I mean, almost nobody uses Safari and this change will simply remove the "almost" from this state of affairs.
2233 posts • joined 16 Jun 2009
I mean, almost nobody uses Safari and this change will simply remove the "almost" from this state of affairs.
I quite like them.
Bip, bip, bip, bip, touch touch tappity tap and I'm off, lunch is done.
For anything larger than lunch, I use the zap guns.
Would have been great, but patents and Apple are a bad combination.
Headers? I have to include the headers.
Windows and Mac Installers? I have to include the actual library binaries, or the customer cannot use the product.
Embedded systems? I have to statically link as there is no filesystem.
All of these things mean that I cannot use GPL3 code, because it opens us up to potential legal action.
Even if we 'win' said action, it costs us a lot and wastes time that could have been used to make products - this has already happened to us with invalid patents.
And if we lose, we are forced to give away our product, perhaps breaching other licences.
It's not worth the risk - get it wrong and you lose the farm.
BSD, Apache, LGPL, MIT and GPL2 are ok. GPL3 is not.
You can't use a GPL3 library, because if you do, it makes your entire project GPL3.
Even in a free project, you often can't do that because it breaks the license for other parts of the project.
In a commercial project, you can't consider that. Releasing the code is a commercial decision that the developer cannot make.
Thus, you cannot use any GPL3 code for any commercial project, or for any non-GPL3 FOSS project, or for any project which uses any parts that are not GPL3.
Thus you cannot improve said code.
Thus said code will die.
This comes from Stallman's insistence that no software developer should be paid for developing software, which is a position that I am fundamentally opposed to as I want to have somewhere to live and to be able to eat and give things to my friends and family.
Tory mates or Labour mates, it's the same thing either way.
What's needed is to break that cycle.
Suggestions on a postcard please!
Yes, and a little bleeding doesn't matter, but losing too much blood will kill you.
It makes sense to run a deficit in a recession - it's a way to get out of it - but you must run a surplus during the boom, or the debt will become too high to pay.
5 sec behind would be good.
10 sec behind would be reasonable.
Utterly wrong on the other hand...
Heat of collision could do it.
Smack two ice cubes together and they can stick together.
Planes don't even use Ethernet as it is generally understood.
They have a set of switches that have hardcoded (from factory) routing tables and paranoid behaviour.
One of the things they do is to blackhole a packet (and if necessary, shut down the port) coming in a physical port that is addressed to an unexpected destination, is malformed or comes more often than expected, because it would indicate a malfunctioning or damaged device.
Obviously that's also reported to the pilot, who can take the appropriate action (reset or ignore the bad kit)
Because this did not happen. At all. It is impossible.
He may have hacked into the inflight entertainment system. That's probably fairly easy as I doubt it's particularly hardened.
But there is not, has not and never will be a backchannel that is physically capable of sending anything from the passenger cabin data systems into the flight control systems.
The FBI are talking utter bollocks.
LED is a narrow band emitter.
"White" LEDs use a Blue LED to pump a yellow phosphor.
Thus, no Red and very little Green - and so pigments look strange, especially ones involving red, like skin for example.
They are a couple of UV-pumped ones that are excellent, but £££££
There have been experimental RGB, RLB and RLW mixes, but I've not seen them on the market yet.
All domestic dimmer switches cut the power completely.
Professional SCR/Triac dimmers go down to zero but have a small leakage current through the suppression caps, however you would not be putting these lamps on a 3kW rated dimmer.
I'll give you those
IoT is simply a buzzword, with no meaning and no genuine products.
The companies making the genuinely useful "Internet of Things" hardware and software don't use the buzzword.
They are lighting and HVAC control systems, integrated alarm systems and the like. The real product is called a "building management system".
Serial numbers are predictable, thus useless as passwords.
Heck, with a little thought you can probably work out the serial number from the public MAC, as the two will be directly related in most high-volume products.
The default password simply has to be truly random, with a good source of genuine entropy.
The majority of home users will never change the password, many won't even realise they can.
I quite like it.
Hard to find in UK restaurants though, can't imagine why.
