Re: Apple HQ
Just wait until they find out about GCHQ Cheltenham!
363 posts • joined 15 Jun 2009
Just wait until they find out about GCHQ Cheltenham!
I don't even think it's that. It's more that people with skills in managing IT procurement etc... are not seen as key front line staff so are the first to be axed or otherwise have the post frozen as part of cost reduction programmes (read: swingeing budget cuts).
Of course this invokes the law of unintended consequences which then screws the department for a lot more money to rectify the lack of skills in-post.
Well quite. That fucker has rounded corners *and* a chunk out of the side.
There's (or perhaps was) supposed to be a population of C. becki tortoises on the northern and western slopes of Volcan Wolf. If the lava is flowing south west (and never mind the dispersement of hot ash) could this endanger that population?
ULCC also provide hosted Moodle sites for other organisations.
To be fair to them they're a good bunch and clued. As Lost all faith says above, DDoS is difficult to prevent which is why it's the attack-of-choice if you just want to vandalise some shit on the Internet.
The El Reg standard unit for Length is the Linguine. 87000 miles is, I think we all agree, best expressed as 1000114955.742 Linguine.
You're reading it wrong. The original cost was 8.1 billion USD. The 6 billion estimate is in Euro. Ignoring what the Euro/Dollar exchange rate was at purchase, 8.1bn USD is about 7bn Euro. So they'd lose 1 billion on purchase price.
That's OK if they've made that profit in the preceding years and especially so if the bidding war pushes past the 6.
Oh yes. Put one of these chips in every "smart meter". Print money.
I thought Icehenge was just a shit Kim Stanley Robinson book. Turns out it was non-fiction.
So, yeah, it was Us all along.
The medical devices market is a very restricted field. Certainly if you're after medical software it's even worse. Basically there's a certain amount of "BT Syndrome" in that these companies don't need to have fantastic products because where else are you going to go? As the title says there's no incentive for these companies to spend time and money aiming for excellence when they just need to be good enough to flog to a captive audience.
My personal worry is that, as more and more devices are connecting wirelessly, the potential for attack grows massively. I can tell you from personal experience that even newer devices have old wireless crypto and authentication standards. Why bother updating it? It's "good enough". *sigh*
For sheer Because It's Friday:
Last Of The Official Flight Telemetry Avionic Rig Test Simulations
According to sources (oh, alright, wonkypodiatrist and giggle) R'lyeh lies close to the Nemo Point in the South Pacific. This is pretty much bang in the middle of the Pacific Abyssal Plain which is somewhere between 3650m and 6000-odd metres deep. Cthulhu would be waiting dreaming at roughly 4000m
Looking up at those wussy Opah that can only handle that mesopelagic fluff.
Isn't that just some bloke flogging dodgy Lumias from the boot of his car?
"Smartphonesforatennergetchergenuinephones. It's OK Madam, I'm a Microsoft Mobile Reseller, I am."
Great idea. That way, when they only listen to the evidence that supports their existing policies they can say it's backed up by science. They can continue to ignore the rest of it.
Still, it's better than the nothing that currently exists so, cynicism aside, I'm for it.
Yes, but with luck they find more identifiably the same remains in another location with maybe a couple of additional bones to add to the jigsaw puzzle so there's evidence that there wasn't just one of these things which, in the wake of the "Archeoraptor" hoax, would make it a strong candidate for a healthy dose of scepticism.
I'm quite happy that they may not have much of a complete skeleton. Less so that what they have got has only been unearthed in one location. That said, I hope they do find many more because dino-boffinry is cool. Bloody hard but cool.
I'm no paleontologist but I think it's because every example of a feathered dinosaur with wings that we've found have been feathered wings and, until now, only the pterosaurs have been known to have a membrane.
It does seem obvious to me, though. Feathers were around before feathered wings evolved so if a feathered animal around that time was evolving to fly it really only had one option for limb form.
Still, if it is a genuine find (always a worry when there's only one of them) it's a cracker!
