Can't wait until...
...they use the 'It's your fault' line for the maps app too.
432 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2009
A former employer of mine - a FTSE 100 company - had a deliberate policy of NOT retaining old email. Users could delete anything they wanted to from their mailbox, including from its archives.
If an incriminating email wasn't there when someone looked for it, and it was older than the backup retention period, the answer would always be 'sorry, pal, nothing we can do'.
Far less onerous than keeping everything 'just in case' and cheaper on storage too.
If I have, then there's no proof any backdoor in the products or some other kind of illegal shenanigans but the House of Representatives says you shouldn't buy from these firms anyway.
I thought that trying to distort the free market philosophy was considered anti-American. But it seems that being able to sell it cheaper than a US firm is the 'crime' they're moaning about here. Incidentally, what country do Cisco use to have their products assembled?
Apple knew the functionality that they were trying to duplicate. So it doesn't matter if it's a good first attempt or not. If you're going to replace anything there will be people who dislike change - any kind of change. But this is a different league: they're pissing off everyone with a product that's several generations behind. That's just stupid.
They should have stuck with Google until they had a product that was, as a minimum, comparable. Anything less is showing just how little regard they have for their customers.
Yes, I get that they're different. But both processes of forecasting rely to a greater or lesser extent on models: that's where I see a parallel. Weather and climate predictions don't always deliver what the model said would happen or when it might happen.
Personally I'd like better weather forecasts. For society as a whole I'd like accurate climate modelling. It's why I said that I hoped that this result improves both.
BT should have been the driving force behind this kind of effort (rather than the county council).
If this kind of saving is possible from one county's services, yet still make a profit for those darn shareholders, BT should be shouting from the rooftops to every council and local authority in the land.
So should their rivals of course.
I also liked the Hamlet Cigar spoof of the Channel 4 logo. Done by the same chaps?
Go one stage further: I have a standard UK four-outlet strip on which I've replaced the UK plug with a schuko plug. It goes with me everywhere in Europe and means I only need remember those pesky adapters if I have to plug something in in a different part of the room.
Two pages of comments and nobody has said: just keep your existing car.
They've said this tech will be introduced via new cars only . By maintaining your current car there's no need to ever get this kit imposed on you, unless you want it of course.
Doesn't mean I'll support the idea - it's still a stupid one with all the issues mentioned above - but it's rare for any kind of legislation to be made retrospective.
Buy something pre-1960 and, from October, it won't even need an MOT and is already exempt from road tax (pre '71). Once a car is old enough to qualify as a classic it also becomes cheaper to insure. It's a win for everyone except the Eurocrats.
I second the call to go to First Direct. OK so, yes, they're officially part of HSBC but they're managed independently. I doubt that'd help much if this kind of midden hits the windmill but their day-to-day interaction just works. The phones are answered by a real person - in the UK - and that one person can deal with 90% of things without having to transfer you.
I'm one of those rare types who does actually move my account between banks - I've tried them all at some point - and only FD have managed to keep this awkward cuss impressed over a long haul.
I watched the recent comedy gala on Channel 4 where Jimmy & Alan Carr* had remade or edited some of the adverts. This was quite possibly the first time in a decade where I'd actively sat through the ads just to see what comic potential those two had found in them.
There are still plenty of good ads made but to keep us involved they must be clever and amusing. I'm sure that those wonderful'refreshes the parts' Heinekin and 'Happiness is...' Hamlet ads still stir a few memories.
*this was a few months ago before Jimmy became the pariah poster boy for tax evasion.
I agree that Nokia should try to engineer that meeting with Apple. But I'm less convinced by the idea that it would be a good thing to [sic] "help WP7 die a litle more quicker."
Whether or not you're a fan of Apple/Android it's surely in everyone's best interest that there are rival products out there. I can't think of many duopolies where you can get the best product at a bargain price.
WinPho (and BlackBerry too) may not be to everyone's taste but as long as they're viable and out there they exert an influence both on product development and the price at which it's sold. At a time when Apple and Android seem unassailable I don't think it's sensible to be wishing the competition away.
You're right. I emailed them to ask about this and got:
"As a newly launched company just coming out of stealth, we are not actively engaging business opportunities outside of the United States at the moment. Once we have expanded to a degree that allows us to deliver the quality, responsiveness and consistency that we know the international community expects, we will engage with partners and customers abroad."
