318 posts • joined Monday 15th June 2009 12:18 GMT
Re: "But customers need choice, they want to be able to try products that work alongside Apple."
Yes. The chairs, f'rinstance !
If they're good enough for Herr Kilmister...
They're good enough for me.
This is the third or fourth review I've read about these phönes and every review has been amazingly favorable.
Think headmaster Lemmy had any say in them or is he just fattening up his retirement fünd ?
Nah, forget it...that was a stupid question.
Rock on Lemmy !
TV is not music.
Apple has been able to convince big labels to sell through their iStore by selling them fear of losing even more marketshare.
TV is a different animal. I sicerely doubt if -at least at this time- they can get the large production houses to give them preference over the classic broadasting outfits. I don't think the production houses can afford to lose the support of the NBC's, ABC's Fox' and HBO's at this time.
Are the Chinese exceptionally patriottic ?
I am wondering if our Chinese friends are favouring their own brands. Maybe they are just finding their own products have come along far enough to be acceptable as alternatives to products sold by foreign companies.
Battery life will make it or break it
If they can get decent battery life out of it (like 10-12 hours) I think they have a fighting chance. However, at those prices they are ogling the enterprise, and even if I had a very good reason to recommend these for my engineers and construction managers I would never get IT to support 8, so it would be a no-no. MAYBE if they could get 7 to work on it without a hassle I could get them to condone it, but otherwise it''ll be smallish laptops.
Re: >"Apple is better off without such autocracy"
A bit like a rotating dial, so to speak ?
Not in a movie..
But definitely the most worrying bit of hardware : Hex in the Unseen University's science department. It's administrator is Ponder Stibbons, and it proudly displays a sticker 'Anthill Inside'.
It's possibilities are endless !
I like their stores
Well, us Belgians do not merit a real Apple store, but we have premium resellers.
When I decided I may want to buy an iPad I went to their store. I was half expecting desinterested spotty yoofs, like the sales people you get in Mediamarkt, Saturn, FNAC (and things like Dixons i visite when I was in the uK)and other stores that sell electronics, the sort that don't really know what you're asking and know even less about the products they earn their crust with.
I was pleasantly surprised to find a store where everything was not only in stock bur available for actual physical contact (the products, people), the sales guy knew the differences between the models, knew what they did and what they didn't and how they worked together with other stuff. He even let le eat my icecream while he was explaining to me.
I don't know what monetary value I should put on the environment and how it equates to the price of the product, but I was happy that at least my mood didn't get totally ruined because I happened to need an electronics device.
Re: Note on Sagan
You seem to be somewhat confused, and you are ignoring the logic of reasoning.
1. From a philosophical standpoint, believing does not enter into the equasion. My comment is about proof.
2. From a scientific standpoint, you believe someting to be the case, you can go about proving it.
In your case of oxygen, proving or disproving oxygen is toxic is proof in both cases. What Sagan seems to be postulating (from what I read about the man, I never met him) is that absence of proof of non-existance is proof of existance. This is pertinently untrue.
Again, this is not a matter of belief. It is cold hard logic. In the case of the existance of god, the fact that there is no(t yet) a unyfying theory of evolution in it's broadest sense does not equal proof of the existance of a deity.
I am sorry I can not make this clearer to you in a forum post, and I wil therefor shut up about the matter.
You may, of course, believe what you like.
Note on Sagan
I've always found him to be a bit schizophrenic in his reasoning.
Especially his argument about atheists being unable to prove god exists due to the lack of evidence has somehow always rubbed me the wrong way. But maybe he was just trying to be funny.
It makes me wonder...
on what basis the manufacturers compile their bid if both of them now find - and not for the first time - they're not making any money on the contract.
Re: I've just looked at the original article...
Tiny top garments that leave very little to the imagination. Or, in this case, the wrong kind of imagination.
Dunno about that. We'll never know the whole story and probably we don't need to. But maybe the bloke wanted kids or something. Thes may put a different complexion on the prejudice argument.
Ah ! We are in the news !
You can always rely on us Belgians for a good tech scoop. Well done lads.
Who's going to be held responsible for the slip in the new iMac delivery. They're pulling out all the stops to give the impression that the machines will be on the shelves this year, but my take is that it's just going to be a token presence. It may well be february before they get any volumes to marked.
Someone (or some more than one) better start going the job ads.
We were so disappointed.
OS/2 Was hyped as the new thing that was going to send Windoze to a well deserved grave. It didn't require DOS, it could address a decent amount of memory, It was going to be much faster. It was going to be a true graphical OS, not a shell stuck to a command prompt. It promised the arrival of new and great native versions of WP, 123 and Symphony, Paradox and so on.
When we finally got our hads on it, we had built custom machines for it. 8 megs of ram, a 200 mb HD, grahivs cards with 256K or 512K ram. They were so hot the guys supplying the parts thought we were building the starship Enterprise.
