Re: "In no way am I suggesting that INgrooves is an evil bunch of bastards"
Or what they have done is of questionable legality, as asserting a copyright claim when it is obviously false may be a breach of the DMCA.
1617 posts • joined 16 Jun 2009
Or what they have done is of questionable legality, as asserting a copyright claim when it is obviously false may be a breach of the DMCA.
Perhaps, but when it's perfect via a proxy from the same browser, there are clearly shenanigans.
Perhaps peering, but the tracert implies otherwise.
MS wanted to delay to mid-February.
Google pushed them to fix it now.
In fact, Google pushed them into fixing it at all.
Now, perhaps MS will put more effort into detecting and fixing these earlier.
Perhaps MS will also put more effort into finding and disclosing security problems in Google's products - and giving Google a fixed 90 days to fix them.
In both these scenarios the customer wins.
Except that it does not exist, and certainly will not exist in the next decade.
The massive improvements in computation and radio (cellphone, TV etc) have come from efficacy improvements - doing more useful work with the same amount of energy.
In a vehicle the useful work is purely energy conversion - absolute maximum of 100% efficiency.
Electric motors and motor controllers already exceed 90% efficiency, and thus cannot ever get more than 10% better.
Even assuming we can somehow get that back into the battery, it is still not enough by the fundamental laws of motion - air resistance, rolling, simple increase in vertical height!
You can discharge a NiCad in mere seconds.
You don't get to use it again, but by Jove it's exciting!
Of course it does.
Is your employer more likely to pay you more if they make a higher profit or a lower profit?
Your bargaining position is much better if you know they can afford to pay you more, and even better if they need you.
Actually, corporation tax is one way of pushing up wages - higher wages means lower profits thus lower tax, as well as (theoretically) better staff.
So I arrange my affairs so I buy everything through my employer.
At the end of each charging period, they calculate my total expenditure, subtract it from my salary and pay me the difference minus the transaction tax.
Their suppliers do the same.
To minimise tax liability all you have to do is bring income and outgoings as close as possible.
The logical result is a massive monopoly - not just for one product, but for all products, and to charge your employees so much that their take-home pay is zero.
The Norks have actual nuclear weapons, and a history of doing the batshit insane.
Remember that much of South Korea is within artillery range, so they don't need a high tech delivery system.
'ing terrifying really.
All of which are examples of things which BT are not permitted to do.
They are also examples of why OFCOM are impotent and/or incompetent, as BT might or might not be doing some or all of these but OFCOM appear incapable or unwilling to examine whether or not they are, or of imposing meaningful sanctions should BT be doing so.
You cannot "opt out" of the working time directive.
The only thing you can do is to accept slightly longer weekly hours than the strictest set, but no more.
You still have a minimum hours off between shifts, a maximum hours in one shift, and a set of rules about breaks.
Unless you're self-employed though. Then it doesn't apply.
(Though a lot of people who claim to be self-employed actually are not.)
Most buses don't have keys, just an "OFF/ON/START" switch.
And a clearly-marked battery isolator.
You've clearly never actually tried to use the WiFi or mobile signal on a UK train - put simply, they don't work.
Aside from that, most of the time it wouldn't matter if they did because you can't get a seat with enough space to open your laptop.
I regularly try to work on the train while travelling to or from a customer's site, and about half the time I don't get anything done and have to catch up the work late in my hotel room, instead of supping at the bar as nature intended.
If the train was half an hour quicker then that would be either half an hour longer in the office/in bed before setting off, or half an hour longer in the hotel bar.
All "local" bus companies receive large subsidies, it's the only way they can exist.
For example, Sheffield's buses receive a subsidy of over £1.6 million a year from central government alone.
In 2013 the council then spent £4.5 million on bus stops etc - another subsidy.
I couldn't find figures for the fare take, but based on passenger numbers I'd guess the subsidy is probably 10% of total revenue.
Because the entire point of an office block is to be near other office blocks.
This allows the high-ups to think that they are important because they have an office near the offices of %BIG_FIRM%, despite said firm not being a customer or supplier.