Not quite. Needs moar lens flare! Get those images to Photoshop* stat!
*or GIMP or Paint Shop Pro if that's still going or other commentard-approved image editing software.
No, he's suggesting that, instead of Pilot + Co pilot having 1x Tablet-X each, the Pilot has 1x tablet-X and Co pilot has 1x Tablet-Y running the same software but on different platforms for system resilience.
Yes there's an initial cost of porting your app to a different platform but given the business impact of not getting your birds in the air at all for want of a second device type is huge.
In that case scenario all the flights would have taken off as each of the 737s would have at least one functioning flight plan tablet.
Proper resilience and business continuity is only expensive until you don't have it.
That Oranjeboom 8.5% is the only one of those super strength brainbreakers that actually tases like beer rather than alcohol and syrup.
As such I keep one in the fridge for emergencies such as Monday.
What was the camera, Mr Dabbs? Enquiring minds (well, me anyway) need to know!
On another note, 6.3 inches for a phone screen? I know it's designed to maximise the VoD experience but seriously, how sodding big have your hands got to be to use that as a phone? I had to make a call on an iPhone 6+ earlier and that was a fistful!
Deffo more to the Tablet side than Phablet. God it's beautiful, though.
According to Bezos' Bargain Basement Bazaar, a Razer Blade Pro will set me back well north of 2 grand! The Gigabyte reviewed here looks a proper bargain compared to that.
Not that I can afford any of them but one can dream.
"Vodafone wants direct access to dark fibre"
Well of course they do but they didn't lay it. They'll also want access to it at rates they decide are competitive.
I mean, BT are obviously massaging the truth a bit with the desperate PR chaff countermeasures here but Void-a-phone are blatantly just throwing some shit here to see if Ofcom or BT will gift them a fibre network to get them to go away. Bunch of chancers.
+1 purely for the "Andromeda" reference in your handle. I thought I was the only one who remembered that series.
Well, my Moto360 (when I remember to take it off my wrist and charge it) acts like a bedside clock when in the charging dock which is nice. I've no idea if Apple Watch has a similar function or not.
However, my Moto360 lasts 36 hours on a full charge so if I leave the dock at work (which I've done on occasion because I'm a moron) on Monday, for instance, it'll last me until Tuesday lunchtime. If it only lasted 18 hours then quite often I'd find it completely flat and useless. For essentially twice what I paid for the 360 I'd expect better from Apple. 18 hours really is a big miss in my opinion.
Eww. I thought that debuted in MS Comic Chat which is the second worst IRC program I've ever seen.
Didn't know it was originally created for Bob. I've learned something today. That means I can officially go back to bed, doesn't it?
The YouTube videos are educational videos on how to cross a road safely and, because of the buffering, the pedestrian thinks "well the Internet hasn't told me I *shouldn't* step out in front of this bus..." and is killed all because traffic jam updates were given network priority?
See, Herr Oettinger, I can make up completely hyperbolic bullshit to support my opinion too.
There was a limited edition LOHAN pint glass released as part of the Kickstarter rewards. I remember it was quite popular. I completely agree with these commentards, can we please have an El Reg pint glass for sale?
Nah, he'll just claim it on expenses.
They do. I've got one. All the stuff you can buy with Station Cash (I assume that's what you're talking about as it's the only non-subscription real world money transaction system they have) that you can't get by playing is appearance stuff.
OK, the worry now they're Daybreak and owned by an investment firm is that they'll change it into whatever scenario you think is currently in place.
Well, Schengen makes the free movement simpler, yes, but all you need is an EU passport and you have free movement even in non-Schengen EU states.
I'm not sure how much benefit there would be from implementing Schengen in an island nation with no common borders to neighbours, anyway.
I've had my own experience of Schengen, when travelling from Finland to Estonia by ferry. I love the idea but I must admit it scared the crap out of me, all these people in the ferry terminal, the destination country assuming that they were OK because the country of departure *obviously* screened them with the diligence required by the Schengen Agreement on the way in, so they must be fine. That's a lot of trust to put in your neighbours.
