347 posts • joined Tuesday 16th June 2009 11:38 GMT
last time I cam acoss an "adult filter" on an internet contract (I think it was a mobile internet) it blocked such well knows adult sites as http://freefall.purrsia.com/ and http://forums.theregister.co.uk I would be suprised if this is any better
the reasion spent fuel rods are dangrious is that they are raidocative. it is exactley the same property that made them usefull in the first place. They are litulery throwing out energy everywhere so all we need to do is develop a way of harnshing that energy you know sort of like reprocessing them and resuing them
3) we can bairley aforde the army we have at the moment (yes you will say they will not need to be paied but they will need to eat be housed armed etc)
long turm efects
you get the same prblem for every sory of industrail process
you are worries about the efect of hi level waste? what about murcry poisning or any heavy mettle poisninging they will leave the ground in a worse state than radactive waste for a lot longer
that would be why they do not build reactors like that any more (and only the russians where silly enought to build them in the first place)
and even so the casuilities where less than on some of there other propanger advantures
cleen feed may have worked whail it was only blocking child porn there was not meny pepol atacking it but now it has just actratcted a hold swarm of atackers a lot of who have at least tasit public suport how long do you think till somone finds a way round or throught it or even brakes it completley and then there gose all the blocks not just the pirate ones
no it is more like
this sort of wibbley wimmly timey wimie ball
not sure about
I have been talking to somone in the decomishing industry and the new genration of nuke plants do not have astrronomical clean up costs
the current gen do but they where built as test plants and wepons genrators and so they have complex clean up. But the new gen desines and easy to clean up and I bleave the ones in the US put asside a little form each MW they sell to pay "cleanup insurance" to cover decomishing costs
I do not have the evidance for this but I was told by somone who works in the nuclear decomising industry is that plants in the USA do pay for them selfs and pay a tax on all energy sold to pay for the cost of decomishing
and by the way before anyboady says so the reasion a lot of decomishing at the moment is very expencive is the things that at the momeny are begin decomishened are test reactors a lot of witch where pushed to the limites (as you do in tests) ans therefor there where some unexpected results witch are costly to clean up
pass me the drill
I would qoute most von lipwig
but there are far to meny to be revlent
but I found the filming of gladator made it feel more personal like you where there fighting in the ring with them so I liked it
bad sfx make good tv
I rember a talk with a friend of mine and the jist of it was that the more mony/effor that gose on sfx the less time/mony gose on good writing
the worse the sfx the better the writing has to be to distract pepol form the pisspoor sfx works for dr who as well
and I bet when petrol cars where first out all the pepol how had horses said that having all that flamable petrolum sprit arpound the stable was a fire hazzard (probley not give the times but) diffrent tyoes of transport will give diffrent thougts. for an example pepol with electric cars will get used to puluging them in every time they part in a carpark then 30 mins charge seams resionable (most pepol want a brake after neally 100 miles drive)
there is a case of a primary school teacher who used to be a erotic dancer and she was fired for letting here pupils find her facebook profile with thouse pics on it
it is perfuctuley justifiable to want to keep parts of your life seprate
it is the goverments fualt that nuclear is so expencive to clean up it they did not insist that it's saftey standards where vastly safer than others it would be much more competive
for example a nuke plant must acount for every attom of wast they produce and must contain it all but a coal plant can dump it's waste up a chimly or in a pit even when it is more raido active than some of the stuff a nuclear plant produces
I would volintear
but I do not think I have the skillset for nuclear work as I bleave it is hightley skilled work and you need to be a fit and heathy indervidual to be a radiation worker and I am a lardbucket
"I ask you, how many of you are from Japan ? ..right, I thought so."
I suspect the pepol in japan have a distanct lack of internet at the moment and thouse that do are a bit bissy to comment on a uk publication but I am sure they will get back to you
I was goiong to comment on the rest of your post but I realy could not understand what you where getting at
let me gess
dose it run on elerium 115?
told by a person working in the indursty
that it says in a goverment safty case for new nuke plants "the leval of safty on new plants must be twice as hi as for other types of plants due to public fears" so they have to be at least twice as safe because pepol do not trust them and pepol do not trust them because they have to be twice as safe
"If there are significant areas of caesium-137 soil concentration of the order of 100,000 Bq kg−1, evacuation of these areas could be effectively permanent,"
IF that amount is founf anywhere
I could equley say "IF we contamnate the soil with mircury or oil it will be usless and evacuation of these areas could be effectively permanent"
dose not mean it has or is going to happen
that they would stop taking the p out of the voters
"wow! that's pretty freaking clever!"'
but we would like to know how much he is lieing to us before we roll out the nobal prise we have all been here before with "amazing descoverys" it is not we are used to tech it is we are used to bein g lied to
4 micro doubble decker busses
can I go as well
I want a trip to russer and I here they are offering trips round the town near chynobal
it did cese
the core scramed all productio of radiocative iodaie (it is a byproduct of the cors oprationn) ceased as soon as the quake hit
if I have sex I MAY DIE!!!!!!!!
for them shock prsumabily?
it is on old phalicy small amounts of rad are no more harmefull than a small amount of heat is it can be thought of in the same way small amount is shriuged off large amount causus damage needs to be repaired large amount kills you
as tot he second point that is why the warning went out but it is no diffrent than the advice n ot to drink the water after a spill at a chemical factory and we get thouse a lot of them time I rmeber a few in the uk
there is talk of making the town a mesuim as it is a pristeen exaplme of a workign sovet town that has not been disturbed by the reviooulations
"From the start it was obvious that the fuel rods had broken and were exposed to air but they have been in denial from the start....."
it was not obvious and I hesatate to say no such thing has happened the steel contaiment vessal is intact there has been no exposer of reactor fule rods
"Now they are finding iodine in the water, what next ??? well if they are finding iodine and caesium in the system then the whole spectrum of radioactive contaminants will be there."
if they where they would have found them
"There is a myth that because something is short half life that is a lesser risk.... whilst this maybe so with radiation when it is contamination and is in the eco system then its a different story."
you are only partley right here but thatg is better than the rest of your post short lived isotopes are usuley more active than long lived ones because they give off so much energy that is why they are short lived BUT the activity lvl is what is being monitered so to get the lvls they are fiondign in the tap water they most be a very minute amount of iodide and it will be gone very quickley and once it is in the enviroment it will decay and delude and be undecatable v ery quickley
"I have no faith in what the Japanese government and its scientists are saying they have been down playing the whole scenario. Which is far from over let me add but the truth will eventually out...."
I think it is more likley everyboady else had been upplayoing it badley and why do pepol mistrust experst so much these days?
where I live
I have lived with in 5 miles of 3 diffrent neculre plants and I have never lost a momnets sleep over them
I lost more sleep when they put up a wind farm near my office cos the flickering blades stoped me taking my mid afternoon nap
in related news
tempatures of over 1000c messered nexturew buring oil refinary that is hasadous to firemen who stood in it
I dought anyboady is alowed to go that close
- Product Round-up Smartwatch face off: Pebble, MetaWatch and new hi-tech timepieces
- Geek's Guide to Britain BT Tower is just a relic? Wrong: It relays 18,000hrs of telly daily
- Geek's Guide to Britain The bunker at the end of the world - in Essex
- Review: Sony Xperia SP
- Dell's PC-on-a-stick landing in July: report