This isn't true. It's actually because most companies can only afford one location and don't like the idea of working from home.
Couple that with the fact that people generally don't like to move home, and you end up with large central blocks of "workplaces" where hundreds of employers exist, surrounded at a distance by homes.
Or a "city".
Given that Facebook want people to post these types of events, they need to take them into account when programming.
However, we already knew that Zuckerberg is chaotic-evil aligned, so it's not that surprising when they don't.
I don't think any of the handsets expose the necessary detail.
I believe they only test signal strength though, which isn't a great indicator of whether or not a given cell can actually sustain a call.
Or it didn't break everywhere at the same time?
Or it only affected sign-on (as per the article) so anybody already signed in would be unaffected?
A DDoS attack often doesn't totally take down a service, it just makes it very slow for normal users in some regions.
Your "Works for me" just means it worked for you, not for anybody else.
It's a lab experiment at the moment!
More seriously, this kind of thing tends to take 5-10 years to either reach the market or discover that it can't be made reliable enough/cheap enough to be marketable.
I import mine direct from Peru.
May have to try some of those London-based places once I run out of this batch.
It was the first science fiction film I've ever seen that didn't have me screaming "You idiots!" at the screen at one point or another, either due to characters hugging the idiot ball or completely ignoring an obvious solution.
None of the characters in Interstellar did anything that should have been obviously stupid to them at the time. They made serious mistakes, they had drama and argued, but they stayed true to character and called each other out on their mistakes - and even seemed to learn from them.
It's so rare to have a science fiction film where the mistakes the characters made were actually believable!
One should judge customer service by what happens when something has gone wrong.
I have had great service from Dabs, CCL and Amazon when things have gone wrong.
Scan seem fine, though I've not had anything go wrong with orders from them so take that with a pinch of salt!
The chances of there being any are millions to one?
No, said prior ruling is what is being challenged.
The US may be breaking international law if the challenge fails.
At that point the EU could (and should) take the US to court over such possible breaches.
It would also sound the death knell of Amazon AWS, MS Azure and all other providers as they currently stand, forcing both companies spin off non-US-owned, totally separate companies to own and run all the servers and hardware outside of the US, simply to meet their legal obligations.
- If you break the law in Country B in order to follow the law in Country A then you're utterly screwed as a company and absolutely have to split.
It'd definitely make cloud hosting within the US a hell of a lot more expensive.
Firefox or Chrome.
It must be easy to disable and re-enable on a per-site basis.
Thousands? [Citation needed]
I fly rather a lot, and I've never, ever seen anybody have anything other than a bottle of water get confiscated.
By the way - I mean "Actually discovered by the security checks", not "Passenger forgot they had it until joining the security queue". Aside from that, an item carried with no intent to harm is harmless.
A small amount of checking is needed, however the current level is way, way beyond what is sane or even useful.
A giant V2 filled with liquid oxygen and kerosene.
I love lamp
The "Quiet" carriage is often misunderstood to be the carriage that has the least noise inside.
In fact its true purpose is to attract and contain the loud mobile phone users, and by doing so makes all the other carriages quieter.
Interesting, that probably means that there is no case to answer, as the BPI have already stated that there is no loss.
Wonder how long it will take for the lawyers to decide, and how much money (both artists and general taxpayers) will be wasted.
Then everyone is happy.
There's a levy on media that xan only be used for copying audio, it earns nothing and costs nothing to administer.
You can't inkjet print blood runes, everybody knows that - the nozzles are too small, so you end up with a hemolytic mess.
Plotters are much better, but interns are cheaper and come with free ink.
Nope it's just a "DO NOT DIG HERE" sign laid in the ground a couple of inches above the fibre, in the vain hope that it'll reduce the chances of some muppet cutting the cable.
The better sign is "HIGH VOLTAGE CABLE", as JCB drivers tend to pay more attention to those due to the really loud bang that happens when they dig through those.
Surely this should mean the members of the Cabinet are personally responsible for the inevitable fines DRIP and this new piece of illegal legislation will garner from the ECHR?
Maybe that would start to concentrate minds.