FPTP is fundamentally flawed, in that it forces a two-party system to come into being, due to the effect of the "split vote".
I'd love STV with something like 3-4 member constituencies.
Then I'd be able to take my issue to whichever of the members I thought was most likely to help on that particular thing.
The current One-Member system has the fundamental problem that if my Member is a Minister, or even worse, the Speaker, I'm stuffed.
The Minister must back the Cabinet due to Collective Responsibility, and the Speaker isn't allowed to express their opinion.
No. It is much easier to lose or change the contents of an electronic ballot box than the contents of a physical one.
While it is relatively easy to 'lose' a physical ballot box, it leaves a physical trail that must also be hidden - 3rd party observers saw it, and every individual ballot paper has to be accounted for.
An electronic 'ballot box' has a no physical trail, only a small amount of data describes its existence - all one would need is the signature, and poof, the entire box is gone or rewritten for the Lizard Party.
The 3rd party observers would have no way of seeing this, and no evidence would exist outside the system itself to indicate that a large-scale fraud had occurred.
Don't forget installation costs, and the VAT, which adds 20% to all the above.
So what you're saying is that it is uneconomic to use these because they will not pay back within their warranty period, unless you steal from the poor.
The 14.45p/kWh comes directly from everyone else's electricity bills.
Everyone who does not have the system is paying you for all the electricity you use.
Who can install these systems? Those who own their property and have either large enough savings to buy outright, or a good enough credit rating that a bank will loan them the upfront cost. In other words, the well-off.
Who pays for the systems? The poor and lower-middle class.
Isn't that simply evil?
It's simply a 120V version with different relay and MOVs.
While the circuit and component selection look fairly sound, the PCB design looks extra-low-voltage, and may not be suitable for EU mains voltage supplies. It's quite hard to get mains voltage thru-hole PCB design right.
Can't be sure without a sample, and there's no hint as to the backside of the board on any of their published docs, however the topside creepage looks like ~1.5mm, when the standard requires at least 2.4mm*. You don't run tracks down the isolation gap - those pins are that far apart for a reason - and Protective Earth looks really close to LN.
I don't think El Reg should mention any mains voltage kits for the EU unless they've got good reason (CE mark etc) to believe that it complies with the basic safety regs in the EU. These set of devices look like they meet most US codes, but not EU ones.
* Assuming 'normal' PCB material and that it's not hermetically sealed.
Indeed - though to be fair, the Surface Pro is actually a decent laptop.
As long as you can manage with 1 (one) USB port and no hardwired Ethernet.
A timer overflow is so obvious and predictable that you can even work out exactly when it will occur to the individual tick.
A mistake in a flight control algorithm that gives unwanted results when fed by a particular mix of wrong and right values is an incredibly hard thing to predict.
One is a failure to count.
The other is an inability to allow for and test all possible circumstances.
It has to come down fast because it can't hover.
The throttle only goes as low as ~1.8G, so the least it can do is roughly maximum braking of a high-performance car. (0.8G)
Lower throttle isn't possible because turbopumps don't do slow, among other things.
According to Scott Manley, it's trying to drive at a brick wall at 120mph, then slam on the brakes and come to a halt just touching the wall.
This time it slammed on the brakes ever so slightly too late.
Would they have shot him first instead if the cop hadn't got a Taser on him?
They can and do kill. It's not a magic stun-phaser like in Star Trek, and somebody high on drugs is at higher than usual risk of death if Tasered.
I wonder what would have happened if the policemen did nothing? Would he have quietly passed out after sexing the tree?
Eeewww! That's a hideous image...
Press release != science.
Then the reporting of the press releases gets even further from the actual results.
It's primarily shoddy journalists, who simply don't understand science at all, but pretend that it's just like the arts or humanities.
So that's equally 'predatory', yes?
Class action isn't really a thing in Europe.
That said, it's a wonderful own-goal by Sony.
The only possible legal results from this are that they cancel the alleged debt, or that they cancel the alleged debt and pay a fine.
The PR result is already clear.
No, that's known as an 'abusive contract' clause, which has no power whatsoever in any European country.