OK, here's what I'm talking about:
Executive Summary
The act of travelling fast isn't of itself fatal.
Elaboration
As I pointed out, it's possible to travel in excess of 500mph in an aeroplane. This is the fastest possible current speed any average human can reach (ok, without joining a space agency). Many thousands of people do this every day without a single speed-induced death. Care to explain that for me? In case you'd forgotten, Concorde's passengers regularly (and safely) exceeded 1300mph for the best part of three decades. When Concorde did crash it wasn't speed that caused that accident either. If you were right then the fastest forms of travel would be the most dangerous, rather than the safest. With cars, motorways are the safest roads even though cars are travelling faster. Speed alone doesn't seem to be killing people there either.
I do accept that injuries are more likely to be serious if something goes wrong when travelling at a higher speed. The majority of such injuries are caused by abrupt deceleration and the effects of momentum on the body. I don't think that's in dispute here. Of course momentum has a relationship with speed but, sadly, that's not the message given out by the 'speed kills' lobby. It doesn't even seem to be your point.
You can only ever be right if you re-state your position as "inappropriate speed kills".
I do recall people saying, back when steam trains were a new idea, that to exceed a walking pace was likely to cause physical injuries and risk death. Is this what you have in mind? I'm pretty sure that to still be of that view (when it's been so comprehensively disproven) is where I'd be applying words like 'infantile' 'dumb' and 'fallacy'.
Just out of curiosity, what speed do you have in mind that will inherently kill someone?
"The reason those camera's are on the A40 / A23 are, as you said, because people think the speed limit is too slow and SPEED. Your own argument justifies the whole situation."
Not quite. A few years ago I might have agreed. But since councils started lowering the limits - and then put in cameras - it weakens this argument.
It used to be the case that speed limits were set based on the behaviour of a certain percentile of road users (i.e. the speed at which most sensible drivers had independently assessed as safe). Now it's all about risk avoidance: the limits come down and thus need more enforcement for the drivers who know it's safe to travel faster (and perhaps were allowed to go faster a few years previously on the same road). Parts of the A40 have been reduced to 40mph (down from 70).
I long for a return to the days when drivers' judgement was considered enough. The prosecutions happened to the drivers with the worst judgement.
There's nothing wrong with that statement. If speed did kill then travelling on an airliner would be the most dangerous thing anyone could do.
There's a lot of silly stuff said by Clarkson but on this issue at least he speaks sense:
"Speed has never killed anyone, suddenly becoming stationary... That's what gets you."
Would you really want to have two 55" tellies side by side? I can see me wanting this tech so that my missus can watch her bloody awful singing/dancing/voting programmes while I turn to the Dave channel.
No need to ponce about with recordings and we can both watch something we like in the same room at the same time. Makes sense to me.
"why not go all the way and get with the times, go metric? "
BMW tried this with wheels for certain models, I seem to recall, in the 90s. I guess proponents of Teutonic efficiency dislike the mixture of inches (wheel diameter) and mm (tyre width).
If you're adamant about keeping the original wheels on one of those models every new tyre you buy costs very silly amounts of money.
Thinking an idea is better idea doesn't mean it'll pan out the way you want. For another example take a look at Brunel's 'broad gauge'.
"...over half the usage of iiNet’s internet service by its customers (measured by volume) was represented by Bit Torrent file sharing which was known to be used for infringing activities,”
The way I read it there's no proof that 'infringing activities' were taking place, just the fact that torrents were being shared. But that tone seems to be trying to infer 'so they must all be guilty'.
Thank heaven for a sensible judgement.
" If the seller has gone out of business in the second year onwards, then there's nothing you can do"
In the UK at least, buying it on a credit card makes the card company jointly liable for dodgy goods. Even if your supplier has gone out of business you're still able to get a refund from the card company. Here's a handy mnemonic for your (UK) rights:
Satisfactory Quality
As
Described
Fit for purpose
And last for a
Reasonable
Ttime.
And, yes, for quoting this, I am one.
Yes, I got one of those. I had bought a TV with a built-in OnDigital decoder but they didn't bother tailoring the letters for people without separate receivers. I wrote back saying something like 'see you in court, pal' and never heard another peep.
On the plus side though, the aerial they fitted for free is still doing sterling service.