Then came the disappointment. It was horrid to install, crashed every time you went for a pee, and gave you grief if you wanted to install DOS software, which you had to, because the great new native apps never arrived.
After several months of trying to make these boxes work anywhere near reliable enough so we could demo them to clients we simply gave up and returned to MS.
For me, OS2 was the biggest let-down in computer history. I still think it's a shame because it had serious potential. But I guess IBM never saw it as something they could flog to PC users as a product. Triple shame.
Had a good larf...
Read about this disguise business and immediately thought of Clouseau !
Dragonworld anyone ?
I played something called 'Dragonworld' in what I remember as 1984, but IIRC it was on the Commodore 64. It had quite decent 320 graphics - on colour! - and I seem to remember the parser was quite good, although this might just be a fond memory now surrounded by the mists of time.
I think I'll start looking around for some emulators and dig up all those old classics.
Did you know the original Hawaii 5-0 and Mannix shows are now available on DVD ? I was amazed to discover they were actually in colour too !
What is never tested : warranty and service.
I've had a Buffalo BAs sitting on a shelf somewhere for over 2 years. It was bought in a pinh by a colleague in Japan and brought over on a project.
The power supply failed at some point. I have emailed and phoned with Buffalo in three continents, and with their main suppliers an dealers all around, AND I've even posted on their forum, asking to send me a replacement power supply. I have offered to pay for it and the shipping.
I have been given the run around from japan to the US to Europe, and ultimately I've been sent packing. They can not provide me with a replacement PS.
So before you part with your hard earned, take into consideration that there's some things that are never tested in a product review.
My brain hurts now
If I understand this correctly, Apple has placed an app of sorts on their iStore. A man is complaining that the stuff is HIS IP, but Apple won't remove it because is can not determine if the man is the IP owner.
It therefor follows that Apple can not determine if the person or persons that placed the content in the store are the IP owners either.
So Apple has put stuff in their store but they can not determine where it came from, and refuses to remove it for this very same reason.
Is it me or do they have it ass bakwards ? Does this now mean I can use any of Apples IP as long as I don't know it's their IP ? For instance, as long as I don't know Apple owns a patent for rectangular slab with rounded corners I can sell as many as I want, Ignorance is now an acceptable defene ?
And I'm not even trying to take the piss here. I'm dumbfounded.
I wonder if it can be done.
It would possibly be a horrendously expensive undertaking to develop a new architecture chip that :
1. outperforms the Intel latest generation
2. delivers comparable performance at a comparable price point
3. does not infringe on AMD or Intel IP (at least not getting away with it)
4. produce it at anysignificant quantities
5. produce the relevant industrial strength compilers and cross platform the software at the time of release.
6. Alternatively, develop new software from scratch. This would truly be a can of worms, migrating to completely new hard- and software from the ground floor ?
I only have to refer to AMD who, although they make exellent products, and were even the originators of the 64 bit instruction sets as we know it, have never been able to make a sizeable dent in the Intel armour, not even when they had superior hardware (I'm conveniently ignoring the Opterons, which had a good run...for a bit). And et's not forget that even Big Blue did not have the stomach to go up against Intel at the time of the PowerPC's
I imagine that as soon as someone adds up the numbers at Fruity Towers the whole idea will be quickly relegated to 'bargaining chip' status.
But, admittedly stranger things have happened.
When I bought my iPad over a year ago it was really no contest between the available 'droids and the iPad. If I would have to make the same choice today I'm not so sure the iPad would ome out on top. the 'droid tablets have come a long way in a year, for sure.
Re: This should never have been a problem
This is a brilliant idea, It could even keep the US patent system alive with only minor changes.
You can file anything you want, but when you want to start an infringment suit you have to pass a 'validaton check' first.
You could wait until the actual infringement suit starts, or you could decide to have any filing validated at the time of filing, or you could systematically validate your filings 'on the quiet' when you seem fit.
What would be the legal hurles ?
I'd upvote you 50 if I could.
Re: The one thing I hate on intel vs AMD comparisons
I would have to agree with you if the comparison is based on 'application benchmarks', i.e. does it offer me the same performance or better on the application I use at a price I am prepared to pay (this could be word processing or number crunching, but also 3D, or games).
However, if a product is marketed as a 'flagship' item, i.e. 'look what we're capable of' I think such comparison can indeed be made.
If I wanted to build a system and bragging rights were important to me, I would indeed wish to know if I had the fastest component installed, even if it was 3.5 times the price of the runner up. Well, for a week at least.
It's just information. What you do with it us up to you. But I would agree that the right to laugh at the slower unit should be reserved to the people who actually fork out the 700$.
I don't think it would be advisable to cut loose Symbian in the current IP climate. Let's just imagine some IP litigation outfit gets to examine the source and claims all matter of copyright infringement.
Nokia has enough trouble right now. They don't need to expose themselves to infringement cases.
Mr. Bond is a Gentleman, and gentlemen do NOT drive Mustangs. And if , for reasons beyond their control, it IS necessery for them to drive one, the less it is mentioned and the sooner it is forgotten the better.