Only personal consequences work when dealing with such people.
Nope, that phrase is the management saying "You're changing the ceiling lights on your own from now on, because your phone will now automatically call the ambulance
to collect your cold, dead corpse before anyone important sees it if you fall, so it's now perfectly safe."
You're assuming his car has a real one, and not one of those stupid "space-saver" things - or indeed nothing at all.
Either way a collision at the 7m stopping distance speed is survivable by both sets of occupants.
However, the ethicists are simply utterly wrong here.
The only "ethical" solution is to avoid the situation in the first place.
The single track road is on the map, thus a collision is only possible if the cars do not communicate, yet the ethical dilemma only exists if the cars do communicate.
Therefore the situation is "bloody stupid" and has no need of an answer, simply engineer to ensure it cannot occur.
For a start, the planets orbit fairly close to the galactic plane.
Having started wrong it rapidly turns mystical and turns from "simplification based on erroneous data" to outright stupidity.
Very surprised to see it here.
One week? That's changed a lot then!
When I first bought Half-Life 2 I was working on a ship and happily played for a couple of months offline after burning several shore leaves getting the damned thing updated.
A good ad-blocker.
I do find it strange how little work the advertiser networks seem to do on preventing the virus-laden adverts, as if they don't they will die.
I generally give a site two strikes of an annoying advert, then Adblock goes back on.
- Also, Adblock is a great little tool for blocking other types of annoying content.
Wouldn't make any difference.
Rosetta is very small and quite far away.
This would be like getting someone stood at the top of the Shard to illuminate your newspaper using a spoon.
If the spoon was painted black.
Design has always gone in "fads, where a given style becomes predominant for a while.
After some time a new design fad takes over and the cycle begins again.
The truly masterful designers are the ones who manage to spot the next fad several times, not just once.
For example, Symantec blocks the installation of some of our software.
We've reported it several times, we've sent them the installers, we've sent them logs from our customers, and they refuse to acknowledge that there just might possibly be an issue with their software.
So we've simply had to advise those customers to drop Symantec. Which they have, because our software is genuinely useful while theirs is...
Saved them a lot of money as well.
My £10 Casio with fabric velcro strap (important*) has survived all the abuse I pounded upon it in the last ten to fifteen years (I forget exactly) - including smashing the face into the side of a yacht when a younger me slipped off the trapeze.
Nuke 'cos I think it would survive that as well.
Unfortunately the backlight went in January and the battery went for the second time a couple of months back, so I'll be replacing it soon with another similar one.
* My skin eats the rubberised plastic straps, destroying them and giving me eczema, so I can't use them.
Maybe it's just me, but I don't see the connection between a $200,000 motor car and how this helps the average working person who would need ten years to make that kind of money.
The only possible connection I can see might just be that 100 years later, almost everybody reading these words can now afford to buy a motor car of their very own.
Nope, this has been "bloody obvious" from the start.
A rogue terminal can do whatever it wants.
So if they set it to £20, and just bonk everyone on the tube, they'll get quite a bit fairly fast and probably get away with it.
The entire security of this system relies on the bank's back-end fraud detection. Which is rubbish and slow.
I wouldn't mind so much on a credit card, because consumers have a legal gap to challenge it before payment.
However, on a debit card this can easily destroy someone - if you run close to the edge, a single denied payment can spiral fast!
Sooner or later this will happen.
It was intended to go to space.
Just not stay there.
'Cos it's a test flight.
Test flights are filled to the gunnels with data recorders measuring and recording (and often transmitting in real-time) anything and everything that can be reasonably measured. They're more fragile (and a heck of a lot more expensive) than black boxes, but the storage media should survive.
They aren't going to speculate on the causes until they've recovered as much of it as possible and had time to analyse what happened.
Equally, there won't be any more test flights until they've done that and figured out how to reduce the probability of it happening again.
A "black box" records absolutely nothing in comparison.
To allow updates.
The firmware will contain bugs, and even if it didn't, the encryption scheme will need new keys and/or a new algorithm from time to time as they get lost, stolen or broken.
"Smart Meters" are an EU dictat.