Dear Sony, you will lose. Trading Standards will rip you a new one.
I read it when I was young and foolish enough to consider making some of the recipes.
Fortunately, I was never quite foolish enough.
Not that load of bollocks again.
You can find somebody claiming anything if you search hard enough.
I pity you. It must be so difficult to maintain such a flawed and bigoted worldview.
Your right to throw a punch ends before it hits another's face.
I think that explains it.
Straw man - it doesn't matter how big a religion is.
He just missed the 'scare quotes' around 'standards'.
There are such things as proprietary standards/specifications though:
A company publishes an interoperability specification which others can use, perhaps even royalty-free, but the company retains full control over it.
Most APIs are like that.
If it's hard work, then maybe it's not right.
It might be hard sometimes, but marriage isn't work!
As far as I recall lithium ion batteries really don't like deep discharge and wear out much faster than the equivalent sealed lead-acid.
So this technique means you'll be replacing more, smaller batteries more often - hoping that 1000 small batteries costs less than 10 big ones.
Not to mention the interesting fire loading - lithium battery fires cannot be doused, and the batteries catch fire quite easily when damaged or overcharged.
You basically have to wait for it to burn out and then put out the secondary fires.
Can their fire suppression system cope with that?
A disc doesn't have to write a full block, it's the file systems that do that.
Not all file systems use blocks, and those that do generally allow you to choose the block size if you want a different tradeoff between storing the location of the data and the data itself.
If I, as a Brit, want to buy German bread then I can send a German bakery money and they send me the bread.
Shipping might be expensive and a bit stale once it arrives, but I can do it and the law does not affect my ability to do so.
However, if I want to buy German television, I cannot. It is simply impossible to do without breaching copyright.
If I want to watch it, I must breach the copyright.
This is the *only* type of goods or services where this is the case within the EU, and it's obviously stupid.
Under 4 microlumens per square inch.
Or 1.3 candela / sq metre in SI units.
So, roughly the brightness of a single candle diffused across a square metre.
Wolfram Alpha says it's less than half the apparent luminance of the twilight sky.
Which is very dim, as the human eye is logarithmic.
But certainly visible.
Why should I need to root my device in order to selectively allow/deny applications unnecessary privileges?
That is one thing Apple do a little better.
Odd that he lists the mostly solved problems as the "huge challenges", but ignores the "make one of these things actually work" and "make it not be a bloody superweapon of hideous death"
A simple and quick way to gain and retain Power is to define an "Other", upon which blame can be placed.
The powerful can either 'pity' "them", try to change "them" to be more like "us", or remove "them".
When a problem arises, it's tempting and really easy to say "The problem came from them", not "us.
Thus diverting attention from the real cause.
All the Mac users I know use USB sticks daily.
Most of them use a second USB device at the same time - what it is varies, but nearly all of them do.
So this one isn't even enough for you.
The nearest comparison is the Microsoft Surface Pro 3, which has a grand total of one USB 3.0 port and one power port - and everyone I know ends up carrying a USB hub because it's not enough.
Most people use USB sticks to transfer files between computers. It's simple and intuitive.
At the office, everyone connects via the wired ethernet because it's faster - most via a desktop dock.
Surface Pro has a dock, does this?
This new Macbook is clearly intended as an alternate iPad with the same pattern of consumption-only use.
So, it's alienating all the professionals who use Mac for creative purposes - continuing a worrying trend from Apple.
Most modern PSUs (chargers etc) are quite capacitive and so have a low power factor in the other direction.
It's all pretty silly anyway, as after I got rid of my electric shower I've not used more than 400kWh in any given month, it's usually closer to 300kWh.
So even in a bad month, my mean (24hour) consumption is under 560W - or 1700W for 8-hour days - which means the error bars are rather significant.
18 months? Useless.
Mine ran for 5 years.
The replacement battery only managed 3, and I was so annoyed that I stopped wearing a watch altogether.
You also need two versions to cover about 99% of the population.
No idea what you do for the last 1% or so.
I luff my 3G Kindle.
Even works in deepest darkest Peru :)