test has needed updating since original publication anyway - the old book had an error on the copyright page, and also contains several incorrect statements - eg legal age for smoking is not 16 as it said in the old Handbook.
Presumably this update is to force all future Governments to update it on coming to power - after all, the second largest party may well be UKIP next time, Labour having self-immolated.
Given that the gears they drew would be hideously inefficient, jam up often and break or wear out extremely quickly.
As in, everyone who knows anyone in or getting a "civil partnership" is calling it being/getting married and it's only the legal document itself that says different.
(Which is why I'm confused by the fuss some backbenchers are making. Doesn't it make sense for the law to match reality?)
Maybe El Reg could run an article or two about these stupid "worst practices".
Then we'd have somewhere to point to when managers insist "but it's best practice".
The heads in your hard disk "float" a very small distance from the surface of the platter, kept aloft by aerodynamic forces.
If they touch the drive surface, that's a "head crash", which usually rips the heads off and gouges furrows in the platter surface. That's generally considered a Bad Thing.
So going to vacuum would need some other way to float the heads.
Presumably something about the aerodynamics of helium gas makes more, thinner platters possible.
Personally, I'd rather we reduce our emissions of actual poisons into the environment.
Things like mercury, heavy metals, arsenic etc. The compounds that actually kill people, animals and plants.
Oddly, a lot of that stuff is in the majority of "green" (ie low-carbon) items but not in the near-equivalent high-carbon item.
Multiprogramming still needs a concept of past and future - or at least "before operation is done" and "after operation is done".
Discarding the idea of the "present" might help avoid race conditions though - a variable has no value "now", only a value before doing X and after doing X.
No idea how you'd express that though, and my head may asplode.
Ditto! Wants one of those screens I does.
The politicians do. The IPCC does. The BBC does.
Real scientists don't, but they are drowned in the noise.
I suspect the problem is that the human eye is not a camera.
The image you see is not the image captured by the retina, it's a composite generated in your brain that's made up from the data of many retinal images* - sort of like the massive mosaics NASA release
To make it more complicated, the retina has extremely variable resolution - in both colour and space!
- high spacial, but no blue at the fontema, lower as you get further away.
*Except that's wrong as well, but closer!
LASIK/LASEK etc seem to sell reasonably well.
Though I see your point!
the last 2 utterly dead areas are smart homes and tv
I disagree, actually.
The "smarts" behind smart homes are gaining quite a bit of traction in offices and public buildings - think Heathrow T5, The Shard, the O2 etc.
Right now, the limiting factor is the cost - so only large installs can justify it. As the cost of components - and installation - comes down, it'll get more traction in the home.
Certainly I can see it turning up in "posh" apartment blocks within the next five years.
How is that any different to the Unix way?
Where exactly is /home? I mean really?
It's somewhere in /dev/hdd, right? Or a network share or something.
It's certainly not straight in the root!
Those things at the top are just symlinks in both Windows and Linux.
In Windows 7, you can finally create some of your own in the GUI, instead of cmd or Registry.
Presumably there is a horrendous rate of false positives.
It's certainly pretty high going by my experience of the mm-wave version with this "vague outline" software.
According to several researchers, the false negatives rate is also very high for X-ray backscatter.
I've not read any studies recently on mm-wave as implemented, and would guess that there hasn't actually been any - bad for the TSA business.
Even if that were possible (it isn't), it wouldn't extinguish the fire.
LiCo battery fires are the components of the battery burning each other - it's a sealed unit, nothing actually gets in until the the cell has already "vented with flame".
I've also seen this with NiCad batteries - less dramatic, those just smoked rather than actual visible flames.
Also, this is most likely to occur when the batteries are charging - thus either in flight (charging from engines) or connected to ground power (thus empty on stand)
One of those is rather serious(!)
I am also surprised at the choice of chemistry - manganese or iron lithium batteries are only slightly less capacious and are considerably safer than the LiCo.
Given the wording of the FAA request, that may be what happens.
No they aren't.
Windows 8 Embedded is x86, it's the TIFKAM* equivalent of Windows XP and 7 Embedded.
Windows 8 RT is the ARM version that replaces Windows CE. Unfortunately, if you make something that can run that then MS say it cannot be allowed to run anything else.
* Inaccurate but I couldn't resist