And I'm not sure about the E-type either
The first Esprits weren't turbo's, and the 750 they started filming with was such a steaming pile of excrement that BMW snuck in a 740 8 cylinder for the rest of the recording. Although the 8 cylinder Beamers are just an ever so slightly less steaming pile of excrement, at least they kept going.
Is this a surprise ?
This is what happens when people do not invest in the company and their product, but only in the hope that an idiot will pay more for their share than they paid for it.
There's simply nothing solid to hang a share value onto. No product. Just some bits flying about with a perceived dispersion measured in clicks. The whole predictability of the business model is based on vapor.
The sheer stupidity of these 'investors' and 'market analysts' is nothing short of baffling.
I always get confused listening to these folks...
First they leave their country and come to ours, and when they are here they want us to start doing things the same way they do in the place they farked off from.
It is very disorienting, not to mention bloody annoying.
I, on the other hand...
Am still waiting for H3 on the PC.
It is, however simple.
It may be within the purview of the US to demand extradition. No country has the right to determine what US law should be.
It is, however, equally within the purview of the NZ law to refuse extradition on the basis of whatever NZ lawmakers decide reasons for refusal are.
We've already started tu turn Mars into a garbage dump too. The efficiency with which humans can srew up their environment boggles the mind !
Re: Hmm, should this have ever gone to court?
'OLD 'ON Guvna !
DID he perform the actus reus ?
1. He sent an email. In itself not an offence.
2. Said email was a bit burnt. In itself not an offence
3. His intent was to send it to his girlfriend. Unless SHE was offended, nuffink to see 'ere, move along !
He, at the time, was UNAWARE he sent the mail to everyone else. Not only did he not intend to (so no guilty mind), but, acording to his defense, he did not execute a deliberate action.
He can therefore only be acused of not RTFM'ming, but if we're going to start putting people away for that we're going to need more real estate in the 'Her Majesty's Pleasure' department.
So IF there was no crime (as there was no awareness nor intent on wrongdoing), the could try and 'do' him for intending the offence, but I think we've established there was no intent.
So acording to you Apple never had a new aplliance lock up on stage ? Hmm.
Can't comment on Groupon US...
But here in Europe they're just a bunch of parasitic scam artists.
And if they would like to sue me for saying that, the Reg is free to fork over my email adress if it is subpoena'd.
Re: So to recapitulate...
Yes. I have a better idea.
So does the US library of congress. Check it out. There's even a whitepaper ! You'll be amazed. They have discovered something called an 'optical disc'. But keep it quiet, or Apple will call it the iArchive and charge us for using it.
Point of my remark being, though : WHY would you replace a technology KNOWN to give you headaches every 15 years by the SAME technology.
If the bloody tapes are so good, do a deal with IBM allowing you to fabricate the drives yourself if and when you need them. I'm sure India has sufficient know-how to produce a tape drive if they put their minds to it.
So to recapitulate...
They're going to spool some old tapes onto new tapes, which will to all intents and purposes be equally out of date in 10 years or so ?
Who's the asshat that thought of this then ?
Re: What to say.
Ah, the reversal of argument ploy ! And not deserving of 5 downvotes, might I add. But it's a politicians argument.
The 'choice' of selling bodyparts for money is NOT, as stated in the argument, a question of self determination. I put it to you that people, given the 'true' free choice (i.e. not influenced by any other factor than their own philosophical or moral standpoint) will NEVER sell organs because of the 'constitutional right to make money'.
You can never protect people from their own stupidity. They will always find new and lever ways to be stupid.
But their is no argument to be made for the selling of organs on a moral or philosophical basis. It should, therefor, not be allowed.
If people need to sell their organs in order to survive, there are surely different measures necessary than allowing them to sell body parts.
I still fail to understand...
Why Apple is not targetting google. Well, I do, because Google also sits on a large pile of cash (or whas that a large cache of piles ?) and they're a US outfit, which would give the presiding judge an identity crisis. But that's beside the point.
I'm in engineering. If I licence a technology from - say - Company K., and buid a plant for a client, an subsequently Company L opines that their patent has been infriged upon, thay would first have to prove this in court in CL vs. CK.
IF they are succesful in defending their claim a licensing deal would have to be brokered between CL and the client, possibly involving damages from CK to CL.
I would have to show I did not infringe knowingly (i.e. defraud) and the client would simply wave it's arms in the air claiming they know nothing and are from Barcelona (if such were the case).
So could someone explain the workings of this claim ?
- Facebook offshores HUGE WAD OF CASH to Caymans - via Ireland
- Review Best budget Android smartphone there is? Must be the Moto G
- NSFW Confessions of a porn site boss: How the net porn industry flopped
- World's OLDEST human DNA found in leg bone – but that's not the only boning going on...
- OHM MY GOD! Move over graphene, here comes '100% PERFECT' stanene