Now then
one claiming he had changed her life in 60 seconds
Fnarr fnarr
619 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2009
You're sort of right.
Not enough to be a pedant but enough to just about not be wrong.
ISO 31 has been superseded by ISO80000 so there is that to deal with if you are trying to be a pedant, and pointing out lack of white space *is* pedantic.
More importantly the ISO refers to styling of SI and derived units. The byte is not an SI unit or derived from any of the physical measures of the SI system so doesn't really apply anyway.
It's a bit like complaining that a bike doesn't comply with a car safety standard from 2008.
But thanks for taking part in the discussion.
I would expect El-Reg to know the history of the word Troll; next you will be telling us that hackers were originally people who broke in to phone systems.
Troll comes from a fishing method where bait is dragged across the bottom of the ocean to draw out the bottom feeders. It entered IT vocab because people were "trolling for suckers" who were dumb enough to take the bait. The initial comments do not have to be dark or offensive, just the sort of thing that gets people posting a reply. Mentioning that evolution is just a theory or purposely misquoting Dumbledore out of Lord of the Rings is classic trolling because although not offensive the deliberate errors will often elicit a response.
It amuses me that all this hatred of trolls is coming at a time when most mainstream media is deliberately controversial in order to 'spark debate' and Simon Cowell is the biggest troll of them all for programs like xfactor which choose the talentless over the talented in order to spark lucrative voting outrage.
Twitter 'trolls' like Old Holborn are just unpleasant people who should be ignored on Twitter as they are in real life.
sneaky beaky sorts have been hiding their secrets in plain sight for decades, either in the private advert column of a newspaper or under a rock in the park; it is all just basic field craft.
Modern equivalent is putting some obscure message on to pastebin so it looks like nothing important unless you know what you are looking for
It is unlikely to be that clever. Most likely just looks for two transactions through one barrier opening (they can detect objects passing through the barrier). It would most likely only have a choice between oyster and credit/debit so would prefer the oyster.
Card bonking and oyster bonking use quite distinctly different tech so are probably handled by different hardware up to a point, this is why you could detect and auth two at a time. You could no more auth two debit cards than you could two Oyster cards.
Presenting the wrong card is not tfl's problem. Reading a nearby credit card when you present your oyster is their problem because it's fraudulent on their part.
With reference to your BGP question it depends on a lot of factors but the biggest is the summarisation one.
If networks learn from their mistakes with v4 then there will be enough opportunities to summarise routes at points in the networks and that dramatically reduces the size of the table. The way that addresses are being allocated with massive amounts held back for future use suggests that some planning and thought has gone in to it so we must keep our fingers crossed.
But it's open source so every freetard out there is busy spending every waking minute fixing bugs and auditing code. If you have big business fat cats doing the work we will have to pay for it and that costs money which we don't want to have to spend in our utopian freetard society.
Also - down with bankers.
In some Snowdenesque plot (or maybe the Lady Bothering Couch Surfer because Snowdon was more tech savvy with encryption) a file is being transferred to a journo somewhere. Grubbymint spooks know all they have to do is pass an MD5 hash of the file to Gurgle and they will provide the deets of the email sender or recipient. Might not be flagged as a peed but will give them the time to supress the information in more traditional ways with a staged suicide or a car accident in a tunnel.
To celebrate Friday here are some of the conversations I have had in the last year.
"The server is down."
"Which one, we have hundreds."
"I don't know, I'm not in IT."
"Yet you feel qualified to conclude that one of the servers is down."
"The firewall is blocking some JavaScript."
"Are you sure the words you are looking for aren't perhaps 'proxy server'."
"OK, smartass, the firewall is blocking the proxy server."
"The firewall between my PC and the server is blocking my traffic."
"There isn't a firewall between your PC and the server."
"The network must be down then."
"Unlikely."
User had locked their account by typing their password wrong.
"Service is down, everything is running slow."
"Surely it can only be one or the other."
"It's a network problem, the user is getting a 404 error."
"So they are receiving an error back from the server to say that the server cannot find the page in the URI? Doesn't that imply that the network connection to the server is working perfectly?"
"I don't have the actual error number."
"Right, so we're just making things up now?"
Rory Twitter Jones is a fantastic example of the sort of person who should not be reporting on tech. I recall the days when a journo was expected to have a basic understanding of his field however Rory is just another mac user with Fry scale incompetence whenever he strays too far from the press release he is regurgitating.