Only if it is actively checked against which will only happen if it is integrated into existing checking database/query systems which, if it happens at all (money, contracts, competency etc...), won't happen for a long time to come. Like another 10 years, I'd say.
ARGH! It's a piece of software, stop trying to anthropomorphise it by pretending it has moods! The whole point of having a piece of equipment is that it does its job and you don't need to care about how it's "feeling".
Most of those all look the bloody same, too!
Possibly Boffin's boffins.
It is particularly cringeworthy and you can see they've just given up and gone "sod it, that's close enough".
The MERLIN one, though, just doesn't work at all.
It'll be 975259.3 falcon heavy.
Or, to use the proper units: 348.3069 KiloJub.
Female Peregrine Falcons can get up to 1.5kg in mass. A Falcon Heavy is predicted to weigh in at 1,462,836kg and add another 53 for payload.
Cristiano Ronaldo. So no.
Hmm, Peri-Peri. So yes.
Wait... Super Bock. So yes.
Sod it, can I change my vote?
Maybe they're trying to say 1.3 AU, where an AU is the distance of the earth/moon system from the Sun. Which is still a horrible approximation and terribly worded.
TBH, I read it as you did, that they'd screwed up the definition of an AU.
From the BT Spokesperson who obviously didn't pay attention in maths at school or to actual facts, it seems:
"They have more than 40 per cent of the broadband market between them, compared with BT’s 31 per cent"
The maths alone tells you that 31 is likely to be more than either of the others if they're splitting 40 between them and both have a significant slice of the proverbial pie.
According to Ofcom:
TalkTalk have 15% market share
Sky have 20%
BT have almost as much as the two combined and 2x the market share that TalkTalk have.
Please shut up, whiny BT spokescreature, you're not being hard done by.
The only thing that makes sense to me is if this is actually a study/research into how to carry out "blind" research experiments.
1) Selecting for iPhone ownership seems arbitrary but it turned out to be the largest group. This was almost certainly done out of a prior assumption that this would be the case as a small group makes for bad Significance.
2) The only things that were done aith any scientific merit were all designed to ensure the test subjects did not guess the true nature of the test and skew results accordingly.
Sure, adding the brand recognition of "iPhone" in the title, much like adding "Star Wars" or any other popular cultural icon is a good way to get interest in your research (and to get it published far and wide) but I think that's secondary.
On reading this, the first challenge to the findings of this research would be "How have you shown that this phenomenon is uniquie to iPhone or even smartphone use and not due to cultural programming that a ringing telephone must be answered?"
I'm fairly sure (as in, I have 1st hand experience of this so it's true) that at least one of those ISPs you mention stick a default administrator password (easily guessable) on the router and the installation engineer is supposed to make you *ahem* change it, on installation.
If you don't then you have a *very* insecure home router.
The wireless passwords do all seem to be randomly generated, though.
It is the healthiest of the oils to fry with and is not dangerous to human health at all. Unless you stick your head in a bucket of it and drown.
Would you care to share the science behind your position?
Allow me to share some of mine:
Christ, even Fox "News" takes a step backwards from this claim.
Have an upvote.
Apparently (from an article on a different site so remaining unnamed) one of the major issues is that they've got too much data on too many people (French, other EU and US agencies included) and don't have the resources to make much use of it so they literally cannot use much of what they have.
Standard Government answer: Let's collect more, for longer!
When you're trying to answer the cries of "something must be done" then it's often a lot easier to do "something" instead of "something effective".
No. We'll do that all by ourselves. Let's go legislate away some more civil liberty and right to personal privacy. Because down with that sort of thing!
It's not easy to see with the pictures provided but it looks as if the top bezel which needs to house all the front facing optical gubbins is noticeably larger than the bottom bezel which is a shame as it makes the phone look unbalanced to me, in the same way as the M8 (and M7) is pleasingly symmetric.
