Re: x86 Software
The difference is MS allows existing hardware to still have 32-bit support whereas Apple pulls the rug out from under everyone's feet.
15420 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jun 2009
will run MacOS, irrespective of the underlying hardware
Catalina has shown that that's not true, not even for 32-bit software on the same CPU. There was no real reason to remove support for 32-bit software either.
If they do the move to ARM in the same way then you can kiss most of your existing software goodbye.
Lotus Notes, eh? There was a website dedicated to how bad it was (the archive.org copy sadly does not have the row of stock photos of business people facepalming across the top).
The problem with Nintendo is your digital downloads last one generation at most as they completely redo online services for every generation. And you need to have both consoles in front of you and wait for the Pikmin to move house.
Such is the state of things these days that your first install from disc is an unplayable bug-ridden mess and a day-one update is required anyway. However unlike, say, Steam, there is no CD key, so you can actually sell/buy discs second hand and the new owner can put the disc in their drive and get updates too, so there's that.
Hopefully the lack of CD keys will continue with the PS5, but you can see that the frog boiling continues apace.
Your Sony TITSUP already happened in 2011, didn't it?
Burying propaganda sponsored by foreign states counts for something. But Facebook remains committed to distributing political lies. Zuckerberg justifies this stance as a defense of freedom of expression; it's also a defense of freedom from accountability.
He so wants to join the Mafia^WTrump administration. He's not quite there yet, but maybe he'll be rewarded after the next election.
There's total freedom of speech, there's censorship, and then there's holding social networks to the same standards that the vast majority of other publishers willingly follow themselves. Considering the many problems social networks cause I really don't have a problem holding them to those same standards.
The wrong person is in prison, it should be Zuck, Jack, or Sundar. But they get to continually target yet more nonsense at yet more muppets until they finally do something stupid like this one has ("Like this nonsense? Here's more!") and pocket billions in ad revenue for it. That's legal.
There's nothing that says that BASIC has to be interpreted, Dartmouth wasn't and the ones running on the 1970s mainframes weren't. CBASIC on CP/M wasn't either. The late 1970s-1980s computer versions were interpreted (and Microsoft did many of those so you know where the blame lies) but then later on they became compiled too as home computers and PCs became more powerful.
There is official advice to avoid washing chicken:
Why you should never wash raw chicken
This just mentions campylobacter, not salmonella (maybe because campylobactor is the most common form of food poisoning in the UK).
Not quite sure how we forgot from grandfathering .eu domain names for the UK and British citizens to washing chicken but there you go.
The policy being revised four times was mostly due to EURid setting a date than the UK kicking the Brexit can down the road meaning EURid's policy has to be updated.
Could we work out the relative dismalness of both the UK's can kicking and EURid's policy changes which are mostly a reaction to said can kicking?
What irritates us is when a particular proposed arrangement is clearly of some benefit to both the EU and a non-member like the UK, but the EU refuses to agree because any apparent benefit to the UK post-Brexit is unacceptable, even if it also benefits the EU.
What would be the benefit for the EU in handing out .eu domains to non-EU organisations? Thruppence ha'penny in the grand scheme of things? I think we're overrating ourselves a bit, aren't we?
Do you mean Britain has absolutely no say in EU trade deal negotiations?
And even if the UK could negotiate completely independently and bilaterally while being part of the EU, could it ever hope to achieve the same leverage as it did when negotiating deals as part of the EU whole?
I think the answers there are no and no.
It's not the chlorine you need to worry about, but the bacteria it's temporarily hiding which will come back by the time the chicken is on your kitchen worktop.
Also, if you double click there is no option to override Gatekeeper, but if you right click then choose Open there is.
Whoever thought of that hadn't read Apple's own UI guidelines, it should have been something like shift-double click or holding down shift in the context menu to get Open Overriding Gatekeeper.
Whatever version of Windows 10 this guy is using must be missing the 'Settings' option.
I can't remember offhand which box(es) you untick to make all the stuff he's whinging about never appear.
[...]
You'd expect a 'computer savvy' person like a developer would know this kind of basic stuff.
So the choice for the average user is going into settings and clicking non-obvious places or responding to seven prompts, many in non-obvious ways.
Lucky we have you here to tell us it's easy, you just go into Settings and, er, oh. You can't remember off-hand.
Each 'level' is really a different VM so try configuring it as you would on your own computer: Limit internet to one site.
Our national failure to make the most of the opportunities when we joined the Community was part of a much more general failure.
In those days, Britain was in the forefront of those resisting change, in fighting to preserve the barriers.
Some in Britain still see it that way, but they are getting fewer and fewer.
But then they managed to convince 37% of the voting population that all their ills could be blamed on the EU. Oh well, let's rejoice as the barriers go up again.
And probably linked to your iPlayer sign-on.
They missed a trick, they should have called it Auntie Beeb though. Makes a nice change from Big Brother.
In Skype's case, it's because you all need accounts to get started, MS have ruined the client, some people don't see other people's video, and if there's four or five people then there's constant feedback driving everyone mad.
In Teams case, it's because everyone needs accounts, results again can be pretty bad depending on how Azure feels like today, the client again is pretty poor, and until recently it wasn't aimed at individual people and it could only show video for up to four people.