Is that the case? Does it actually look top-heavy in the, er, plastic?
In order for planets to form you need a stable(ish) solar system and lots of time (think: in the millions of years). Now, usually the planets start to form from discs of material, dust etc... surrounding their start shortly after the star's birth. Close enough that you start the "millions of years" clock from star birth.
It's reasonable to assume, then, that these planets have orbited that star since about 3-10 million years after its birth. A Red Dwarf star burns longer the smaller it is and these stars (according to the article) are smaller than our sun meaning they could go on for more than 15, 20 billion years. I can't find info on the mass of Kepler 442, the star Kepler 442b orbits so will have to leave the guess as to its age in the billions of years.
This means the planets have been around for likely billions of years and, at least up until 470 years ago, in a stable system.
So the chances of them undergoing some catastrophic event that has destroyed them is 470 divided by those billions of years. Sufficiently small for us to conclude they're so overwhelmingly likely to still be there now that it's not statistically credible to propose that they are not.
Good question, though!
1) I choose to give these people my data when I choose to present my loyalty card at the till. On a visit by visit basis. Care.data is opt out so you're in by default and you don't get to choose who gets what data about you.
2) I am incentivised by the loyalty card company to give them my data with money off stuff and special offers on things I buy normally. In return the big supermarket chain might sell me more cheese and beer. With the care.data scheme I am not incentivised, the data recipients get all the benefit.
3) Loyalty card schemes are not set up at taxpayers expense to benefit private companies.
In fact I was unsure how I felt about the care.data scheme until you came up with that marvellous false equivalence and I had to think about it.
What is it you're not "buying into"? That the leaked docs originated from the NSA? That Snowden leaked them for public interest reasons/whistleblowing? That Snowden isn't sat over a keyboard in the Kremlin sending out another snippet when Vlad gives the go ahead?
What is this duck you speak of and what is it that you have identified as the duck-shaped object?
1) The NSA and other authorities have already copped to the info being theirs and gone on the attack accusing Snowden of being a traitor/terrorist/ etc...
2) There are easier ways to getting celebrity status if I'm honest.
3) As has been said, Snowden spaffed the lot in one go before jumping on the plane to wherever the hell would take him and going into hiding. It's the journo who is now "leaking" the info on the drip feed, whether that's to keep it in the public eye (so it's not just one story that can be quickly forgotten when the next big story comes up) or to ensure a regular supply of articles or some of both isn't really relevant.
They could just be binning any connection they see more than one MAC address on as well (to prevent you running your own private network on theirs). Not very nice if you happen to fire up a VM and then your connection gets canned.
Nor are people forced to have a website or an email address. However, it's increasingly difficult to function, especially if you're self employed, for example, without the use of social media.
If you remember some of the examples given as to why being forced to use your real name on Google+ (also Facebook) was bad then it follows that any breach of your privacy on social media is just as bad. The most recent example being the disgusting doxxing attacks carried out in the pursuit of "ethics in gaming journalism" *cough*.
It's not as simple as "I'm being harrased/stalked/bullied on Facebook, I'll just move to Ello instead".
Remember, also, that in some cases the cyber bullies are also those same bullies you can't avoid at school.
The reason the medium is relevant is that Law relies heavily on wording and Case Law. When the medium changes to something new that wasn't thought about in the original draft and/or has little to no case law to go on, there's essentially little to nothing to go on in order to bring a successful prosecution. There's also the difference in scale. If BT erroneously publish my telephone number in the business directory when I've opted out of the residential phone book then the potential privacy breach is maybe the tens of thousands (no idea, just pulling handy numbers out of my arse for illustrative purposes) but if someone sticks my number in a public post on Facebook to invite harrassment or otherwise to cause me grief, then the potential breach is the number of people on Facebook plus anywhere it gets reposted (Reddit, Twitter, 4Chan etc...) and that's enormous. A potential that just isn't taken into account in current harassment laws.
So, in my opinion anyway, I think it does need either new laws or old laws being extended.